guiding interaction behaviors for multi modal grounded
play

Guiding Interaction Behaviors for Multi-modal Grounded Language - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Guiding Interaction Behaviors for Multi-modal Grounded Language Learning Jesse Thomason, Jivko Sinapov & Raymond J. Mooney Presented by Siliang Lu Multi-modal grounded language learning Multiple modalities Physical properties of objects


  1. Guiding Interaction Behaviors for Multi-modal Grounded Language Learning Jesse Thomason, Jivko Sinapov & Raymond J. Mooney Presented by Siliang Lu

  2. Multi-modal grounded language learning Multiple modalities Physical properties of objects Language predicates in the world Interaction behaviors Visual predicate Non-visual predicate (i.e. “red”) (i.e. “empty”) Modalities: Audio, Haptics, visual colors and shapes Behaviors: look, drop, grasp, hold, lift, lower, press, push

  3. Classification

  4. Consideration of only validation confidence Method: • SVM using the feature space for each sensorimotor context (a combination of a behavior and sensory modality) Sensorimotor context

  5. Consideration of only validation confidence

  6. Confidence and behavior annotations

  7. Confidence and behavior annotations

  8. Confidence and multi-modality annotations Modalitie s: auditory, haptic, visual color and visual shapes (fpfh)

  9. Sharing confidence between related predicates • Calculating cosine distance in word embedding space by using Word2Vec

  10. Sharing confidence between related predicates i.e. if kappa of “thin, grasp/haptic” is high for the predicate “narrow”, we should trust grasp/haptic sensorimotor context

  11. Results

  12. Results • Adding behavior annotations or modality annotations improves performance over using kappa alone • Sharing kappa information improves recall at the cost of precision • Trade-off due to real world “noise” in specific domains. • i.e. “water” correlated with object weights

  13. Future work • Apply behavior annotations in an embodied dialog agent • Explore other methods of sharing information between predicates such as using a maximally similar neighbor word • i.e. the best neighbor of “narrow” is “thin”

  14. Thanks!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend