GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT DISTRICT-WIDE FACILITY STUDY & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

great valley school district
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT DISTRICT-WIDE FACILITY STUDY & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT DISTRICT-WIDE FACILITY STUDY & MASTER PLAN FINANCE COMMITTEE DISCUSSION 04 MAY 2020 1 K-5 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CURRENT capacity analysis OPERATING CAPACITY TARGET 90% 2019 OPERATING CAPACITY CURRENT USE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

DISTRICT-WIDE FACILITY STUDY & MASTER PLAN FINANCE COMMITTEE DISCUSSION 04 MAY 2020

1

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2019 OPERATING CAPACITY

CURRENT USE CAPACITY FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY

CHARLESTOWN ES 80% 73% GENERAL WAYNE ES 87% 69% K.D. MARKLEY ES 84% 81% SUGARTOWN ES 92% 85%

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

K-5 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CURRENT OPERATING CAPACITY – TARGET 90%

capacity analysis

2

The K-5 Elementary Schools can individually and together accommodate the current enrollments GWES Functional Capacity repurposes rooms internally for program to capture additional capacity

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2019 OPERATING CAPACITY

PDE CAPACITY FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY

GREAT VALLEY MS 86% 122% CURRENTLY NEED 14 ADDITIONAL GENERAL INSTRUCTIONAL SPACES (14 x 28 STUDENTS/CLRM = CAPACITY INCREASE OF 392) TO ACHIEVE THE TARGETED 85% UTILIZATION AT THE MIDDLE SCHOOL (Does not include space needs for additional support rooms such as Art, Music, Special Education, etc., plus spaces needs at the Cafeteria)

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

6-8 MIDDLE SCHOOL CURRENT OPERATING CAPACITY – TARGET 85%

3

Great Valley Middle School is currently over capacity

capacity analysis

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2019 OPERATING CAPACITY GREAT VALLEY HS 60%

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

9-12 HIGH SCHOOL CURRENT OPERATING CAPACITY – TARGET 80%

4

(Does not include space needs for additional support rooms such as Art, Music, Special Education, etc., plus spaces needs at the Cafeteria)

Great Valley High School currently has additional space

capacity analysis

CURRENTLY HAS APPROX. 18 CLASSROOMS OF SURPLUS CAPACITY (540 SEATS AT 30 STUDENTS/CLRM. OF AVAILABLE CAPACITY) TO BE WITHIN THE TARGETED 80% UTILIZATION AT THE HIGH SCHOOL

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 1. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS – As a whole, are at capacity,

however renovation to “Middle School” type spaces within General Wayne ES would allow for increased capacity

  • 2. MIDDLE SCHOOL – Is currently over capacity. If the building is

utilized as originally planned then it greatly exceeds capacity

  • 3. HIGH SCHOOL – Has additional capacity within

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

MASTER PLANNING – CONCLUSIONS REACHED

5

master planning

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 1. Delay activating the master planning, provide short-term

solutions and “weather the storm”. Possible short-term solutions presented as part of this presentation.

  • 2. Begin the planning process in order to be underway to manage

the student capacity issues.

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

MASTER PLANNING - TWO OPTIONS

6

master planning

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Possible recession duration according to some economists Planning, Design and Permitting Time Construction Time TOTAL TIME UNTIL MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION COULD BE RECOGNIZED TO ADDRESS CAPACITY ISSUES

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

MASTER PLANNING – DELAYED

7

master planning

24 months 18 months 18-24 months

60-66 months

slide-8
SLIDE 8

WHAT WILL GVSD LOOK LIKE IN FIVE YEARS IF WE DO NOTHING

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

DISTRICT-WIDE ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS

9

+350 students +203 students +273 students IN 5 YEARS

enrollment projections

slide-10
SLIDE 10

K-5 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS PROJECTED OPERATING CAPACITY – TARGET 90%

10

capacity analysis

Existing and Functional Use Compared to Projected Enrollments - By School and Grade Level PRIMARY SCHOOLS

GRADE E STR TRUCTU TURE BUIL ILDIN DING 2025- 2025-26 DI 26 DI ENR NROLLME MENT NT PROJECTI TION CURRENT U T USE CAPACIT ITY Y (2019- (2019-20) 20) CURRENT U T USE PROJECTE TED OPERATI TING CAP APAC ACITY FUNCT NCTIONA NAL USE C CAPACIT ITY Y (2019- (2019-20) 20) FUNCT NCTIONA NAL USE SE PROJECTE TED OPERATI TING CAP APAC ACITY K-5 Charlestown ES 375 454 83% 502 75% K-5 General Wayne ES 722 654 110% 110% 820 88% K-5 Kathryn D. Markley ES 658 686 96% 96% 712 92% 92% K-5 Sugartown ES 618 554 112% 112% 600 103% 103% TOTAL AL AV AVERAG AGE K K-5 C CAP APAC ACITY 2373 2373 2348 2348 101% 101% 2634 2634 90% 90%

General Wayne Elementary School

  • The Functional Capacity includes converting former “Middle School” program areas to

additional classroom space Sugartown and K.D. Markley Elementary Schools

  • Sugartown, and to a lesser extent K.D. Markley, will be over capacity in 5 years based
  • n the projected enrollments
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Operating as the buildings currently do, solutions to address capacity may include:

  • Renovations/Additions
  • General Wayne: Convert “Middle School-type” spaces to

additional instructional space

  • Redistrict K-5 to re-apportion populations
  • Modular classrooms in lieu of renovations to GWES or in

lieu of re-districting

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SOLUTIONS IN 5 YEARS No District Changes

11

master planning

slide-12
SLIDE 12

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

SECONDARY SCHOOL PROJECTED OPERATING CAPACITY

12

capacity analysis

Existing and Functional Use Compared to Projected Enrollments - By School and Grade Level

SECONDARY SCHOOLS

GRADE E STR TRUCTU TURE BUIL ILDIN DING 2025- 2025-26 DI 26 DI ENR NROLLME MENT NT PROJECTI TION CURRENT U T USE CAPACIT ITY Y (2019- (2019-20) 20) CURRENT U T USE PROJECTE TED OPERATI TING CAP APAC ACITY FUNCT NCTIONA NAL USE C CAPACIT ITY Y (2019- (2019-20) 20) FUNCT NCTIONA NAL USE SE PROJECTE TED OPERATI TING CAP APAC ACITY 6-8 Great Valley MS 1275 1306 98% 98% 876 146% 146% 9-12 Great Valley HS 1610 2228 72%

  • Middle School – Target 85%
  • The Middle School is currently over capacity and will further exceed it’s capacity in 5

years based on projected enrollments High School – Target 80%

  • The High School can accommodate the projected 5-year enrollments and would require no

changes as it currently operates

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Operating as the building currently does, solutions to address capacity may include:

  • Additions
  • Add 22 general instruction classrooms (22 x 28 students/classroom = 616 seats;

functional capacity 876 + 616 = 1492 x 85% occupancy = 1268 capacity to accommodate projected enrollments in 5 years)

  • Plus add classroom space for learning support or specials rooms
  • Plus expand kitchen/cafeteria for increased population
  • Modular classrooms in lieu of additions
  • Same notes as above
  • Move 8th grade into the High School (Grades 8-12)
  • Although the number of 8th grade general instruction classrooms and learning support

classrooms can be accommodated in the high school, the high school department structure would integrate 8th grade throughout the school, or modifications to the high school would be required to accommodate the 8th grade teams including Science.

  • Specials, kitchen/cafeteria and athletics would need to be addressed to accommodate

the increased population.

  • Note: teachers would likely not have their own classrooms. The function would need

to be modified to act as a “community college” setting where every space is programmed the majority of the day.

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

MIDDLE SCHOOL SOLUTIONS IN 5 YEARS No District Changes

13

master planning

slide-14
SLIDE 14

GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

THANK YOU!