Implementation of of Joi oint Wavi viness/R /Rou oughness into - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

implementation of of joi oint wavi viness r rou oughness
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Implementation of of Joi oint Wavi viness/R /Rou oughness into - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Implementation of of Joi oint Wavi viness/R /Rou oughness into o DEM EM Si Simulation ons Fifth International al ITASCA S Symposium, F Februar ary 1 y 17-21, 21, 2020, 2020, V Vienna, Au Austria By: Ali Mortazavi, Professor


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Implementation of

  • f Joi
  • int Wavi

viness/R /Rou

  • ughness

into

  • DEM

EM Si Simulation

  • ns

Fifth International al ITASCA S Symposium, F Februar ary 1 y 17-21, 21, 2020, 2020, V Vienna, Au Austria

By: Ali Mortazavi, Professor School of Mining and Geosciences Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 2

Presentation O Outline

 Introduction  Significance of joint waviness in rock mass behaviour  Joint waviness/roughness implementation algorithm  Numerical simulation of the effect of joint waviness on opening stability  Conclusions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 3

Introduct ction

  • n

Rock mechanics problems fall into the class of " data limited " problems; one seldom knows enough about a rock mass to model it properly. It is obvious that data limited problems require a very different analysis approach from that of other applications such as electrical or aerospace engineering. In rock engineering applications the real world is too complex for our understanding and use

  • f numerical techniques are indispensable. Various modelling approaches have been

developed and used to model the rock behavior under static and dynamic loading conditions.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 4

Introduct ction

  • n

 Rock Engineering problems

 Deal with the most complicated engineering material (e.g. fractured rock at Large scales, etc.)  Has the highest design complexities:

 Rock/joints non-linear behaviour  Complex loading conditions  Complicated, large, and deep structures  Always lack design data !! Holling’s Classification of Engineering Problems

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 5

Si Signific ficance of

  • f Joint Waviness in R

Rock Mass Be Behaviour

 The nature of joint surfaces

 The nature of joint surface should be considered in in relation to it waviness and roughness  Waviness and roughness differ in terms of scale and their effect on shear strength  Waviness refers to first order asperities and patches and are not likely to shear off during movement  Roughness refers to 2nd order asperities which shear of upon movement  Waviness does not affect the joint frictional properties, but affect the apparent dip angle

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 6

Si Signific ficance of

  • f Joint Waviness in R

Rock Mass Be Behaviour

Failure plane with waviness Simplified failure plane considered in most analyses

Average dip

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 7

Si Signific ficance of

  • f Joint Waviness in R

Rock Mass Be Behaviour

 In the analysis of jointed rock mass behaviour, a realistic definition of block interfaces has always been a challenge  In all stability analysis methods, block interfaces are assumed to be of hard contacts with no physical roughness and thickness  Implementation of nonlinear joint constitutive models to describe the joint nonlinear behaviour (Bandis et al. 1983, Saeb & Amadei 1992, etc.) ??  This approach is difficult to apply in practice and is not feasible computationally. Also it is very difficult to determine the required input parameters for these nonlinear joint models  The behaviour of a jointed rock mass is mainly controlled by the geometry and

  • rientation of discontinuities
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 8

Si Signific ficance of

  • f Joint Waviness in R

Rock Mass Be Behaviour

A rough joint surface A smooth joint surface

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 9

Si Signific ficance of

  • f Joint Waviness in R

Rock Mass Be Behaviour

A natural joint surface (actual field scenario) An artificial joint surface with regular asperities (physical modelling) An artificial joint surface with no asperities (numerical modelling)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 10

Si Signific ficance of

  • f Joint Waviness in R

Rock Mass Be Behaviour

Practical Joint Constitutive Models

(Barton & Choubey, 1973)

10

tan .log

n r n

JCS JRC τ σ ϕ σ     = +          

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 11 Input joint data based on field mapping including:

  • roughness profile
  • orientation
  • aperture
  • filling material thickness and type
  • etc.

Start JProfiler

Prepare the input joint/data file for DDA including The above parameters Process input data including:

  • multiple joint sets at varying orientation, spacing, and type
  • varying roughness profile and scale
  • aperture
  • varying filling material, thickness and aperture

End JProfiler

Joint W Waviness/rou

  • ughness I

Implementation

  • n Algorithm
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 12

Joint W Waviness/rou

  • ughness I

Implementation

  • n Algorithm
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 13

Joint W Waviness/rou

  • ughness I

Implementation

  • n Algorithm
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 14

Joint W Waviness/rou

  • ughness I

Implementation

  • n Algorithm
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 15

Non-linear joint geometry implemented into a blocky mesh

Joint W Waviness/rou

  • ughness I

Implementation

  • n Algorithm
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 16

Discon

  • ntinuou
  • us Defor
  • rmation
  • n A

Analysis (DDA)

 Introduced by Shi (1988)  Is an implicit method in which displacements are the unknowns  Mechanical interactions between blocks are simulated by springs or penalties  System of equations are obtained by minimizing the total potential energy of the system  Performs both dynamic and static analysis

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 17

Discon

  • ntinuou
  • us Defor
  • rmation
  • n A

Analysis (DDA)

 Equilibrium Equations in DDA

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 18

Numerical Simulation o

  • f Joint W

Wavi viness Effect on Opening S Stability ty

 A simple geometry cavern was considered in a jointed rock mass  A horse shoe shape cavern of 7 m in span and 8.5 m in height was considered within the modelling domain  The rock mass consisted of two joint sets. The first set was dipping at 60 degree with a spacing of 0.8 m and the second set was horizontal with and average spacing of 3

  • m. An 11 m rock cover was assumed above the opening

 Two series of runs were carried out to evaluate the effect of joint roughness

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 19

Numerical Simulation o

  • f Joint W

Wavi viness Effect on Opening S Stability ty

Density (kg/m3) 2700 Modulus of Elasticity (GPa) 50 Poisson’s Ratio 0.25 Joint Cohesion (MPa) 0.0 Joint tensile strength (MPa) 0.0 Joint Friction angle (degree) 30

Rock Mass Data

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 20

Model I: A A bloc

  • cky D

DDA Mesh – Planar Joint Geom

  • metry

40 m 30 m

7 m 8 m 3 m 8 m

32.4 ton block Impacts at 12 m/s

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 21

Model II: A A bloc

  • cky D

DDA Mesh – Wavy J Joint Geom

  • metry
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 22

Model l I: : Simula latio ion R Result lts – Planar Joint Geom

  • metry

(a) (b) (c) (d)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 23

Model l II: : Simula latio ion R Result lts – Wavy Jo Joint G Geometry

(a) (b) (c) (d)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 24

Mod

  • dels I &

& II Simulation

  • n R

Results

Planar Joint Geometry Wavy Joint Geometry

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Fifth International ITASCA Symposium, February 17-21, 2020, Vienna, Austria

February 17-21, 2020 25

Su Summary & & Con

  • ncl

clusion

  • ns

 An useful algorithm was developed to incorporate the effect of waviness/roughness into modelling in a physically meaningful manner and allow for simulation of geometric aspects of joint non-linearity in discontinuum analysis  The analysis results show that the consideration of a small waviness (at a macro scale) or roughness (in a micro scale) for discontinuities significantly affects the discontinuum modelling results  When considering a wavy/rough discontinuity surface the rock mass behaves in a much stiffer manner and maintains its integrity even under intense dynamic loadings  It should be realized that even sophisticated modelling tools (DDA, DEM, etc.) can produce erroneous and unrealistic results without considering the physical and geometric aspects of discontinuities