Ground-based high spatial resolution observations of massive star - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ground based high spatial resolution observations of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ground-based high spatial resolution observations of massive star - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ground-based high spatial resolution observations of massive star forming regions Morten Andersen, Gaetano Sivo, Margaret Meixner, Jonathan Tan, Yu Chen, Grace Lawrence et al. How massive star clusters are formed is poorly known What is


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ground-based high spatial resolution observations

  • f massive star forming regions

Morten Andersen, Gaetano Sivo, Margaret Meixner, Jonathan Tan, Yu Chen, Grace Lawrence et al.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

How massive star clusters are formed is poorly known

  • What is their low-mass IMF?
  • Is their formation fast or slow? (relative to the ff time)
  • High spatial resolution is key to reach low masses
  • Proper motion to probe the dynamics of the clusters
slide-3
SLIDE 3

How is the IMF assembled?

Westerlund 1, Andersen et al. 2017a

slide-4
SLIDE 4

JWST+NIRCAM will be revolutionary

  • >10^4 objects within a few arc minutes
  • High contrast, from O stars to brown dwarves
  • Accurate photometry to derive e.g. disk fractions
  • High sensitivity to reach the lowest mass objects
  • Relatively large field-of-view
slide-5
SLIDE 5

MCAO can do high spatial resolution

  • 8 meter class telescopes can achieve ~60-70mas
  • 1.5-2 arc minute field of view
  • Stable PSF across the field of view
  • Increases the probability of suitable guide stars
  • Can do larger surveys, more time epochs etc.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

GeMS+GSAOI

  • 5 laser spot MCAO system, 85” FOV
  • ~30% Strehl in the K band
  • 70 mas or better spatial resolution in the K band
  • Up to 3 NGS, can work with 1 or more
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Wd 1

  • Most massive young star cluster in Galaxy
  • 3-5 Myr, distance of 3-5 kpc.
  • ~50 000 Msun total mass
slide-8
SLIDE 8

FOV of GSAOI within Wd1

slide-9
SLIDE 9

NGS configuration on the observed mosaic

slide-10
SLIDE 10

GSAOI (2.1 micron) vs HST (F125W)

FOV 45”x60”

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Source detection: GSAOI (left), HST (right)

Increased source counts mainly due to resolution

slide-12
SLIDE 12

G286, forming massive star cluster

  • HCO+ line analysis suggest infall of 0.03 Msun/yr
  • Total mass uncertain, at least 2000 Msun (dust)
  • Could be up to 10^4 Msun (line data)
  • Few red sources identified in shallow observations
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Andersen et al. 2017, ApJ

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Andersen et al. 2019, in Prep

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Three main regions identified

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Large differences in extinction

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Large disk fractions

Disk fractions 27-44% (small fraction in control field)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

A competitor to 30 Dor?

Ochsendorf et al. 2017

slide-19
SLIDE 19

A competitor to R136?

Ochsendorf et al. 2017

slide-20
SLIDE 20

N79

N79, GS FLAMINGOS 2 JHK 1’, 15 pc Andersen et al. in prep

slide-21
SLIDE 21

N79

Andersen et al. in prep

slide-22
SLIDE 22

N79

Andersen et al. in prep

slide-23
SLIDE 23

N79

Andersen et al. in prep

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Improved MCAO: GNAO

  • a GeMS system for Gemini North
  • 2’ Field of view.
  • 0.8-2.4micron throughput
  • 50% Strehl in K band at 45 degrees across the field
slide-25
SLIDE 25

GNAO performance

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Next step: GNAO

  • Particular attention to astrometric precision
  • Aiming for 0.2 mas
  • 0.8-2.4micron throughput
  • 50% Strehl in K band at 45 degrees across the field
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Next step: GNAO

  • Much more nimble operation than GeMS
  • Part of queue observing, well suited for ToOs
  • 15 minute or faster acquisition
  • Capable of non-sidereal tracking
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Next step: GNAO

  • CoDR in one month (exactly)
  • PDR end of next August
  • First light in 2024
  • First light instrument : GNAOI imager
  • GIRMOS (5 arm IFU) is anticipated to go to GN