High-Statistics Calculation
- f Nucleon Structure and Matrix Elements
- n Isotropic Clover Lattices
High-Statistics Calculation of Nucleon Structure and Matrix Elements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
High-Statistics Calculation of Nucleon Structure and Matrix Elements on Isotropic Clover Lattices Combined LHP & NME Proposal LHP: S.Syritsyn(PI), J.Green, M.Engelhardt, N.Hasan, S.Krieg,J.Negele, S.Meinel, A.Pochinsky NME: R.Gupta(PI),
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Scientific Objectives
Systematics
Systematics study [NMEp]
study [NMEp]
proposed in [LHPp]
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Scientific Objectives
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Scientific Objectives
· Ï Û ı · Ï Á · Ï ˜ 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 a HfmL gA
u-d
· Ï Û ı · Ï Á · Ï ˜ 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 Mp2 HGeV2L gA
u-d
· Ï Û ı · Ï Á · Ï ˜ 3 4 5 6 7 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 MpL gA
u-d
· Ï Û ı · Ï Á · Ï ˜ 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 a HfmL gS
u-d
· Ï Û ı · Ï Á · Ï ˜ 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Mp2 HGeV2L gS
u-d
· Ï Û ı ·Ï Á · Ï ˜ 3 4 5 6 7 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 MpL gS
u-d
· Ï Û ı · Ï Á · Ï ˜ 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 a HfmL gT
u-d
· Ï Û ı · Ï Á · Ï ˜ 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 Mp2 HGeV2L gT
u-d
· Ï Û ı · Ï Á · Ï ˜ 3 4 5 6 7 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 MpL gT
u-d
π + γe−mπL
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Scientific Objectives
m휋=149 MeV data vs Phenomenology [J.Green et al(LHP), PRD90:074507(2014)]
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Gv
E
Q2 (GeV2) Alberico et al parametrization lattice data 1 2 3 4 5 6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Gv
M
Q2 (GeV2) Alberico et al parametrization lattice data
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 mπ [GeV] 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 hr2
1iud [fm2] µp PDG 2012 QCDSF ’11 Nf = 2 PNDME ’13 Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 ETMC ’10 Nf = 2 ETMC ’13 Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 CLS-Mainz ’12 Nf = 2 RBC/UKQCD ’08, ’13 Nf = 2 + 1 LHPC ’10 Nf = 2 + 1 LHPC ’09 Nf = 2 + 1 LHPC ’12 Nf = 2 + 1
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Scientific Objectives
implications for neutrino flux norm. in IceCube, etc
varying nuclear / GA shape models: mA=0.9 ... 1.4 GeV
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Q2 [GeV2] 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 GA
phenomenology T = 8a T = 9a T = 10a T = 12a summ
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Q2 [GeV2] 10 20 30 40 50 60 GP
phenomenology T = 8a T = 9a T = 10a T = 12a summ
Physical m휋, chiral quarks [LHP & RBC collabs, Lattice’14]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Q
2 [GeV 2]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
GA (Q
2) / GA (0)
[V.Bernard et at, J.Phys.G28:R1(2002)]
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Scientific Objectives
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 mπ[GeV ] −0.2 −0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Jconn
q
1 2∆Σu+d
Lu+d
ETMC ’13 (Twisted Mass Nf = 2(+1 + 1) QCDSF ’12 (Wilson-clover Nf = 2) LHPC ’10 (Asqtad+DWF Nf = 2 + 1) LHPC ’10 (DWF Nf = 2 + 1) PRELIM Nf = 2 + 1 DWF (LHP&RBC)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 mπ[GeV ] −0.2 −0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Jconn
q
Ju Jd
ETMC ’13 (Twisted Mass Nf = 2(+1 + 1) QCDSF ’12 (Wilson-clover Nf = 2) LHPC ’10 (Asqtad+DWF Nf = 2 + 1) LHPC ’10 (DWF Nf = 2 + 1) LHPC ’13 (Wilson-clover Nf = 2 + 1) PRELIM Nf = 2 + 1 DWF (LHP&RBC)
−0.4 −0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 Jd −0.4 −0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 Ju
HERMES DD HERMES Dual JLab DD LHP’07 [0705.4295] QCDSF’07 [0710.1534] LHP’10 [1001.3620] ETMC Nf = [1012.0857] χQCD’13 [1312.4816] LHP&RBC mphys
π
PRELIMINARY
disconnected contributions are not included Jq,glue = 1 2 h Aq,glue
20
(0) + Bq,glue
20
(0) i
q
20(0)
⇥N(p + q)| T q,glue
µν
|N(p)⇤ n A20, B20, C20
discrepancy with 흌QCD result for Lu+d
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Scientific Objectives
l + N(P) − → l0 + N(Ph) + X
τ
with spacelike link path U =
SIDIS DY SiversShift, ud quarks Ζ 0.39, bT 0.36 fm, mΠ 518 MeV 10 5 5 10
0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Ηv lattice units mN f
1 1 f
1 0 GeV
valence DWF on Asqtad [B.Musch, P.Hägler, M.Engelhardt, J.Negele, A.Schäfer]
ˆ ζ = P · v mN |v| → ∞
“light-cone” limit
at Euclidean time 휏
Non-local lattice operator probes k⟘-moments (“shifts”) of TMDs
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Improvements
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Improvements
Signal hN(T) ¯ N(0)i ⇠ e−MNT Noise h|N(T) ¯ N(0)|2i |hN(T) ¯ N(0)i|2 ⇠ e−3mπT Signal/Noise ⇠ e−(MN− 3
2 mπ)T
[LHP, PLB734 290 (2014)]
0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 mπ [GeV] 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 hxiud
BChPT CTEQ6
0.93 1.16 1.39 fm summ.
0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 mπ [GeV] 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 (r2
1)u−d [fm2]
HBChPT+∆ µp + PDG PDG 2012
1.39 1.16 0.93 fm summ.
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Improvements
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Q2 (GeV2)
−0.07 −0.06 −0.05 −0.04 −0.03 −0.02 −0.01 0.00
F2 (disconn.)
t/a = 10 strange light 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Q2 (GeV2)
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012
F1 (disconn.)
t/a = 10 light strange
Disconnected diagrams with JLab isotropic Clover [S.Meinel’s USQCD project ’13; in prep.]
1 ≤ X
a
|xa − ya| ≤ 2k : 1 N
N
X
i
zi(x)zi(y)† ≡ 0
† /
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Request
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2
Nucleon Structure with Wilson Clover Lattices USQCD All-Hands Meeting, Fermilab, May1&2 Improvements
Multi-GPU DD scaling (Titan)
512 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608 Titan Nodes (GPUs) 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 TFLOPS BiCGStab: 72
3x256
DD+GCR: 72
3x256
BiCGStab: 96
3x256
DD+GCR: 96
3x256
Strong Scaling, QUDA+Chroma+QDP-JIT(PTX)
0" 50" 100" 150" 200" 250" 300" 32" 64" 128"
Wall$clock$(me$(s)$$ XK$Nodes$
light"quark,"MG,"CPU,"8"cores/node" light"quark,"MG,"CPU,"16"cores/node" light"quark,"BiCGStab,"GPU+1"core/node" strange"quark,"BiCGStab,"GPU+1"core/node"
Comparison of AMG (QDP-MG) to usual Krylov iteration methods