PT Considerations for the Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humerus - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pt considerations for the nonoperatively treated proximal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PT Considerations for the Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humerus - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PT Considerations for the Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humerus Fractures John Cavanaugh PT MEd ATC SCS 2 3 Proximal Humerus Fractures - Intro Incidence: 4-6% of all fractures 3rd most common fx pattern seen in elderly Injury


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PT Considerations for the Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humerus Fractures

John Cavanaugh PT MEd ATC SCS

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Proximal Humerus Fractures - Intro

  • Incidence: 4-6% of all fractures

 3rd most common fx pattern seen in elderly

  • Injury ratio: 2:1 female to male

 ↑’ed age correlates with increasing fracture risk in women

  • Mechanism of injury:

 Low-energy falls elderly with osteoporotic bone  High-energy trauma young individuals

  • Concomitant soft tissue and neurovascular injuries

(axillary nerve)

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Non-Operative Management

  • 85% PHF are minimally displaed & managed

non-operatively

 1, 2, 3 part surgical neck fractures  Greater tuberosity fractures displaced < 5mm

  • Good to Excellent outcomes ~85%

– Koval KJ J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 – Gaebler C, Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 – Kruithof RN J Orthop Traumatol 2017

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Non-Operative Management

Fracture healing: 3 distinct but overlapping stages

 Inflammatory stage  Repair stage  Late remodeling stage

Rehabilitation: 3 distinct but overlapping phases

 Maximum Protection Phase  Moderate Protection Phase  Return to Function Phase

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Proximal Humerus Fracture Non-Operative Rehabilitation Guielines

  • General Principles

 Phyisician directed  Radiograph evidence of healing  Realistic Goals  Early Mobilization

– Hodgson J Shld Elbow Surg 2007 – Lefevre-Colau JBJS 2007

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Randomized, prospective/controlled trial of minimally displaced PHF
  • Group A: (N 44) Immediate ROM
  • Group B: (N 42) 3 weeks of immobilization
  • Craft Shoulder Disability Questionnaire

 Group A 42.8% (1 year) 43.2% (2 year)  Group B 72.5% (1 year) 59.5% (2 year)

– Reported 3x more pain on movement, 2x night disturbance

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • RCT: 74 patients with an impacted PHF (1,2,3 part)
  • Group A: 37 passive mobilization within 3 days of frx
  • Group B: 37 sling immobilization x 3 weeks
  • Constant Global Score (3 months f/u)

 (A) 71 vs (B) 61.1  Mean change in pain (6 weeks→3 mo) (A) 34.9 vs (B) 19.2

  • Fracture-healing rate 100% (A & B)
  • Compliance to PT sessions = 70% (A & B)

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Proximal Humerus Fracture Non-Operative Rehabilitation Guielines

  • General Principles

 Physical Therapist guided

– MD directed clinical guideline

  • Individualized
  • Criteria based progression
  • Communication w/MD

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Maximum Protection Phase (0-6 weeks)

11

Goals: Control pain and swelling

Protect fracture site / Allow for healing Maintain ROM/Function distal extremity Improve AAROM: Elevation to 110° and ER to 30° Independent with home exercise program

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Maximum Protection Phase (0-6 weeks)

  • Treatment Interventions:

 Modalities (Ice / TENS ) (Moist Heat after 10 days)  Sling immobilization (duration / schedule per MD)  Cervical & distal extremity AROM  Postural correction

(as indicated)

 Codman’s / Pendulum execises

(when tolerated)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Maximum Protection Phase (0-6 weeks)

  • Treatment Interventions:

 PROM: Elevation / ER  AAROM (when tolerated):

– Elevation / ER

 Aquatic therapy

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Re-education for

dyssynergic shoulders

  • Adjunct to traditional

therapeutic exercise

  • Proprioceptive input

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Maximum Protection Phase (0-6 weeks)

  • Treatment Interventions

 Scapular and Deltoid

strengthening (when tolerated)

 Soft Tissue Massage  Home exercise program

– consider insurance situation

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Maximum Protection Phase (0-6 weeks)

  • Criteria for Advancement

 Tolerating sling discontinuation

with self-care, ADL’s

 AAROM: Elevation to 110°

ER to 30°

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Moderate Protection Phase (4-12 weeks)

  • AAROM: Wand FF/ER
  • Pulleys (when appropriate)

 120 degrees FF  Humeral Head Control

  • Active IR ROM (Towel pass)

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Moderate Protection Phase (4-12 weeks)

  • Glenohumeral mobilization
  • Scapular stabilization

exercises

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Moderate Protection Phase (4-12 weeks)

  • Airdyne Bike

Upper Body Ergometer

  • Scapular and

Deltoid PRE’s

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Moderate Protection Phase (4-12 weeks)

  • Rototor cuff Isometrics

 Dictated by gains in ER ROM

  • Scaption (PRE)

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Moderate Protection Phase (4-12 weeks)

  • Criteria for Advancement / Goals

 AAROM :

Elevation to 150° ER to 65°, IR to 70°

 Improve scapulohumeral rhythm to WNL < 90° elevation

(scapular plane)

 Improve muscle strength to > 4/5  Independent with home exercise program as instructed

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Strengthening / Function Phase (10-? Weeks)

  • Goals:

 Improve scapulohumeral rhythm to

WNL < 120°elevation (scapular plane)

 Improve muscle strength to 5/5  Maximize ROM, strength, flexibility so to meet the

demands of ADL and/or sports participation where indicated

 Independent with home exercise program as instructed

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Strengthening / Function Phase (10-? Weeks)

  • Treatment Interventions

 Towel Stretch (IR)  Posterior capsule stretching  Pect Minor Streching  Rototor cuff Isotonics

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Strengthening / Function Phase (10-? Weeks)

  • Treatment Interventions

 PNF (Manual resistance → theraband)  Sport Specific Activites (if and when indicated)

– e.g. golf, tennis, etc)

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Summary

  • Rehabilitation Guidelines: PHF

 Directed by MD, Guided by PT  Radiological evidence of healing  Early Mobilization  Criteria for advancement

  • Succesful Outcome

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26