Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects: Strategies & Methods - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

heterogeneity of treatment effects strategies methods
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects: Strategies & Methods - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects: Strategies & Methods University of Cincinnati Sheldon Greenfield, MD Sherrie H. Kaplan, PhD, MPH Health Policy Research Institute University of California, Irvine May 20, 2012 Definition of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects: Strategies & Methods University of Cincinnati

Sheldon Greenfield, MD Sherrie H. Kaplan, PhD, MPH Health Policy Research Institute University of California, Irvine May 20, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Definition of Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects

  • Variation in outcomes within clinically

defined populations

  • Disjunction between the overall (

summary, average ) effects of a treatment vs. effects in individuals or subsets

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Urgency

  • Evolving disease epidemiology: the

failure of chronic disease nosology

  • Quality, CPGs, coverage
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

3 Overarching Causes

  • Genetic/biologic
  • Clinical stage/severity/outcome risk
  • Beyond the disease: comorbidity,

passivity, burden, “resiliency”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Understudied Sources of Individual Patient Variation

Heterogeneity of treatment effects can be due to variables that include:

  • Biologic causes (e.g. biomarkers, stages

detected by imaging, differences in metabolism, etc.).

  • Disease severity (i.e. those sicker at

baseline respond more favorably)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Understudied Sources of Individual Patient Variation (cont’)

  • Comorbidity, as a determinant of response

due to:

  • Competing risk for mortality or other
  • utcomes
  • Disease-disease interactions
  • Drug-drug interactions
  • Burden of polypharmacy
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Understudied Sources of Individual Patient Variation (cont’)

  • Functional status, quality of life,

resilience

  • Social support
  • Depression or other mental health

problems

  • Medical context, e.g.
  • Willingness and ability to work with

providers to optimize/tailor treatments

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Understudied Sources of Individual Patient Variation (cont’)

  • Personal, cultural
  • Adherence to treatment
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Recent Trials With Misleading Results

  • Prostate cancer
  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Healthy
  • ASA for peripheral vascular disease
slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • ACCORD
  • ADVANCE
  • DVT
  • CATIE

Recent Trials With Misleading Results

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

The Diabetes Story

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Reduction in Risk for Cardiovascular Events Associated With HbA1c Level 6.5% or Less or 7.0% or Less, by TIBI Subgroup

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Solutions

  • Don’t do studies with mixed

populations: use prior data

  • Stratified studies/ matching
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Multivariable Models

  • CHADS
  • GRACE
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Endarterectomy
  • TIBI
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Hypothetical Example

slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43

The Total Illness Burden Index: Scoring and Validation

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Dimensions of the TIBI

Hearing Problems Gastro- Intestinal Disease Pulmonary Disease Arthritis Stroke and Neurological Disease Atherosclerotic Heart Disease Foot Disease Congestive Heart Failure Eye and Vision Conditions Total Illness Burden (TIBI)

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Scoring Shortness of Breath

1. During the past 4 weeks, how often have you felt short of breath… (circle one number on each line) ALL of the Time MOST

  • f the

Time SOME of the Time A LITTLE

  • f the

Time NONE

  • f the

Time

  • a. When lying down flat?…………………………………………..

1 2 3 4 5

  • b. When sitting, resting?…………………………………………...

1 2 3 4 5

  • c. When walking less than one block?…………………………...

1 2 3 4 5

  • d. When climbing one flight of stairs?…………….……………...

1 2 3 4 5

  • e. When climbing several flights of stairs?……….……………..

1 2 3 4 5

  • If any in orange zone are circled, add 5
  • If any in yellow zone are circled, add 3
  • If any in green zone are circled, add 1
  • Note: Risk factors from other questions (swelling in ankles, Hx of heart

disease, etc) may result in addition of 1 more.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Scoring COPD

If one tablespoon or more, add 2 to total. If less than a teaspoon add 1 to total. If none, add 0 to total.

1. Do you have a regular or daily cough? (check one) NO YES

1 ฀ 2

  • 8a. When you cough, how much phlegm or sputum do you cough up?

(circle one) None………………………………………………………………. 1 Less than a teaspoonful a day…………………………………. 2 About a tablespoonful a day…………………………………… 3 Several tablespoonfuls a day………………………………….. 4 About a cup or more a day……………………………………... 5

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Scoring COPD

Have you ever been told by a physician that you have any

  • f the following problems with your breathing?

NO YES Emphysema…………………………………………………………..

1 2

Chronic bronchitis………………………………….….……………..

1 2

Asthma…………………………………………………………………

1 2

If “yes” to any of these, add 1 to total.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Steps in Constructing Subdimensions

  • Transformed variables to uniform metric
  • Tested reliability of clinically defined scale

(Cronbach’s alpha > .80)

  • Created composite of each subdimension using

simple algebraic sum, mean

  • Items in each subdimension varied
  • Validated each subdimension as scale using

SF-36, etc.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Summing the Scales

  • A total score for TIBI is computed by

transforming and summing all of the scales.

  • Validation of composite score robust across

scoring methods.

slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51
slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53
slide-54
SLIDE 54
slide-55
SLIDE 55
slide-56
SLIDE 56
slide-57
SLIDE 57
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Table 4. Domain scores for each disease cohort: outcome category discrimination by ENSEMBLE MDS domains

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Table 4. Domain scores for each disease cohort: outcome category discrimination by ENSEMBLE MDS domains

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Conclusions

  • With CER, heterogeneity cannot be

ignored

  • Need to collect data on causes
  • Need solutions such as stratification