How Do We Plan for Transit? JACKIE EASTWOOD, TRANSPORTATION PLANNER - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how do we plan for transit
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How Do We Plan for Transit? JACKIE EASTWOOD, TRANSPORTATION PLANNER - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How Do We Plan for Transit? JACKIE EASTWOOD, TRANSPORTATION PLANNER LA CROSSE AREA PLANNING COMMITTEE (LAPC) MPO FOR THE LA CROSSE AND LA CRESCENT URBANIZED AREA WISCONSIN TRANSIT ALLIANCE, APRIL 30, 2018 Overview Background and duties of the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

How Do We Plan for Transit?

JACKIE EASTWOOD, TRANSPORTATION PLANNER LA CROSSE AREA PLANNING COMMITTEE (LAPC) MPO FOR THE LA CROSSE AND LA CRESCENT URBANIZED AREA WISCONSIN TRANSIT ALLIANCE, APRIL 30, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

Background and duties of the LAPC Transit services in the La Crosse area Transit Planning at the LAPC Required Elements for Providing Transit Service Challenges for Transit

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What is the LAPC?

WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LAPC Organization

Metropolitan planning organization (MPO)

  • Federal transportation bill
  • Urbanized areas of 50,000 people or more

Bi-State MPO

  • Wisconsin and Minnesota

Classified as a small MPO (<200,000 people)

  • About 118,000 people
  • Can’t apply for most grants
  • No regulatory authority
  • Don’t receive federal funds directly—comes

through States

slide-5
SLIDE 5

LAPC Structure We are advisory ONLY! We facilitate & coordinate!

LAPC Policy Board Technical Advisory Committee Committee on Transit and Active Transportation Staff

slide-6
SLIDE 6

LAPC Duties

Metropolitan Transportation Plan Transportation Improvement Program Planning Work Program Public Participation Plan Title VI Plan Modal studies and plans

  • Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Study
  • Transit Development Plan for MTU
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Transit Services in the La Crosse Area

slide-8
SLIDE 8

History of Transit in La Crosse

1879 – businessmen began privately-

  • wned horse-drawn system

1893-1923 – Horse-drawn system converted to electrified streetcar system 1929-1935 – Streetcar routes converted to bus routes Privately-owned until 1974 when the City

  • f La Crosse purchased the La Crosse

Transit Company La Crosse MTU began operations in 1975

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Current General Public Transit Services

La Crosse Municipal Transit Utility (MTU)

  • Owned and operated as a department within

the City of La Crosse

Onalaska/Holmen/West Salem Public Transit (OHWSPT)

  • Administered by the City of Onalaska
  • Contracted with a private provider
  • Began in 1999

Scenic Mississippi River Transit (SMRT)

  • Administered by the City of Prairie du Chien
  • Contracted with a private provider
  • Began in 2012
slide-10
SLIDE 10

La Crosse MTU

Nine fixed routes

  • Five City routes that operate 7 days per week
  • One City route that operates weekdays only
  • Three contract routes (renewed annually)
  • La Crescent, MN (1998): Weekdays and Saturdays
  • City of Onalaska (1999): Weekdays only
  • French Island & La Crosse Airport (2000): Weekdays only

Deviated fixed-route and complementary paratransit Free transfers between MTU and OHWSPT Allows SMRT to use MTU bus stops Jefferson Lines bus bay at GRS Bike racks on all buses; bike racks and lockers at GRS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Onalaska/Holmen/West Salem Public Transit (OHWSPT)

Door-to-door shared-ride taxi service

  • perating 7 days per week

Origin and destination need to be in the City of Onalaska, the Village of Holmen, or the Village

  • f West Salem

Free transfers from/to MTU at Center 90 and Valley View Mall City of Onalaska initiates RFP for a shared-ride service provider every five years

  • Running, Inc has had the contract since

inception in 1999

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Scenic Mississippi Regional Transit (SMRT)

Regional fixed routes:

  • Prairie du Chien – La Crosse (Dec 2012)
  • LaFarge/Viroqua – La Crosse (Dec 2012)
  • Tomah – La Crosse (Oct 2017)

Funded through the 5311 Rural Program Multi-jurisdictional support Looking to expand to Arcadia

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Other Regional Transportation Services

JEFFERSON BUS LINES Designated bus stop at Grand River Station Ticket agent AMTRAK No direct MTU bus service

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Transit Planning at the LAPC

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Local Transit Planning

LA CROSSE MTU TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Operations and performance Availability and access

  • Service frequency and hours
  • Coverage (transit-supportive areas)
  • Contracted service
  • Multimodal connections
  • Environmental (social) justice

Comfort and convenience Density Criteria

  • 60-minute service
  • 4-9 jobs per acre
  • 3-6 households per acre
  • 30-minute service
  • > 9 jobs per acre
  • > 6 households per acre
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Regional Transit Planning

COMMUTER BUS SERVICE FEASIBILITY PLAN Expansion of SMRT to Arcadia and Tomah Tomah route implemented as pilot in October 2017 MRRPC, LAPC, La Crosse County, and UW Extension

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Regional Transit Planning

TWIN CITIES-MILWAUKEE-CHICAGO (TCMC) INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE STUDY LAPC provided $40,000 in support in 2017 WisDOT and MnDOT are requesting $40,000 in 2018 to help fund phase 2

  • NEPA work
  • Service Development Plan
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Regional Transit Planning

TWIN CITIES TO MILWAUKEE HIGH-SPEED RAIL CORRIDOR Staff participates in technical committees:

  • Minnesota Passenger Rail Forum
  • Minnesota High-Speed Rail Commission
  • Twin Cities-to-Milwaukee HSR Corridor
  • Midwest Rail Plan
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Required Elements for Providing Transit Service

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Local Sponsor

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Federal and State Funding

Program Description Federal/State Share Bus and Bus Facilities (Section 5339) Federal discretionary grant for capital 80% Federal Formula Grant for Rural Areas (5311) Capital, planning, and operating assistance to states for public transit in rural areas with populations less than 50,000 80% capital; 50% operating; 80% paratransit Federal Formula Grant for Urbanized Areas (5307) Capital assistance for large areas (>200,000); capital and

  • perating assistance for areas with 50,000-200,000 people

80% capital; 50% operating State Urban Mass Transit Operating Assistance (85.20) State operating assistance; often combined with the 5307 80% Wisconsin Employment Transportation Assistance Program to connect low-income workers with jobs 80% capital; 50% operating

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Local Match

Percentage of project cost

  • Generally 20% for capital and 50% for operations

Can come from multiple sources

  • Municipalities
  • Businesses
  • Non-profits
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Service Provider

Contracted through a competitive bid process

  • Required at least every 5 years
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Challenges for Transit

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Local Support

Competition with other needs and goals

  • Capital budgets

Sustainable source of funding

  • Operations
  • Vehicle maintenance and replacement

Naysayers and nimbys

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Political Will and Priorities

slide-27
SLIDE 27