pt considerations for the nonoperatively treated proximal
play

PT Considerations for the Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humerus - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PT Considerations for the Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humerus Fractures John Cavanaugh PT MEd ATC SCS 2 3 Proximal Humerus Fractures - Intro Incidence: 4-6% of all fractures 3rd most common fx pattern seen in elderly Injury


  1. PT Considerations for the Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humerus Fractures John Cavanaugh PT MEd ATC SCS

  2. 2

  3. 3

  4. Proximal Humerus Fractures - Intro  Incidence: 4-6% of all fractures  3rd most common fx pattern seen in elderly  Injury ratio: 2:1 female to male  ↑’ ed age correlates with increasing fracture risk in women  Mechanism of injury:  Low-energy falls elderly with osteoporotic bone  High-energy trauma young individuals  Concomitant soft tissue and neurovascular injuries (axillary nerve) 4

  5. Non-Operative Management  85% PHF are minimally displaed & managed non-operatively  1, 2, 3 part surgical neck fractures  Greater tuberosity fractures displaced < 5mm  Good to Excellent outcomes ~85% – Koval KJ J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 – Gaebler C, Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 – Kruithof RN J Orthop Traumatol 2017 5

  6. Non-Operative Management Fracture healing : Rehabilitation: 3 distinct but overlapping 3 distinct but overlapping stages phases  Inflammatory stage  Maximum Protection Phase  Repair stage  Moderate Protection Phase  Late remodeling stage  Return to Function Phase 6

  7. Proximal Humerus Fracture Non-Operative Rehabilitation Guielines  General Principles  Phyisician directed  Radiograph evidence of healing  Realistic Goals  Early Mobilization – Hodgson J Shld Elbow Surg 2007 – Lefevre-Colau JBJS 2007 7

  8.  Randomized, prospective/controlled trial of minimally displaced PHF  Group A: (N 44) Immediate ROM  Group B: (N 42) 3 weeks of immobilization  Craft Shoulder Disability Questionnaire  Group A 42.8% (1 year) 43.2% (2 year)  Group B 72.5% (1 year) 59.5% (2 year ) – Reported 3x more pain on movement, 2x night disturbance 8

  9.  RCT: 74 patients with an impacted PHF (1,2,3 part)  Group A: 37 passive mobilization within 3 days of frx  Group B: 37 sling immobilization x 3 weeks  Constant Global Score (3 months f/u)  (A) 71 vs (B) 61.1  Mean change in pain (6 weeks →3 mo) (A) 34.9 vs (B) 19.2  Fracture-healing rate 100% (A & B)  Compliance to PT sessions = 70% (A & B) 9

  10. Proximal Humerus Fracture Non-Operative Rehabilitation Guielines  General Principles  Physical Therapist guided – MD directed clinical guideline  Individualized  Criteria based progression  Communication w/MD 10

  11. Maximum Protection Phase (0-6 weeks) Goals : Control pain and swelling Protect fracture site / Allow for healing Maintain ROM/Function distal extremity Improve AAROM: Elevation to 110 ° and ER to 30 ° Independent with home exercise program 11

  12. Maximum Protection Phase (0-6 weeks)  Treatment Interventions:  Modalities (Ice / TENS ) (Moist Heat after 10 days)  Sling immobilization (duration / schedule per MD)  Cervical & distal extremity AROM  Postural correction (as indicated)  Codman’s / Pendulum execises (when tolerated) 12

  13. Maximum Protection Phase (0-6 weeks)  Treatment Interventions:  PROM: Elevation / ER  AAROM (when tolerated): – Elevation / ER  Aquatic therapy 13

  14.  Re-education for dyssynergic shoulders  Adjunct to traditional therapeutic exercise  Proprioceptive input 14

  15. Maximum Protection Phase (0-6 weeks)  Treatment Interventions  Scapular and Deltoid strengthening (when tolerated)  Soft Tissue Massage  Home exercise program – consider insurance situation 15

  16. Maximum Protection Phase (0-6 weeks)  Criteria for Advancement  Tolerating sling discontinuation with self-care, ADL’s  AAROM: Elevation to 110° ER to 30° 16

  17. Moderate Protection Phase (4-12 weeks)  AAROM: Wand FF/ER  Pulleys (when appropriate)  120 degrees FF  Humeral Head Control  Active IR ROM (Towel pass) 17

  18. Moderate Protection Phase (4-12 weeks)  Glenohumeral mobilization  Scapular stabilization exercises 18

  19. Moderate Protection Phase (4-12 weeks)  Airdyne Bike Upper Body Ergometer  Scapular and Deltoid PRE’s 19

  20. Moderate Protection Phase (4-12 weeks)  Rototor cuff Isometrics  Dictated by gains in ER ROM  Scaption (PRE) 20

  21. Moderate Protection Phase (4-12 weeks)  Criteria for Advancement / Goals  AAROM : Elevation to 150° ER to 65°, IR to 70°  Improve scapulohumeral rhythm to WNL < 90° elevation (scapular plane)  Improve muscle strength to > 4/5  Independent with home exercise program as instructed 21

  22. Strengthening / Function Phase (10-? Weeks)  Goals:  Improve scapulohumeral rhythm to WNL < 120°elevation (scapular plane)  Improve muscle strength to 5/5  Maximize ROM, strength, flexibility so to meet the demands of ADL and/or sports participation where indicated  Independent with home exercise program as instructed 22

  23. Strengthening / Function Phase (10-? Weeks)  Treatment Interventions  Towel Stretch (IR)  Posterior capsule stretching  Pect Minor Streching  Rototor cuff Isotonics 23

  24. Strengthening / Function Phase (10-? Weeks)  Treatment Interventions  PNF (Manual resistance → theraband)  Sport Specific Activites (if and when indicated) – e.g. golf, tennis, etc) 24

  25. Summary  Rehabilitation Guidelines: PHF  Directed by MD, Guided by PT  Radiological evidence of healing  Early Mobilization  Criteria for advancement  Succesful Outcome 25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend