HIT/HIE Community and Organizational Panel Office of Health - - PDF document

hit hie community and organizational panel
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HIT/HIE Community and Organizational Panel Office of Health - - PDF document

10/13/2016 HIT/HIE Community and Organizational Panel Office of Health Information Technology October 13, 2016 Welcome, Introductions, and Agenda Review 1 10/13/2016 Agenda New Member Introduction and Discussion Regarding Membership


slide-1
SLIDE 1

10/13/2016 1

HIT/HIE Community and Organizational Panel

Office of Health Information Technology October 13, 2016

Welcome, Introductions, and Agenda Review

slide-2
SLIDE 2

10/13/2016 2

Agenda

  • New Member Introduction and Discussion Regarding Membership
  • HIE in Oregon: Current Thinking and Crosswalk
  • HITOC Strategic Planning Status Update
  • HCOP Members’ HIE Strategic Plans

– Governance – Roadmaps

  • HIE Onboarding Program: Update and Discussion
  • Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Update
  • Future Topics

3

Health Information Exchange in Oregon

Susan Otter Marta Makarushka

slide-3
SLIDE 3

10/13/2016 3

Health Information Exchange Bright Spots, Gaps, and Opportunities

Current health information exchange platforms

Type Examples Level of information able to be shared

Intra-system Sharing Kaiser, Legacy, Providence High Preferred Provider Networks (sharing EHR) Legacy, Providence High Association Networks IPAs High Intra-vendor Sharing EpicCareEverywhere High Collaboratives/ Integration Commonwell, Carequality Medium - High HIE JHIE, RHIC Medium - High Direct Secure Messaging CareAccord, DSM within EHRs Low - Medium Payer-based CCOs, BCBS claims-level: High case management: Low- Medium Subscription-based EDIE/ PreManage Low - Medium Personal Health Records Humetrix, Medyear, caresync Medium - High Public Health Registries Syndromic surveillance, PDMP Low - Medium This matrix is illustrative, not exhaustive. Gap Dimension Highlighted Examples of Largest Gaps Impact/Importance Examples Availability of Resources Critical access hospitals, high Medicaid members, nonprofits, behavioral health, long-term services and supports Organizations may be limited by low/negative margins or business models that preclude IT investment Urban-rural Small/solo practitioners, specialty/complex care Rural areas more likely to have one dominant system/network which creates both opportunities and gaps; rural trading partners likely to be outside of local area Eligible professional Behavioral health, LTSS, social services, corrections, EMS EP status directly tied to incentive payment availability Practice size Small/solo practitioners, independent specialists Organizations may lack scale to achieve efficiencies from IT adoption/use Patient acuity Less sick/privately insured patients less likely to be affected/ interested Higher acuity patients typically involve substantially more organizations but receive higher attention from Medicaid/ payers; low acuity patients may have lower coordination needs but also receive much less support Types of data shared Complex/unstructured data, setting- specific data formats and definitions More complex/less structured data typically more difficult to exchange but likely to have higher value

6

This matrix of gap dimensions follows from the August 2016 HITOC discussion of HIE gaps. It is illustrative, not exhaustive.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10/13/2016 4

HIE Governance Principles

The HITOC discussion of June 2016 implied principles for moving forward with a coordination role for statewide HIE

  • efforts. Are these principles in alignment with the HIE

methods discussed?

  • Democratize the data
  • Establish minimums (not maximums) and work to “raise all

boats”

  • Management to ensure appropriate and free use
  • Accountability
  • Rules of the road for data sharing/use
  • Inclusive
  • Trust/Transparency
  • Provider workflow and use is critical
  • Governance role

HIT Crosswalk

  • At July 2016 HITAG/HCOP meeting, request was made for

OHA to create a crosswalk of HIT services available to providers in Oregon

  • Planning to develop two versions

– High level overview or roles of HIT (e.g., next slide) – Detailed Crosswalk of available services (e.g., outdated handout: Crosswalk of JHIE and OHA’s HIT initiatives)

  • Feedback:

– What else should we consider adding? – What suggestions do you have for improvement?

