highway 52 safety access and interchange location study
play

Highway 52 Safety, Access, and Interchange Location Study Public - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Highway 52 Safety, Access, and Interchange Location Study Public Open House May 15, 2011 Presentation Overview Project Background Goals and Objectives Alternatives Development & Evaluation Next Steps Project Background


  1. Highway 52 Safety, Access, and Interchange Location Study Public Open House May 15, 2011

  2. Presentation Overview • Project Background • Goals and Objectives • Alternatives – Development & Evaluation • Next Steps

  3. Project Background CR 14 Highview Rd • Study Location – Begins: • Highview Road CR 1 South of Cannon Falls CR 9 – Ends: • 135 th Avenue South of Hader

  4. Project Background • History – Previous planning studies identified recommended Highway 52 safety improvements • Interchange in the vicinity of County Road 1 & County Road 9 • Removal of direct access of County Road 14 to Highway 52

  5. Project Background • History – MnDOT and Goodhue County initiated the current study • To recommend location of an interchange and reroute of County Road 14 • Prepare environmental documentation for these long- term improvements

  6. Project Background • Current Study – Project Management Team (PMT) has been meeting to: • Establish purpose & need • Define goals & objectives • Review initial alternatives

  7. Project Background • Current Study – PMT members include • MnDOT staff • Goodhue County Staff • Local Township Representatives • HR Green Staff

  8. Goals and Objectives • Goal 1: Enhance the SAFETY of the traveling public • Goal 2: Identify ACCESS MANAGEMENT improvements • Goal 3: Enhance MOBILITY AND CONNECTIVITY along Hwy 52 and supporting roadway network • Goal 4: Minimize SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEE) impacts • Goal 5: Maximize the COST EFFECTIVENESS and flexibility of the overall system

  9. Alternatives • Study area was divided into seven subareas • The current study is focusing on the two main subareas – Subarea 1 (CR 14) – Subarea 4 (Interchange Location)

  10. Alternatives

  11. Alternatives • Subarea 1 (County Road 14) – Alternative 1.A: Improved 57 th Avenue – Alternative 1.B.1: Backage Road west – Alternative 1.B.2: Backage Road west with south connection – Alternative 1.C: Backage Road parallel to Hwy 52

  12. Alternatives • Subarea 1 • Potential connection to planned Cannon Falls route on the north • Alternatives 1.B and 1.C use a new alignment • Alternatives 1.B.1 and 1.B.c cross challenging topography • Alternative 1.A uses an existing rout with many residential driveways

  13. Alternatives • Subarea 1 Evaluation Matrix Safety Access Mobility and Social, Cost Management Connectivity Economic, and Effectiveness Environmental 1.A Improved 57th Ave - 0 0 + + 1.B.1 Backage Road – west + 0 0 0 0 Backage Road - west with south 1.B.2 + 0 0 0 0 connection 1.C Backage Road – Parallel to US 52 + + + 0 +

  14. Alternatives • Subarea 4 (Interchange Locations) – County Road 1 – County Road 9 – In-between

  15. Alternatives • Subarea 4 (Interchange Location) – Alternative 4.A: PARCLO AB interchange at CR 1 – Alternative 4.B: Diamond interchange at CR 1 – Alternative 4.C.1: Diamond interchange between CR 1 and CR 9 – Alternative 4.C.2: Diamond interchange between CR 1 and CR 9, w/frontage roads – Alternative 4.D.1: Split diamond interchange at CR 1 and CR 9 – Alternative 4.D.2: Split diamond interchange at CR 1 and CR 9, w/frontage roads – Alternative 4.E: Diamond interchange at CR 9

  16. Alternatives Alternative 4.A: Alternative 4.A Partial Cloverleaf at CR 1 • Reroutes CR 9 traffic County Road 1 • Travel time to Highway 52 less for residents near CR 1 • Closes several driveways • Challenging topography County Road 9

  17. Alternatives Alternative 4.B: Alternative 4.B Diamond at CR 1 • Reroutes CR 9 traffic • Travel time to Highway 52 less for residents near CR 1 County Road 9 • Closes several County Road 1 driveways • Challenging topography • Less farmland impacted than for 4.A County Road 9

  18. Alternatives Alternative 4.C.1: Alternative 4.C.1 Diamond between CR 1 & CR 9 • Minimizes adverse travel time impacts County Road 9 County Road 1 • Reroutes CR 9 and CR 1 traffic • Closes few at-grade accesses • High impacts to farmland County Road 9

  19. Alternatives Alternative 4.C.2: Alternative 4.C.2 Diamond between CR 1 & CR 9 w/frontage road • Minimizes adverse travel time impacts • Less CR 9 traffic County Road 1 rerouted (frontage road) • High impacts to farmland County Road 9

  20. Alternatives Alternative 4.D.1: Alternative 4.D.1 Split diamond at CR 1 & CR 9 • Minimizes adverse travel time impacts • Convenient access for residents near CR 1 & CR 9 County Road 1 • High ROW and environmental impacts • High cost County Road 9

  21. Alternatives Alternative 4.D.2: Alternative 4.D.2 Split between CR 1 & CR 9 w/frontage • Minimizes adverse roads travel time impacts • Convenient access for residents near CR 1 & CR 9 County Road 1 • Provides efficient replacement for closed driveways • High ROW and environmental impacts County Road 9 • High cost

  22. Alternatives Alternative 4.E Alternative 4.E: Diamond at CR 9 • Travel time to Highway 52 less for residents near CR 9 • Closes several County Road 1 driveways • Some rerouting for residents near CR 1 • Low environmental impacts County Road 9

  23. Alternatives • Subarea 4 Evaluation Matrix Safety Access Mobility and Social, Cost Management Connectivity Economic, and Effectiveness Environmental Partial Cloverleaf Interchange at 4.A 0 0 0 0 - CR 1 4.B Diamond Interchange at CR 1 0 0 0 0 - Diamond Interchange between CR 4.C.1 0 - 0 0 0 1 & CR 9 Diamond Interchange between CR 4.C.2 1 & Cr 9 w/Frontage Road + 0 0 0 0 connection to CSAH 9 Split Diamond Interchange at CR 1 4.D.1 & CR 9 w/existing roadway + 0 + - - network. Split Diamond Interchange at CR 1 4.D.2 & CR 9 w/Frontage Road + + + - - connections 4.E Diamond Interchange at CR 9 + + 0 + +

  24. Next Steps • Interchange Location – June 2012 • Select recommended alternative – Late Summer 2012 • Complete draft environmental documentation – Fall 2012 • Public meeting on environmental document – Early Winter 2012 • Complete environmental document

  25. Next Steps • CR14 Location – June 2012 • Select recommended alternative

  26. Contact Information • Heather Lukes MnDOT Project Manager 507-286-7694 heather.lukes@state.mn.us • Greg Isakson Goodhue County Project Manager 651-385-3025 greg.isaskson@co.goodhue.mn.us • Jack Broz Project Website: HR Green Project Manager 651-659-7711 http://www.dot.state.mn.us/d6/projects/ jbroz@hrgreen.com hwy52accessstudy/index.html

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend