Group Meeting 4 13 November 2018 Reference Group Agenda Taiwhenua - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

group
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Group Meeting 4 13 November 2018 Reference Group Agenda Taiwhenua - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reference Group Meeting 4 13 November 2018 Reference Group Agenda Taiwhenua Feed back Project name Values exercise summary Creating a vision Establishment of criteria framework Big picture objectives Taiwhenua Feedback Purpose of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Reference Group

Meeting 4 13 November 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Reference Group Agenda

Taiwhenua Feed back Project name Values exercise – summary Creating a vision Establishment of criteria framework Big picture objectives

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Taiwhenua Feedback

  • To provide taiwhenua with information about our

wastewater treatment plants

  • To discuss the project
  • Discuss how taiwhenua and the community can be involved
  • Talk about the development of the criteria
  • Talk about affordability

Purpose of meeting

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Taiwhenua Feedback

  • Project background
  • The issues
  • The process
  • Engagement with community
  • Desired outputs
  • Reference Group
  • Tangata Whenua involvement
  • Wider community involvement

What we talked about

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Taiwhenua Feedback

  • Representation on the reference group

Outcomes

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Project Name

Who for? What does it signal? Last time talked about “Project Flush” Wait for vision?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Values exercise

Four pillars Grouped and scored using dots Number of dots demonstrated importance within and across pillars

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Values exercise

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Values exercise

slide-10
SLIDE 10

32 10 7 10 5

Values exercise

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Values exercise

Top 5

Protection of the River Recognise wastewater as a resource Not polluting the environment Forward looking, future-proof investment Community use, facilities, amenity value

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Values exercise

Can it be used to create a road map/vision?

So what?

Representative of community? This information can be used to develop

  • ption selection process
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Creating a vision

Recycle, Future proof, Environment, Investment, Funding, Cultural, Swimming, Safe, Financial, Minimise, Facilities, River, Compliance, Ratepayer, Fishing, Recreation, Protection, Standards, Affordable, Maori, Community, Alternative, Environmental, food, Pollution, Social, Impact, Resource, Amenity

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Creating a vision - example

Removal of wastewater discharges from the X River Commitment to improvement of river health not just related to wastewater – but in a holistic way Wastewater is managed in an environmentally and fiscally sound way for our community.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Creating a vision

Recycle, Future proof, Environment, Investment, Funding, Cultural, Swimming, Safe, Financial, Minimise, Facilities, River, Compliance, Ratepayer, Fishing, Recreation, Protection, Standards, Affordable, Maori, Community, Alternative, Environmental, food, Pollution, Social, Impact, Resource, Amenity

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Criteria framework

Value and vision

  • Basis for developing criteria to assess the options and development of a BPO.
  • Assist with developing qualitative or quantitative measures of the non-cost

considerations.

Criteria aims to:

  • Enable a multi criteria decision making process to be used to allow options to

be evaluated on their importance to the community.

  • Allow for options to be evaluated on their importance to the community.
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Criteria framework

  • Develop questions that allow all options to be

compared evenly and consistently Purpose

  • Questions and response per option.
  • Could be yes/no or a score that is added.
  • Could have minimum score threshold.
  • Could need positive response for each

question. Structure

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Criteria framework

  • What level of evaluation is used :
  • Phase A - Screening
  • Phase B - Preference
  • Phase C - BPO
  • It can change over time

Level applied

Screening may be qualitative BPO may be quantitative

Less detail More detail

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Criteria framework

3 types of assessment:

  • Has to be met

Bottom lines

  • Need to be addressed

Requirements

  • Would ideally like to achieve

Aspirational

Need to make sure address/fulfil the Vision

  • If $X, how good compared to $Y
  • If 15g/m3, how good is that compared to 23g/m3

Need to convert technical attributes to a score

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Criteria framework

Issue Criteria Means of Assessment

Health and wellbeing of the waterbodies is restored and protected for current and future generations. Waterbodies are accessible and safe to swim in, and take kai from, all year round. Measured improvements in effluent bacteriological quality. Reduction in nitrogen levels. Alignment to Healthy River Wai Ora Plan change. Decrease in annual loads of nitrogen discharged into waterbodies. Reduction in phosphorus levels. Alignment to Healthy River Wai Ora Plan change. Reduction in phosphorus levels. Acknowledgement and protection of cu cultural val alues. Mauri and mana is safeguarded for present and future generations. Raukawa kaitiaki relationship with their waters is respected, enhanced and supported. Method of discharge used. A wastewater solution that meets the lon long-term ne needs s

  • f
  • f the com
  • mmunity in a

flexible way Meets future needs (including cultural needs). Continuous improvement.

  • Ability of the solution to be scaled for growth over an agreed period of time.
  • Recognition that resource consents can be granted for up to a maximum of 35 years.
  • Ability of final solution to be staged to match both growth and funding ability.

Economically via iable for the community Cost to ratepayers. Total cost to the residential ratepayers from the upgrades. This includes any potential revenue generation from the options, as this will offset operating costs.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Big picture objectives

What are we trying to achieve? Will this achieve the Vision?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Criteria

Bottom line? Aspirational?

Phase A Screen

Bottom line? ?

Phase B Preference

Bottom line? Requirement?

Phase C BPO

slide-23
SLIDE 23

100 % Land 100 % Water Cultural Preference Financial Preference Environmental Preference Recreational Preference

Big Picture Options

slide-24
SLIDE 24

100 % Land 100 % Water Cultural Preference Financial Preference Environmental Preference Recreational Preference

Irrigation - High-rate Irrigation - Non-deficit Irrigation - Deficit Overland - Rock trench Rapid Infiltration Pipe to Water Overland - Wetland

Big Picture Options

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Criteria

  • John’s Presentation
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Criteria

Bottom line? Aspirational?

Phase A Screen

Bottom line? ?

Phase B Preference

Bottom line? Requirement?

Phase C BPO

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Option Development – Phase A

Keep High Level

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Criteria

Bottom line? Aspirational?

Phase A Screen

Bottom line Score In or out Aspirational Score In or out

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Option Development – Phase A

Bottom line Aspirational

Keep High Level

slide-30
SLIDE 30