How to Treat Proximal Humeral Fractures: Pearls to Successful - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how to treat proximal humeral fractures pearls to
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How to Treat Proximal Humeral Fractures: Pearls to Successful - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How to Treat Proximal Humeral Fractures: Pearls to Successful Management Brad Parsons, MD Associate Professor and Residency Director Chief, Shoulder Service Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Conflict of Interest Consultant:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

How to Treat Proximal Humeral Fractures: Pearls to Successful Management

Brad Parsons, MD Associate Professor and Residency Director Chief, Shoulder Service Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Conflict of Interest

  • Consultant:

– Arthrex, Inc

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Spectrum of Challenges

  • Historically many managed nonoperatively

– “Acceptable outcomes”

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Patient Selection

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Patient Factors

  • Majority of patients older

– Osteoporotic fracture

  • Comminution
  • Challenging ORIF
  • Historically nonop or Hemi
  • Weightbearing arms

– Not always “low demand”

  • Preserve independence?
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Case 1: 77 y/o female, LHD

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

X-Rays Provide the Bulk of Information

APER Outlet Axillary

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CT Can Be Helpful Too

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Beware the Varus Fx

  • Varus is a problem

– Calcar Comminution – Unstable – Often progresses – Highest rate of hardware failure and cutout

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Valgus Impacted Fracture

  • Doesn’t fit well into a

classification system

– Lower AVN rate – Special consideration for treatment

– Jakob et al. JBJS. 73B. 1991

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Understanding the Deforming Forces

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Don’t Forget About Version

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Which Fx’s Do I Non-op?

  • Preserved relationships:

– Preserved head-tuberosity relationship – Minimal varus (tuberosity) – Valgus tolerated better – No block to rotation (version)

  • Nondominant > dominant
  • Pt education of outcome
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Surgical Indications/Options

  • Displaced Fx’s in Active Patients

– Distorted Anatomy

  • Tub-Head
  • Head Inclination
  • Version
  • Options:

– Fixation

  • Percutaneous Tx
  • ORIF with locked plate

– Arthroplasty

  • Hemi vs. Reverse
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Indications for ORIF

  • Most Fractures

– 2, 3 and 4-parts – Varus Fx’s – Valgus Impacted

  • Too late for pinning
  • Osteoporotic Fxs
  • Comminution
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Classic Arthroplasty Fx Indications

  • 4 Part Fx-Dislocation
  • Head Split
  • Elderly 4-Part/ Some 3-

Part

  • Some Chronic Situations

– Nonunion – Malunion

slide-20
SLIDE 20

When Do I Do a Hemi?

  • Younger, unreconstructable (e.g. head split)
  • Older but good tuberosities (not

comminuted)

  • Good protoplasm
  • Physiologic demands
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Indications for Reverse

  • Elderly patient (> 75)
  • Poor tuberosity bone

– Comminuted – Osteopenic

  • Preexisting cuff tear?
  • Preexisting OA/DJD
  • Poor protoplasm for

tuberosity healing

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Goal of Surgery: Restore Relationships

  • Anatomic is Best

– Not always possible – Elderly comminuted fxs

  • Restore Calcar Integrity

– Bone Contact Key

  • Tuberosity Relationships

– Restore Inclination – Restore Version

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Conclusions

  • Most Fx’s can be non-op
  • Close monitoring:

– Especially varus fx’s

  • Tuberosity malposition poorly tolerated
  • Most surgical indications is ORIF
  • Reverse >> Hemi
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Thank You

The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY