In tro duction Spin correlations for the and pairs - - PDF document

in tro duction spin correlations for the and pairs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

In tro duction Spin correlations for the and pairs - - PDF document

In tro duction Spin correlations for the and pairs generated in hea vy ion colli sions and resp ectiv e angular correlations at the join t registration of hadron ic deca ys of


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • In
tro duction Spin correlations for the
  • and
  • pairs
generated in hea vy ion colli sions and resp ectiv e angular correlations at the join t registration
  • f
hadron ic deca ys
  • f
t w
  • h
yp erons with space parit y nonconserv ation giv e imp
  • rtan
t information ab
  • ut
the c haracter and mec hanism
  • f
m ultipl e pro cesses The adv an tage
  • f
the
  • and
  • systems
  • v
er
  • ther
  • nes
is due to the fact that the P
  • dd
deca ys
  • p
  • and
  • p
  • serv
e as eectiv e analyzers
  • f
spin state
  • f
the
  • and
  • particles
In connection with this spin corre lations in the
  • and
  • systems
can b e rather easily distinguished and studied exp erimen tall y b y the metho d
  • f
momen ts
  • v
er the bac kground
  • f
a large amoun t
  • f
pro duced secondary particles This fact is esp ecially meaningful for the in v estigations
  • f
m ultipl e generation at mo dern and fu ture ion colliders lik e RHIC LHC NICA since the p
  • larization
parameters
  • esp
ecially for the
  • pair
  • are
v ery sensitiv e to the scenario
  • f
pro cess after the act
  • f
collision
  • f
relativistic hea vy ions
  • General
structure
  • f
the spin densit y matrix
  • f
the pairs
  • and
  • The
spin densit y matrix
  • f
the
  • and
  • pairs
just as the spin densit y matrix
  • f
t w
  • spin
particles in general can b e presen ted in the follo wing form
  • I
  • I
  • P
  • I
  • I
  • P
  • X
i
  • X
k
  • T
ik
  • i
  • k
  • in
doing so tr
  • Here
  • I
is the t w
  • ro
w unit matrix
  • x
  • y
  • z
  • is
the v ector P auli
  • p
erator x y
  • z
  • P
  • and
P
  • are
the p
  • larization
v ectors
  • f
rst and second particle
  • P
  • h
  • i
P
  • h
  • i
  • T
ik
  • h
  • i
  • k
i are the correlation tensor comp
  • nen
ts
  • In
the general case T ik
  • P
i P k
  • The
tensor with comp
  • nen
ts C ik
  • T
ik
  • P
i P k describ es the spin correlations
  • f
t w
  • particles
  • The
resp ectiv e
  • neparticle
densit y matrices are as follo ws
  • I
  • P
  • I
  • P
slide-3
SLIDE 3 The trace
  • f
the correlation tensor is T
  • T
xx
  • T
y y
  • T
z z
  • h
  • i
  • The
eigen v alues
  • f
the
  • p
erator
  • equal
  • t
  • for
three triplet states total spin S
  • and
  • s
  • for
the singlet state total spin S
  • Let
us in tro duce the
  • p
erators
  • f
pro jection
  • n
to the triplet states and
  • n
to the singlet state
  • P
t
  • P
s
  • The
follo wing matrix equalities are satised
  • P
  • t
  • P
t
  • P
  • s
  • P
s
  • P
t
  • P
s
  • P
s
  • P
t
  • F
  • r
all the purely triplet states the trace
  • f
the correlation tensor T
  • whereas
for the purely singlet state T
  • No
w let us in tro duce the
  • p
erator
  • f
p erm utation
  • f
spin pro jections ha ving the form
  • P
  • I
  • I
  • Then
w e
  • btain
  • P
  • P
t
  • P
t
  • P
  • P
t
  • P
  • P
s
  • P
s
  • P
  • P
s
  • The
eigen v alues
  • f
  • P
  • equal
  • for
the three triplet states and
  • for
the singlet state
  • The
t w
  • particle
spin densit y matrix
  • ma
y b e decomp
  • sed
in to the triplet singlet and the mixed singlettrip let parts
  • t
  • s
  • ts
  • st
  • in
doing so
  • t
  • P
t
  • P
t
  • s
  • P
s
  • P
s
  • ts
  • P
t
  • P
s
  • st
  • P
s
  • P
t
  • The
relativ e fraction
  • f
the triplet states amoun ts to W t
  • tr
  • t
  • tr
  • P
t
  • P
t
  • tr
  • P
t
  • T
  • and
the relativ e fraction
  • f
the singlet state amoun ts to
slide-4
SLIDE 4 W s
  • tr
  • s
  • tr
  • P
s
  • P
s
  • tr
  • P
s
  • T
  • in
doing so W t
  • W
s
  • T
  • W
t
  • W
s
  • W
s
  • Due
to the
  • rthogonalit
y
  • f
the pro jection matrices
  • P
t and
  • P
s
  • the
fol lo wing relation holds tr
