HIGGS SECTOR IN THE SUPERSYMMETRIC EXTENSION OF THE STANDARD MODEL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

higgs sector in the supersymmetric extension of the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HIGGS SECTOR IN THE SUPERSYMMETRIC EXTENSION OF THE STANDARD MODEL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HIGGS SECTOR IN THE SUPERSYMMETRIC EXTENSION OF THE STANDARD MODEL WITH LIGHT SGOLDSTINOS Sergey Demidov, Dmitry Gorbunov, Ekaterina Kriukova Lomonosov Moscow State University, Institute for Nuclear Research of RAS 8th International Conference


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HIGGS SECTOR IN THE SUPERSYMMETRIC EXTENSION OF THE STANDARD MODEL WITH LIGHT SGOLDSTINOS

Sergey Demidov, Dmitry Gorbunov, Ekaterina Kriukova

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Institute for Nuclear Research of RAS

8th International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics, 27 August 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Model with sgoldstino

◮ Supersymmetric model with low-scale SUSY breaking in

hidden sector. Goldstone theorem ⇒ goldstino G, sgoldstino φ.

◮ Heavy fields are integrated out. Effective theory with MSSM

fields, goldstino multiplet and gravitino.

◮ Sgoldstino can decay to SM particles (R-even). Interactions in

effective lagrangian: sgg, shh, sW +W −, sZZ, sγγ, sZγ.

◮ Aim: consider the possibility of increase in di-Higgs

production cross section at LHC due to processes with sgoldstino gg → s → hh.

◮ Main SM diagrams for di-Higgs production.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MSSM Lagrangian

◮ sum over all gauge superfields Wα → kinetic terms of gauge

fields 1 4

  • α
  • d2θTrWαW α + h.c.,

(1)

◮ K¨

ahler potential (sum over all matter superfields Φk and Higgs fields)

  • d2θd2¯

θ

  • k

Φ†

keg1V1+g2V2+g3V3Φk,

(2)

◮ superpotential

  • d2θǫij
  • µHi

DHj U + Y L abLj aE c b Hi D+

+Y D

abQj aDc bHi D + Y U abQi aUc bHj U

  • + h.c.

(3)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Spontaneous SUSY breaking

Goldstone theorem ⇒ goldstino fermion G, its superpartner sgoldstino φ.

Chiral superfield

Φ = φ + √ 2θG + Fφθ2, where Fφ is an auxiliary field. Its nonzero VEV, Fφ ≡ F = 0, breaks the supersymmetry. The lagrangian of goldstino supermultiplet: LΦ =

  • d2θd2¯

θΦ†Φ −

  • d2θFΦ + h.c.
  • (4)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lagrangian of the model with SUSY breaking

L = LK + Lsuperpotential + Lgauge + LΦ, (5) LK =

  • d2θd2¯

θ

  • k
  • 1 − m2

k

F 2 Φ†Φ

  • Φ†

keg1V1+g2V2+g3V3Φk,

(6) Lsuperpotential =

  • d2θǫij
  • µ − B

F Φ

  • Hi

DHj U+

+

  • Y L

ab + AL ab

F Φ

  • Lj

aE c b Hi D +

  • Y D

ab + AD ab

F Φ

  • Qj

aDc bHi D+

+

  • Y U

ab + AU ab

F Φ

  • Qi

aUc bHj U

  • + h.c.,

(7) Lgauge = 1 4

  • α
  • d2θ
  • 1 + 2Mα

F

  • TrWαW α + h.c.,

(8)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Potential of scalar fields p.1

V = V11 + V12 + V21 + V22, (9) V11 = g2

1

8

  • 1 + M1

F (φ + φ∗) −1 h†

dhd − h† uhu−

−φ∗φ F 2

  • m2

dh† dhd − m2 uh† uhu

2 , (10) V12 = g2

2

8

  • 1 + M2

F (φ + φ∗) −1 h†

dσahd + h† uσahu−

−φ∗φ F 2

  • m2

dh† dσahd + m2 uh† uσahu

2 . (11) Here g1, g2 are coupling constants of the groups U(1)Y , SU(2)L, M1, M2 are soft masses, corresponding to gauginos, √ F is a scale

  • f supersymmetry breaking, σa are Pauli matrices.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Potential of scalar fields p.2

V21 =

  • 1 − m2

u

F 2 h†

uhu − m2 d

F 2 h†

dhd − m4 u

F 4 φ∗φh†

uhu − m4 d

F 4 φ∗φh†

dhd

−1

  • F +
  • −h0

dh0 u + h−h+ B

F − m2

u + m2 d

F 2 φ∗

  • µ − B

F φ

  • 2

, (12) V22 = µ2 F 2 |φ|2 m2

uh† dhd + m2 dh† uhu

  • +
  • µ − B

F φ

  • 2

h†

dhd + h† uhu

  • .

(13) Higgs doublets hd = h0

d

h−

  • , hu =

h+ h0

u

  • ,

µ is a real parameter of higgsino mixing from superpotential.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Some notation

vu ≡ v sin β, vd ≡ v cos β, v = 174 GeV The expansion of fields around electroweak vacuum h0

u = vu + 1

√ 2 (h cos α + H sin α) + i √ 2 A cos β, (14) h0

d = vd + 1

√ 2 (−h sin α + H cos α) + i √ 2 A sin β. (15) Extract scalar s and pseudoscalar p from sgoldstino field φ = 1 √ 2 (s + ip). (16) Introduce masses m2

Z ≡ g2 1 + g2 2

2 v2, m2

A ≡ m2 u + m2 d + 2µ2.

(17)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Trilinear couplings before mixing

sHH term. 1 F √ 2

  • −v2

4

  • g2

1 M1 + g2 2 M2

  • (2 cos 2α cos 2β − sin 2α sin 2β + 1) +

+µ sin 2α m2

A

2

  • 1 − sin 2β

sin 2α

  • − µ2
  • .

(18) shh term. 1 F √ 2 v2 4

  • g2

1 M1 + g2 2 M2

  • (2 cos 2α cos 2β − sin 2α sin 2β − 1) −

−µ sin 2α m2

A

2

  • 1 + sin 2β

sin 2α

  • − µ2
  • .

(19) Other sgoldstino-Higgs vertices: shH, sAA, sh+h−, pAH, pAh, ssH, ssh, ppH, pph.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Rotation towards mass basis p.1

Mass terms have the following form: 1 2 (H h s)   m2

H

Y /F m2

h

X/F Y /F X/F m2

s

  H h s

  • +

+ 1 2 (A p)

  • m2

A

Z/F Z/F m2

p

A p

  • ,

(20) where X = v g 2

1 M1 + g 2 2 M2

2 v 2 cos 2β sin (α + β) + µm2

A sin 2β sin (α − β)+

+

  • m2

A − 2µ2

µ cos (α + β)

  • (21)

Y = −v g 2

1 M1 + g 2 2 M2

2 v 2 cos 2β cos (α + β) + µm2

A sin 2β cos (α − β)+

+

  • 2µ2 − m2

A

  • µ sin (α + β)
  • (22)

Z = µv

  • m2

A − 2µ2

. (23)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Rotation towards mass basis p.2

Mixing angles, formulae are valid in approximation θ, ψ, ξ ≪ 1 θ = X F(m2

h − m2 s ),

ψ = Y F(m2

H − m2 s ),

ξ = Z F(m2

A − m2 p).

(24) Old fields via new ones (mass matrix is diagonal in new basis) H = ˜ H − ˜ s Y F(m2

H − m2 s ),

(25) h = ˜ h − ˜ s X F(m2

h − m2 s ),

(26) s = ˜ H Y F(m2

H − m2 s ) + ˜

h X F(m2

h − m2 s ) + ˜

s, (27) A = ˜ A − ˜ p Z F(m2

A − m2 p),

(28) p = ˜ A Z F(m2

A − m2 p) + ˜

p. (29)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

New trilinear couplings

Order Vertex Example of coefficient hhh, HHH, hhH, hHH, hh+h−, Hh+h−, hAA, HAA Chhh, CHAA 1 sHH, shh, shH, sAA, sh+h−, pAH, pAh CsHH/F, CpAh/F 2 ssH, ssh, ppH, pph CssH/F 2, Cpph/F 2 ˜ s ˜ H ˜ H F

  • CsHH − ChHH

X m2

h − m2 s

− 3CHHH Y m2

H − m2 s

  • ,

(30) ˜ s˜ h˜ h F

  • Cshh − 3Chhh

X m2

h − m2 s

− ChhH Y m2

H − m2 s

  • .

(31)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Numerical computation of sgoldstino production cross section

Main process is the gluon fusion, gg → s. Tree-level — due to vertex sgg in sgoldstino lagrangian: −

1 2 √ 2 M3 F sG µνGµν.

Integrate gluon distribution functions by momentum fraction: σ(pp → s) = σ0τ 1

τ

dx x g(x, m2

s )g(τ

x , m2

s ),

(32) σ0 = πM2

3

32F 2 , τ = m2

s

S , √ S = 13 TeV. (33) Table CTEQ6L PDF for calculations in leading order. Loop QCD contributions: K-factor ≃ 1.6.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Sgoldstino production cross section for different centre-of-mass energies

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Numerical computation of cross section pp → s → hh

Fix tan β = 10, µ, mA = 5 TeV, ms = 1 TeV, M1 = 1 TeV, M2 = 1 TeV, M3 = 3 TeV, √ F = 20 TeV. Using them find α, m2

H, X, Y , θ, ψ.

Small mixing angles

Consider only points of parameter space where θ < 0.3, ψ < 0.3.

Narrow width approximation

σ (pp → s → hh) = σprod(pp → s)Br(s → hh), (34) Br(s → hh) = Γ (s → hh) Γtot (s) . (35)

Sgoldstino decay channels

s → hh, s → gg, s → WW , s → ZZ, s → γZ, s → γγ Given the mixing with h, H, we compute widths and Br

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Sgoldstino decay widths [Zwirner et al., 2000]

Γ (s → gg) = 1 4π M2

3

F 2 m3

s ,

Γ (s → hh) = 1 8πms C˜

s˜ h˜ h

F 2 , (36) Γ (s → γγ) = 1 32π 1 F 2

  • M1 cos2 θW + M2 sin2 θW

2 m3

s ,

(37) Γ (s → γZ) = 1 16π (M2 − M1)2 F 2 cos2 θW sin2 θW m3

s

  • 1 − m2

Z

m2

s

3 . (38) CsWWT = −M2, CsZZT = −M1 sin2 θW − M2 cos2 θW , (39) C˜

sWWL = −

√ 2 v sin(β − α) − √ 2 v cos(β − α) = 2C˜

sZZL,

(40) Γ (s → WW ) = 1 16π m4

W

ms C 2

sWWT

F 2

  • 6 − 4 m2

s

m2

W

+ m4

s

m4

W

  • − 6

√ 2 CsWWT F C˜

sWWL×

×

  • 1 −

m2

s

2m2

W

  • + C 2

˜ sWWL

  • 3 − m2

s

m2

W

+ m4

s

4m4

W

1 − 4m2

W

m2

s

, (41) Γ (s → ZZ) = 1 8π m4

Z

ms C 2

sZZT

4F 2

  • 6 − 4 m2

s

m2

Z

+ m4

s

m4

Z

  • − 3

√ 2 CsZZT F C˜

sZZL×

×

  • 1 − m2

s

2m2

Z

  • + C 2

˜ sZZL

  • 3 − m2

s

m2

Z

+ m4

s

4m4

Z

1 − 4m2

Z

m2

s

. (42)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Experimental searches for scalar resonances

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Br for main sgoldstino decay channels

Figure: Branching ratio of sgoldstino.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Dependence of di-Higgs production cross section on tan β

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Dependence of di-Higgs production cross section on M3

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Curves Br(s → hh) = 0.125

Fixed parameter values M1 = M2 = 1 TeV, √ F = 20 TeV.

(a) Curves in plane (tan β, µ) (b) Curves in plane (M3, µ) (c) Curves in plane (ms, µ) (d) Curves in plane (mA, µ)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Upper limit on M3/F from experimental data

Regime 1:2:1

Br(s → hh) = Br(s → ZZ) = 0.25, Br(s → WW ) = 0.5. For fixed ms σmax

hh , σmax WW , σmax ZZ

are upper limits on hh, WW , ZZ production cross section in resonant scalar decays. Then σprod < σmax

hh /Br(s → hh) etc.

σprod ∼ M2

3/F 2 ⇒

  • M3/3 TeV

( √ F/20 TeV)2 max =

  • σmax

prod

σ′

prod

  • σmax

XX

σ′

prodBr(s → XX).

(43)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Upper limit on M3/F from experimental data at 95%CL

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Lower limit on √ F assuming M3 ≥ 1.9 TeV

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Comparison with numerical results

Figure: Analytically and numerically obtained branchings.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Results

◮ Found trilinear couplings for vertices with sgoldstino and

Higgses

◮ Analytically made rotation towards mass basis and checked

that formulae for mixing angles agree with numerical results

◮ Numerically obtained the sgoldstino production cross section ◮ Wrote program for computing sgoldstino decay widths and Br,

di-Higgs production cross section

◮ Studied the dependence of cross section on model parameters ◮ Found borders of gluino dominating region ◮ Put upper limit at 95% CL on M3/F in regime 1:2:1

Increase in di-Higgs production up to about 0.25 σprod(pp → s) is possible in the found parameter region of µ, tan β, M3, ms, mA.