How formal concept lattices solve a problem of ancient linguistics - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how formal concept lattices solve a problem of ancient
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How formal concept lattices solve a problem of ancient linguistics - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How formal concept lattices solve a problem of ancient linguistics Wiebke Petersen Department of Computational Linguistics Institute of Language and Information University of Dsseldorf 2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005 P nini's ivas


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

How formal concept lattices solve a problem of ancient linguistics

Wiebke Petersen

Department of Computational Linguistics Institute of Language and Information University of Düsseldorf

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's Śivasūtras

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Phonological rules

A is replaced by B if preceded by C and followed by D

  • in modern form:
  • as context-sensitive rule:
slide-4
SLIDE 4

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Phonological rules

A is replaced by B if preceded by C and followed by D

  • in modern form:
  • as context-sensitive rule:

Example: final devoicing in German (Hunde - Hund) [d]→[t] / _#, [b]→[p] / _#, [g]→[k] / _#, ...

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Phonological rules

A is replaced by B if preceded by C and followed by D

  • in modern form:
  • as context-sensitive rule:

Example: final devoicing in German (Hunde - Hund) [d]→[t] / _#, [b]→[p] / _#, [g]→[k] / _#, ...

#

/_

consonantal consonantal nasal nasal voiced voiced + +         − → −         + −    

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's coding of rules

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's coding of rules

A + genitive, B + nominative, C + ablative, d + locative

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's coding of rules

A + genitive, B + nominative, C + ablative, d + locative

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's coding of rules

A + genitive, B + nominative, C + ablative, d + locative

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's coding of rules

A + genitive, B + nominative, C + ablative, d + locative

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's Śivasūtras

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's Śivasūtras

anubandha sūtras

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's Śivasūtras

anubandha sūtras

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Phonological classes/ pratyāhāras

Phonological classes are denoted by pratyāhāras. E.g., the pratyāhāra iC denotes the set of segments in the continuous sequence starting with i and ending with au, the last element before the anubandha C.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Phonological classes/ pratyāhāras

Phonological classes are denoted by pratyāhāras. E.g., the pratyāhāra iC denotes the set of segments in the continuous sequence starting with i and ending with au, the last element before the anubandha C. iC

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Phonological classes/ pratyāhāras

Phonological classes are denoted by pratyāhāras. E.g., the pratyāhāra iC denotes the set of segments in the continuous sequence starting with i and ending with au, the last element before the anubandha C. iC

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Minimality criteria

1. The length of the whole list is minimal. 2. The length of the sublist of the anubandhas is minimal and the length of the whole list is as short as possible. 3. The length of the sublist of the sounds is minimal and the length of the whole list is as short as possible.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Minimality criteria

1. The length of the whole list is minimal. 2. The length of the sublist of the anubandhas is minimal and the length of the whole list is as short as possible. 3. The length of the sublist of the sounds is minimal and the length of the whole list is as short as possible.

– no duplication of h – less anubandhas

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Basic concepts

e d M1 c i f M2 g h M3 b M4 a M5

S-alphabet (A,Σ,<) of Φ:

alphabet marker total order on A∪Σ

Φ={{d,e},{b,c,d,f,g,h,i},{a,b},{f,i},{c,d,e,f,g,h,i},{g,h}}

S-encodable set of sets:

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Basic concepts

e d M1 c i f M2 g h M3 b M4 a M5

S-alphabet (A,Σ,<) of Φ:

alphabet marker total order on A∪Σ

Φ={{d,e},{b,c,d,f,g,h,i},{a,b},{f,i},{c,d,e,f,g,h,i},{g,h}}

S-encodable set of sets:

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

S-encodability and planar formal concept lattices

If Φ is S-encodable, then the formal concept lattice is planar

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

S-encodability and planar formal concept lattices

If Φ is S-encodable, then the formal concept lattice is planar

concept lattice for Pānini's phonological classes

.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

S-encodability and planar formal concept lattices

K5 K3,3 Criterion of Kuratowski: A graph is planar iff it has neither K5 nor K3,3 as a minor.

part of the concept lattice for Pānini's phonological classes

.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

S-encodability and planar formal concept lattices

K5 K3,3 Criterion of Kuratowski: A graph is planar iff it has neither K5 nor K3,3 as a minor.

part of the concept lattice for Pānini's phonological classes

.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

X X X X X X X X X

K5 is a minor of the concept lattice for Pānini's phonological classes

.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

X X X

K5 is a minor of the concept lattice for Pānini's phonological classes

.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

X X

K5 is a minor of the concept lattice for Pānini's phonological classes

.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

X

K5 is a minor of the concept lattice for Pānini's phonological classes

.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

K5 is a minor of the concept lattice for Pānini's phonological classes

.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

We are not done yet!

plane but not S-encodable!

Φ={{d,e},{b,c,d,f,},{a,b},{b,c,d}}

slide-31
SLIDE 31

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Existence of S-alphabets

The following statements are equivalent: 1. is S-encodable 2. is planar

Φ={{d,e},{b,c,d,f,},{a,b},{b,c,d}}

slide-32
SLIDE 32

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Existence of S-alphabets

The following statements are equivalent: 1. is S-encodable 2. is planar

Φ={{d,e},{b,c,d,f,},{a,b},{b,c,d}} Φ={{d e}

slide-33
SLIDE 33

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Existence of S-alphabets

The following statements are equivalent:

S-encodable not S-encodable

1. is S-encodable 2. is planar

  • 3. the S-graph contains all attribute concepts
slide-34
SLIDE 34

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

slide-35
SLIDE 35

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a

slide-36
SLIDE 36

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a b

slide-37
SLIDE 37

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a b M1

slide-38
SLIDE 38

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a b M1 c

slide-39
SLIDE 39

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a b M1 c h g

slide-40
SLIDE 40

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a b M1 c h g c M2

slide-41
SLIDE 41

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a b M1 c h g c M2 f i c M2

slide-42
SLIDE 42

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a b M1 c h g c M2 f i c M2 c M3 c M2

slide-43
SLIDE 43

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a b M1 c h g c M2 f i c M2 c M3 c M2 d c M3 c M2

slide-44
SLIDE 44

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a b M1 c h g c M2 f i c M2 c M3 c M2 d c M3 c M2 e M4 M5

slide-45
SLIDE 45

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Construction of S-alphabets

a b M1 c h g c M2 f i c M2 c M3 c M2 d c M3 c M2 e M4 M5

× ×

slide-46
SLIDE 46

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's Śivasūtras are optimal .

slide-47
SLIDE 47

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's Śivasūtras are optimal .

slide-48
SLIDE 48

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

slide-49
SLIDE 49

2 Wiebke Petersen ICCS 2005

Pānini's Śivasūtras are optimal .