Housing Conservation District Advisory Group March 28, 2018 Recap - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

housing conservation district advisory group
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Housing Conservation District Advisory Group March 28, 2018 Recap - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Housing Conservation District Advisory Group March 28, 2018 Recap on Initial Poverty Rates by Census Tracts Community Engagement Communit Co ity mem embers and stakeh ehold lders gen enerall lly exp xpres essed: Support for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

March 28, 2018

Housing Conservation District Advisory Group

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

2

Co Communit ity mem embers and stakeh ehold lders gen enerall lly exp xpres essed:

  • Support for overall

l goa

  • als of
  • f th

the e dis istric ict

  • In

Interest in in:

  • addin

ing units its with ithin exis xisti ting g build ildin ings (i.e (i.e. Engli glish basement units its)

  • additi

itional op

  • pti

tions for

  • r tr

transferring develo elopment righ rights ts

  • smalle

ler dwell ellin ing units its

  • clea

clear per ermit itting processes and exp xpectations

  • ptions and incentives that don’t require “strings” or large investments
  • updates to
  • th

the e exis xisting Multif ltifamil ily Reh ehabili litation Part rtia ial Property Tax x Exempti tion program

  • miti

itigating pot

  • ten

ential l im impacts to

  • lo

low in income ren enters dis ispla laced th through HC HCD in incen centives

  • property tax

x ben enefit its for

  • r providers of
  • f affordable hou
  • using

Recap on Initial Community Engagement

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

3

  • Eligib

ligible le owners of

  • f mult

ltif ifamil ily propertie ies rec eceiv ive an exemption on

  • n th

the e in incre crease in in asses essed ed valu lue due e to

  • reh

ehab/renovation wor

  • rk.
  • The exempti

tion is is for 15 years but t is is phased ou

  • ut

t in in 20% in increments for th the la last t 5 yea ears.

  • Countywide
  • Must have 5+ dwelling units
  • No affordability requirements
  • Assessed building value must increase by 20% or more
  • Square footage cannot increase more than 30%
  • Building must be at least 25 years old
  • Must apply for program prior to undertaking rehab work

Multifamily Rehabilitation Partial Property Tax Exemption

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

4

Properties Currently Using the Program

Property Owner Exempt Units Year Exemption Began 2018 Total Value (includes exempt value) Exemption Value Exemption Value/Unit One Year of Foregone Tax Revenue (1.006 Tax Rate) Columbia Heights Apartments (Monterey) Silverwood Companies 154 2005 $14,053,200 $4,439,000 $28,825 $44,125 Wildwood Towers [1] Dittmar Company 134 2005 $31,028,800 $6,194,900 $46,231 $61,580 Gates of Ballston AHC Inc. 464 2008 $80,354,700 $19,764,600 $42,596 $196,467 Dolley Madison [1] Dittmar Company 364 2009 $109,796,300 $52,981,600 $145,554 $526,656 Westover Apartments AHC Inc. 152 2011 $24,223,300 $3,697,300 $24,324 $36,752 Buchanan Gardens APAH 111 2013 $17,183,700 $6,005,300 $54,102 $59,695 Colonial Village Wesley 162 2013 $26,797,300 $4,692,000 $28,963 $46,640 2nd and Wayne [1,2] Wayne and 2nd Street Apt. Owners 16 2015 $5,799,800 $647,700 $40,481 $6,438 Woodland Hills Senior Apartments Woodland Hills Preservation Association 235 2015 $34,548,500 $8,210,300 $34,937 $81,613 Pierce Queen Apartments [3] Wesley 20 2017 $58,540,200 $678,000 $33,900 $6,740 William Watters Wesley 21 2018 $3,036,500 $976,700 $46,510 $9,709 Total

  • 1,833
  • - $405,362,300 $108,287,400

$59,077 $1,089,371

  • 1. Units are market rate.
  • 2. Exemption only applies to 16 of total 32 units.
  • 3. Exemption applies only to 20 of total 192 units.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

5

Properties Pending for the Program

Property Owner Exempt Units 2018 Total Value Culpepper Garden Culpepper Garden 1 Inc. 204 $15,693,100 Shirlington House [1] Shirlington House LLC 437 $88,081,800 Dominion Arms [1] 333 S Glebe LLC 188 $34,169,600 Courtland Towers [1] Courtland Towers Ass. LLC 575 $192,262,100 Potomac Towers [1] Snell Construction 406 $88,457,300 Fisher House APAH 68 $8,528,200

  • 1. Units are market rate only
slide-6
SLIDE 6

$800 $900 $1,000 $1,100 $1,200 $1,300 $1,400 $1,500 $1,600 $1,700 $1,800

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Average Asking Rent Per Unit* Wildwood Towers Dolley Madison 60% AMI Rent 80% AMI Rent

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

6

Comparison of Rent Levels for Recently-Renovated MARKS

Beg Began Ex Exemptio ion

Da Data Sou Sources: Cos Costar and and Ar Arlington Co County *One bedroom units built prior to 2000

Beg Began Ex Exemptio ion

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

7

Locally-Defined Parameters

Arlington’s Requirement St State Allo lows s Us s to to Modif ify? Min inim imum Num umber of

  • f

Dw Dwelli ling Unit its 5 Yes Must be be rental pr property Yes Yes Age e of

  • f St

Structure Not less than 25 years Yes (not less than 15 years) Incr Increase in Asses ssessed Valu lue fr from

  • m Rehabili

litation 20% Yes (no limit in VA code) Maximum Inc Increase se in GF GFA 30% Yes Ter erm of

  • f Ex

Exemptio ion 10 years with 5 year step down Yes (no longer than 15 years) Appli licatio ion Fee ee $250 Yes (not to exceed $250) Loc Location of

  • f Bu

Build ilding Countywide Can be limited to districts Type of

  • f Acti

ctivit ity Rehabilitation only Yes (+replacement)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

8

In In focus groups, owners s fr frequently cit cited property tax relie lief as as a a desi sirable le in ince centive. Staff an and th the community have id identifie ied 4 4 pot

  • tential

l property tax mechanis isms:

  • Exemption
  • Property tax cr

credit

  • De

Deferment or

  • r ab

abeyance

  • Reimbursement

Property Tax Incentives

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

9

Multifamily Rental Assessed Value Within the HCD

Multifamil ily Rental Property Taxes All l HCD HCD apa apartment pr property asse assess ssments $1,0 $1,091,1 ,125,200 HC HCD CA CAF F Asses ssessments $117 $117,043,9 ,900 Multifamil ily asse assessments ne net t of

  • f CA

CAFs $974 $974,081,3 ,300 Taxes fr from

  • m HCD

HCD MARKs $9,7 $9,799,2 ,260 HC HCD MARK un unit its 5245 5245 Average pr property tax per per un unit it $1,8 $1,868 Monthly per per un unit tax $156 $156

$156 translates into 6 to 7.5% of AMI affordability

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

10 10

Exemptions - Florida, North Carolina, California, and others

  • Property tax exemptions for non-profits providing affordable housing.
  • Units must be provided as affordable housing as defined by statute.

Montgomery County, MD property tax credit

  • Property tax credit for units rented at reduced rent for elderly or disabled

tenants.

  • Property tax credit allowed for 50% of the amount of reduced rent.
  • Tax credit cannot exceed property tax amount.
  • Must demonstrate reduction from market rate rent in same building.
  • Program limited to $250,000 per fiscal year.

Deferral – Florida

  • Available only to affordable housing providers.

National Precedents for Tax Incentives

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

11 11

Illinois - Housing Opportunity Area Tax Incentive Act

  • Located in low poverty area (Less than 10% poverty rate)
  • Unit must be occupied by tenant with rent subsidy (Housing Choice

Vouchers)

  • Maximum of 20% of units (or 2 units in buildings with less than 10 units)
  • 81% reduction of property tax on eligible units.

National Precedents for Tax Incentives

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

12 12

Potential Property Tax Incentive Considerations

Mechanis ism Imp Impact to to Cou County Revenue Imp Impact to to APS PS Revenue Requires s St State Leg Legisla latio ion Li Lien Pl Placed

  • n
  • n Property

Exemption    Tax Credit    Deferral Short-term Short-term   Reimbursement 

Reven enue im impacts fr from tax x in incen centiv ives wou

  • uld lik

likely ely be e con

  • nsid

idered as for

  • regone

reven enue and wou

  • uld be

e vie viewed in in ligh light t of

  • f th

the e overall ll budget for affordable hou

  • using

g exp xpenditu tures. An of

  • ffset for th

the e budget im impact wou

  • uld have

e to

  • be

e id iden entif tified.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

13 13

Potential Property Tax Incentive Considerations

Should there be a tim ime commit itment? What affordabil ility requir irements would ld be appropriate?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

14 14

Potential Property Tax Incentive Considerations

Should their ir be a min inim imum number or share of unit its elig ligible wit ithin a property? Should there be a maxi ximum number or share of unit its elig ligible wit ithin a property?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

15 15

Potential Property Tax Incentive Considerations

How sh should ld the County guarantee that part rtic icip ipatin ing unit its meet t healt lth and sa safety standards (C (Code)? )?

Should an in incentive program in inclu lude a lim limit it on

  • verall fis

iscal im impact to County?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

16 16

Potential Property Tax Incentive Considerations

Any y other factors/components the County should ld consid ider? Should the in incentiv ive cover the full ll assessment for each elig ligib ible unit it, , or should ld it it cover a portion

  • f that amount?