Indirect expropriation: The role of national institutions and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

indirect expropriation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Indirect expropriation: The role of national institutions and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Indirect expropriation: The role of national institutions and domestic elites in the Mozambican farmland grab Madeleine Fairbairn International Conference on Global Land Grabbing Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex 6-8


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Indirect expropriation:

The role of national institutions and domestic elites in the Mozambican farmland grab

Madeleine Fairbairn International Conference on Global Land Grabbing Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex 6-8 April 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Mozambican “Land Grab”

  • Who: Mostly private firms based in Europe and

South Africa.

– Biggest participants: Sweden, Norway, Portugal, UK and South Africa. – Other participants: US, Canada, Zimbabwe, Italy, Germany, and India.

  • What: Mostly biofuels (jatropha and sugarcane) and

timber (eucalyptus and pine).

  • Where: Zambezi Valley and Beira Corridor.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Zambezi valley Timber plantations Jatropha plantations Beira corridor

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The insertion of domestic elites into foreign land acquisitions

  • Although the major land concessions are going to

foreign firms, domestic elites are key to shaping the acquisition process.

  • Facilitation of land acquisitions seems to be

concentrated at the lowest and highest levels of government.

  • Passive role: shaping the broader institutional

framework to serve own interests.

  • Active role: opportunism catalyzed by foreign

demand for land.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Foreign interest In Mozambican farmland Actions by Mozambican elites

National Provincial District Community Create a national legislative framework which marginalizes existing land claims. Allow foreign project on land for which you hold rights in exchange for annual percentage. Serve as a board member or other functionary for foreign investment. Use political power to demand facilitation or

  • bstruction of a project

by subordinate. Use admin post to demand “facilitation fee”. Use admin post to gain inside information about proposed deals. Manipulate consultation in return for bribes/jobs.

Actually existing “foreign” land grabs

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Conclusions

  • Focus on land grabs as “neo-colonialism” only

captures one aspect of the phenomenon.

  • Need for further research on how international

capital articulates with domestic institutions and class structure.

  • The importance of domestic institutions/actors also

has positive implications; recently there have been positive developments thanks to domestic actors.