May 2010 May 2010 1 1
I ntegrated Solar and Wind I ntegrated Solar and Wind Energy Powers Oil Recovery Energy Powers Oil Recovery
Former St. Croix Alumina (SCA) Former St. Croix Alumina (SCA) site in site in
- St. Croix, VI
- St. Croix, VI
I ntegrated Solar and Wind I ntegrated Solar and Wind Energy Powers - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
I ntegrated Solar and Wind I ntegrated Solar and Wind Energy Powers Oil Recovery Energy Powers Oil Recovery Former St. Croix Alumina (SCA) Former St. Croix Alumina (SCA) site in site in St. Croix, VI St. Croix, VI May 2010 1 May 2010 1
May 2010 May 2010 1 1
May 2010 May 2010 2 2
*SCA
May 2010 May 2010 3 3
SCA was a bauxite refinery which utilized the “ “Bayer Process Bayer Process” ” to to produce alumina (aluminum oxide), an intermediate product in produce alumina (aluminum oxide), an intermediate product in aluminum manufacturing. The facility was closed in 2002 and is aluminum manufacturing. The facility was closed in 2002 and is slated for redevelopment. slated for redevelopment.
I n 1994, EPA became aware of a subsurface oil plume at the SCA site, which was later shown to be caused by commingled site, which was later shown to be caused by commingled petroleum products released at both SCA (formerly VI ALCO) and petroleum products released at both SCA (formerly VI ALCO) and the adjacent HOVI C (now HOVENSA) petroleum refinery. the adjacent HOVI C (now HOVENSA) petroleum refinery.
The contamination exists in the form of a light non-
aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) plume of petroleum (mostly diesel) floating on th liquid (LNAPL) plume of petroleum (mostly diesel) floating on the e groundwater in the Kingshill Aquifer and perched groundwater in groundwater in the Kingshill Aquifer and perched groundwater in unconsolidated sediments over the Kingshill. unconsolidated sediments over the Kingshill.
Groundwater is not utilized at the SCA facility; however, the Kingshill Aquifer is used upgradient of the facility and elsewhe Kingshill Aquifer is used upgradient of the facility and elsewhere re
May 2010 4
96 344 343 95 53 94 342 141 232
HOVIC Alumina L.L.C. Channel Flood Contro
S
roix A lum ina H O V IC
Property Line
Tank Tank
DEPT. PURCHASING PARKING LOT
TANK TANK
ALUMINA PLANT
H IG HW AY TO M ELV IN EVAN S COURT TENNIS GATE TRACK GATE DEPT. PURCHASING
E-5000' E-5500' E-6000' E-6500' E-7000' E-7500' E-8000'
HOVENSA L.L.C. GRID SYSTEM (ft.)
N-8500' N-9000' N-9500' N-10000' N-10500' N-11000' N-11500'
VW1 VW10 VW11 VW12 VW13 VW14 VW15 VW16 VW17 VW18 VW19 VW2 VW20 VW21 VW22 VW23 VW24 VW25 VW26 VW27 VW3 VW4 VW5 VW6 VW7 VW8 VW9R 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.73 1.70 1.11 0.00 0.00 1.25 0.82 1.45 1.64 1.40 0.00 1.80 0.95 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.00 1.03 1.16 1.63 0.91 0.00 0.00
LEGEND
OIL THICKNESS, FT ISOPACH CONTOUR OBSERVATION WELL RECOVERY WELL 0.00
Oil Thickness (ft) FEBRUARY 2000 DATA
0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1
May 2010 May 2010 5 5
Under a 2001 RCRA Consent Order, oil recovery began in January 2002 through use of four wind 2002 through use of four wind-
driven turbine compressors (WTCs) to drive compressed air operated, pneumatic total to drive compressed air operated, pneumatic total-
fluid pumps in six recovery wells. recovery wells.
The WTC power system was initially selected because electricity was was not available at this closed site when the project began (the fa not available at this closed site when the project began (the facility cility when operational had previously generated its own power). when operational had previously generated its own power).
The WTC-
powered system was estimated to cost approximately one third the cost to connect to the power grid. This provided an third the cost to connect to the power grid. This provided an economic advantage to using alternative energy instead of economic advantage to using alternative energy instead of additional construction to provide conventional power. additional construction to provide conventional power.
May 2010 May 2010 6 6
May 2010 May 2010 7 7
May 2010 May 2010 8 8
May 2010 May 2010 9 9
May 2010 May 2010 10 10
May 2010 May 2010 11 11
May 2010 May 2010 12 12
May 2010 May 2010 13 13
May 2010 May 2010 14 14
May 2010 May 2010 15 15
May 2010 May 2010 16 16
and the solar panels.
panels, or a combination of both, based on the power needed by the pump at that instant to lift fluid from the well.
there is no wind at night, then no fluid is pumped. So (all other things be equal) in general, you can expect maximum pumping rates and power consumption during day-light hours.
May 2010 May 2010 17 17
May 2010 May 2010 18 18
– lower capital cost, – lower maintenance cost (due to no theft of batteries and need for regular inspection & replacement of batteries); – and no hazardous waste generated by battery disposal.
May 2010 May 2010 19 19
May 2010 May 2010 20 20
May 2010 May 2010 21 21
May 2010 May 2010 22 22
May 2010 May 2010 23 23
May 2010 May 2010 24 24
Environmental Benefits – – Reduced emissions of greenhouse gasses (CO Reduced emissions of greenhouse gasses (CO
2 2 ) and other air
) and other air pollutants (SO pollutants (SO
X X , NO
, NO
X X )
) – – Reduced dependency on fossil fuels Reduced dependency on fossil fuels – – Reduced waste generation Reduced waste generation – – Reduced impact on local ecosystems and communities Reduced impact on local ecosystems and communities
Economic Benefits – – Reduced construction costs for remote sites where utility power Reduced construction costs for remote sites where utility power is unavailable is unavailable – – Power system is portable and can be moved to other sites Power system is portable and can be moved to other sites – – Minimizes on Minimizes on-
going power and hazardous waste disposal costs – – Federal tax credits for renewable energy use Federal tax credits for renewable energy use
May 2010 May 2010 25 25
May 2010 May 2010 26 26
May 2010 May 2010 27 27
May 2010 May 2010 28 28