Group Meeting 4 13 November 2018 Reference Group Agenda Taiwhenua - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Group Meeting 4 13 November 2018 Reference Group Agenda Taiwhenua - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Reference Group Meeting 4 13 November 2018 Reference Group Agenda Taiwhenua Feed back Project name Values exercise summary Creating a vision Establishment of criteria framework Big picture objectives Taiwhenua Feedback Purpose of
Reference Group Agenda
Taiwhenua Feed back Project name Values exercise – summary Creating a vision Establishment of criteria framework Big picture objectives
Taiwhenua Feedback
- To provide taiwhenua with information about our
wastewater treatment plants
- To discuss the project
- Discuss how taiwhenua and the community can be involved
- Talk about the development of the criteria
- Talk about affordability
Purpose of meeting
Taiwhenua Feedback
- Project background
- The issues
- The process
- Engagement with community
- Desired outputs
- Reference Group
- Tangata Whenua involvement
- Wider community involvement
What we talked about
Taiwhenua Feedback
- Representation on the reference group
Outcomes
Project Name
Who for? What does it signal? Last time talked about “Project Flush” Wait for vision?
Values exercise
Four pillars Grouped and scored using dots Number of dots demonstrated importance within and across pillars
Values exercise
Values exercise
32 10 7 10 5
Values exercise
Values exercise
Top 5
Protection of the River Recognise wastewater as a resource Not polluting the environment Forward looking, future-proof investment Community use, facilities, amenity value
Values exercise
Can it be used to create a road map/vision?
So what?
Representative of community? This information can be used to develop
- ption selection process
Creating a vision
Recycle, Future proof, Environment, Investment, Funding, Cultural, Swimming, Safe, Financial, Minimise, Facilities, River, Compliance, Ratepayer, Fishing, Recreation, Protection, Standards, Affordable, Maori, Community, Alternative, Environmental, food, Pollution, Social, Impact, Resource, Amenity
Creating a vision - example
Removal of wastewater discharges from the X River Commitment to improvement of river health not just related to wastewater – but in a holistic way Wastewater is managed in an environmentally and fiscally sound way for our community.
Creating a vision
Recycle, Future proof, Environment, Investment, Funding, Cultural, Swimming, Safe, Financial, Minimise, Facilities, River, Compliance, Ratepayer, Fishing, Recreation, Protection, Standards, Affordable, Maori, Community, Alternative, Environmental, food, Pollution, Social, Impact, Resource, Amenity
Criteria framework
Value and vision
- Basis for developing criteria to assess the options and development of a BPO.
- Assist with developing qualitative or quantitative measures of the non-cost
considerations.
Criteria aims to:
- Enable a multi criteria decision making process to be used to allow options to
be evaluated on their importance to the community.
- Allow for options to be evaluated on their importance to the community.
Criteria framework
- Develop questions that allow all options to be
compared evenly and consistently Purpose
- Questions and response per option.
- Could be yes/no or a score that is added.
- Could have minimum score threshold.
- Could need positive response for each
question. Structure
Criteria framework
- What level of evaluation is used :
- Phase A - Screening
- Phase B - Preference
- Phase C - BPO
- It can change over time
Level applied
Screening may be qualitative BPO may be quantitative
Less detail More detail
Criteria framework
3 types of assessment:
- Has to be met
Bottom lines
- Need to be addressed
Requirements
- Would ideally like to achieve
Aspirational
Need to make sure address/fulfil the Vision
- If $X, how good compared to $Y
- If 15g/m3, how good is that compared to 23g/m3
Need to convert technical attributes to a score
Criteria framework
Issue Criteria Means of Assessment
Health and wellbeing of the waterbodies is restored and protected for current and future generations. Waterbodies are accessible and safe to swim in, and take kai from, all year round. Measured improvements in effluent bacteriological quality. Reduction in nitrogen levels. Alignment to Healthy River Wai Ora Plan change. Decrease in annual loads of nitrogen discharged into waterbodies. Reduction in phosphorus levels. Alignment to Healthy River Wai Ora Plan change. Reduction in phosphorus levels. Acknowledgement and protection of cu cultural val alues. Mauri and mana is safeguarded for present and future generations. Raukawa kaitiaki relationship with their waters is respected, enhanced and supported. Method of discharge used. A wastewater solution that meets the lon long-term ne needs s
- f
- f the com
- mmunity in a
flexible way Meets future needs (including cultural needs). Continuous improvement.
- Ability of the solution to be scaled for growth over an agreed period of time.
- Recognition that resource consents can be granted for up to a maximum of 35 years.
- Ability of final solution to be staged to match both growth and funding ability.
Economically via iable for the community Cost to ratepayers. Total cost to the residential ratepayers from the upgrades. This includes any potential revenue generation from the options, as this will offset operating costs.
Big picture objectives
What are we trying to achieve? Will this achieve the Vision?
Criteria
Bottom line? Aspirational?
Phase A Screen
Bottom line? ?
Phase B Preference
Bottom line? Requirement?
Phase C BPO
100 % Land 100 % Water Cultural Preference Financial Preference Environmental Preference Recreational Preference
Big Picture Options
100 % Land 100 % Water Cultural Preference Financial Preference Environmental Preference Recreational Preference
Irrigation - High-rate Irrigation - Non-deficit Irrigation - Deficit Overland - Rock trench Rapid Infiltration Pipe to Water Overland - Wetland
Big Picture Options
Criteria
- John’s Presentation
Criteria
Bottom line? Aspirational?
Phase A Screen
Bottom line? ?
Phase B Preference
Bottom line? Requirement?
Phase C BPO
Option Development – Phase A
Keep High Level
Criteria
Bottom line? Aspirational?
Phase A Screen
Bottom line Score In or out Aspirational Score In or out
Option Development – Phase A
Bottom line Aspirational