Water Quality and Freshwater Mussel Status in Mining-Influenced - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

water quality and freshwater mussel status in mining
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Water Quality and Freshwater Mussel Status in Mining-Influenced - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Water Quality and Freshwater Mussel Status in Mining-Influenced Virginia-Tennessee Rivers Carl E. Zipper Collaborators and Abstract Co-authors: B. Beaty, The Nature Conservancy J.W. Jones, US Fish and Wildlife Service C. Lott and R. Stewart,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Carl E. Zipper

Water Quality and Freshwater Mussel Status in Mining-Influenced Virginia-Tennessee Rivers

Collaborators and Abstract Co-authors:

  • B. Beaty, The Nature Conservancy

J.W. Jones, US Fish and Wildlife Service

  • C. Lott and R. Stewart, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

American Society of Mining and Reclamation 10-13 April 2017. Morgantown WV,

slide-2
SLIDE 2

USA Biodiversity “Hot Spots”*

Biodiversity

High Low 6 top “hot spots”

  • 1. Hawaii
  • 2. San Francisco Bay
  • 3. Southern Appalachians
  • 4. Death Valley
  • 5. Southern California
  • 6. Florida Panhandle

Source: Chaplin et

  • al. 2000. In:

“Precious Heritage.”

* Defined using a “rarity and richness” index.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Presentation Goals:

Describe status of freshwater mussel fauna in the Clinch and Powell Rivers of Virginia and Tennessee. Review what is known about threats to the fauna in these mining-influenced rivers. Review ongoing research that is intended to identify ecosystem stressors that are causing faunal decline in some river sections.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Freshwater Mussels - Basic Biology

 300 species in North America (highest diversity worldwide) > 70 federally listed.  45 species, 20 federally listed, are extant in Clinch & Powell Rivers.  Free-living adults, larvae parasitic on fish gills.  Limited mobility, can move along substrate with muscular foot, stay anchored in the sediment by staying partially buried.  Filter feeders, remove food particles and bacteria from water column.  Long lived, usually 15 to 100+ years depending upon species.  Sensitive to water and sediment contaminants, esp. metals, ammonia.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Major Threats (Global) to Freshwater Mussels

(Williams et al. 1993, Bogan 1997, Bogan 2001)

  • Siltation, from erosion, runoff, unstable streambanks
  • Pollution: they are particularly sensitive to some substances
  • Dams, channelization
  • Decline of host fishes
  • Invasive species
slide-6
SLIDE 6

VA TN

Clinch and Powell Rivers Of Southwestern Virginia and Northeastern Tennessee

Appalachian coalfield Ridge & Valley

slide-7
SLIDE 7

VA TN

Mined (detected 1984-2011) Mined pre-1984 (most) Other Virginia coalfield surface mining, as detected by Landsat satellites

(Li et al. Env. Monit. Assess.)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

VA TN

Mussel Status* Excellent Good Fair Poor

* Mussel status evaluated based in density & age structure / reproduction.

Johnson et al. 2012. Walkerana 15: 83-98 Jones et al. 2014. JAWRA 50: 820-836 Ahlstedt et al. J. Mollusk Biol. Cons. (in press)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Questions:

  • Why are mussels doing so poorly in some

areas, when they are doing well in others that are close by?

  • Are specific stressors responsible for

mussels’ poor status in some areas? Following slides summarize completed and

  • ngoing research intended to answer those

questions.

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 1. Mussels have experienced declines in sections of

both rivers over decades.

1979 1987 1994 1999 2004 2009

Density (per m2)

1975 1982 1989 1996 2003 2010

Clinch, Pendleton Island Jones et al. 2014 Powell, four sites near VA-TN border

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • 1. Mussels have experienced declines in sections of both rivers
  • ver decades. In contrast, mussels are doing well in other

areas.

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Density (per m2)

Clinch River Swan Island TN Data from Jones et al. 2009, 2014.

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 2. Watershed influence by mining, as evidenced

by water conductivity and total dissolved solids, has been increasing in both rivers over periods of mussel decline.

  • 3. Total Dissolved Solids concentrations –

indicator of mining influence in these watersheds

  • - are negatively correlated, both spatially and

temporally, with freshwater mussel status in both rivers.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Cumulative Area Mined (km2) 1984 2011

Cumulative mining, VA coalfield as detected by Landsat, 1984-2011

(Li. et al. 2015)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 1 2 3 4 5 6

River Section Dissolved Solids (mg/L) .

c

b b ab a b ab ab

Mean Values

Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend No Trend at α = 0.05 1 2 3 4 5 6

Dissolved Solids, Clinch River: Mean values and temporal trends: 1960s – 2010, by river section.

River sections designated by numbers: 0 (Tennessee) to 6 (furthest upstream)

Price et al. 2014

1 2 3 4 5 6

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dissolved Solids, Clinch River: (1960s-2010)

 Rising trends throughout, but few differences among overall mean values.

100 200 300 400 Apr-68 Jun-89 Aug-10

Dissolved Solids (mg/L)

Section 1

100 200 300 400 Apr-68 Jun-89 Aug-10

Dissolved Solids (mg/L)

Section 2

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 1 2 3 4 5 6

River Section Dissolved Solids (mg/L) .

c

b b ab a b ab ab

Mean Values

Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend No Trend at α = 0.05

Price et al. 2014

slide-16
SLIDE 16

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 1 2 3 4 5 6

River Section Dissolved Solids (mg/L) .

c

b b ab a b ab ab

Mean Values

Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend Increasing Trend No Trend at α = 0.05 1 2 3 4 5 6

Dissolved Solids, Clinch River: Mean values and temporal trends: 1960s – 2010.

Mussel Status Good Mediocre Poor

Johnson et al. (2014) measured continuous SC in Sections 0 and 2; found SC in Sec. 2 > SC in Sec. 0 (p<0.05). **************** Later, Sec. 2 is described as “impacted reach” 1 2 3 4 5 6

Price et al. 2014

slide-17
SLIDE 17

km

TENNESSEE VIRGINIA KENTUCKY Big Stone Gap water monitoring station (Virginia DEQ)

Mined areas, as defined by Li et al. 2015

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 New Mined Lands (km^2)

Estimate annual surface coal production, Powell River watershed -- assuming (a) equivalent proportions of Wise Co. totals for both mined land disturbance and coal production; (b) estimates for missing years.

  • 1

2 3 4 5 6 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 10^6 Tonnes Coal / Year

Land disturbance by mining, Powell River Watershed above Big Stone Gap, by year of detection (Landsat).

Zipper et

  • al. 2016
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Total Dissolved Solids DEQ monitoring data, 1967 – 2014: Highly significant increasing trend at Big Stone Gap (through 6/10). Increasing trends also present further downstream.

Big Stone Gap – RKM 288.4

200 400 600 800 1000 Jun-67 Mar-79 Dec-90 Oct-02 Jul-14 Dissolved Solids (mg/L)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Spatial correlations of river km with mussel metrics in Powell River

River km is proxy for mining influence / TDS, since major mining influence is in the headwaters. Mussel data from Johnson et al. (2012) based on 2008-2009 sampling.

(chart from Zipper et al. 2016)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Year

RKM 288 Coal RKM 224

Decay-wt.

Disturb. RKM 288 TDS mean

RKM 223-231 TDS 5-yr mean RKM 105-194 TDS 5-yr mean

Mussel density 0.97 **** 0.98 **** 0.99 **** 0.83 **** 0.87 **** 0.87 **** 0.92 **** 0.97 **** 0.97 **** 0.92 **** 0.75 **** 0.86 **** 0.83 **** 0.72 **** 0.87 ****

  • 0.81

*

  • 0.71

  • 0.75

  • 0.72

  • 0.68

  • 0.65

RKM 288 = Big Stone Gap RKM 223-231 = Jonesville RKM105-194 = Lower Virginia to Tennessee Mussel density near VA-TN state line (4

locations; data from Alstedt et

  • al. 2017).

Temporal Correlations: Environmental Indicators vs. Mussel Status

† = 0.05<p<0.10

(chart from Zipper et al. 2016)

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 4. Bioassays to test influence of

environmentally relevant concentrations of major ions (TDS) on juvenile mussel survival and growth have revealed no significant toxicity or growth impairments.

Ciparis et al. 2015

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Ciparis et al. 2015

Hypothesis: Major ions / TDS / Specific Conductance are exerting toxic influence in the Clinch and/or Powell Rivers? Investigate Hypothesis: 56 day exposure of juvenile Villosa Iris, a native mussel, to major ion mixtures equivalent to “worst case” measured conditions both rivers.

Ca2+, 50 K+, 3 Mg+, 21 Na+, 33 SO42-, 118 Cl-, 15 HCO3-, 184

Ca2+, 86 K+, 6 Mg+, 49 Na+, 114 SO42-, 452 Cl-, 19 HCO3-, 229

Clinch: 424 mg/L

Below Guest R.

Powell: 942 mg/L

Big Stone Gap

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Methods (con’d): Experiment was fully replicated (6 groups for each of 4 treatments: Clinch, Powell, full pond control, ½ control); 1200 mussels total. Results: No statistically significant difference between either Powell or Clinch treatment with control (α = 0.05). Powell growth was nominally depressed, relative to Clinch and control. Conclusion: Results do not support the “major ion toxicity” hypothesis – at least for V. iris at that life stage.

Ciparis et al. 2015

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • 5. Mussels are known to be sensitive to metals.

Both water-column and tissue concentrations of potentially toxic metals are elevated in mining- influenced sections of the Clinch River where mussel declines have been noted.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

VA DEQ – TN DEC Cooperative Water Monitoring

VA TN

LEGEND Watershed boundary Clinch River Major tributaries Proposed Sampling Locations TN Ref Impacted Upstream Ref Tributary (Guest River) Physiography within the watershed: Appalachian plateaus Ridge and valley X X

Coordinated baseflow monitoring of Clinch River by state agencies, for the purpose of enabling interstate water quality comparisons

Sampling Sites by Reach: TN Reference Impacted Upstream Reference Tributary (Guest R)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

VA DEQ – TN DEC Cooperative Water Monitoring

Mean values of TN-Reference and Upstream-Reference parameters that are both significantly different from Impacted Reach means (Yr 1)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % of Impacted Reach Mean TN Ref Up Ref Dissolved - - - - - -Total - - - - - -

slide-28
SLIDE 28

US Geological Survey Study: Clinch River

Compare tissue concentrations of caged (V. iris) and resident (A. pectorosa) mussels in Impacted Reach vs. Horton Ford (TN Reference)

Johnson et al. 2014

0% 50% 100%

Al Cd Co Cu Fe Pb Li Mg Ni K Th V

% Increase vs. TN Ref Caged- Dungannon Caged- Ft. Blackmore Resident - Dungannon

slide-29
SLIDE 29

N.C. State University Study (Archambault et al. 2017)

Trap suspended sediments at multiple locations. Expose juvenile E. brevidens to sediments in laboratory biossays. Assess relationships of mussel survival and biomass to sediments’ extractable constituents .

Mean Survival (%) Mean Biomass Change (%) Mn Concentration (µg/g) sediment Mn Concentration (µg/g) sediment

Results

Survival was negatively correlated with:

  • Mn, Co, NH4

Biomass was negatively correlated with:

  • Mn, Co, Total Organic C
slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • 6. Recent data show that polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbon (PAHs) concentrations are elevated in Clinch River sections where mussel declines have been noted, relative to other sections.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Trap suspended sediments at multiple locations …. Assess relationships

  • f mussel status to sediments’ extractable constituents .

Results: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

are elevated in river sections of poor mussel status. Total PAH PAH Chronic Toxicity Units

Mussel decline zone Mussel decline zone

Petrogenic PAH (i.e. derived from unburned fossil fuel -- including coal, oils, etc.) are 65-85% of total PAH at most locations.

N.C. State University Study (Archambault et al. 2017)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Conclusions

 Freshwater mussel populations in the Clinch and Powell Rivers are a unique and valued biodiversity resource.  Freshwater mussels have declined relative to historic levels in most sections of the Clinch River and throughout the Powell River.  Mussel declines appear as correlated with coal-mining influence, but specific stressors responsible for declines are not known.  Candidate responsible stressors include:

  • TDS/major ions (perhaps working through subtle mechanisms

such as effects on reproduction).

  • Metals: Via bioaccumulative mechanisms and/or physiological

interactions with fine-particulate forms.

  • PAHs derived from unburned fossil fuels.

 Observed effects may be caused by synergistic interactions of multiple contaminants.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

References

Ahlstedt SA et al. Quantitative monitoring of freshwater mussel populations from 1979–2004 in the Clinch and Powell Rivers of Tennessee and Virginia, with miscellaneous notes on the fauna. J. Mollusk Biol. Cons. (In press) Archambault JM et al. 2017. Assessing toxicity of contaminants in riverine suspended sediments to freshwater mussels.

  • Environ. Tox. Chem. 36: 395-407.

Ciparis S et al. 2015. Effects of environmentally relevant mixtures of major ions on a freshwater mussel. Environ. Pollut. 207: 280-287. Johnson GC.et al. 2014. Influences of water and sediment quality and hydrologic processes on mussels in the Clinch

  • River. JAWRA 50: 878-897.

Johnson MS et all 2012. Freshwater mussels of the Powell River, Virginia and Tennessee: abundance and distribution in a biodiversity hotspot. Walkerana, 15: 83-98. Jones JW et al. 2009. Status and trends of freshwater mussel populations, Clinch and Powell Rivers, Virginia and

  • Tennesee. Prepeard for Clinch-Powell Clean Rivers Inititiative (unpublished).

Jones JW et al. 2014. Clinch River freshwater mussels upstream of Norris Reservoir, Tennessee and Virginia: a quantitative assessment from 2004 to 2009. 50(4), pp.820-836. Li J et al. 2015. Reconstructing disturbance history for an intensively mined region by time-series analysis of Landsat

  • imagery. Environ. Mon. Assess. 187(9),:557.

Price JE et al. 2014. Water and sediment quality in the Clinch River, Virginia and Tennessee, USA, over nearly five

  • decades. JAWRA 50: 837-858.

Zipper CE et al. 2014. Freshwater mussel population status and habitat quality in the Clinch River, Virginia and Tennessee, USA: A featured collection. JAWRA 50: 807-819. Zipper CE et al. 2016. Spatial and temporal relationships among watershed mining, water quality, and freshwater mussel status in an eastern USA river. Sci Tot Environ 541: 603-615.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Thanks to many contributors and collaborators for the research reported.

Thanks to US Office of Surface Mining, Virginia DMME, and The Nature Conservancy for funding the VA DEQ – TN DEC Cooperative Water Monitoring Study. Thanks to Clinch Powell Clean Rivers Initiative for providing mechanism for collaboration and funding. Thanks for cooperative efforts by parties representing the The Nature Conservancy, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, US Geological Survey, NC State University, and other entities.