IEEE-SA P2020 Kick-Off Meeting 20 September 2016, AutoWorld, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ieee sa p2020
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

IEEE-SA P2020 Kick-Off Meeting 20 September 2016, AutoWorld, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IEEE-SA P2020 Kick-Off Meeting 20 September 2016, AutoWorld, Brussels, Belgium Agenda Call to Order & Introductions Robert Stead Scope and Purpose of Working Group Robert Stead IEEE Patent Policy Michael Kipness


slide-1
SLIDE 1

IEEE-SA P2020

Kick-Off Meeting 20 September 2016, AutoWorld, Brussels, Belgium

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Call to Order & Introductions – Robert Stead
  • Scope and Purpose of Working Group – Robert Stead
  • IEEE Patent Policy – Michael Kipness
  • Approval of Working Group P&Ps – Robert Stead and Michael Kipness
  • Appointment of Officers – Robert Stead
  • Technical Discussion – Sven Fleck
  • Adjourn
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introductions

  • Robert Stead, Sense Media Group
  • Benjamin May, AMX13
  • Sven Fleck, SmartSurv
  • Patrick Denny, Valeo Vision Systems
  • Michael Kipness, IEEE-SA
  • CPIQ WG members
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Affiliation Declarations

  • Name
  • Job title
  • Declaration of which entity is supporting your

participation in this working group (company, individual or other organisation)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PAR Summary

  • Sponsoring Society and Committee: IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/Intelligent

Transportation Systems (VT/ITS)

  • PAR link: https://development.standards.ieee.org/get-

file/P2020.pdf?t=89521200003

  • Project information: https://standards.ieee.org/develop/project/2020.html
  • Contact Information for IEEE-SA Liaison

Name: Michael Kipness Email Address: m.Kipness@ieee.org Phone: +1 732-562-3810

  • Contact Information for Standards Representative

Name: Thomas Kurihara Email Address: t.kurihara@ieee.org

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Scope of PAR

This standard

addresses the fundamental attributes that contribute to image and quality for automotive Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) applications, as well as identifying existing metrics and other useful information relating to these attributes. It defines a standardized suite of objective and subjective test methods for measuring automotive camera image quality attributes, and it specifies tools and test methods to facilitate standards-based communication and comparison among OEM and Tier 1 system integrators and component vendors regarding automotive ADAS image quality.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Purpose of the PAR

Purpose:

  • This standard specifies methods and metrics for measuring and testing automotive image quality

to ensure consistency and create cross-industry reference points. Need for the Project:

  • Cameras are being used in greater numbers in automotive applications. Most of these systems

have been developed independently, with no standardised calibration or measurement of image

  • quality. Consumers have no standard reference point when using camera enabled systems, and

OEM/Tier 1 developers cannot compare camera systems side by side. Stakeholders for the Standard:

  • Automotive OEMs, Automotive Tier 1 suppliers, image processing software and hardware

companies, optics companies, sensor manufacturers, safety certification

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Today’s Meeting and General Expectations

See Q4 & Q7 on survey for details…

  • Define standard terminology, test methods and KPIs
  • Industry collaboration across supply chain
  • Increase knowledge transfer and harmonisation
  • Define scope, roles and responsibilities
  • Meet the other participants
  • Establish sub-groups and objectives
slide-9
SLIDE 9

IEEE Patent Policy

  • MK slides
slide-10
SLIDE 10

P2020 Policies and Procedures

  • Review of document
  • Q&A
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Appointment of P2020 Officers

Chair Robert Stead +44 208 133 5116 rob@sensemedia-events.com Vice Chair

  • Dr. Sven Fleck

+49 176 61040825 fleck@smartsurv.de Secretary Benjamin May +49 173 2386833 Benjamin.may@amx13.com Treasurer

  • Prof. Patrick Denny

+353 93 23184 patrick.denny@valeo.com

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Technical Discussion

  • Review of survey results
  • Response to proposed work packages
  • New packages proposed
  • Draft Outline – review and feedback
  • Establishment of work packages
  • Include / exclude in P2020
  • Proposal and nomination of work package leaders
  • Goals of ‘work package’ group
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Example of work packet aims

  • Definitions of relevant terms
  • Review of existing relevant standards
  • Review of existing relevant technical studies
  • Definition of proposed standard test / method / KPI /

measurement

  • Objective measurement outcomes
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Next meetings?

  • Teleconference – 6 weeks?
  • Finalise work packet teams with balanced representation
  • Present proposed draft outline for work packet
  • Complete definition of terms
  • Propose and confirm outstanding work packet leaders
  • Face to Face
  • 6 months?
  • Present review of relevant standards and studies
  • ???
slide-15
SLIDE 15

IEEE-SA Project 2020 Subproject Summary

2016-09-20

  • M. Kipness, R. Stead, S. Fleck, B. May, P. Denny
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Agenda

Questionnaire Feedback Discussion of Project Proposals Expectations Locations Next Steps

Lets make a motion… ... for the agenda of course.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

IEEE P2020 AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEM IMAGE QUALITY

ROBERT STEAD (CHAIR), DR. SVEN FLECK (VICE CHAIR), BENJAMIN MAY (SECRETARY), PROF. DR. PATRICK DENNY (TREASURER) Q1 SUGGESTED IMAGE QUALITY WORK PACKAGES Q2 IMAGE QUALITY WORK PACKAGES – ADDITIONAL PROPOSALS Q3 LEADING A SUB-GROUP Q4 WHAT DO YOU EXPECT MOST FROM P2020? Q5/6 P2020 MEETINGS [EVERY N WEEKS] ? 1. WEB, 2. FACE TO FACE

slide-18
SLIDE 18

IEEE P2020 AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEM IMAGE QUALITY

ROBERT STEAD (CHAIR), DR. SVEN FLECK (VICE CHAIR), BENJAMIN MAY (SECRETARY), PROF. DR. PATRICK DENNY (TREASURER) Q7 EXPECTATION OF P2020 MEETING @AUTOSENS CONFERENCE Q8 BEST LOCATION FOR THE NEXT FACE-TO-FACE MEETING? Q9 CONTACT INFORMATION

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Questionaire Feedback

Q1-3: Working Groups, Additional Proposals, Leaders of Sub Groups Q4: Expectations Q5&6: Meeting Cadence Q7: Expectation of Meeting Q8: Location for F2F meeting Q9: Contact Information

IEEE P2020 AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEM IMAGE QUALITY

ROBERT STEAD (CHAIR), DR. SVEN FLECK (VICE CHAIR), BENJAMIN MAY (SECRETARY), PROF. DR. PATRICK DENNY (TREASURER) Q1 SUGGESTED IMAGE QUALITY WORK PACKAGES Q2 IMAGE QUALITY WORK PACKAGES – ADDITIONAL PROPOSALS Q3 LEADING A SUB-GROUP Q4 WHAT DO YOU EXPECT MOST FROM P2020? Q5/6 P2020 MEETINGS [EVERY N WEEKS] ? 1. WEB, 2. FACE TO FACE
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Topic Summary

  • [proj #1] LED flicker standards
  • [proj #2.X] IQ for viewing
  • [proj #3.X] IQ for computer vision
  • [proj #4] Camera system interface standards
  • [proj #5] IQ safety standards beyond ISO26262
  • [proj #6] Mapping P2020 standards -> SAE levels
  • [proj #7] Customer perception quality standards
  • [proj #8] Video quality
  • [proj #9] Calibration quality standards
  • [proj #10] IQ requirements/specification standards

Initial proposals additional proposals

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Topic Summary

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Project Goal - [proj #1] LED flicker standards

Harmonization of different settings as this reduces impact on image and machine vision functions such as:

  • vehicle illumination
  • street illumination
  • traffic sign control
slide-23
SLIDE 23

[proj #2.X] IQ for viewing

Two subprojects proposed: [proj #2.1] IQ for viewing - component level

  • KPI standards and test setups

[proj #2.2] IQ for viewing - system level

  • KPI standards and test setups
slide-24
SLIDE 24

[proj #3.X] IQ for computer vision

Two subprojects proposed: [proj #3.1] IQ for computer vision - component level

  • KPI standards and test setups

[proj #3.2] IQ for computer vision - system level

  • KPI standards and test setups
slide-25
SLIDE 25

[proj #4] Camera system interface standards

especially to measurement systems including:

  • firmware requirements
  • "ONVIF for automotive"
slide-26
SLIDE 26

[proj #5] IQ safety standards beyond ISO26262

Potential extension of ISO26262 for image quality due to new applications for viewing systems in automotive

slide-27
SLIDE 27

[proj #6] Mapping P2020 standards -> SAE levels

minimum image quality requirements for each SAE level Link to autonomous driving

slide-28
SLIDE 28

[proj #7] Customer perception quality standards

End customer studies and correlation with defined system-level standards (e.g. proj #2.2)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

[proj #8] Video quality

  • framerate, jitter, lag, etc.
  • motion related issues (artefacts, motion blur, rolling shutter, etc.)
  • video coding standards and tools
slide-30
SLIDE 30

[proj #9] Calibration quality standards

  • KPI standards for intrinsic + extrinsic calibration
  • component and system calibration
  • plant and online calibration in the field
slide-31
SLIDE 31

[proj #10] IQ requirements/specification standards

  • standardization of variables, terms and system descriptions
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Q4: What to Expect…?

KPI-driven development

Industry Exchange

IQ Standardization

EU H2020 projects

Convergence of Viewing and Processing Viewing and Perception

Automotive specific requirements Harmonization of Expectations

Unified Testing

End-to-end automotive system description

Automotive lighting standardization (on- & offboard)

Terminology harmonization

Best In Class

Deep learning

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Q5&6: Meeting Cadence

  • Mean for Webmeeting:

Every 7.5 weeks

  • Mean for F2F Meeting:

Every 20 weeks

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Q8: LOCATION – Where next?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Q8: LOCATION – Where next?

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Next Steps

  • Organization of Sub Group meetings
  • Define Future milestones of Sub Groups
  • Introduction of Sub Group priorities and their respective leaders
  • Beer and Fun…
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Key Contacts – P2020 Officers

Chair Robert Stead +44 208 133 5116 rob@sensemedia-events.com Vice Chair

  • Dr. Sven Fleck

+49 176 61040825 fleck@smartsurv.de Secretary Benjamin May +49 173 2386833 Benjamin.may@amx13.com Treasurer

  • Prof. Patrick Denny

+353 93 23184 patrick.denny@valeo.com