independent parallel runway visual approach in beijing
play

Independent Parallel Runway Visual Approach in Beijing Capital - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Independent Parallel Runway Visual Approach in Beijing Capital Airport SUMMARY Basic Concepts of Visual Approach The Promoting Process Of Visual Approach (including The Preparation) The Implementation Process Of Visual Approach


  1. Independent Parallel Runway Visual Approach in Beijing Capital Airport

  2. SUMMARY • Basic Concepts of Visual Approach • The Promoting Process Of Visual Approach (including The Preparation) • The Implementation Process Of Visual Approach • The Experience And Lessons Gained Within The Process.

  3. The promoting process of Visual Approach in Beijing On 26th July 2008, CAAC issued the temporary provisions for visual separation and visual approaches. On 1st August 2008, visual separations have been provided at Capital Airport and Tianjin International Airport for a test run. Consulting with the North China regional management bureau of CAAC and several major airlines. On 28th October 2014, radar vector for visual approach was implementing at Beijing International Airport .

  4. Basic Concepts of Visual Approach The pilot must, at all times, have either the landing runway or the preceding aircraft in sight. VISUAL APPROACH An approach conducted on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight VISUAL plan which APPROACH authorizes the pilot is not an instrument to proceed visually approach procedure. and clear of clouds There is no to the airport. missed approach t

  5. Clearing for a visual approach  No. 3: No.1 – able to visual NEGATIVE AIRPORT, BUT approach, pilot responsible for  TRAFFIC IN obstacle clearance SIGHT No.2 – able to visual approach, pilot responsible for obstacle clearance, controller No.2: needs to ensure the standard No.1: NEGATIVE separation with the preceding AIRPORT TRAFFIC, IN SIGHT aircraft until pilot reports AIRPORT IN SIGHT having the preceding aircraft in sight No.3 – able to visual approach, pilot responsible for obstacle clearance and spacing with the preceding No. 4: TRAFFIC aircraft IN SIGHT No.4 – to better control the  flight path of aircraft, it will be better not to issue visual approach clearance until the aircraft is already on base, then clear the aircraft visual with a heading to final

  6. Different requirements for different spacing runways Different spacing of D ≥1310m D < 760m 1310m > D ≥760m parallel runways (D) Separation with aircraft Standard separation is Standard separation is Standard separation is provided by ATC provided by ATC provided by ATC on the adjacent final (prior to one pilot receipt of the visual approach clearance) Separation with aircraft Visual Separation not necessary to apply any not necessary to apply ( * do not permit a on the adjacent final other type of separation any other type of ( * Each aircraft has been (after one pilot receipt heavy/B757 or heavier separation ( *Flight paths do not of the visual approach aircraft to overtake another issued and acknowledged aircraft on the adjacent final ) intersect ) clearance) receipt of the visual or instrument approach clearance **Flight paths do not intersect *** Both aircraft are established on a heading which will intercept final ) Intercept angle not greater than 30 degrees not greater than 30 degrees

  7. 1310m > D≥760m D≥1310m Each aircraft has been issued and acknowledged receipt of the visual or ฀ ฀ instrument ฀ ฀ VA approach VA clearance. Both aircraft are established on a One pilot receipt heading which of the visual will intercept 30 ° approach 30 ° final. 30 ° clearance. ฀ VA VA/ILS VA

  8. VECTOR FOR VISUAL APPROACH A vector for a visual approach may be initiated if : The visibility is 5 km or greater The reported ceiling at the airport of intended landing is at least 150 meters above the MVA (Minimum Vectoring Altitude)

  9. Reference : FAA 7110.65 • 3. Parallel runways separated by 4,300 feet or more. (a) When aircraft flight paths do not intersect, visual approaches may be conducted simultaneously, • provided standard separation is maintained until one of the aircraft has been issued and the pilot has acknowledged receipt of the visual approach clearance. FLIGHT PATH − A line, course, or track along which an • (b) Visual approaches may be conducted to one runway while visual or instrument approaches are conducted simultaneously to other runways, provided the conditions of subpara (a) are met. aircraft is flying or intended to be flown. • (c) Provided the aircraft flight paths do not intersect, when the provisions of subparas (a) and (b) are met, it is not necessary to apply any other type of separation with aircraft on the adjacent final approach TRACK − The actual flight path of an aircraft over the course. surface of the earth. • (d) Each aircraft must be assigned headings which will allow the aircraft to intercept the extended centerline of the runway at an angle not greater than 30 degrees. NOTE− • • 1. The intent of the 30 degree intercept angle is to reduce the potential for overshoots of the extended centerline of the runway and preclude side-by-side operations with one or both aircraft in a “belly-up” configuration during the turn. Aircraft performance, speed, and the number of degrees of the turn are factors to be considered when vectoring aircraft to parallel runways. • 2. Variances between heading assigned to intercept the extended centerline of the runway and aircraft ground track are expected due to the effect of wind and course corrections after completion of the turn and pilot acknowledgment of a visual approach clearance.

  10. Flight paths do not intersect FLIGHT PATH INTERSECT MAINTAIN STANDARD SEPARATION UNTIL VISUAL SEPARATION IS PROVIDED  RWY 01 RWY 36L RWY 01

  11. After the implementation of Visual Approach • During the first three months period, 2398 flights have conducted visual approach • 467 flights have reported unable to comply • percentage of implementation is 84% • 6 aircraft have conducted missed- approach procedure or go-around.

  12. The percentage of implementation • Is getting Higher 3rd month 91.21% 2nd month 75.77% 1st month 73.33%

  13. Missed-approaches resulted from chasing on final • have been reduced month by month. 追赶导致复飞/中止进近架次 Missed-approaches resulted from chasing on final 12 10 10 8 7 6 4 3 2 1 0 10月 11月 12月 1月 Oct Nov Dec Jan

  14. The separation on same and adjacent runway • have been optimized or reduced. Same Runway Adjacent Runway

  15. The average arrival flight time • has been reduced around 3-4 minutes for each arrival point. Arrival point ( VYK ) Arrival point ( GITUM )

  16. 谢谢 Thanks

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend