iec project review
play

IEC Project Review East Side Access March 24, 2014 SCHEDULE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DRAFT CONFIDENTIAL March 2014 CPOC IEC Project Review East Side Access March 24, 2014 SCHEDULE MTACC will manage to a schedule at the low end of the preliminary range presented in January 2014 and the IEC plans to monitor the


  1. DRAFT CONFIDENTIAL March 2014 CPOC IEC Project Review  East Side Access March 24, 2014

  2. SCHEDULE • MTACC will manage to a schedule at the low end of the preliminary range presented in January 2014 and the IEC plans to monitor the project’s progress based on this schedule • Risks that could extend the schedule:  Complex interaction of architectural/MEP and systems work in GCT Caverns  Durations for track, traction power and signal installation in Manhattan  Time for Integrated Systems Testing • Opportunities to improve the schedule:  Early start of back-of-house work in GCT Caverns  Repackaging of track work to avoid conflicts in tunnels IEC 1

  3. COST • MTACC will manage to a cost at the low end of the preliminary range presented in January 2014 and the IEC plans to monitor the project’s cost based on this budget • Risks to increase cost:  Remaining risk in GCT Cavern Finish-out (CM007)  On some upcoming contracts there are no independent estimates available that support the revised budgets  The current staging of non–FRA Harold work increases delay risks and may jeopardize full funding of FRA work • Opportunities:  Timely delivery of work to reduce overhead cost and claim exposure IEC 2

  4. CONCERNS • Awards of Systems Package 1 (CS179) and Manhattan North Structures (CM006) are one month later than planned • The IEC considers the MTACC assumption of a procurement duration for GCT Concourse and Finishes (CM014B) of 7 months to be aggressive, in that historical data shows that MTACC averages 12 months for an RFP procurement IEC 3

  5. RECOMMENDATIONS • Based on the preliminary results of risk assessments, the IEC recommends the following:  Allocate schedule contingency in the IPS to reduce pressure building on internal milestones  Increase unallocated contingency to account for additional risk  Re-sequence elements of work in Harold, not associated with the FRA Grant, in order to improve schedule certainty and maximize FRA funding • Take action on the South Manhattan Structures (CM005) contract to ensure the timely completion of the critical path work IEC 4

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend