ICHARM CHALLENGES FOR CONTRIBUTION TO WATER RELATED DISASTER REDUCTION AND PREVENTION
- May. 27, 2014
ICHARM CHALLENGES FOR CONTRIBUTION TO WATER RELATED DISASTER - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ICHARM CHALLENGES FOR CONTRIBUTION TO WATER RELATED DISASTER REDUCTION AND PREVENTION May. 27, 2014 The 7 th GEOSS Asia-Pacific Symposium WG1(AWCI) YOICHI IWAMI ICHARM International Center for Water Hazard and Risk Management under the auspices
Mission of ICHARM (newly established at the first governing board on February 25, 2014)
The mission of ICHARM is to serve as the Global Centre of Excellence for Water Hazard and Risk Management by, inter alia, observing and analyzing natural and social phenomena, developing methodologies and tools, building capacities, creating knowledge networks, and disseminating lessons and information in order to help governments and all stakeholders manage risks of water- related hazards at global, national, and community levels. The hazards to be addressed include floods, droughts, landslides, debris flows, tsunamis, storm surges, water contamination, and snow and ice disasters. We envision a Center of Excellence housing a group of leading people, superior facilities, and a knowledge base which enables conducting i) innovative research, ii) effective capacity building, and iii) efficient information networking. Based on these three pillars, ICHARM will globally serve as a knowledge hub for best national/local practices and an advisor in policy making. ICHARM was established March 6, 2006 at Tsukuba
Delivering best available knowledge to local practices
Flood & drought risk assessment under climate change Supported by MEXT (Sousei Program)
IFNet/GFAS Sentinel Asia WWF, APWF Effective capacity building Innovative research Efficient information networking
UNESCO Centers
IRDR
UNISDR GP-GAR
Working as a Knowledge Hub on W&D through Technical Assistance Supported by ADB & UNESCO Flood Alert system Hazard mapping (IFAS, BTOP, RRI models)
Flood Preparedness Indicators/Standard WWAP, AWDO ・Master Course ・Ph.D. Course
Hazard Mapping Course River & Dam Course Supported by JICA
GEOSS AWCI Global Centre of Excellence for Water Hazard and Risk Management
Import satellite rainfall and ground-gauged data
Model creation Run-off analysis by PWRI distributed tank model Output: River discharge, Water level, Rainfall distribution Courtesy of JAXA
Global data: topography, land use, etc.
Aquifer model River course model Surfacemodel
Discharge reaches warning level Alert message by E-mail
and on the display for river management authorities
Evacuate from dangerous areas
Judge by River management authorities
input
16 participants from 6 countries (Philippine, Thailand, Viet Nam, Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria)
Centre for Humanitarian Assistance on Disaster Management) in Jakarta 18 participants from 10 countries (Singapore, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam)
Pampanga River
10,454km2 18 rainfall stations 11 water level stations
Cagayan River
27,280km2 5 rainfall stations 5 water level stations
5 10 15 20 25 30 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 2011/9/26 2011/9/27 2011/9/28 2011/9/29 2011/9/30 2011/10/1 2011/10/2 2011/10/3 2011/10/4 Rainfall (mm/hr) Discharge (m3/s) Rain (Ground) Measured Q Ground GSMaP original Ground with dam 5 10 15 20 25 2011/9/26 2011/9/27 2011/9/28 2011/9/29 2011/9/30 2011/10/1 2011/10/2 2011/10/3 2011/10/4 Rainfall (mm/hr)
Ground GSMaP original
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 2006/1/23 2006/1/24 2006/1/25 2006/1/26 2006/1/27 2006/1/28 2006/1/29 2006/1/30 2006/1/31 Rainfall (mm/hr) Discharge (m3/s) Rain Measured Q Ground GSMaP 3B42RT 5 10 15 20 25 2006/1/23 2006/1/24 2006/1/25 2006/1/26 2006/1/27 2006/1/28 2006/1/29 2006/1/30 2006/1/31 Rainfall (mm/hr) Ground GSMaP 3B42RT
IFAS results at Mayapyap station IFAS results at Gamu station
8
Gamu station Mayapyap station
2D Diffusion in Catchment Subsurface + Surface Vertical Infiltration 1D Diffusion in River
positioned within the same grid cell
Rainfall DEM Land Cover Cross Sec. Input Discharge
Inundation Output
Sayama, T. et al.: Rainfall-Runoff-Inundation Analysis of Pakistan Flood 2010 at the Kabul River Basin, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57(2), pp. 298-312, 2012.
13 Oct, 2011 by MODIS
10
1 : July 2 31 : Aug 1 62 : Sep 1 92 : Oct 1 123 : Nov 1 152 : Nov 30
0m 5m Simulation on Oct 18, 2011 by ICHARM RRI (Rainfall - Runoff - Inundation) model by using satellite data
(3B42RT) (Sayama 2011)
Nakhon Sawan Ayutthaya Bangkok Emergency inundation Simulation in Chao Phraya river basin in Thailand as of Oct.14, 2011
Two dimensional diffusion wave model
5 10 15 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 15-Jul 16-Jul 17-Jul 18-Jul 20-Jul 21-Jul 22-Jul 23-Jul 25-Jul 26-Jul 27-Jul 28-Jul 30-Jul 31-Jul 1-Aug 2-Aug 4-Aug 5-Aug 6-Aug 7-Aug 9-Aug 10-Aug 11-Aug 12-Aug 14-Aug 15-Aug 16-Aug 17-Aug satellite based rainfall(mm) discharge(m3/s)
11
Kabul river at Nowshera Target area for IFAS
Satellite based rainfall GSMaP ICHARM modified
15 July to 18 August
Kabul river Kabul river
+ RRI model Discharge input
UNESCO Project (2 years: 2012-14) Strategic Strengthening of Flood Warning and Management Capacity of Pakistan
6/3/2014 12
INPUT DATA :
(PMD ground- gauges, GSMaP and forecasted)
discharges OUTPUT DATA:
distribu- tion maps
graphs at specified locations
extents in mid-low Indus
[m] 0.0-0.5 0.5-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.5
FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING
Inundation area by RRI
INPUT DATA CHALLENGES:
boundary data
gauges network density
6/3/2014 13
Short- training in Japan of 11 Senior Managers from Pakistan 6 Pakistani
IPD) graduating
from ICHARM/GRIPS
MSc
ICHARM participation to international Workshop and Training in Pakistan
Indus-IFAS training at FFD Lahore
14
Flood Inundation Frequency Map in South Sudan based on MODIS Remote Sensing Analysis (April 3, 2014)
(ICHARM Web site http://www.icharm.pwri.go.jp/news/news_e/140403_south_sudan_e.html) A number of IDPs (Internally Displaced Persons) may currently live in high flood potential areas in South Sudan. As humanitarian and emergency aid to mitigate flood damages, a country wide flood hazard map is desired for effective
January 2003 to December 2013.
15
Original PRISM DEM(2km×2km) Including noise
Modified PRISM DEM(2km×2km) Only structures are remained.
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 0.0 2,000.0 4,000.0 6,000.0 8,000.0 10,000.0 12,000.0 altitude, m distance, m A B E D
After removing structures, making moving average of DEM in plain area and then compounding the structures and the modified DEM with GPS
Original PRISM DSM (12km×12km) Modified PRISM DSM (12km×12km)
PRISM DSM LP modified DSM with GPS plain A
A B
Elevation in A-B line
Projection of water level variation Projection of water depth variation Socio-economic impact assessement
House, industrial, agricultural damages
Downscaling/ Biais correction Uncertainty assessment Flood risk Drought risk
Water resources assessment, water stress, risk partition
Disaster Risk monitoring indices 1/10,1/25,1/50 Flood frequency map
Water Depth (m)
Projection of discharge variation Basin scale rainfall information Hydrological models
IFAS / BTOP / RRI
Various GCM experimental on future/current climate Various scenarios
GCM sim imulati tion
16
Uncertainty assessment Uncertainty assessment Uncertainty assessment
Indus Chao Phraya Mekong Solo Pampamga
17
Flood event period September 26th to October 4th, 2011
milions pesos Pampanga River Basin Calculated Caluculated Reported Caluculated Reported Maxium 1,754 777 54 Minimum 966 443 30 Pampanga Province (Total Affected Area 15,900ha) Calumpit Municipality (Total Affected Area 1,250ha) 1,376 37
Comparison of reported and calculated damage values Flood damage matrix (Bureau of Agricultural Statistics) Maximum damage Minimum damage
Reference: Okazumi, T., Miyamoto, M., Shrestha, B. B. and Gusyev, M.: Uncertainty estimation during the process of flood risk assessment in developing countries – case study in the Pampanga river basin -, Journal of Disaster Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 69-77, 2014.
This consultation is planned to offer water-related risk assessment methods, and help policy-makers and investors take risk sensitive actions. We show that extreme flood risks are measured by using improved methods and risk indices, and provide practical implications for Asia Pacific region
The results of several river basin examples to be introduced for explaining success, difficulty and limitation as case study
hazard, exposure, and vulnerability
in cooperation with MLIT and UNISDR Kobe office
national level information about risk indices, effectiveness of prevention efforts, and key risk drivers
Major inputs to the Asia-Pacific consultation
Risk Assessment
(Flood risk indicator : GWDRIs)
Vulnerability Assessment Quantifying bio-physical aspects of risks Hazard Assessment
conditions? Exposure Assessment
are affected by hazards?
significantly influence losses and damage?
coupled into human losses or economic damages?
Understanding risks in the human system
GWDRIs (Global Water-Related Disaster Risk Indicators) = Total number of fatalities due to the 50-yr flood = children deaths + elderly deaths + other deaths = f (affected people at 50-yr-flood, fatality rate, population distribution ratios)
(water depth and area)
(Number of people)
(10-yr stratified age- group population)