8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10/13/2016 5

High-Level Overview of HIT Roles

9

Web portal- based tools (DSM) EHR HIE National HIE Initiatives

Sample JHIE/OHA Initiatives Crosswalk

Overview

  • Overall goal/value
  • Operating Organization
  • Key Users
  • Timing
  • Funding
  • Geographic Scope

Data Scope

  • Data Sources
  • Data Types

Services/Functions

  • Direct Secure Messaging
  • Provider Directory
  • Clinical Referrals
  • Results Delivery
  • Integration with hospital and

physician EHR systems for bidirectional health information exchange

  • Registry Reporting

Other features

  • Member File Management
  • Reporting and Analytics
  • Meaningful Use
  • Healtheway National HIE
  • Patient Search
  • Patient Matching and Record

Locator Service

  • Privacy/Security
slide-6
SLIDE 6

10/13/2016 6

HITOC Strategic Planning/Business Plan Update

Susan Otter Director of Health IT

12

Strategic planning process and progress

Step in the process Status Timeframe Goals (confirm) Completed December 2015 Aims/objectives Completed December 2015 State’s role / Principles Initial discussion Summer 2016 Prioritizing objectives and

  • utcomes

Fall 2016 Assess environment:

  • Identify current state
  • Identify changing policies, etc.

Ongoing Ongoing Define/refine strategies:

  • Technology
  • Governance/Finance
  • Policy, legal, education, etc.
  • HIE Onboarding Program

End of 2016/2017 Roadmap/Final Plan 2017

slide-7
SLIDE 7

10/13/2016 7

ONC Interoperability Roadmap Milestones

13

Strategic Plan/Business Plan Update Timeline 2016- 2017

14

Potential March Meeting/ Retreat

2016 2017

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10/13/2016 8

Development of Draft HIT Utility Governance Model

  • Building off EDIE Utility public/private model experience
  • Grant funding from OHA to OHLC to support the

development of governance model to:

– connect existing HIT systems, – support statewide HIT solutions, and – guide future investments to provide HIT solutions that support the health of Oregonians across payers, providers, and health systems

  • Model will be developed in partnership with OHA, HITOC

and other stakeholders

15 16

Governance Entity CareAccord Provider Directory TBD (MPI, query, etc.) ADT/ Hospital Notifications Regional HIE Shared Funding (including HIE Onboarding Funding) Shared Principles, Policies, Agreements Hospital Behavioral health Corrections LTC Clinic PDMP (Gateway) CCO Shared Accountability (Oversight and Reporting) Large Health System Clinic EMS CCO Hospital Behavioral health Hosted EHR or

  • ther HIE

Hospital Clinic Shared Services

The diagram is highly simplified, not exhaustive, and represents HIE relationships to a governance entity and not necessarily between each other

Stakeholders OHA/ State

  • f Oregon

Example “Network of Networks” Structure

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10/13/2016 9

HCOP Members’ HIE Strategic Plans Governance

As OHA is considering the development of a governing layer, we are interested in learning from each of your

  • experiences. Please describe your governance structure.
  • What do you consider the critical components of your

governance structure? – Specific committees?

  • Technology
  • Privacy & Security

– What advice/reflections do you have on what it takes to bring stakeholders together?

  • For a state-level governance entity that is going to play a

connecting role, based on your experiences, what advice would you offer?

18

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/13/2016 10

ONC-Identified Near-term Priority Data Domains

19

  • Individual Name*
  • Sex*
  • Date of Birth*
  • Race/ Ethnicity*
  • Address*
  • Phone Number*
  • Preferred Language*
  • Smoking Status
  • Problems
  • Medications
  • Medication Allergies
  • Laboratory Test(s)
  • Laboratory Value(s)/Result(s)
  • Vital Signs
  • Procedures
  • Care Team Members
  • Immunizations
  • Unique Device Identifier(s) for

Implantable Device(s)

  • Assessment and Plan of Treatment
  • Goals
  • Health Concerns

* OHA Identified Minimum Data Element ** OHA also identified the following minimum data elements:

  • Admission/ Encounter Date
  • Basic Provider Identification
  • Service Location

HITOC Member Survey

N=9

Importance Rating Low Medium High Highest High or Highest

Medications*

4 5 9

Medication Allergies*

1 2 6 8

Diagnoses

1 4 4 8

Discharge Summary

1 4 4 8

Allergies

1 5 3 8

Laboratory Value(s)/Result(s)*

1 5 3 8

POLST Registry (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment)

1 5 3 8

Advance Directives

1 1 4 3 7

Imaging results

1 1 5 2 7

Medication History

2 6 1 7

Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) (i.e. opioid prescription history)

2 6 1 7

Hospital Event (ADT)

1 1 2 4 6

Social Determinants (e.g. food/ housing instability, ACE score, income)

3 3 3 6

Problem list*

1 2 3 3 6

Vital Signs*

3 4 1 5

Care plan*

4 4 1 5

Procedures*

4 4 1 5

Behavioral Health Plan

3 5 5

Referrals

4 5 5

20

*ONC- Identified Near-term Priority Data Domain

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10/13/2016 11

Opportunity in Oregon: Medicaid priorities Your Roadmap

Given your current and planned efforts, what alignment or gaps do you see compared to:

  • the HITOC priority data elements?
  • the Medicaid priorities?

What is on your longer-term roadmap? To what extent is your HCOP: member initiatives information (handout from June 2015) outdated?

22

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10/13/2016 12

Break

23

HIE Onboarding Program Update & Discussion

Lisa Parker Francie Nevill

slide-13
SLIDE 13

10/13/2016 13

HIE Onboarding Program (HOP)

Oregon intends to explore using new federal funds to: 1) Support care coordination across providers by paying for the costs of an eligible HIE entity (e.g., regional HIEs) to onboard Medicaid providers including:

– Participants of housing and corrections initiatives in Oregon’s proposed Medicaid 1115 Demonstration Waiver

2) Support Oregon’s Medicaid providers, with or without an EHR, including:

– Behavioral health, long-term care, corrections, and other social services, to connect to HIE entities.

3) Ensure HIE entities in Oregon are able to support OHA’s Medicaid objectives by setting criteria that entities would need to meet to be eligible for funding

25

HOP Overview

Purpose Statement

  • The HIE Onboarding Program (HOP) will be a 4-5 year

program to enhance health information exchange within the state of Oregon. The goal of the program is twofold: – to accelerate onboarding Medicaid providers onto health information exchanges and incentivize cross-

  • rganizational exchange; and

– establishing and formalizing the Oregon HIE network of networks within the state.

  • HOP will accomplish this through funding HIE entities to
  • nboard providers, and through the establishment of criteria

for HIE entities to receive these funds.

  • The criteria will serve to set a baseline for the minimum

services required to participate in the network of HIE networks in Oregon.

26

slide-14
SLIDE 14

10/13/2016 14

What HOP will do

  • Support a network of networks
  • Support HIE entities’ costs for onboarding Medicaid

providers

  • Support HIE entities who can support Medicaid
  • bjectives (e.g., open to participation, capable of

inter/intra-state exchange)

  • Establish basic standards for HIE entities

27

What HOP will not do

  • Establish a state-run HIE
  • Provide funding directly to providers, clinics,

hospitals, or health systems

  • Support HIEs who do not support Medicaid
  • bjectives (to be defined)
  • Support the ongoing costs of HIE entities after
  • nboarding is complete
  • Support operational costs or purchase EHRs

28

slide-15
SLIDE 15

10/13/2016 15

HOP Advisory Group topics/schedule

  • October 2016: Orientation to HOP; gaps and
  • pportunities in the Oregon health information exchange

(HIE) landscape (e.g., geography, provider types)

  • November 2016: What types of HIE are most critical;

services that HIE entities should offer in order to be eligible for support

  • December 2016: Criteria for HIE entities to be eligible;

explore what a network of networks might mean in Oregon; wrap up

  • January 2016: Placeholder meeting

29

HOP Advisory Group Participants

Name/Title Organization Maili Boynay, IT Director Legacy Bud Garrison, Dir. of Clinical Informatics OHSU Brandon Gatke, CIO Cascadia Behavioral Health Mark Hetz, CIO Asante Linda Mann, Dir. of Community Outreach Capitol Dental Care Sonney Sapra, CIO Tuality Healthcare Gina Seufert, VP Physician & Clinic Services Tillamook Adventist Kim Whitley, VP/COO IHN CCO Andy Zechnich, MD Providence Additional Recruiting Underway LTSS, Tribes, supported housing, HIE, and additional behavioral health representation

30

slide-16
SLIDE 16

10/13/2016 16

HOP Advisory Group’s Relationship to

  • ther Groups
  • The HOP Advisory Group is a staff advisory group

(rather than being advisory to HITOC, HCOP, etc.)

  • OHA staff will share insights from HOP Advisory Group

with other groups, including:

– HITOC and OHPB – HITAG (CCO HIT Advisory Group) – HITOC’s HCOP (HIT/ HIE Community and Organizational Panel)

31

Overall HOP Timeline

  • October 2016: HOP Advisory Group begins
  • Expected to meet approximately 3 times
  • Winter 2016/2017: Review documents with standing

committees

  • Spring 2017: Funding Request to CMS for HITECH funds
  • Spring 2017: Develop RFA/RFP for program
  • Summer 2017: RFA/RFP Posted
  • Fall 2017: Recipients Announced
  • Winter 2017: HOP launched
  • Underway by summer 2018: Implementation/HIE entities
  • nboarding clinics and providers

32

slide-17
SLIDE 17

10/13/2016 17

HIE Onboarding Program Discussion Criteria for Utilization of Funds

  • HIE that enables Medicaid providers to

– to connect with eligible professionals – to meet meaningful use for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

  • Can support costs of HIE entity to onboard Medicaid

providers:

– who are eligible for EHR incentives: MDs, Dentists, NPs, PAs in certain settings – And those who are not eligible: behavioral health, long- term services & supports, home health, correctional health, substance use treatment providers, laboratory, pharmacy, emergency medical services, and public health providers

34

slide-18
SLIDE 18

10/13/2016 18

Value and use of onboarding funds

Given your roadmap and current activities, staffing, etc., what would the impact of these funds be?

What would you be able to do with the funds? – Accererate planned efforts? – Expand services to new providers? – Expand geographically? – Hire necessary staff? – Other?

35

What would it really take? (continued)

  • What would the onboarding time frame be? In terms of

ramp up, staffing, adjusting strategy, etc.?

  • What are the components of onboarding costs?
  • What would you have to do in order to utilize the

funds/take on the work?

  • What would be the implications for your current business

model in terms of sustainability and governance?

36

slide-19
SLIDE 19

10/13/2016 19

Potential Model

37

Priorities Org/Provider Types Region Activities/ Services

1 2 3

Priorities Org/Provider Types Region Activities/ Services

1 2 3

Phase One Phase Two

Provider Types: Deeper Discussion

In looking at provider types of high priority for Medicaid:

  • Patient-Centered Primary Care Homes
  • Behavioral Health
  • Dental
  • Housing and other social services
  • Corrections
  • Long-term Services and Supports
  • Pharmacy/labs

What does onboarding these provider types look like? What are current opportunities? Risks? Concerns? Challenges?

38

slide-20
SLIDE 20

10/13/2016 20

Questions?

39

Prescription Drug Monitoring Program/ HB 4124 and Gateway Update

Susan Otter

slide-21
SLIDE 21

10/13/2016 21

Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Update

  • HB 4124 (2016) authorized PDMP users to access opioid

prescription data through an HIT system

  • Rules Advisory Committee convened and final rule expected by
  • Feb. 2017
  • PDMP staff, OHIT and stakeholders are conducting due

diligence with a gateway solution, Appriss PMP Gateway

  • Once connected, health systems and providers would contract

with Appriss to provide the gateway service ($50/ provider/ year, with volume discounts)

  • Connection through the gateway would also be provided

through EDIE to ED physicians and JHIE using federal grant funding

  • Concurrently, OHIT and CMT are also exploring a direct

connection between EDIE and the PDMP

  • Expect solution to go live in early 2017

41

Process Check

  • Are you finding these meetings valuable?

– Most valuable? Least valuable?

  • What did you like about today’s meeting?

– Topics? – Format? – Discussion?

  • What would you like to see us change?

– What should we add? – What should we remove?

42

slide-22
SLIDE 22

10/13/2016 22

Conclusions, Next Meeting, and Action Items

  • HCOP to continue meeting quarterly in 2017 on

2nd Thursday from 1-5 pm

– January 12th (Potential combined meeting with CCO HIT Advisory Group) – April 13th – July 13th – October 12th

43

For more information on Oregon’s HIT/HIE developments, please visit us at http://healthit.oregon.gov Susan Otter, Director of Health Information Technology Susan.Otter@state.or.us Marta Makarushka, Strategy and Policy Analyst Marta.M.Makarushka@state.or.us