How are we doing? 2 Measures of a Great University o Academic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how are we doing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How are we doing? 2 Measures of a Great University o Academic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How are we doing? 2 Measures of a Great University o Academic reputation o UG and graduate o Ability to attract & education retain the best o Faculty resources faculty & students o Federal research o Student selectivity o Necessary o


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

How are we doing?

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Measures of a Great University

  • UG and graduate

education

  • Federal research
  • Membership in

national academies

  • Faculty awards
  • Industry research
  • Doctoral degrees
  • Academic reputation
  • Faculty resources
  • Student selectivity
  • Financial resources
  • Graduation rate
  • Retention rate
  • Alumni giving rate
  • Ability to attract &

retain the best faculty & students

  • Necessary

resources to pursue teaching & research

  • Freedom to pursue

critical thinking, innovation & creativity

Ideas – People - Infrastructure

2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

RANK Institution Awards per faculty Books per faculty Grant $ per faculty Articles per faculty Nat’l Academy Members per faculty 1 UC-Berkeley 1.51 1.04 $259,841 10.97 0.15 2 UCSB 0.86 1.04 $192,173 8.53 0.08 3 UCLA 0.84 0.86 $283,462 10.75 0.06 4 UCSD 0.84 0.65 $429,137 13.02 0.10 5 University of Michigan 0.75 0.70 $275,577 10.24 0.04 6 University of Texas 0.72 1.05 $184,125 9.06 0.05 7 UC-Irvine 0.66 0.90 $237,851 10.66 0.03 8 University of Colorado 0.65 0.73 $221,443 8.52 0.03 9 University of Illinois 0.64 0.62 $178,622 9.19 0.03 10 Georgia Institute of Technology 0.62 0.47 $260,975 11.37 0.03 11 Rutgers 0.60 0.82 $146,785 7.14 0.03 12 University of Virginia 0.55 0.96 $193,036 6.91 0.03 13 University of Wisconsin 0.55 0.61 $247,348 9.76 0.03 14 Stony Brook University 0.54 0.55 $223,819 8.19 0.02 15 UC-Davis 0.54 0.55 $251,781 11.57 0.03 16 University of Washington 0.52 0.55 $356,905 10.05 0.05 17 University of Maryland 0.51 0.74 $184,199 7.78 0.02

AAU Comparisons (2015)

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RANK Institution Awards per faculty Books per faculty Grant $ per faculty Articles per faculty Nat’l Academy Members per faculty 18 Indiana University 0.49 0.84 $95,606 5.41 0.01 19 Pennsylvania State University 0.48 0.69 $179,613 8.32 0.01 20 University of Oregon 0.46 0.76 $151,022 5.27 0.01 21 Ohio State University 0.45 0.60 $166,656 7.98 0.01 22 University of Minnesota 0.43 0.54 $181,466 9.14 0.02 23 University of North Carolina 0.42 0.62 $242,650 9.54 0.02 24 Purdue University 0.40 0.44 $133,111 7.21 0.01 25 University of Arizona 0.37 0.59 $151,299 7.68 0.02 26 Iowa State University 0.37 0.33 $125,228 8.13 0.01 27 University of Florida 0.36 0.55 $167,209 9.90 0.01 28 Texas A&M University 0.35 0.56 $123,104 8.04 0.01 29 University of Kansas 0.33 0.60 $152,115 6.85 0.01 30 University of Pittsburgh 0.31 0.55 $299,774 11.16 0.02 31 Michigan State University 0.31 0.57 $136,115 7.15 0.01 32 University of Iowa 0.30 0.51 $190,366 8.38 0.02 33 University of Missouri 0.26 0.51 $122,129 6.29 0.01 34 University at Buffalo 0.23 0.49 $134,167 7.05 0.01

AAU Comparisons (2015)

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2015 ASU MUP Metrics for Top 200 Institutions

6

MU Minnosota UIC Total Research $233M (55) $834M (9) $359M (40) Federal Research $108M (64) $489M (11) $219M (33) Endowment $804M (40) $3,165M (9) $300M (93) Annual Giving $119M (33) $287M (10) $67M (69) National Academy 8 (44) 40 (12) 7 (51) Faculty Awards 7 (50) 26 (8) 12 (27) Doctorates 390 (33) 778 (8) 328 (43) SAT Scores 1170 (66) 1260 (21) 1090 (140) National Merit Scholars 30 (34) 141 (4) 3 (92)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

School Nat’l Rank % of Full Time Faculty 6-year Grad Rate Accept Rate Reten Rate HS Counselor score Peer Score SAT (conv from ACT) Fresh Top 10% Student /Faculty Ratio

MU 111 97 69 78 85 3.6 3.2 1220 28 20 S&T 164 90 65 88 84 3.5 2.6 1320 44 19 UMKC 210 83 52 63 72 3.2 2.5 1180 32 14 UMSL 220 74 41 76 77 3.2 2.4 1180 29 17 Rutgers 70 (25) 74 80 58 92 4.0 3.4 1226 38 12

US News and World Report 2016

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Student Diversity (US Dept of Education)

8

MU S&T UMKC UMSL MSU UIUC Total UG 27,276 6,418 8,127 8,936 16,177 31,875 Full Time 94% 90% 81% 65% 87% 98% Social Economic Diversity (<$40K) 21% 26% 32% 29% 33% 21% White 79% 78% 57% 62% 81% 51% Black 8% 4% 16% 19% 4% 5% Int’l 3% 7% 4% 3% 5% 15% Asian 2% 3% 7% 5% 1% 16% Hispanic 3% 3% 7% 3% 3% 9% Two or More Races 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% 3%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Rank School Black or African American Faculty Rank School Black or African American Faculty 1 University of North Carolina 6.5% 16 Rutgers University 3.2% 2 University of Georgia 5.8% 17 UC-Berkeley 3.0% 3 University of Illinois 4.8% 17 University of Florida 3.0% 4 Michigan State University 4.5% 19 Virginia Polytechnic Institute 2.8% 4 University of Maryland 4.5% 20 Purdue University 2.7% 6 The University of Texas 4.4% 20 University of Pittsburgh 2.7% 7 University of Michigan 4.3% 22 UCSB 2.6% 8 Pennsylvania State University 4.1% 23 Georgia Institute of Technology 2.5% 9 Ohio State University 3.9% 24 University of Iowa 2.4% 10 Texas A & M University 3.7% 24 University of Wisconsin 2.4% 11 University of Virginia 3.6% 26 University of Minnesota 2.3% 12 Clemson University 3.5% 27 UC-Davis 2.2% 13 University of Connecticut 3.4% 27 University of Washington 2.2% 14 College of William and Mary 3.3% 29 UCSD 2.1% 14 UCLA 3.3% 30 UC-Irvine 2.0% MU 2.8% UMKC 5.0%

Faculty Diversity (2015 IPEDS)

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Rank School Hispanic Faculty Rank School Hispanic Faculty 1 UCSB 6.8% 15 Michigan State University 3.9% 2 UCLA 6.4% 15 University of Georgia 3.9% 3 UCSD 6.1% 15 University of Iowa 3.9% 4 Texas A & M University 6.0% 18 University of Marylad 3.8% 4 The University of Texas 6.0% 19 Georgia Institute of Technology 3.5% 6 UC-Berkeley 5.6% 19 Pennsylvania State University 3.5% 7 UC-Irvine 5.4% 19 Virginia Polytechnic Institute 3.5% 7 University of Florida 5.4% 22 University of Wisconsin 3.4% 9 University of Illinois 5.3% 23 Rutgers University 3.2% 10 UC-Davis 4.7% 24 Purdue University 3.1% 11 University of Connecticut 4.3% 25 Ohio State University 2.8% 12 University of Michigan 4.1% 26 University of Minnesota 2.7% 12 University of Washington 4.1% 27 University of Pittsburgh 2.5% 14 University of North Carolina 4.0% 28 Clemson University 2.4% 14 UCSB 6.8% 29 University of Virginia 2.1% MU 3.2% UMKC 3.5%

Faculty Diversity (2015 IPEDS)

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Student Financial & Performance Statistics (US Dept of Education)

11

Family Income MU S&T UMKC UMSL MSU UIUC Students Receiving Federal Loans 47% 52% 48% 41% 50% 39% Median Federal Loan Debt $21,647 $25,000 $20,605 $21,114 $22,313 $20,500 Graduation Rate 70% 63% 52% 44% 54% 84% Retention Rate 86% 86% 73% 79% 75% 93% Earnings After Completion $46,000 $64,100 $43,700 $40,000 $36,800 $56,600

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Average Annual Cost by Family Income (US Dept of Education)

12

Family Income MU S&T UMKC UMSL MSU UIUC Up to $30K $13,035 $10,832 $16,488 $9,704 $11,872 $7,801 $30K to $48K $13,858 $12,001 $16,910 $10,336 $12,511 $12,231 $48K to $75K $15,936 $14,783 $19,857 $13,681 $14,896 $17,934 $75K to $110K $19,056 $17,529 $21,268 $15,634 $16,406 $24,625 Over $110K $21,119 $17,454 $21,834 $17,258 $17,241 $27,070

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

How do we get there?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Current System Strategic Plan

14

  • Leverage system resources to support campus

unique strengths

  • Foster campus/system collaboration and best

practices for effective and efficient resource use

  • Advocate for higher education and UM
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Principles for New Strategic Plan

15

  • Place the highest emphasis on excellence
  • Invest in faculty research & scholarship
  • Invest in student success & outcomes
  • Invest in programs that promote inclusive diversity &

educational pipeline

  • New & reallocated resources to support plan
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Broad Vision

16

  • Invest in strategic faculty research (through cluster hiring,

internal grants, equipment, proposal writing support, etc.) that will lead to grants:

  • Templeton Foundation
  • National Endowments for the Arts & Humanities
  • NSF Engineering Research Centers
  • NIH P30 Centers
  • National Network of Manufacturing Innovation
  • DoE Energy Frontiers Research Centers
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Goals in Research

  • Develop new knowledge and innovative

solutions to society’s pressing problems & to improve the human condition

  • Extramural research
  • Publications & citations
  • Juried performances
  • Patents and licenses
  • National faculty awards
  • Doctoral degrees

17

Dawn Cornelison MU Associate Professor Biological Sciences Recipient of Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Broad Vision

18

  • Student Success and Outcomes:
  • Increase need/merit scholarships
  • Increase support for Pell

recipients

  • Increase retention and graduation

rates

  • Reduce debt at graduation
  • Increase job placement rates and

matriculation for graduate & professional studies

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Goals in Undergraduate Education

  • Recruitment of outstanding students

(diversity, SAT, GPA)

  • New concentrations, minors & majors
  • Research experiences, internships,

global engagement and service learning

  • More students receiving prestigious

scholarships (Truman, Marshall, Rhodes, NSF GRFP)

  • Improve rankings in U.S. News and

World Report

19

Abas Pauti MU sophomore from Memphis, TN Journalism Major, Kinders Scholar Mizzou Tour Team Guide Advisor for Residential Life

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Goals in Graduate Education

  • Recruit outstanding students

(diversity, GRE, GPA and UG institutions)

  • National fellowships (NSF GRFP,

NSF NRT, DoED GAANN, DOD NDSEG, NIH Traineeship, NEH/NEA Scholars)

  • Implement professional and

academic development programs

  • Improve placement in prestigious

academic and industry appointments

Tracy Rittenhouse UConn Assistant Professor of Natural Resources and the Environment 2007 MU PhD (R.D. Semlitsch, Advisor)

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Teaching Effectiveness

  • Reward creativity, innovation

and collaboration in teaching:

  • Open source textbooks
  • Experiential learning
  • Growth and outcomes:
  • 1st year retention rates
  • Graduation rates
  • Student satisfaction
  • Develop Institute for Excellence in

Teaching and Learning

21

Jung Ha- Brookshire Associate Professor Textile and Apparel Management Billie Cunningham Teaching Professor Accountancy 2017 William T. Kemper Fellows for Teaching Excellence Michael Podgursky Professor Economics Stacey Woelfel Associate Professor Journalism Thom Lambert, Professor and Wall Chair in Corporate Law & Governance

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Goals In Public Engagement

  • Develop outreach programs

that serve the public and educate our students

  • Support community-based

partnerships that benefit citizens in Missouri

  • Strengthen global

engagement programs by partnering with top international universities

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Broad Vision

23

  • Invest in research and teaching facilities with joint

investments from industry partners and donors

  • Shared core research facilities (microscopy,

imaging, additive manufacturing, HPC)

  • Student innovation laboratories for coding, 3D

printing and product development

  • Living & learning communities that foster

community and inclusion

  • Library of the future
  • Modern visual and performing arts spaces
slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Increase retention and graduation

rates for a more diverse student body

  • Create a welcoming environment to

acknowledge and celebrate diversity and to interact and to communicate

  • Implement innovative programs to

hire and retain outstanding faculty from under-represented groups (KM)

  • Implement pipeline programs from K-

12 to the doctorate to the professoriate

7

Broad Vision

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Faculty Hiring

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Upper Bound program supports preparation for college admission
  • Research Experiences for Teachers supports K12 STEM teachers to

participate in laboratory discovery

  • Research Experiences for Undergraduates engages UG students in

faculty research

  • Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation supports UG students

completing STEM baccalaureate degrees

  • McNair Scholar Program prepares UG students for doctoral studies

through involvement in research and other scholarly activities.

  • Bridge to the Doctorate Program enables students to successfully earn

STEM doctoral degrees and transition into the professoriate

8

Pipeline Programs

slide-27
SLIDE 27

We Can Make Progress

My Previous Institution 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 URM UG 515 661 749 835 984 1,122 1,189 URM BS Degrees 104 85 82 128 104 146 190 URM MS Degrees 8 12 17 19 18 13 19 URM PhD Degrees 1 1 3 8 10 7 10

9

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Economic Impact of Universities

$12.5B in FY14 $13.9B in FY16 $8.6B in FY12

  • Impact through research spending, operational spending, capital

spending, student & visitor spending, number of employees, salaries & benefits

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Economic Impact of UM System

29

  • MU economics professors, Ronald Harstad and

Joseph Haslag, found that:

  • UMS expenditures in instruction and research

totaled $847M in FY14

  • With a 4.1 multiplier effect, our economic

impact is estimated to be $3.5B

  • Missouri’s economic growth rate is 25% higher

due to our R&D efforts

  • Aggregate income increases because of our

graduates contributing to the economy

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Budget Challenges

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Budget Challenges

31 29

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33 31

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

State Support

35

  • FY17
  • $37M in withholds
  • FY18 Governor’s Budget
  • $41M in core rescission
  • $15M in partnership rescission
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Investments in Academics & Research

36

  • Increase enrollment where capacities exist
  • Increase tuition while maintaining access and affordability
  • Increase out of state and int’l student enrollment
  • Increase philanthropic (individual donors and corporations)

contributions to critical needs in student scholarship and faculty research

  • Increase research support that leads to innovation
  • Develop partnerships with industries
  • Make compelling case for state support
slide-37
SLIDE 37

How Can You Contribute?

37

  • Continue with your outstanding research, teaching and
  • utreach
  • Develop new collaborations with UM colleagues
  • Promote the unique aspects of your campus but recognize the

pride in being part of the UM System with 3 sister campuses

  • Share a positive narrative about the university
  • Challenge us when improvements are needed
  • We need your input and support to make difficult but

necessary changes

slide-38
SLIDE 38

What We Will Do!

  • We will support your collective vision
  • We will be strategic and focused
  • We will celebrate your successes
  • We will be transparent and accountable
  • We will reduce administrative burdens
  • We will be your partners to create a stronger University
  • f Missouri System

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Thank you

39

www.umsystem.edu