  • ts
  • tr
  • st
  • tr
  • P
s
  • P
t
  • There
are also some matrix equalities con taining the
  • p
erator
  • f
p erm u tation
  • f
spin pro jections
  • P
  • P
  • t
  • P
  • t
  • P
  • s
  • P
  • s
  • P
  • ts
  • P
  • ts
  • P
  • st
  • P
  • st
  • It
should b e noted that the matrices
  • t
and
  • s
incorp
  • rate
  • nly
symmetric com binations
  • f
spin
  • p
erators
  • f
t w
  • particles
whereas the matrices
  • ts
and
  • st
include
  • nly
an tisymmetric com binations
  • f
spin
  • p
erators
  • The
explicit form ulas for the triplet
  • t
  • singlet
  • s
  • and
mixed
  • ts
  • st
  • comp
  • nen
ts
  • f
the spin densit y matrix are as follo ws
  • t
  • h
  • T
  • I
  • I
  • I
  • I
  • P
  • P
  • X
i
  • X
k
  • i
  • k
  • T
ik
  • T
k i
  • T
  • ik
  • i
  • s
  • T
  • I
  • I
  • ts
  • st
  • h
  • I
  • I
  • P
  • P
  • X
i
  • X
k
  • i
  • k
T ik
  • T
k i
  • i
  • i
  • k
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • ts
  • st
  • i
  • h
  • X
i
  • X
k
  • X
l
  • ik
l
  • i
  • k
P l
  • P
l
  • X
i
  • X
k
  • X
l
  • ik
l
  • i
  • I
  • I
  • i
  • P
k P l i
  • where
  • ik
l is the totally an tisymmetric tensor
  • f
the rd rank In doing so the matrices
  • t
  • s
and
  • are
Hermitian and the matrix
  • is
an tiHermitian
  • If
the rst particle and second particle ha v e dieren t relativistic momen ta the p
  • larization
v ectors P
  • P
  • and
the correlation tensor comp
  • nen
ts with left and righ t indices are sp ecied resp ectiv ely
  • in
the rest frames
  • f
the rst and second particle
  • in
the unied co
  • rdinate
axes
  • f
the cm frame
  • f
t w
  • particles
  • Spin
correlations and angular correlations at join t registration
  • f
deca ys
  • f
t w
  • particles
in to the c hannel
  • p
  • An
y deca y with the space parit y nonconserv ation ma y serv e as an ana lyzer
  • f
spin state
  • f
the unstable particle
  • The
normalized angular distribu ti
  • n
at the deca y
  • p
  • tak
es the form d w n d
  • n
  • P
  • n
  • Here
P
  • is
the p
  • larization
v ector
  • f
the
  • particle
n is the unit v ector along the direction
  • f
proton momen tum in the rest frame
  • f
the
  • particle
  • is
the co e cien t
  • f
P
  • dd
angular asymmetry
  • The
deca y
  • p
  • selects
the pro jections
  • f
spin
  • f
the
  • particle
  • n
to the direction
  • f
proton momen tum the analyzing p
  • w
er equals
  • n
  • No
w let us consider the double angular distributi
  • n
  • f
!igh t directions for protons formed in the deca ys
  • f
t w
  • particles
in to the c hannel
  • p
  • normalized
b y unit y
  • the
analyzing p
  • w
ers are
  • n
  • n
  • It
is describ ed b y the follo wing form ula
slide-6
SLIDE 6 d
  • w
n
  • n
  • d
  • n
  • d
  • n
  • P
  • n
  • P
  • n
  • X
i
  • X
k
  • T
ik n i n k
  • where
P
  • and
P
  • are
p
  • larization
v ectors
  • f
the rst and second
  • particle
T ik are the correlation tensor comp
  • nen
ts n
  • and
n
  • are
unit v ectors in the resp ectiv e rest frames
  • f
the rst and second
  • particle
dened in the common
  • unied
  • co
  • rdinate
axes
  • f
the cm frame
  • f
the pair
  • i
k
  • f
  • g
  • fx
y
  • z
g
  • By
using the metho d
  • f
momen ts the comp
  • nen
ts
  • f
p
  • larization
v ectors and correlation tensor ma y b e determined as a result
  • f
a v eraging com bi nations
  • f
trigonometric functions
  • f
angles
  • f
proton !igh t
  • v
er the double angular distribut ion
  • P
i
  • hn
i i P k
  • hn
k i T ik
  • hn
i n k i
  • Here
hi
  • Z
  • d
  • w
n
  • n
  • d
  • n
  • d
  • n
  • d
  • n
  • d
  • n
  • n
x
  • sin
  • cos
  • n
y
  • sin
  • sin
  • n
z
  • cos
  • n
x
  • sin
  • cos
  • n
y
  • sin
  • sin
  • n
z
  • cos
  • where
  • and
  • and
  • are
the p
  • lar
and azim uthal angles
  • f
emission
  • f
protons in the rest frames
  • f
the rst and second
  • particle
resp ectiv ely
  • with
resp ect to the unied system
  • f
co
  • rdinate
axes
  • d
  • n
  • sin
  • d
  • d
  • and
d
  • n
  • sin
  • d
  • d
  • are
the elemen ts
  • f
solid angles
  • f
proton emission
  • The
double angular distribut ion ma y b e in tegrated
  • v
er all angles except the angle
  • b
et w een the v ectors n
  • and
n
  • cos
  • n
  • n
  • cos
  • cos
  • sin
  • sin
  • cos
  • A
t this in tegration the solid angle elemen t d
  • n
  • can
b e dened without losing generalit y
  • in
the co
  • rdinate
frame with the axis z b eing parallel to the v ector n
  • and
the solid angle elemen t d
  • n
  • is
dened in the co
  • rdinate
frame where the p
  • larization
parameters are sp ecied d
  • n
  • sin
  • d
d d
  • n
  • sin
  • d
  • d
slide-7
SLIDE 7 here
  • is
the azim uthal angle
  • f
rotation
  • f
the v ector n
  • around
the v ector n
  • So
the angular correlation b et w een the proton momen ta at the deca ys
  • f
t w
  • particles
is expressed as follo ws d w cos
  • Z
d
  • w
n
  • n
  • d
  • n
  • d
  • n
  • dd
  • n
  • sin
  • d
  • In
doing so n
  • Z
n
  • d
d
  • n
  • n
  • Z
n
  • d
d
  • n
  • n
i n k
  • Z
n i n k d d
  • n
  • cos
  • ik
  • The
angular correlation b eing describ ed b y the form ula
  • d
w cos
  • T
cos
  • sin
  • d
  • is
determined
  • nly
b y the trace
  • f
the correlation tensor T
  • W
t
  • W
s
  • and
it do es not dep end
  • n
the p
  • larization
v ectors
  • singleparti
cl e states ma y b e unp
  • larized
  • So
nally w e ha v e d w cos
  • W
s
  • W
t
  • cos
  • sin
  • d
  • W
s and W t are relativ e fractions
  • f
the singlet state and triplet states resp ectiv ely
  • Correlations
at the join t registration
  • f
the deca ys
  • p
  • and
  • p
  • Due
to C P in v ariance the co e cien ts
  • f
P
  • dd
angular asymmetry for the deca ys
  • p
  • and
  • p
  • ha
v e equal absolute v alues and
  • pp
  • site
signs
  • The
double angular distribu tion for this case is as follo ws
  • d
  • w
n
  • n
  • d
  • n
  • d
  • n
  • P
  • n
  • P
  • n
  • X
i
  • X
k
  • T
ik n i n k
slide-8
SLIDE 8 here
  • and
  • Th
us the angular correlation b et w een the proton and an tiproton momen ta in the rest frames
  • f
the
  • and
  • particles
is describ ed b y the expression d w cos
  • T
cos
  • sin
  • d
  • W
s
  • W
t
  • cos
  • sin
  • d
  • where
  • is
the angle b et w een the proton and an tiproton momen ta
  • Mo
del
  • f
  • neparticle
sources F
  • r
describing the momen tumenergy correlations and related spin cor relations
  • f
iden tical particles generated in pro cesses with high m ultipli cit y
  • the
mo del
  • f
  • neparticle
sources
  • constituen
ts
  • is
widely applied
  • In
the framew
  • rk
  • f
this mo del the sources emitting particles do not
  • v
er lap in space and time
  • it
is supp
  • sed
that the sizes
  • f
the sources themselv es are small as compared with the distances b et w een them In accordance with this eac h source is c haracterized b y the co
  • rdinate
x i
  • fr
i
  • t
i g In doing so the spatial region
  • ccupied
b y all the sources is v ery small as compared with the sizes
  • f
detectors measuring the particle momen ta p
  • and
p
  • and
the duration
  • f
the generation pro cess is v ery small as compared with the time parameters
  • f
detectors According to the mo del
  • f
  • neparticle
sources
  • Kop
ylo v P
  • dgorets
ky
  • particles
are emitted b y the sources indep end en tl y and incoheren t ly
  • Th
us at the early stage
  • f
particle formation
  • at
the stage
  • f
hadroniza tion
  • f
quarks and gluons
  • the
momen tumenergy and spin correlations are absen t
  • Correlations
for iden tical particles pro duced in the same ev en t
  • f
collision arise
  • n
accoun t
  • f
the eects
  • f
quan tum statistics
  • Bose
statis tics for particles with in teger spin and F ermi statistics for particles with halfin teger spin
  • and
nalstate in teraction
  • A
t presen t the mo del
  • f
sources is successfully used as w ell for the description
  • f
pair momen tum energy correlations
  • f
noniden ti cal particles conditioned exclusiv ely b y the nalstate in teraction
  • It
is essen tial that the pair momen tumenergy correlations and spin cor relations connected with the particle iden tit y and the nalstate in teraction dep end up
  • n
the momen tum dierence in the cm frame
  • f
the pair and as up
  • n
the parameters
  • f
the pro cess up
  • n
the spacetime c haracteris tics
  • f
the region
  • f
m ultiple generation
  • f
particles corresp
  • nding
to the
slide-9
SLIDE 9 socalled freezeout
  • In
accordance with the mo del
  • f
sources the corre lations reac h the maxim um at relativ e momen ta b eing small as compared with the in v erse spacetime dimensions
  • f
the generation region whereas in the limit
  • f
large relativ e momen ta they disapp ear
  • This
fact has serv ed as a basis for elab
  • ration
  • f
the correlation metho d
  • the
socalled correlation fem toscop y
  • allo
wing
  • ne
to in v estigate exp erimen tall y the spacetime de v elopmen t
  • f
the pro cesses
  • f
m ultiple generation
  • f
leptons photons and hadrons
  • Since
the momen tumenergy correlations and spin correlations in the framew
  • rk
  • f
the mo del
  • f
  • neparticle
sources are substan tial
  • nly
in a suf cien tly narro w range
  • f
small relativ e momen ta in most
  • f
real ev en ts the particle densit y in phase space is small enough so that it w
  • uld
b e p
  • ssible
to consider the pair correlations
  • nly
  • disregarding
the triple correlations moreo v er the correlations
  • f
higher
  • rders
  • as
w ell as neglecting their in!uence up
  • n
the pair correlations
  • In
the mo del under consideration the sources ha v e a v ery broad momen tum sp ectrum as compared with the relativ e momen ta b eing c haracteristic for pair correlations th us the emission probabiliti es for eac h
  • f
the
  • ne
particle sources c hange insignican tl y under the v ariation
  • f
momen ta p
  • and
p
  • within
the correlation eect
  • that
is the socalled smo
  • thness
condition
  • The
metho d
  • f
correlation fem toscop y
  • based
  • n
the source mo del has b een used successfully enough for studying the correlations in pro cesses
  • f
collision
  • f
elemen tary particles
  • But
b y its essence this approac h is the most adequate
  • ne
namely for pro cesses
  • f
m ultipl e generation
  • f
particles in collisions
  • f
hea vy n uclei
  • Let
us remark that when describing the correlations
  • f
pions generated in m ultiple pro cesses the mo del
  • f
b
  • son
formation in socalled c haotic and coheren t states is used as w ell
  • In
the framew
  • rk
  • f
this mo d el the in terference correlations
  • f
iden tical b
  • sons
are partly suppressed in connection with the fact that the b
  • sons
b eing pro duced in the same quan tum state are already initial l y symmetrized just at their generation Analogous results follo w from the mo del incorp
  • ratin
g b
  • th
the
  • neparticle
sources and m ultiparticl e sources with the xed n um b er
  • f
particles
  • Ho
w ev er
  • n
accoun t
  • f
the P auli principl e these mo dels are inapplicabl e to fermions
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Spin
correlations at the generation
  • f
  • pairs
in m ultiple pro cesses a The F ermistatistics eect leads not
  • nly
to the momen tumenergy
  • correlation
s at small relativ e momen ta
  • correlation
fem toscop y
  • but
to the spin correlations as w ell
  • The
follo wing relation holds in consequence
  • f
the symmetrization
  • r
an tisymmetrizati
  • n
  • f
the total w a v e function
  • f
an y iden tical particles with nonzero spin
  • b
  • sons
as w ell as fermions
  • S
L
  • Here
S is the total spin and L is the
  • rbital
momen tum in the cm fra me
  • f
the pair A t the momen tum dierence q
  • p
  • p
  • the
states with nonzero
  • rbital
momen ta die
  • ut
and
  • nly
states with L
  • and
ev en total spin S surviv e
  • Since
the particle spin is equal to
  • at
q
  • the
  • pair
is gener ated
  • nly
in the singlet state with S
  • Mean
time at the momen tum dierence q
  • there
are also triplet states generated together with the singlet state
  • Within
the con v en tional mo del
  • f
  • neparticle
sources emitting unp
  • larized
particles the triplet states with spin pro jections
  • and
  • are
pro duced with equal probabiliti es
  • If
correlations are neglected the singlet state is generated with the same probabilit y
  • the
relativ e w eigh ts are f W t
  • f
W s
  • When
