How Do Mortgage Rate Resets Affect Consumer Spending and Debt - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how do mortgage rate resets affect consumer spending and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How Do Mortgage Rate Resets Affect Consumer Spending and Debt - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How Do Mortgage Rate Resets Affect Consumer Spending and Debt Repayment? Evidence from Canadian Consumers Katya Kartashova Xiaoqing Zhou Bank of Canada Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas The views in this presentation are solely the responsibility


slide-1
SLIDE 1

How Do Mortgage Rate Resets Affect Consumer Spending and Debt Repayment? Evidence from Canadian Consumers

Katya Kartashova Bank of Canada Xiaoqing Zhou Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

The views in this presentation are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Bank of Canada, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation

◮ In recessions, central banks cut policy rates to stimulate the economy. ◮ One transmission channel is the consumer cash-flow channel:

Mortgage rate ↓ ⇒ lower mortgage payment ⇒ higher consumption ◮ In the U.S., consumers refinance long-term fixed-rate mortgages. ◮ In other countries, consumers often experience automatic mortgage rate resets (ARMs are popular outside of the U.S.). ◮ Powerful channel: Mortgage is largest component of household debt.

◮ Key questions:

  • 1. The effect of this channel on consumer spending and savings
  • 2. Are the effects symmetric between rate decreases and increases?

1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Empirical Challenges

◮ U.S. mortgage market:

◮ Refinancing decisions depend on borrowers’ characteristics. ⇒ Concern: Endogeneity ◮ Adjustable-rate mortgage borrowers (Di Maggio et al. 2017) ⇒ Concern: Not representative for most mortgage borrowers

◮ Other countries:

◮ Comparing ARM borrowers with FRM borrowers (Jappelli & Scognamiglio 2018; La Cava et al. 2016; Floden et al. 2016) Comparing mortgagors with outright homeowners (Agarwal et al. 2019) ⇒ Concern: Selection bias ◮ Limited consumer and mortgage data 2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

This Paper

Focus on Canadian mortgage market and consumers:

  • 1. Institutional features facilitate a clean identification design
  • 2. Detailed data on consumers and mortgages from a major credit agency
  • 3. Both expansionary and contractionary MP episodes in recent years

3

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Canadian Mortgage Market

◮ Dominated by short-term fixed-rate mortgages (most common: 5-year) ◮ Contract Renewal/Rate Reset: Mortgage rate is fixed within a term but has to be reset at the end of the term according to the prevailing market rate. ◮ Strategy: Compare two borrowers similar in every aspect, except that one borrower resets her mortgage rate earlier than the other borrower ◮ Identification: Exploit variation in the predetermined timing of mortgage rate resets

4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Outline

  • 1. Data
  • 2. Empirical strategy
  • 3. Micro-level effects

◮ Loan-level: mortgage rate, payment ◮ Consumer-level: consumer spending, debt repayment, default ◮ Heterogeneity across consumers

  • 4. Macro-level effects

◮ Aggregate spending 5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Data

◮ TransUnion Canada

◮ Account-level panel data on mortgages, auto loans, credit cards, lines of credit, installment loans, linked by consumer identifiers ◮ Static information at origination + monthly updates on performance

◮ Our sample: Mortgage borrowers from one of the largest banks

◮ The only major bank that reports timing of mortgage rate resets ◮ Market share close to 20% ⇒ Large ◮ Loan characteristics similar to other banks ⇒ Representative

◮ Main data blocks

  • 1. Consumer characteristics: credit score, age, postal code, local LTV
  • 2. Mortgages: rate, payment, delinquency, timing of renewal
  • 3. Non-mortgage debt: durable spending, revolving debt repayment

6

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Empirical Strategy - An Illustration

Paid off 2010 2030 Loan

  • riginated

Consumer A

7

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Empirical Strategy - An Illustration

Renewed Renewed Renewed Paid off 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Loan

  • riginated

Consumer A

7

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Empirical Strategy - An Illustration

Renewed Renewed Renewed Paid off 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2011 2016 2031 Renewed Paid off Loan

  • riginated

Consumer A Loan

  • riginated

Consumer B

7

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Empirical Strategy - An Illustration

Renewed Renewed Renewed Paid off 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2011 2016 2031 Renewed Paid off 2015 2016 Loan

  • riginated

Consumer A Loan

  • riginated

Consumer B

Policy rate cut Policy rate cut

7

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Empirical Strategy

◮ Other institutional features

◮ Prepayment penalties:

  • 1. Three months of interest on the remaining balance
  • 2. Interest differential based on the change in rate

⇒ No incentive to prepay ◮ No reassessment of credit score, LTV and DTI, if renewing with the current lender ⇒ Resets not depend on borrower characteristics

◮ Identification

◮ Timing of mortgage rate reset is predetermined ◮ Change in mortgage rate upon reset is ◮ driven by evolution of prevailing market interest rate ◮ exogenous w.r.t. consumer’s income, home equity and spending 8

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Baseline Specification

yj,t = α0 + α1PostRenewj,t + α2xj,t + γj + δt + εj,t

yj,t: an outcome variable of consumer j in month t PostRenewj,t=1 after renewal; =0 before renewal α1: effect of mortgage rate reset ◮ Expansionary episode (rates decrease) Sample: all mortgages reset in 2015.1-2017.1 (∼ 88k) ◮ Contractionary episode (rates increase) Sample: all mortgages reset in 2017.7-2019.6 (∼ 85k) ◮ We group consumers according to their mortgage terms before the reset (2, 3, 4, 5 years) and estimate the effects separately for each group.

9

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Outline

  • 1. Data
  • 2. Empirical strategy
  • 3. Micro-level effects

◮ Loan-level: mortgage rate, payment ◮ Consumer-level: consumer spending, debt repayment, default ◮ Heterogeneity across consumers

  • 4. Macro-level effects

◮ Aggregate spending 9

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Change in Mortgage Rate and Required Payment After Reset

2 3 4 5

Term before reset

  • 1.5
  • 1
  • 0.5

Expansionary Mortgage rate

2 3 4 5

Term before reset

  • 100
  • 50

Expansionary Required monthly payment

2 3 4 5

Term before reset

0.5 1

Contractionary Mortgage rate

2 3 4 5

Term before reset

50 100

Contractionary Required monthly payment

* Required payments are computed using the amortization before the reset

10

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Change in Total Payment

Expansionary episode Contractionary episode Remaining Monthly Total Remaining Monthly Total months payment ($) change ($) months payment ($) change ($) FRM-5yr 227

  • 92.03
  • 20,891

208 +34.00 +7,072 FRM-4yr 208

  • 34.17
  • 7,107

197 +36.29 +7,149 FRM-3yr 209

  • 13.91
  • 2,907

205 +54.98 +11,271 FRM-2yr 219

  • 14.74
  • 3,228

230 +83.33 +19,165

11

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Change in Total Payment

Expansionary episode Contractionary episode Remaining Monthly Total Remaining Monthly Total months payment ($) change ($) months payment ($) change ($) FRM-5yr 227

  • 92.03
  • 20,891

208 +34.00 +7,072 FRM-4yr 208

  • 34.17
  • 7,107

197 +36.29 +7,149 FRM-3yr 209

  • 13.91
  • 2,907

205 +54.98 +11,271 FRM-2yr 219

  • 14.74
  • 3,228

230 +83.33 +19,165

◮ Next, we study the effect of mortgage rate resets on

  • 1. Durable spending
  • 2. Mortgage paydown
  • 3. Non-mortgage debt paydown (credit cards, lines of credit)
  • 4. Defaults

11

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • I. Response of Durable Spending

◮ Measures:

  • 1. Newly originated auto loans ⇒ Spending on automobiles
  • 2. Newly originated installment loans ⇒ Spending on other durables

Amount spent ($/month) and likelihood of spending (%)

Expansionary episode Contractionary episode Auto Auto Installment Installment Auto Auto Installment Installment ($/month) (%) ($/month) (%) ($/month) (%) ($/month) (%) FRM-5yr 18.6*** 0.07*** 44.4*** 0.14*** 7.1 0.02 22.4 0.04 (6.09) (0.02) (12.03) (0.03) (8.34) (0.02) (15.55) (0.04)

◮ Heterogeneity:

In the expansionary episode, spending is higher for young borrowers and for borrowers with high credit scores 12

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • II. Mortgage Paydown

2 3 4 5

Term before reset

  • 100
  • 80
  • 60
  • 40
  • 20

$/month Expansionary episode

Payment required by lenders Payment chosen by borrowers 2 3 4 5

Term before reset

20 40 60 80 100

$/month Contractionary episode

◮ Expansionary episode: Use part of interest gains to pay down mortgage ◮ Contractionary episode: Raise payment to the required level ◮ Heterogeneity: constrained borrowers pay down less in expansionary episode

13

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • III. Deleveraging of Consumer Debt

Expansionary episode Contractionary episode Credit Lines of Total Credit Lines of Total cards credit revolving cards credit revolving FRM-5yr

  • 161***

252** 101

  • 247***
  • 279
  • 438**

(32.54) (120.79) (124.59) (40.73) (210.50) (213.42)

◮ Expansionary episode: Pay down credit card debt but accumulate debt

  • n lines of credit ⇒ Overall no change

◮ Contractionary episode: Pay down credit card debt and lines of credit debt ⇒ Overall deleveraging ◮ Heterogeneity: constrained borrowers deleverage less in both episodes

14

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • IV. Change in Default Rate

◮ Default measure (‰): Prob. of delinquent on payment for 60+ days for at least one account

Expansionary episode Contractionary episode Mortgage Auto Installment Credit Mortgage Auto Installment Credit loans loans cards loans loans cards FRM-5yr

  • 1.10***
  • 0.13
  • 0.13

0.00

  • 0.27
  • 0.06
  • 0.16
  • 0.42

(0.20) (0.07) (0.09) (0.00) (0.19) (0.08) (0.12) (0.26)

◮ Overall, not much change in either episode

15

slide-22
SLIDE 22

From Micro Effect to Aggregate Effect

◮ At micro level:

◮ When mortgage rates decrease ◮ durable spending increases ◮ consumers pay down mortgage debt Expansionary MP stimulates consumer spending and improves balance sheets ◮ When mortgage rates increase ◮ durable spending does not change ◮ consumers pay down non-mortgage debt Contractionary MP does not appear to hurt consumers through higher mortgage rates

◮ At macro level: spending increases when consumers reset to lower rates.

16

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Aggregate Spending Effect:

  • D

∆RD

t rate change

× εD

  • spending elasticity

× φt(D)

total # resets

50 100 150 200 million dollars 2009m1 2011m1 2013m1 2015m1 2017m1 2019m1

upper bound lower bound

Auto spending

17