how geophysicists intuition
play

How Geophysicists Intuition Fuzzy-Motivated Solution Helps Seismic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . How De-Noising under . . . Tikhonov . . . How Geophysicists Intuition Fuzzy-Motivated Solution Helps Seismic Data What If Signals Are . . . Limitation of a . . . Processing Solution: Using


  1. Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . How De-Noising under . . . Tikhonov . . . How Geophysicists’ Intuition Fuzzy-Motivated Solution Helps Seismic Data What If Signals Are . . . Limitation of a . . . Processing Solution: Using Local . . . Expert Knowledge: . . . Afshin Gholamy 1 and Vladik Kreinovich 2 Home Page Title Page 1 Department of Geological Sciences 1 Department of Computer Science ◭◭ ◮◮ University of Texas at El Paso ◭ ◮ 500 W. University El Paso, Texas 79968, USA Page 1 of 14 afshingholamy@gmail.com vladik@utep.edu Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  2. Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . 1. Expert Knowledge Is Needed In Geophysics How De-Noising under . . . • In geophysics, signals come with noise; this noise af- Tikhonov . . . fects the resulting images and maps. Fuzzy-Motivated Solution What If Signals Are . . . • It is therefore desirable to minimize the effect of this Limitation of a . . . noise. Solution: Using Local . . . • Sometimes, we know the probabilities of different val- Expert Knowledge: . . . ues of signal and noise. Home Page • In such situations, we can use statistical filtering tech- Title Page niques to find optimal de-noising. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Since the original Wiener filter, many filtering statisti- ◭ ◮ cal techniques have been invented. Page 2 of 14 • In geophysics, it is often impossible to directly measure the physical characteristics of the rocks at large depths. Go Back • Thus, we do not know the actual probabilities. Full Screen • So, we have to rely on expert knowledge. Close Quit

  3. Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . 2. How Geophysical Expert Knowledge Is Used How De-Noising under . . . Now Tikhonov . . . • Now, the geophysical expert knowledge is mainly used Fuzzy-Motivated Solution to select the most physically reasonable Earth model. What If Signals Are . . . Limitation of a . . . • This trial-and-error approach has led to many success- Solution: Using Local . . . ful applications, such as finding oil. Expert Knowledge: . . . • However, this search-in-the-dark processes is very time- Home Page consuming. Title Page • We need faster ways to translate expert knowledge into ◭◭ ◮◮ data processing techniques. ◭ ◮ • We show that fuzzy techniques can help with such Page 3 of 14 translation. Go Back • We show that the results are in good accordance with the empirically successful semi-heuristic methods. Full Screen Close Quit

  4. Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . 3. How De-Noising under Uncertainty Is Done How De-Noising under . . . Now: Case of Smooth Signals Tikhonov . . . • In many practical situations, we know that the actual Fuzzy-Motivated Solution signal x ( t ) is smooth. What If Signals Are . . . Limitation of a . . . • In contrast, the observed signal � x ( t ) contains non- smooth noise and is, thus, non-smooth. Solution: Using Local . . . Expert Knowledge: . . . • Often, we know how smooth is the actual signal: � Home Page x ( t )) 2 dt ≤ b 2 for some b . ( ˙ Title Page • Among all such smooth signals, we find X ( t ) which is ◭◭ ◮◮ the closest to � x ( t ): � ◭ ◮ x ( t )) 2 dt → min . ( X ( t ) − � Page 4 of 14 � x ( t )) 2 dt under the con- • We want to minimize ( X ( t ) − � � Go Back x ( t )) 2 dt ≤ b 2 . straint ( ˙ Full Screen • According to Lagrange multiplier technique, this is � � Close x ( t )) 2 dt + λ · C ( t )) 2 dt → min . ( ˙ equivalent to ( X ( t ) − � Quit

  5. Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . 4. Tikhonov Regularization: Problems How De-Noising under . . . • In Fourier transform, the resulting Tikhonov regular- Tikhonov . . . ˆ x ( ω ) � Fuzzy-Motivated Solution ization has the form ˆ X ( ω ) = 1 + λ · | ω | 2 . What If Signals Are . . . • This works well when we know how smooth is the orig- Limitation of a . . . inal signal, i.e., when we know λ . Solution: Using Local . . . Expert Knowledge: . . . • Often, we do not know smoothness. Home Page • So, after applying this idea, we realize that an addi- Title Page tional smoothing ∆ λ is needed. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Alas, applying this additional smoothing to ˆ X ( ω ), we get a result different from smoothing w/ λ ′ = λ + ∆ λ : ◭ ◮ ˆ ˆ Page 5 of 14 � x ( ω ) � x ( ω ) (1 + λ · | ω | 2 ) · (1 + ∆ λ · | ω | 2 ) � = 1 + λ ′ · | ω | 2 . Go Back Full Screen • Also, in geosciences, the signal is often discontinuous, since there are abrupt transitions (like Moho). Close Quit

  6. Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . 5. Fuzzy-Motivated Solution How De-Noising under . . . • We know that X ( t ) ≈ � x ( t ) . Tikhonov . . . • Smoothness means that if t and t ′ are close, then Fuzzy-Motivated Solution X ( t ) ≈ X ( t ′ ) and thus, X ( t ) ≈ � x ( t ′ ). What If Signals Are . . . Limitation of a . . . • Let µ ( t, t ′ ) describe closeness; then, for each t , we get Solution: Using Local . . . x ( t ′ ) with degree µ ( t, t ′ ). X ( t ) = � Expert Knowledge: . . . • The usual centroid defuzzification leads to Home Page � µ ( t, t ′ ) · � x ( t ) dt ′ � X ( t ) = Title Page . µ ( t, t ′ ) dt ′ ◭◭ ◮◮ • Under reasonable assumptions, closeness is described ◭ ◮ by a Gaussian membership function � � Page 6 of 14 − ( t − t ′ ) 2 µ ( t, t ′ ) = exp . 2 σ 2 Go Back � � − ( t − t ′ ) 2 � Full Screen x ( t ′ ) · exp dt ′ . • Thus, we get X ( t ) = C · � 2 σ 2 Close Quit

  7. Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . 6. Fuzzy-Motivated Solution (cont-d) How De-Noising under . . . � � − ( t − t ′ ) 2 � Tikhonov . . . x ( t ′ ) · exp dt ′ . • We get X ( t ) = C · � 2 σ 2 Fuzzy-Motivated Solution � 1 � What If Signals Are . . . 2 · σ 2 · ω 2 X ( ω ) = ˆ • In Fourier transform, ˆ x ( ω ) · exp � . Limitation of a . . . Solution: Using Local . . . • In this case, two consecutive smoothings are equivalent Expert Knowledge: . . . to a single smoothing of this type: Home Page � 1 � � 1 � 2 · ( σ ′ ) 2 · ω 2 2 · ( σ ′′ ) 2 · ω 2 = ˆ ˆ X ( ω ) · exp x ( ω ) · exp Title Page � , ◭◭ ◮◮ = σ 2 + ( σ ′ ) 2 . where ( σ ′′ ) 2 def ◭ ◮ • Moreover, one can prove that this is the only smoothing Page 7 of 14 with this property. Go Back • The resulting shape regularization has indeed been suc- Full Screen cessfully used in geophysics (Sergey Fomel et al.). Close Quit

  8. Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . 7. What If Signals Are Sometimes Not Smooth? How De-Noising under . . . • Many geophysical structures have abrupt boundaries. Tikhonov . . . Fuzzy-Motivated Solution • Thus, the signals are not smooth: they have abrupt What If Signals Are . . . transitions corresponding to these boundaries. Limitation of a . . . • To describe such signals, it is thus natural to use piece- Solution: Using Local . . . wise smooth models ( splines ). Expert Knowledge: . . . Home Page • Splines have indeed been efficiently used in data pro- cessing, in particular, in seismic data processing. Title Page • However, splines do not explain what type of a transi- ◭◭ ◮◮ tion this is. ◭ ◮ • A more adequate description should take into account Page 8 of 14 the specifics of the corresponding transitions. Go Back • In general, specifics means that we have a family of Full Screen models m ( t,� c ), with parameters � c = ( c 1 , . . . , c k ). Close Quit

  9. Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . 8. Families of Models How De-Noising under . . . • A smooth dependence can be locally well described by Tikhonov . . . a linear model Fuzzy-Motivated Solution What If Signals Are . . . x ( t ) ≈ m ( t ) = c 1 + c 2 · t. Limitation of a . . . • A wave can be locally described by a sinusoid Solution: Using Local . . . x ( t ) ≈ m ( t ) = c 1 · cos( c 2 · t + c 3 ) . Expert Knowledge: . . . Home Page • There are also finite-parametric models for such non- Title Page smooth phenomena as phase transitions. ◭◭ ◮◮ • In all the above cases, a model with a finite number of ◭ ◮ parameters is only an approximation: Page 9 of 14 – the longer the period of time that we need to cover, Go Back – the less accurate the model becomes. Full Screen • Thus, a reasonable idea is to use each such model only locally. Close Quit

  10. Expert Knowledge Is . . . How Geophysical . . . 9. Limitation of a Traditional Piece-Wise Smooth How De-Noising under . . . (Spline) Approach: Example Tikhonov . . . • A smooth function x ( t ), in the vicinity of each point Fuzzy-Motivated Solution t 0 , can be well approximated by a linear function: What If Signals Are . . . Limitation of a . . . x ( t ) ≈ m ( t ) = x ( t 0 ) + ˙ x ( t 0 ) · ( t − t 0 ) . Solution: Using Local . . . • The further t from t 0 , the less accurate the correspond- Expert Knowledge: . . . ing approximation. Home Page Title Page • To make approximation accurate, we need to use differ- ent linear approximations on different time intervals: ◭◭ ◮◮ • first m ( t ) = x ( t 0 ) + ˙ x ( t 0 ) · ( t − t 0 ), ◭ ◮ • then m ( t ) = x ( t 1 ) + ˙ x ( t 1 ) · ( t − t 1 ), etc. Page 10 of 14 • At the border between two intervals, the derivative Go Back m ( t ) changes from ˙ ˙ x ( t 0 ) to ˙ x ( t 1 ). Full Screen • However, the original signal x ( t ) was smooth! Close Quit

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend