HUMAN-AUTOMATION COLLABORATION STRATEGIES dr. Jonas Lundberg, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

human automation collaboration strategies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HUMAN-AUTOMATION COLLABORATION STRATEGIES dr. Jonas Lundberg, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HUMAN-AUTOMATION COLLABORATION STRATEGIES dr. Jonas Lundberg, Linkping University, Sweden Jonas.lundberg@LiU.se sa Svensson, Linkping University, Sweden Asa.Svensson@LiU.se dr. Jimmy Johanson, Linkping University, Sweden


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HUMAN-AUTOMATION COLLABORATION STRATEGIES

This study was sponsored by the Swedish Transport Administration and the Air Navigation Services of Sweden (LFV)

  • dr. Jonas Lundberg, Linköping University, Sweden

Åsa Svensson, Linköping University, Sweden

  • dr. Jimmy Johanson, Linköping University, Sweden

Billy Josefsson, Air Navigation Services of Sweden (LFV), Sweden

Jonas.lundberg@LiU.se Billy.Josefsson@LFV.se Asa.Svensson@LiU.se Jimmy.Johansson@LiU.se

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SAFETY PROBLEM

  • Separation Incidents 2011-2012 


in Swedish Air Space

  • Either ATC did not pay sufficient

attention to the tools (should try harder)

  • Or the tools were not sufficiently clear


(should be designed better)

Perhaps I should check one more time?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Case study - to uncover basic human-automation collaboration strategies

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 3 Planner - overflight
  • 3 Planner - climb/descend
  • 3 Executive - overflight
  • 3 Executive - climb / descend

6 Planner 6 Executive

Overflight and climb / descend areas

Divided into four conditions 6 male, 6 female, 9-38 years of experience

Scenarios with irregularities During verification-of- competence training

12 fully licensed ATCOS with valid ratings

CASE STUDY

MTCD was only used in overflight area

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SITUATION AWARENESS

Based on Lundberg (2015) A process … … of understanding what goes on in uncertain dynamic situations…. … through collaboration with automated tools and other agents…

Processes States Systems eye tracking actions video/audio recordings SA, how? SA, what? SA, where? Dimension Primary measure

Lundberg, J. (2015). Situation Awareness Systems, States and Processes: A holistic framework. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2015.1008601.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CONFLICT AND RISK DISPLAY

SA Systems: Automation

slide-7
SLIDE 7

FLIGHT LEG

SA Systems: Automation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

INDICATORS

SA Systems: Automation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SA Process: Eye tracking recording

When a conflict becomes visible on CARD, then what does the ATCO do?

EPISODE ANALYSIS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SA Process: Eye tracking recording

GAZE PLOT based on eye tracking recording

EPISODE ANALYSIS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SA Process: Eye tracking recording

When a conflict becomes visible on CARD, then what does the ATCO do?
 ( What role does CARD and FLEG have in conflict detection?)

EPISODE ANALYSIS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

STRATEGIES

  • A: Rely primarily on the automation, examine

conflicts as they emerge on MTCD

  • B: Rely primarily on an own independent scan,

check MTCD now and then.

  • …. : Combinations, variations?

SA Process: Collaboration and coordination

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • A. RELY ON AUTOMATION
slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • VS. B: INDEPENDENT SCAN
  • a. checking card first
  • b. checking card AFTER examining the conflict

vs

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • E. LOOKING AHEAD

An ideal situation

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • C. DELAY IN DETECTION

… how could this result in separation infringements….? 48 second delay

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • D. SHORT TIME TO CONFLICT

… how could this result in separation infringements….?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

…INFRINGEMENTS…?

  • A delay in conflict examination (C)
  • + short time to conflict (D)
  • could result in an infringement.