taking in to accoun t the F ermi statistics and sw a v e nalstate in teraction whic h is essen tial at close momen ta
  • at
  • rbital
momen ta L
  • the
con tribution
  • f
nalstate in teraction is suppressed
  • the
fractions
  • f
triplet states and the singlet state b ecome prop
  • rtional
to the quan tities
  • W
t q
  • hcos
q xi W s q
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • here
q
  • p
  • p
  • is
the dierence
  • f
momen ta x
  • x
  • x
  • is
the dierence
  • f
co
  • rdinates
  • f
t w
  • sources
  • In
the ab
  • v
e form ula
  • hcos
q xi
  • Z
W x cos q x d
  • x
slide-11
SLIDE 11 is the F ermistatistics con tribution here W x is the distribu ti
  • n
  • f
dier ence
  • f
co
  • rdinates
  • f
t w
  • sources
B int q
  • is
the con tribution
  • f
sw a v e nalstate in teraction
  • f
t w
  • particles
In doing so Rq
  • W
t q
  • W
s q
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • is
the correlation function describing the momen tumenergy correlations
  • f
t w
  • particles
with close momen ta
  • The
correlation function Rq
  • represen
ts the ratio
  • f
the t w
  • particle
sp ectrum to the noncorrelated bac kground whic h is constructed usually as a pro duct
  • f
  • neparticle
sp ectra from dieren t ev en ts at the same v alues
  • f
momen ta In terms
  • f
inclusiv e cross sections w e ha v e
  • d
  • d
  • p
  • d
  • p
  • Rq
  • tot
hnn
  • i
hni
  • d
  • d
  • p
  • d
  • d
  • p
  • where
n is the m ultipli ci t y and
  • tot
is the total in teraction crosssection
  • for
the P
  • isson
distributi
  • n
  • f
m ultipli ci t y w e ha v e hnn
  • ihni
  • b
The spin densit y matrix
  • f
t w
  • particles
with close momen ta at the emission
  • f
unp
  • larized
  • particles
has the follo wing structure
  • W
s q
  • s
  • W
t q
  • t
W s q
  • W
t q
  • Rq
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • s
  • hcos
q xi
  • t
  • Here
  • s
  • I
  • I
  • is
the densit y matrix
  • f
the singlet state and
  • t
  • I
  • I
  • is
the densit y matrix
  • f
the unp
  • larized
triplet state a v eraged
  • v
er the spin pro jections
  • t
  • t
  • t
  • t
  • s
  • t
  • I
  • I
  • It
is easy to see that Eq
  • for
  • can
b e rewritten in the form
slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • I
  • I
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • Rq
  • The
correlation tensor comp
  • nen
ts
  • T
ik
  • C
ik
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • ik
  • dep
end up
  • n
the momen tum dierence as w ell as up
  • n
the spacetime parameters
  • f
the generation region the trace
  • f
the correlation tensor amoun ts to T
  • X
i T ii
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • Th
us
  • n
accoun t
  • f
the eects
  • f
quan tum statistics and nalstate in teraction at small relativ e momen ta t w
  • iden
tical particles initial ly unp
  • larized
P
  • P
  • and
noncorrelated b y spins remain unp
  • larized
as w ell but their spins b ecome correlated
  • A
t q
  • w
e
  • btain
hcos q xi
  • T
ik
  • ik
  • singlet
state
  • On
the
  • ther
hand in the limit
  • f
large q
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • Rq
  • T
ik
  • ie
b
  • th
the momen tumenergy and spin correlations v anish
  • c
No w let us consider the emission
  • f
  • particles
with equal p
  • larization
v ectors e P
  • e
P
  • e
P
  • It
should b e noted that at the stage
  • f
emission b y sources correlations are absen t The fraction
  • f
the triplet state with the total spin pro jection
  • n
to the direction
  • f
e P and the resp ectiv e constituen t
  • f
the spin densit y matrix are as follo ws
  • f
W t
  • e
P
  • t
  • I
  • l
  • I
  • l
  • here
e P
  • j
e Pj and l is the unit v ector directed along e P
  • Analogously
  • w
e ha v e the follo wing fractions and spin densit y matrix constituen ts for the triplet state with total spin pro jection
slide-13
SLIDE 13 f W t
  • e
P
  • t
  • I
  • l
  • I
  • l
  • for
the triplet state with total spin pro jection
  • f
W t
  • e
P
  • t
  • I
  • I
  • l
  • l
  • and
for the singlet state f W s
  • e
P
  • s
  • I
  • I
  • In
doing so the fractions
  • f
spin states f W t
  • f
W t
  • f
W t
  • f
W s
  • b
ey the normalization condition f W t
  • f
W t
  • f
W t
  • f
W s
  • and
the primary spin densit y matrix is describ ed b y the expression
  • f
W t
  • t
  • f
W t
  • t
  • f
W t
  • t
  • f
W s
  • s
  • I
  • e
P
  • I
  • e
P
  • A
t lo w relativ e momen ta
  • n
accoun t
  • f
F ermi statistics and nalstate in teraction the fractions
  • f
triplet states and singlet state c hange and b e come prop
  • rtional
to the follo wing quan tities W t
  • q
  • e
P
  • hcos
q xi
  • W
t
  • q
  • e
P
  • hcos
q xi
  • W
t
  • q
  • e
P
  • hcos
q xi
  • W
s q
  • e
P
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • The
inclusiv e crosssection
  • f
generation
  • f
the
  • pair
with close mo men ta is prop
  • rtional
to the correlation function describing the momen tum energy correlations
slide-14
SLIDE 14 Rq
  • W
t
  • q
  • W
t
  • q
  • W
t
  • q
  • W
s q
  • e
P
  • hcos
q xi
  • e
P
  • B
int q
  • In
doing so the renormalized densit y matrix is determined b y the relation
  • Rq
  • W
t
  • q
  • t
  • W
t
  • q
  • t
  • W
t
  • q
  • t
  • W
s q
  • s
  • In
accordance with this the p
  • larization
parameters
  • f
the
  • particles
renormalized due to the eects
  • f
F ermi statistics and sw a v e nalstate in teraction tak e the form P
  • P
  • Rq
  • hcos
q xi e P
  • T
ik
  • Rq
  • hcos
q xi e P i e P k
  • e
P
  • hcos
q xi
  • B
int q
  • ik
  • Irresp
ectiv e
  • f
the primary p
  • larization
e P
  • at
the momen tum dierence q
  • nly
the singlet state
  • f
the
  • pair
is realized and the renormalized p
  • larization
v ectors P
  • P
  • tend
to zero
  • The
sw a v e nalstate in terac tion amplies the predominan t role
  • f
the singlet state If e P
  • then
in the limit q
  • the
generation
  • f
  • pairs
is forbidden
  • in
full accordance with the P auli principl e
  • d
In the cm frame
  • f
the
  • pair
w e ha v e q
  • f
kg where k is the momen tum
  • f
  • ne
  • f
the particles In doing so the momen tum k is connected with the relativ e momen tum q in the lab
  • ratory
frame b y the Loren tz transformation
  • w
e use the unit system with
  • c
  • k
  • q
  • qv
v jv j
  • v
q
  • here
v
  • p
  • p
  • is
the v elo cit y
  • f
the
  • pair
in the lab
  • ratory
frame
  • v
  • is
the Loren tz factor q
  • p
  • p
  • and
q
  • The
Loren tz transformations
  • f
co
  • rdinates
are giv en b y the expres sions
slide-15
SLIDE 15 r
  • r
  • rv
v jv j
  • v
t t
  • t
  • vr
  • where
r
  • x
  • x
  • and
t
  • t
  • t
  • The
in terference term connected with iden tit y quan tum statistics is determined b y the expression hcos q xi
  • hcos
kr
  • i
  • Z
W v r
  • coskr
  • d
  • r
  • where
W v r
  • Z
W x d t
  • Z
W r
  • t
  • d
t
  • is
the distribut ion
  • f
co
  • rdinate
dierence b et w een t w
  • sources
in the cm frame
  • f
the
  • pair
  • Mean
time the con tribution
  • f
sw a v e nalstate in teraction is expressed as follo ws
  • at
the sizes
  • f
the generation region in the cm frame exceeding the eectiv e radius
  • f
in teraction
  • f
t w
  • particles
  • B
int q
  • B
  • k
v
  • Z
W v r
  • bk
r
  • d
  • r
  • where
the function bk r
  • has
the structure
  • bk
r
  • jf
  • k
j
  • r
  • Re
  • f
  • k
  • e
ik r
  • cos
kr
  • r
  • jf
  • k
j
  • d
  • r
  • Here
k
  • jkj
r
  • jr
  • j
f
  • k
  • is
the amplitude
  • f
lo wenergy
  • scattering
In the framew
  • rk
  • f
the eectiv e radius theory
  • f
  • k
  • a
  • d
  • a
  • k
  • i
k a
  • where
b y denition a
  • is
the length
  • f
sw a v e scattering and d
  • k
d d k
  • Re
  • f
  • k
  • is
the eectiv e radius
  • The
in tegral
  • with
expression
  • inside
appro ximately tak es in to accoun t the dierence
  • f
the true w a v e function
  • f
t w
  • in
teracting
  • particles
slide-16
SLIDE 16 with the momen ta k and k at small distances from the asymptotic w a v e function
  • f
con tin uous sp ectrum
  • The
information ab
  • ut
the parameters
  • f
  • scattering
is con tained in the w
  • rks
studying double h yp ern uclei and pair correlations in the reactions with formation
  • f
t w
  • particles
  • see
for example
  • Analysis
  • f
