Implementing Basel II and Beyond Michael Barak SVP, Basel Capital - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

implementing basel ii and beyond
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Implementing Basel II and Beyond Michael Barak SVP, Basel Capital - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Implementing Basel II and Beyond Michael Barak SVP, Basel Capital Manager October 16, 2012 *Views expressed here are my own and do not represent those of Union Bank Agenda Union Bank Overview Current Status Union Bank Solution


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Implementing Basel II and Beyond

Michael Barak SVP, Basel Capital Manager October 16, 2012

*Views expressed here are my own and do not represent those of Union Bank

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1 |

  • Union Bank Overview
  • Current Status
  • Union Bank Solution
  • Risk Management: Basel II End-to-End Controls
  • Current Challenges
  • What Worked – Applicability for Basel III

Agenda

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2 |

  • Headquartered in San Francisco, CA
  • Financial Highlights
  • Total assets: $90B
  • Total loans held for investment: $54B
  • Core deposits: $53B
  • Tier 1 common capital ratio: 13.78%
  • 407 Branches
  • Key Markets
  • Consumer
  • Small Business
  • Middle Market
  • Real Estate
  • Corporate
  • Union Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group

Union Bank Overview: Financial Highlights

Source: SNL, 2Q12, end of period

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3 |

Union Bank Overview: Risk Management Framework

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4 |

Basel II Capital Accord

Validation, Oversight and Governance Data Integrity and Management

Pillar 1 Capital Requirement Pillar 2 Capital Adequacy Pillar 3 Market Discipline

Pillar 2 – Capital Adequacy

  • Validate capital calculated in Pillar 1
  • Consider risks not valued in Pillar 1
  • Establish Risk Appetite
  • Challenge capital calculation through:

– Stress Testing – Concentration Analysis – Economic Capital

Pillar 3 – Market Discipline

Public disclosure of capital requirement for publicly traded companies and additional regulatory schedules for all Basel II companies

Pillar 1 – Capital Requirement

Calculate capital for:

  • Credit Risk

– Establish Rating Philosophy – Advanced Internal Ratings Based Approach – Retail exposure segmentation – Wholesale scorecards

  • Market Risk

– Value at Risk modeling

  • Operational Risk

– Advanced Measurements Approach – Internal and External Loss Data – Business Environment & Internal Control Factors – Scenario Analysis

Union Bank Overview: Basel II Capital Accord

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5 |

  • Union Bank entered parallel on April 1, 2011
  • Leading up to the parallel run entry, UB conducted three self assessment exercises which served

as the basis for entering parallel

  • Parallel entry has triggered Regulatory Reviews and increased scrutiny
  • Submitted 5 quarters of Basel II results to the Supervisors
  • Regulatory Changes
  • CCAR
  • Basel III
  • Basel Standardized & Advanced
  • Union Bank Changes
  • Acquisitions
  • New Products
  • Supervisory Recommendations

Current Status

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6 |

Deliverable Business Solution Documentation Deliverable Regulatory Gap Documentation Deliverable Business Requirements Documentation Deliverable Data Requirements Documentation Deliverable Key Data Elements

Objectives Deliverables Using the Basel II Pillar I Advanced Approach, calculate the Bank’s RWA across all exposures

Deliverable Policies and Procedures

Implement a vendor supported risk-weighted asset and economic capital engine and data model Integrate the risk-weighted assets results with the required Regulatory Reports Integrate the economic capital results within Performance Reporting Define and execute a monthly process where the results are timely and accurate (Attestation)

Union Bank Solution: Objectives & Key Deliverables

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7 |

Source: Basel II FP&A Process Documentation

Wholesale excl . Trading

Systems and Data Sources

Data Warehouse SAS Limits Management System Excel Direct Input

Retail excl . SAS General Ledger Retail Trading ( Credit ) Securitized Assets Equities / Funds Wholesale Securities GL Adjustments ARC Counterparty Impairment Wholesale Impairment Fronting Committed Unissued LC’s Wholesale Impairment Credit Default Swaps (CDS) Total Return Swaps (TRS) FDIC Indem. Asset

RWA Calculator

Basel II Reporting

FFIEC 101

Electronic Submission

FFIEC 101

Other Reporting

FFIEC 031 & FR Y - 9 C Management Reporting

Moody’s

Operational Risk Acquisition

Data Quality, Data Management, Data Governance Program

  • The RWA calculation is an integrated process encompassing attributes from multiple sources. A vendor

tool from Moody’s is used for the RWA calculation, FFIEC 101 reports and the electronic submission.

Acquired Loan Data Mart

FDIC Acquisitions Market Risk

Union Bank Solution: Basel II RWA Overview

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8 |

Exposure Category

A Exposure at Default ($M) B Wt Avg PD (%) C Wt Avg LGD (%) D Wt Avg Maturity (Years) E RWA ($M) F RWA / EAD (%) Wholesale Exposures Corporate / Bank / Sovereign

1,463 0.2 (0.6) (0.3) 554

  • 1%

Real Estate: IPRE & HVCRE

299 1.8 (0.9) (0.0) (146)

  • 5%

Securities

(3,880) 0.0 (0.1) 0.1 (389) 0%

Counterparty (Derivatives)

(2) 0.1 (1.6) 0.4 93 6%

Retail Exposures Mortgage - First Lien

751 (0.2) (0.8) (486)

  • 3%

Mortgage - Junior Lien

(1) 0.1 (1.6) (41)

  • 1%

Other Retail Exposures

513 0.0 (6.4) 188

  • 3%

Securitization Exposures

123 (0.0) (71)

  • 3%

Equity Exposures

(15) (315)

  • 15%

Other Assets

(1,801) (32) 13%

Acquisition

(2,041) (529) 38%

Excess Credit Reserves

(25)

Market Risk Assets

41

Operational Risk

(781)

TOTAL

(4,592) (1,889) 1%

Union Bank Solution: Use Test - Basel II QoQ Changes

Higher PDs due to integration of acquired assets; otherwise lower. June sales of securities drive decrease in wholesale borrowings; proceeds fund repayment of short-term debt Decrease in Equity RWA driven mainly by continued fund sales due to Volcker Rule Completed integration of acquired exposures into Basel II AIRB Annual scenario analysis resulted in increased alignment with AMA model, thus less additional capital required HPI decrease results in lower LTVs, and thus decreased PD and LGD

>10% change, benefit to RWA 5%-10% change, benefit to RWA >10% change, detriment to RWA 5%-10% change, detriment to RWA <5% change, minimal RWA impact

Legend

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9 |

Allocated Capital

Total of Business Unit Capital Consumption is greater than Allocable Capital Pool.

  • “Residual” credited back reduces Business Unit Capital Consumption. Pro rata based on Consumption

Segment Capital Consumption (Basel II, Pillar 2)

Risk Based Capital

  • Economic Capital on

segment assets

  • Basel II Credit EC (8.5% x

RWA)

Other EC Components

  • Ops Risk (8.5% x RWA), market risk,

pension risk, business risk, management buffer, less diversification benefit

  • No ALM Market Risk

Minimum 5% TCE floor applied

  • Tangible floor of 5% is less than 7%

bank-wide hurdle

  • Represents some diversification

benefit

Goodwill

  • Including

privatization

Allocable Capital Pool (Basel I Based)

GAAP Shareholder’s Equity

  • Represents UB capital, the base upon which a return is expected

Strategic Capital

  • Determined by Basel I as constraint
  • Undeployed capital reserved for strategic purposes
  • Segments not expected to earn a return on Strategic Capital

Management Reporting

Union Bank Solution: Use Test – Capital Allocation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10 |

Risk Management: Basel II End-to-End Controls

Basel II End-to- End Controls Framework

  • 6. Attestation

3. Documentation

  • 1. Governance
  • 2. Testing
  • 4. Data Integrity
  • 5. Operational

Process

Utilize for key decisions, policy and procedures, executive milestones and result review Process for testing Basel II as a whole covering key functionality, IT infrastructure, data sets and complete data Defining business and data requirements; defining solution design and desktop procedures Examines completeness, validity, consistency, timeliness and accuracy of data as it moves from source to target Ensures on-going security, integrity and continuity of systems and data; incorporates change management Process that requires business users to sign-off completeness, accuracy and timeliness of data;

  • verall ownership & approval
slide-12
SLIDE 12

11 |

Executive Steering Committee

  • Corporate & Retail

Banking Vice Chair

  • CIO
  • CRO-Chair / CFO

Co-Chair

  • CEO

Basel II PMO

  • Regulatory Liaison
  • BTMU Liaison
  • Project Managers
  • Budget Analysts

Workstream Leads

  • Risk-Weighted

Assets

  • Data Integrity
  • Pillar II / ICAAP
  • Regulatory

Reporting

  • Counterparty Risk
  • Market Risk
  • Operational Risk
  • Wholesale Credit

Risk

  • Retail Credit Risk
  • Other Credit Risk

RWA Steering Committee

  • EVP, Controllers
  • SVP, Internal Audit
  • SVP, IT
  • Basel PMO
  • EVP, FP&A
  • CFO, Treasury
  • EVP, Risk Mgt.

Board of Directors

  • Risk Committee
  • Utilize governance for key decisions, executive milestones, budget approval

and project execution.

Risk Management: Governance Overview

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12 |

Moody’s Calculator Testing RWA Engine & FFIEC 101 Testing Testing By Portfolio Entire Portfolio Testing

5 Months 4 Months 7 Months 3 Months

  • Verify RWA

calculations

  • Verify solution meets

project requirements

  • Obtain UA for FFEIC 101

and RWA implementation

  • Verify data provisioning by

major exposure type

  • Verify entire portfolio data
  • Verify activity execution
  • Create core test

cases

  • Fast start
  • Identify and address any

critical data quality issues

  • Mitigate implementation

risk

  • Run the period close

process and make necessary adjustments

  • RWA engine is

installed

  • Test data is mapped

to the RWA calculator

  • UB’s parameterization and

customization are performed

  • UB’s specific target data

elements are identified.

  • Calculator testing results

variances are explained

  • Basel II upstream IT

projects are finished

  • Development of RWA data

provisioning is complete

  • Attestation process

participants are trained; RWA data sources are in production

  • Development of outbound

interfaces and management reporting is complete

  • Development
  • Mock-up data
  • Test
  • Data for GL, Commercial

and Retail

  • Mock-up data for Trading,

Securitization & Equity exposures

  • Test
  • Snapshots of real UB

portfolio data

  • Production
  • Min. 2 monthly runs of UB

data with 1 month being quarter end

Objective Benefits Data & Environment Dependencies

Risk Management: Testing Activities & Timeline

slide-14
SLIDE 14

13 |

Exposure Class Parameters Tested Results Tested # of Test Cases # of Variances Commercial

  • Exposure Sub-Category
  • Default Flag
  • PD Floor
  • Maturity Floor & Ceiling
  • PD Substitution
  • LGD Adjustment
  • UB PD/LGD Combinations
  • R based on exposure sub-category
  • K & DRBC amount based on defaulted

and non-defaulted exposures

  • RWA & ECL

131 Trading – OTC Derivatives

  • Exposure Sub-Category
  • Default Flag
  • PD Floor
  • Maturity Floor & Ceiling
  • Derivative Type
  • Collateral Type, Issuer & Rating
  • Remaining Principal Payments
  • Holding Period
  • Currency Mismatch
  • Netting

97 14 Trading – Repo Style Transactions 65 65 Retail

  • Exposure Sub-Category
  • Default Flag
  • PD & LGD Floor
  • Sovereign Guarantee
  • Segmentation

30 11 Securitization

  • External rating & rating type
  • Seniority
  • Granularity
  • RWA & Deductions from capital

352 Equity

  • Exposure Sub-Category
  • RWA based on exposure sub-category

9 Other Exposures

  • DvP/PvP and Non-DvP/Non-PvP flag
  • Failed business days
  • RWA

10 1 Retail/Wholesale Boundary

  • Monitoring retail-wholesale boundary
  • Basel II exposure class

11 4 Wholesale + Retail

  • Cross-default functionality
  • Exposure & obligor default consistency

10 3

Risk Management: Testing – Overview of Results

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14 |

  • Detailed requirements addressing exposure completeness, RWA calculation,

reporting and input

  • Defines the data elements, data structure, data owners used to determine

source to target mapping and coding

  • Defines all the regulatory rules, rule by rule
  • Describes how the business requirements, data requirements and Basel II

requirements are integrated into the comprehensive Basel II solution

  • Describes the functional roles and responsibilities, the operating calendar,

procedures and controls for executing the quarterly process and producing the regulatory reports and executive presentations

Business Requirements Data Requirements Solution Design Gap Analysis Objectives Deliverables Desktop Procedures

Risk Management: Documentation

slide-16
SLIDE 16

15 |

Priority Criteria Key Components Examples

1 Data elements that impact the RWA calculation and asset classification RWA calculation drivers Asset Classification Performing Status Specific Allowances Responsibility Center PD, LGD, M, EAD, External Agency Ratings Sovereign, Bank, Corporate, Residential Mortgage Default Expected Loss Holding Company vs. Bank 2 Data elements that impact the economic capital calculation and both regulatory and management reporting Regulatory reporting Economic Capital Management reporting LTV, Lien Position, FICO Score ZIP, Collateral type, Owner Occupied Flag Chart of Account 3 Data elements that impact internal analysis Internal Analysis Obligation Name, Data Source, Originating Responsibility Center, Purpose code

The process to identify the RWA data element priorities was based on the overall impact that the data elements have on the calculation and reporting functions, categorized as follows:

Risk Management: Data Integrity – Key Data Elements

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16 |

Gather Data Verify Data Prepare Feed Load Data in FDM Manual Data Entry Run DQ Checks Prepare & Load GL ID Non- Matl & Other Exposures Perform GL Recon Adjust Calculate RWA Analyze, Enter OTT

  • Adj. Rerun

Attest Prepare Regulatory Reports Analyze Rerun, Attest and Submit Investigate Communicate and Disclose

  • 1. Prepare Portfolio / Data for RWA
  • 2. Instrument Data Provisioning
  • 3. GL Data Provisioning
  • 4. Exposure

Completeness

  • 5. RWA Calculation
  • 7. Post-Submission Inquiry

Support

  • 6. Regulatory Reporting

Line of Business ITG ITG Finance & Reg. Reporting Finance & Regulatory Reporting Regulatory Reporting Finance & Regulatory Reporting

Key Process Primary Process Owner

Source: Basel II FP&A Process Documentation

Risk Management: Operational Process – Overview

slide-18
SLIDE 18

17 |

Deliverable KDE Quality Tracking & Reporting Deliverable Data Governance Policy Deliverable Key Data Elements Inventory Deliverable End-to-End Data Process Maps Deliverable Roles & Responsibilities for Data & Controls

Objectives Deliverables

Establish one source of data and data process truth

Deliverable Policies and Procedures

Create a centralized repository for documentation Establish governance and controls around data and data processes to ensure quality standards are met

Union Bank Solution: Objectives & Key Deliverables

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18 |

  • 1. Prepare Portfolio

Data for RWA

  • Gather and verify data from system of record’s (SOR’s) into data repositories
  • General ledger (GL) asset classification including review by Controllers and Finance Team
  • Capital calculation parameters as defined by Credit Risk Function
  • 2. Instrument Data

Provisioning

  • Load data into Fermat Data Mart (FDM)
  • Information technology group (ITG) and Finance Teams runs error checks for data quality

issues

  • 3. GL Data Provisioning
  • Prepare and load GL data into Fermat and perform GL data quality check
  • May require multiple load of GL data
  • Identify non-material and other exposures
  • 4. Exposure

Completeness

  • Reconcile GL amounts against instrument data and identify variances
  • Analyze and remediate variances and trigger adjustment process
  • 5. RWA Calculation
  • Calculate risk-weighted asset (RWA)
  • Perform comparative and variance analysis
  • Input over the top (OTT) adjustments from controllers (as needed) and recalculate RWA
  • Communicate results and obtain approvals
  • 6. Regulatory Reporting
  • Collect data, including results of RWA calculation, manual inputs from the controllers
  • Prepare regulatory reports
  • Analyze, re-run, attest and submit
  • 7. Post-Submission

Inquiry Support

  • Investigate and resolve feedback from the regulators following submission of regulatory
  • reports. This step requires close cross-functional coordination
  • Regulatory reporting group communicates and discloses

Source: Basel II FP&A Process Documentation

Risk Management: Operational Process – Activities

slide-20
SLIDE 20

19 |

Finance

  • Responsible for regulatory and economic capital calculations
  • Responsible for capital calculator changes when regulatory requirements

change

  • Attests accuracy of the risk-based capital numbers

Controllers Regulatory Reporting

  • Attests accuracy of the FFIEC 101 schedules
  • Maintains GL account hierarchy and coordinates chart of accounts (COA)

communications

Credit Risk

  • Defining and maintaining policies and procedures around risk parameters

(e.g. probability of default (PD) risk rating scale, loss given default (LGD) risk rating scale, and default flags)

Data Integrity

  • Provides data quality support to business data owners
  • Defines data governance policies specifying data quality thresholds and data

resolutions

Line of Business

  • Attests to accuracy and completeness of data
  • Supports Finance in exposure completeness and GL Reconciliation

Information Technology Group

  • Part of Bank’s ITG function supporting Bank’s systems
  • Manages data repositories and technology processes
  • Responsible for managing and resolving IT related issues

Moody’s Support

  • Support is provided under a contract between the bank and Moody’s

Risk Management: Operational Process – Roles

slide-21
SLIDE 21

20 |

Business Units FP&A

Gather securitizations and equity data for electronic transfer load

Regulatory Reporting

Manually input over the top entries, capital adjustments and intercompany eliminations

KEY CONTROLS Business units attest to accuracy and completeness of source data. Additional controls are currently being developed and put in place. POINTS OF CONTACT Wholesale Retail Traded Products Securities Securitizations and Equities KEY CONTROLS 1. Conduct attestation meetings with BUs that certify to the accuracy and completeness of source data 2. Review and analyze data integrity and proxy issues 3. Reconcile GL to RWA exposures 4. Perform RWA variance analysis 5. Provide attestation to RWA calculation to Regulatory Reporting 6. Present results to governance committees for review KEY CONTROLS 1. Review all workpapers and schedules by 2 levels of managers 2. Reconcile FFIEC 101 to FRY9C 3. Obtain certifications from all BUs that provide data 4. Resolve all data validation checks 5. Prepare reports in accordance with regulatory instructions 6. Perform variance analysis of all line items

Submit FFIEC 101 to regulators through IESUB Manually input Market Risk, Operational Risk , and acquisition information Develop and maintain source data Coordinate resolution of data integrity and exposure completeness issues Generate FFIEC 101 reports, including Capital and RWA

Data Management Office

Gather data for input to data models

Risk Management: Attestation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

21 |

  • Data integrity is a focal point for the industry, regulators, and UB
  • Processing time for RWA calculations
  • Matters Requiring Attention (MRA)
  • As implementation progresses and matures, variability in results must be

understood and explained to BTMU and other stakeholders

  • New products

The challenges outlined below are by no means unique to UB. These are challenges that have had to be addressed by all Basel II banks whether domestic or international

Current Challenges

slide-23
SLIDE 23

22 |

Project Management

  • Teamwork
  • Project

Management 101

Business & Data Requirements

  • Extra time spent
  • n gathering and

finalizing business & data requirements

  • Basis for change

control

  • Basis for Vendor

communication

Staffing and Resourcing

  • Right resources

with subject matter expertise

  • Training
  • Key resources in

testing / quality assurance

  • Key resource in

Data Analyst / bridge between IT and Business

Vendor Relationship

  • Business

knowledge

  • Receptive to

change / lack of bureaucracy

  • Incorporated into

initial planning and design

What Worked – Applicability for Basel III

slide-24
SLIDE 24

23 |

  • Reporting capital in accordance to

 Basel I general risk-based approach  Basel II advanced approach

  • CCAR stress testing exercises and reports (FR-Y14A, FR-Y14Q, FR-Y 14M)
  • Starting January 2015, Union Bank is required to report capital as per Basel III-

Standardized Approach

  • Report capital in accordance with BIII Advanced Approach
  • Phase in the G-SIB initiative – FRY-15
  • Single Counterparty Credit Limit
  • CCAR exercise with updated reporting requirements (FR-Y14A, FR-Y14Q, FR-Y 14M)
  • Basel III Liquidity risk (LCR and NSFR liquidity ratios) once US rules will be defined

Changing Regulatory Landscape

Current regulatory environment Future regulatory environment

23

slide-25
SLIDE 25

24 |

Impacts due to changing regulatory landscape

  • CCAR and Basel calculations should be integrated to be consistent with

regulatory filings to handle reconciliation issues between FRY-14 schedules and FR-Y 9C

  • Regulatory capital calculations:

 A greater data granularity is required for regulatory capital calculations  Regulatory capital optimization – sourcing collaterals and guarantees data – optimization algorithms for Standardized approach

  • Regulatory capital forecasting processes become more complex since

regulatory capital calculations require more granular data

  • FR-Y 15 requires credit and liquidity risk information

24