PANCARE PANCARE Working Group Group Working National and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pancare pancare working group group working national and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PANCARE PANCARE Working Group Group Working National and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PANCARE PANCARE Working Group Group Working National and Group National and Group Registries and Databases Registries and Databases Report about about Report further work work on on further PANCARE online


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PANCARE PANCARE – – Working Working Group Group „ „National and Group National and Group Registries and Databases Registries and Databases” ”

Report Report about about further further work work on

  • n

PANCARE online PANCARE online questionnaire questionnaire

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Recapitulation Recapitulation

  • nline
  • nline Questionnaire

Questionnaire

  • Completion

Completion Quest Quest.: .: Oct

  • Oct. / November 2008

. / November 2008

  • 28

28 Datasets Datasets (2 (2 Doublettes Doublettes) )

  • 26

26 Datasets Datasets from from 16 16 countries countries

  • Database of at least

Database of at least 118,000 118,000 patients patients in total in total ( (avoiding avoiding doublicates doublicates) )

  • Of

Of those those are are at least at least 80,000 80,000 in FUP in FUP

  • Of

Of them them deceased deceased: : 12,000 12,000

  • Most

Most with with regular regular FUP FUP

  • Most of

Most of them them have have data data on

  • n main

main variables variables

  • Law

Law challenges challenges: :

  • nly
  • nly anonymous

anonymous data data, , data data protection protection law law, , ethical ethical committee committee

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Questions Questions most most relevant relevant

  • 1. Please list your affiliation and the details
  • 1. Please list your affiliation and the details
  • f your registry / centre
  • f your registry / centre
  • 5

5 population population-

  • based

based registries registries or

  • r

childhood childhood cancer cancer registries registries

  • 4

4

  • ther
  • ther registries

registries / / Late Late effects effects network network

  • 17

17 Clinical Clinical centres centres / / hospitals hospitals

  • Catchment area:

Catchment area: 14 14 country country 12 12 parts of country, cities parts of country, cities

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Cancer Type:

Cancer Type: all childhood malignancies; all childhood malignancies; 4/26 only e.g. 4/26 only e.g. leukemia leukemia, lymphomas; radiotherapy , lymphomas; radiotherapy

  • 11. How often you are able to conduct a follow
  • 11. How often you are able to conduct a follow-
  • up per

up per patient? patient?

  • 3

3 sporadically sporadically ( (every every 3 3-

  • 5

5 years years) )

  • 22

22 systematically systematically (14 (14 every every year year; ; 8 8 every every 2 2-

  • 10

10 years years) )

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 13. Which data are available to potentially collaborate
  • 13. Which data are available to potentially collaborate

with the Pan with the Pan-

  • European

European-

  • Network?

Network?

  • 25

25 Year Year of

  • f birth

birth

  • 24

24 Sex Sex

  • 25

25 Childhood Childhood cancer cancer diagnosis diagnosis

  • 23

23 Date of Date of diagnosis diagnosis Crude Crude therapy therapy data data

  • 24

24 Any Any radiotherapy radiotherapy

  • 24

24 Any Any chemotherapy chemotherapy

  • 24

24 Any Any surgery surgery

  • 23

23 Any Any bone bone marrow marrow transplant transplant

  • 17

17 Any Any other

  • ther treatment

treatment

  • e.g. Biotherapy

Availability Availability of

  • f

detailed detailed therapy therapy data data

  • 23

23 Date of Date of treatment treatment

  • 20

20 Radiotherapy Radiotherapy field field and dose and dose

  • 22

22 Type of Type of cytostatic cytostatic drugs drugs

  • 18

18 Dose Drugs Dose Drugs

  • 21

21 Type of Type of stem stem cell cell transplant transplant

  • 20

20 Site of Site of surgery surgery

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Vital Vital status status

  • 25

25 Vital Vital status status (5 to (5 to unlimited unlimited years years after after diag diag.) .) ( (until until 18/19 18/19 yrs yrs of age)

  • f age)

Late Late effects effects

  • 24

24 Cause of Cause of death death (10 to (10 to unlimited unlimited yrs yrs after after d.) d.) ( (until until 18/19 18/19 yrs yrs of age)

  • f age)
  • 24

24 Secondary Secondary malignant malignant neoplasms neoplasms (10 to (10 to unlimited unlimited yrs yrs after after d.) d.) ( (until until 18/19 18/19 yrs yrs of age)

  • f age)
  • 13

13 Others Others

  • e.g. Cardiovascular diseases, osteoporosis, lung

disease,

  • fertility, offsprings
  • any possible late effect
  • phychological major late effects
  • see questionnaire at www.bccss.bham.ac.uk
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Biological Biological samples samples

  • 2

2 Collection Collection not not possible possible

  • 13

13 Potential to Potential to collect collect

  • 10

10 Already Already available available

  • 7

7 Tumour Tumour tissue tissue

  • 1

1 Normal Normal tissue tissue

  • 6

6 Blood Blood

  • 2

2 Saliva Saliva

  • 3

3 Other Other types types

  • 2

2 bone bone marrow marrow ( (but but not not of

  • f each

each case case) )

  • Potential to

Potential to collect collect blood blood

Other Other data data

  • 15

15 Socioeconomic Socioeconomic, , environmental environmental exposures exposures, ,

  • r
  • r life

life-

  • style

style factors factors

  • 14. Could you potentially contribute these variables for
  • 14. Could you potentially contribute these variables for

all patients being involved in the follow all patients being involved in the follow-

  • up?

up?

  • 15

15 Yes Yes

  • No

No

  • 1

1 Do Do not not know know

  • 8

8 In In part part

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What What we we did did since since the the meeting meeting in Graz in Graz … …

  • M. Hawkins, M. Heymans, L. Kremer/C.
  • M. Hawkins, M. Heymans, L. Kremer/C. Ronckers

Ronckers, , Z.

  • Z. Jakab

Jakab, G. , G. Pastore Pastore, D. , D. Debling Debling, ,

  • New members: Claudia

New members: Claudia Kuehni Kuehni, Daniela , Daniela Kodytkova Kodytkova, Jorgen Olsen , Jorgen Olsen

  • Two

Two Telephone Telephone-

  • Conferences

Conferences (12/2008; 3/2009) (12/2008; 3/2009)

  • Contact

Contact to: to: Gemma Gemma Gatta Gatta ( (EUROCARE EUROCARE), Eva ), Eva Steliarova Steliarova-

  • Foucher

Foucher ( (ACCIS ACCIS) )

  • Additional

Additional Questions Questions & & Flow Flow-

  • Charts

Charts To Do: To Do:

  • Final

Final Adjustment Adjustment of

  • f Questionnaires

Questionnaires

  • Revision of

Revision of online

  • nline Questionnaire

Questionnaire ( (Medical Medical Informatics Informatics Mainz, Torsten Panholzer) Mainz, Torsten Panholzer)

  • Put

Put Questionnaires Questionnaires online

  • nline for

for new new completion completion

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Questions Questions to to nominated nominated coordinators coordinators per per country country

  • How is

How is Long Long-

  • term surveillance (LTS) organized

term surveillance (LTS) organized in your in your country? country? Please describe in short Please describe in short (one page) how long (one page) how long-

  • term follow

term follow-

  • up of

up of former childhood and adolescent cancer patients is organized former childhood and adolescent cancer patients is organized in your country. in your country.

  • Who is your

Who is your central representative/coordinator central representative/coordinator? ?

  • Please list

Please list all institutions all institutions involved in this process and give a involved in this process and give a short description of these institutions. short description of these institutions.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Questions Questions to to nominated nominated coordinators coordinators per per country country (2) (2)

  • Please define the

Please define the role role of all

  • f all institutions

institutions involved in this involved in this process. process.

  • How

How many patients many patients are involved in your LTS? are involved in your LTS? (inclusion criteria; deceased/ alive) (inclusion criteria; deceased/ alive)

  • How

How do you do you follow up follow up former patients? former patients?

  • How often

How often do you follow them up? do you follow them up?

  • Who

Who does follow them up? does follow them up?

  • Further particulars

Further particulars: : Please feel free to add those information especially relevant fo Please feel free to add those information especially relevant for r your country not hit by the questions above. your country not hit by the questions above.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Cécile Ronckers, Leontien Kremer

Goal

Detailed description of all relevant aspects of cohorts/populations to

(1) create a complete inventory of the “Pan European Cohort” and to (2) support future activities including research, patient care and lobbying

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Flowcharts

Patient Care Outcome: Mortality SMN Health Problems

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Example Example

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Item 1: CHILDHOOD CANCER COHORT DEFINITION

  • Population-based v.s. hospital-

based

  • Regional v.s. nation-wide
  • Overlap in existing

studies/cohorts/patient populations

  • Method of case ascertainment
  • Completeness
  • Sources/methods used to ascertain

completeness

  • Potential additional sources to be

used

  • Estimated completeness of

coverage in catchment area of clinic/cohort

  • Number of patients
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Item a: INCLUSION CRITERIA Inclusion criteria for childhood cancer survivor cohort (5-yr survivorship taken as example)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Item 2: EXCLUDED

  • No. patients excluded from

survivor cohort (if possible per exclusion criterion)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

item 3: SURVIVOR COHORT DEFINITION

  • Population-based v.s. hospital-based
  • Regional v.s. nation-wide
  • Overlap in existing studies/cohorts/patient populations
  • Method of case ascertainment
  • Completeness
  • Sources/methods used to ascertain completeness
  • Potential additional sources to be used
  • Estimated completeness of coverage in catchment area of clinic/cohort
  • Number of patients:

Inclusion criteria

  • Childhood cancer diagnoses
  • Age at diagnosis
  • Calendar period of diagnosis

TREATMENT INFORMATION

  • Quality control measures / validation procedures
  • Estimated completeness
  • Available/not available/potentially available
  • Use of standardized coding scheme/code book?
  • Who abstracts the data + how is this person trained?
slide-19
SLIDE 19

To inventory how countries

  • provide patient care
  • what type of care
  • coverage rate
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Item b: LATE EFFECTS CARE

  • Type of care: systematic approach?
  • What type of care-giver sees

patients?

  • Which survivors are eligible?
  • What sources of funding are

available for patient care?

  • Is funding sufficient to cover the

needs?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Items 4, 5, 6 N in care N without care N seen at least once?

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Item c: VITAL STATUS FOLLOW-UP Methods if vital status tracing

  • Ascertainment methods for

vital status and date of death

  • Ascertainment methods for

cause of death

  • Frequency of tracing action
  • Who codes cause of death

into ICD?

  • Version of ICD used
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Items 7 and 8

  • N vital status known
  • N dead
  • N alive
  • N lost-to-follow-up
  • N cause of death known
  • N vital status unknown
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Item d: SMN follow-up Ascertainment of SMN

  • Potential methods
  • Available information

Definition of SMN

  • Calendar period of follow-up

(entry until exit year)

  • Diagnoses included
  • Central pathology or medical

chart review (available/possible)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Items 9 and 10

  • N second malignancy known
  • N with second malignancy alive
  • N with second malignancy dead
  • N source of validation
  • N lost-to-follow-up
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Item e: Health outcomes

  • Ascertainment methods of specific health outcomes
  • Potential methods/sources
  • Available information
  • Definition of specific health outcome
  • measuring methods
  • uniformity of methods used / validation
  • Calendar period of follow-up (entry until exit year)
  • Diagnoses included
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Inclusion/ exclusion criteria could change from research question to research question (e.g. years of survival, contact to patients of deceased patients or not ….)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Suggestions Suggestions

  • Revision

Revision of

  • f Questionnaire

Questionnaire after after Definition of Definition of inclusion inclusion criteria criteria for for research research questions questions ( (one

  • ne global

global database database and and extractions extractions per per research research question question) )

  • Different

Different inclusion inclusion criteria criteria per per research research field field possible possible

  • Definition

Definition of

  • f minimum

minimum set set of relevant

  • f relevant variables

variables per per research research question question

  • Asking

Asking the the data data from from research research coordinator coordinator per per country country