the exp erimen tal data leads to the conclusion that the length
  • f
  • scattering
is comparable b y magnitude
  • fm
  • with
the length
  • f
neutronneut ron scattering
  • In
the case
  • f
Gauss distribu ti
  • n
  • f
co
  • rdinates
  • f
t w
  • indep
end en t sources in the lab
  • ratory
frame with the meansquare radius p hr
  • i
  • p
hr
  • i
  • p
r
  • and
the meansquare emission time p ht
  • i
  • p
ht
  • i
  • w
e
  • btain
for the function W v r
  • W
v r
  • r
  • p
r
  • v
  • exp
  • r
  • r
  • n
  • r
  • r
  • n
  • r
  • v
  • In
doing so hcos kr
  • i
  • exp
  • k
  • r
  • v
  • kn
  • r
  • and
the con tribution
  • f
sw a v e nalstate
  • in
teraction at the momen tum k
  • maxim
um v alue
  • is
as follo ws
  • B
  • v
  • a
  • r
  • A
  • d
  • p
  • r
  • p
  • C
a
  • where
  • q
r
  • v
  • A
  • u
arcsin u C
  • u
ln
  • u
  • u
  • u
  • v
p r
  • Spin
correlations at the generation
  • f
  • pairs
in m ultiple pro cesses In the framew
  • rk
  • f
the mo del
  • f
indep end en t
  • neparticle
sources spin correlations in the
  • system
arise
  • nly
  • n
accoun t
  • f
the dierence b et w een the in teraction in the nal triplet state
  • S
  • and
the in teraction in the nal singlet state
  • A
t small relativ e momen ta the sw a v e in teraction pla ys
slide-17
SLIDE 17 the dominan t role as b efore but con trary to the case
  • f
iden tical particles
  • in
the case
  • f
noniden ti cal particles
  • the
total spin ma y tak e b
  • th
the v alues S
  • and
S
  • at
the
  • rbital
momen tum L
  • In
doing so the in terference eect connected with quan tum statistics is absen t
  • If
the sources emit unp
  • larized
particles then in the case under consid eration the correlation function describing momen tumenergy correlations has the follo wing structure
  • in
the cm frame
  • f
the
  • pair
  • Rk
v
  • B
  • t
k v
  • B
  • s
k v
  • The
spin densit y matrix
  • f
the
  • pair
is giv en b y the form ula
  • I
  • I
  • B
  • t
k v
  • B
  • s
k v
  • Rk
v
  • and
the comp
  • nen
ts
  • f
the correlation tensor are as follo ws T ik
  • B
  • t
k v
  • B
  • s
k v
  • B
  • t
k v
  • B
  • s
k v
  • ik
  • here
the con tributions
  • f
nalstate triplet and singlet
  • in
teraction are determined b y the expression
  • analogously
to Eqs for the
  • in
ter action
  • with
the replacemen t cos kr
  • e
i k r
  • in
Eq
  • wing
to the noniden ti t y
  • f
the particles
  • and
  • B
  • st
k v
  • jf
  • st
k j
  • h
  • r
  • i
  • Re
  • f
  • st
k
  • h
e ik r
  • e
i kr
  • r
  • i
  • k
jf
  • st
k j
  • d
d k
  • Re
  • f
  • st
k
  • A
W v
  • where
f
  • st
k
  • is
the amplitud e
  • f
the sw a v e lo wenergy singlet
  • triplet
  • scattering
  • Some
information
  • n
the
  • in
teraction at lo w energies ma y b e
  • btained
b y in v estigating for example the annihilati
  • n
pro cess p
  • p
  • A
t su cien tly large v alues
  • f
k
  • ne
should exp ect that
  • B
  • s
k v
  • B
  • t
k v
slide-18
SLIDE 18 In this case the angular correlations in the deca ys
  • p
  • p
  • connected
with the nalstate in teraction are absen t
  • T
ik
  • T
  • Angular
correlations in the deca ys
  • p
  • and
  • p
  • and
the mixed phase Th us at su cien tly large relativ e momen ta
  • for
k
  • m
  • ne
should exp ect that the angular correlations in the deca ys
  • p
  • and
  • p
  • connected
with the in teraction
  • f
the
  • and
  • h
yp erons in the nal state ie with
  • neparticle
sources
  • are
absen t
  • But
if at the considered energy the dynamical tra jectory
  • f
the system passes through the socalled mixed phase then the t w
  • particle
sources consisting
  • f
the free quark and an tiquark
  • start
pla ying a noticeable role
  • F
  • r
example the pro cess s
  • s
  • ma
y b e discussed
  • In
this pro cess the c harge parit y
  • f
the pairs s
  • s
and
  • is
equal to C
  • LS
  • where
L is the
  • rbital
momen tum and S is the total spin
  • f
the fermion and an tifermion
  • Mean
time the C P parit y
  • f
the fermion an tifermion pair is C P
  • S
  • In
the case
  • f
  • negluon
exc hange C P
  • and
then S
  • ie
the
  • pair
is generated in the triplet state in doing so the trace
