I-90 / I-495 Interchange Improvements Project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

i 90 i 495 interchange
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

I-90 / I-495 Interchange Improvements Project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I-90 / I-495 Interchange Improvements Project Hopkinton-Westborough- Southborough March, 2015 MEPA Scoping Session Page Czepiga, EEA, MEPA Unit Renata Welch, P.E., MassDOT Highway Division Dave Derrig, AECOM MEPA Process Overview


slide-1
SLIDE 1

I-90 / I-495 Interchange Improvements Project Hopkinton-Westborough- Southborough

March, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

MEPA Scoping Session − Page Czepiga, EEA, MEPA Unit − Renata Welch, P.E., MassDOT Highway Division − Dave Derrig, AECOM

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MEPA Process Overview

  • MEPA requires state agencies study the environmental

consequences of their actions, including permitting and financial assistance.

  • Requires all feasible measures to avoid, minimize, and

mitigate damage to the environment.

  • Requires that state agencies minimize damage to the

environment by studying alternatives to the proposed project.

  • MEPA review is not a permitting process. MEPA requires

public study, disclosure, and development of feasible mitigation.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

When is MEPA review required?

  • Project requires a State Agency Action:

─ Proposed by a State Agency ─ State Permit ─ Financial Assistance ─ Land Transfer

  • Project meets or exceeds a MEPA review threshold:

─ Land, Rare Species, Wetlands, Water, Wastewater, Transportation, Energy, Air, Solid/Hazardous Waste, Historical/Archaeological Resources ─ MassDOT projects typically exceed thresholds associated with Land, Wetlands and Transportation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MEPA Applicability

  • The project is being undertaken by a state agency,

requires a permit from a state agency and may receive state funding

  • MEPA jurisdiction is broad in scope (not limited to one

area of environmental impact)

  • Triggered EIR Review Thresholds:

─ Land: Creation of >10 acres of impervious area ─ Wetlands: Alteration of >1 acre of Bordering Vegetated Wetlands; requires a Variance from Wetland Protection Act

slide-6
SLIDE 6

MEPA Process Schedule

  • ENF Filed with MEPA: 2/27/15
  • Environmental Monitor Notice: 3/11/15
  • MEPA Consultation Session: 3/19/15 (today’s meeting)
  • Comments Due: 3/31/15
  • Secretary’s Certificate Issued: 4/10/15
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Background

  • Historic congestion at interchange associated with toll plazas
  • MassDOT planning study (2012-2013) identifying deficiencies and

need for improvements

  • Implementation of All Electronic Toll System (AETS) July 15, 2016
  • MassDOT Feasibility Study (2014) to identify options to improve

safety and mobility

  • ENF filed March 2, 2015
  • Elimination of toll plazas will not eliminate congestion and safety

issues

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Safety and Operational Issues

  • Substandard geometry
  • Magnitude of passenger vehicle traffic
  • Magnitude of truck traffic
  • Vehicle conflicts (weaving sections) within interchange

area

  • Crash history at ramps and through interchange
slide-9
SLIDE 9

What Are We Trying to Do

  • Eliminate Weaving Movement Conflicts
  • Improve Interstate-to-Interstate Design
  • Reduce Congestion and Travel Time
  • Minimize Resource Impacts
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Concept Development & Screening

  • “Blank Slate” configurations
  • Modifications maintaining appropriate design speeds

and geometry

  • No design exceptions
  • Eight original concepts
  • Over 20 additional variations
  • Three advanced to ENF stage (Concept 22-3, Concept

14-5, Concept 14-4)

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Concept 22-3

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Concept 14-5

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Concept 14-4

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Based upon 2035 Priority

Development Areas scenario

  • Baseline (No Build)

represents conditions with toll plazas removed

  • Weekday AM and PM peak

hours analyzed

  • All three concepts provide

acceptable operations and address weaving and congestion concerns

Preliminary Traffic Modeling

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Insert video clip 2035 No Build PM

Future PM Peak Hour Conditions (2035) –No Build

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Future PM Peak Hour Conditions (2035) – Concept 14-4

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Preliminary Resource Impacts

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Concept 22-3 $285,000,000*
  • Concept 14-5

$220,000,000*

  • Concept 14-4

$165,000,000* note: does not include engineering, mitigation or ROW costs

* 2014 Dollars

Conceptual Cost Estimates

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Overall Project Schedule

1 2 3 4 5 6

Planning Study Feasibility Study/ Conceptual Design EA / EIR / 25% Design Final Design and Permitting Early Action Construction Construction Complete

Current Stage

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Next Steps

  • Continue to refine concepts and impacts calculations
  • Work with MPOs (Boston, Central Mass) to include

project in long-range plans

  • Procure consultant services for environmental

documentation / 25% / permitting

  • Prepare Environmental Assessment / Environmental

Impact Report for NEPA and MEPA and obtain permits

  • Design and Construction
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Public Comment

Comments on the proposed project must be submitted by March 31, 2015 in writing via hard copy, email, or fax to:

1. Secretary Matthew Beaton Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Attn: MEPA Office, Page Czepiga 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 2. Email comments to: Page.Czepiga@state.ma.us 3. Fax#: (617) 626-1181