  • f
the correlation tensor T
  • Ev
en if the frames
  • f
  • negluon
exc hange are
  • v
erstepp ed the quarks s and
  • s
  • b
eing ultrarelativi sti c in teract in the triplet state
  • S
  • In
so doing the primary C P parit y is C P
  • and
due to the C P parit y conserv ation the
  • pair
is also pro duced in the triplet state Let us denote the con tribution
  • f
t w
  • quark
sources b y x
  • Then
at large relativ e momen ta T
  • x
  • Apart
from the t w
  • quark
sources there are also t w
  • gluon
sources b eing able to pla y a comparable role Analogously with the annihilati
  • n
pro cess
  • in
this case the trace
  • f
the correlation tensor is describ ed b y the form ula
  • the
pro cess g g
  • is
implied
  • T
  • sin
  • sin
slide-19
SLIDE 19 where
  • is
the v elo cit y
  • f
  • and
  • in
the cm frame
  • f
the
  • pair
  • is
the angle b et w een the momen ta
  • f
  • ne
  • f
the gluons and
  • in
the cm frame
  • see
  • A
t small
  • the
  • pair
is pro duced in the singlet state
  • total
spin S
  • T
  • whereas
at
  • in
the triplet state
  • S
  • T
  • Let
us remark that at ultrarelativi sti c v elo cities
  • ie
at extremely large relativ e momen ta
  • f
  • and
  • b
  • th
the t w
  • quark
and t w
  • gluon
mec hanisms lead to the triplet state
  • f
the
  • pair
  • T
  • In
the general case the app earance
  • f
angular correlations in the deca ys
  • p
  • and
  • p
  • with
the nonzero v alues
  • f
the trace
  • f
the correlation tensor T at large relativ e momen ta
  • f
the
  • and
  • particles
ma y testify to the passage
  • f
the system through the mixed phase
  • Summary
It is advisable to in v estigate the spin correlations
  • f
  • and
  • pairs
pro duced in relativistic hea vy ion collisions
  • see
also
  • The
spin correlations are studied b y the metho d
  • f
angular correlations
  • metho
d
  • f
momen ts
  • The
spin correlations as w ell as the momen tumenergy
  • nes
mak e it p
  • ssible
to determine the spacetime c haracteristics
  • f
the generation region and b esides the parameters
  • f
lo wenergy scattering
  • f
  • n
  • and
  • n
  • The
spin correlations should b e in v estigated join tly with the momen tum energy correlations The authors are grateful to AV Efremo v AO Kec hec h y an R Led nic ky
  • Y
uA P anebratsev OV T ery aev and MV T
  • k
arev for the in terest in this w
  • rk
and useful discussions
  • References
  • VL
Lyub
  • shitz
and MI P
  • dgoretsky
  • Y
ad Fiz
  • Ph
ys A t Nucl
  • VL
Lyub
  • shitz
in Pr
  • c
e e dings
  • f
XXXIV Winter Scho
  • l
  • f
the Pe tersbur g Institute
  • f
Nucle ar Physics Physics
  • f
A tomic Nuclei and Elementary Particles StP etersburg
  • p
  • R
Lednic ky and VL Lyub
  • shitz
Ph ys Lett B
slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • G
Alexander and HJ Lipkin Ph ys Lett B
  • R
Lednic ky
  • VV
Lyub
  • shitz
and VL Lyub
  • shitz
Y ad Fiz
  • Ph
ys A t Nucl
  • MI
P
  • dgoretsky
  • Fiz
Elem Chast A t Y adra
  • So
v J P art Nucl
  • R
Lednic ky and VL Lyub
  • shitz
Y ad Fiz
  • So
v J Nucl Ph ys
  • CN
F
  • wler
and RM W einer Ph ys Lett B
  • RM
W einer Ph ys Lett B
  • R
Lednic ky
  • VL
Lyub
  • shitz
MI P
  • dgoretsky
  • Y
ad Fiz
  • So
v J Nucl Ph ys
  • VL
Lyub
  • shitz
Y ad Fiz
  • LD
Landau and EM Lifshitz Quantum Me chanics Nonr elativistic The
  • ry
in Russian Nauk a Mosco w
  • xx
  • VL
Lyub
  • shitz
and VV Lyub
  • shitz
in Pr
  • c
e e dings
  • f
XXXVII and XXXVIII Winter Scho
  • ls
  • f
the Petersbur g Institute
  • f
Nucle ar Physics Physics
  • f
A tomic Nuclei and Elementary Particles StP etersburg
  • p
  • HA
Bethe and P
  • Morrison
Elementary Nucle ar The
  • ry
New Y
  • rk
  • x
  • VL
Lyub
  • shitz
Y ad Fiz
  • So
v J Nucl Ph ys
  • S
Iw ao M Chak
  • I
Kazana v a Progr Theor Ph ys
  • AO
Onic hi et al Nucl Ph ys A
  • R
Afnan Nucl Ph ys A
  • H
McMaster Rev Mo d Ph ys
  • VL
Lyub
  • shitz
and VV Lyub
  • shitz
  • Nucl
Ph ys A
  • p
c
  • in
Pro ceedings
  • f
the In ternational Conference SEWM
  • Amsterdam
the Netherlands August
  • VL
Lyub
  • shitz
and VV Lyub
  • shitz
JINR E
  • Dubna
  • Y
ad Fiz
  • Ph
ys A t Nucl