Governors Committee on Energy Choice: Choice: Technical Working - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

governor s committee on energy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Governors Committee on Energy Choice: Choice: Technical Working - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Governors Committee on Energy Choice: Choice: Technical Working Group on Innovation, Technology, & Renewable Energy Marta Tomic Community Solar, Program Director December 5, 2017 Agenda enda 1. Community solar and a comparison to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Governor’s Committee on Energy Choice: Choice: Technical Working Group on Innovation, Technology, & Renewable Energy

Marta Tomic Community Solar, Program Director

December 5, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda enda

  • 1. Community solar and a comparison to other solar

energy offerings

  • 2. Benefits of community solar
  • 3. Community solar in restructured markets
  • 4. Key recommendations

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Wh What at is is Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar? r?

» Community mmunity solar ar refers ers to to local cal solar lar facil ciliti ities es share ared d by multiple tiple commu mmunit nity membe mbers rs who

  • recei

ceive ve credi edits ts

  • n their

ir elect ectricity ricity bills lls for r their ir share re of the e energ ergy y produ

  • duced

ced. » Community solar differs from

  • ther customer-focused
  • fferings such as community

choice aggregation and green tariff programs (e.g.: “subscription solar”)

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Co Comm mmunity unity Ch Choi

  • ice

ce Ag Aggr gregati egation

  • n (C

(CCA CA)

Legal in 7 States: CA, IL, MA, NJ, OH, RI and NY Under consideration in: UT, DE, MN

Image source: http://www.leanenergyus.org/cca-by-state/

» A A program

  • gram that

t allows lows cities ies and count unties ies to buy and/or /or generate erate elect ectric ricity ity for residents, idents, busin sinesses esses and d government ernment elect ectricity ricity users ers withi thin n its s jurisdiction. isdiction.

˃ Aggregated buying power ˃ CCAs enter contracts with alternative suppliers or large generators connected to the transmission system ˃ Utility retains ownership and management

  • f transmission and distribution.

Community Choice Aggregation must be legislatively enabled.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Gr Gree een n Ta Tari riff ff Pr Prog

  • grams

rams (e (e.g .g. . “subscription solar”)

» Pros Pros

˃ Flexible contract terms ˃ Allows subscribers to meet individual and corporate sustainability goals ˃ Allows utilities to maintain the customer relationship

» Cons Cons

˃ Subscribers pay a premium ˃ Renewable energy generating facilities are typically not sited locally ˃ Do not provide the energy from the generating facility

  • n subscriber bills

˃ Do not offer the opportunity to reduce energy expenditures

» Invol volve ve the e sale le of Renew newable able Energ ergy y Credi edits ts (RECs ECs) ) from m a renew newabl able e energy rgy facility ility to individual ividual subscribers scribers.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ut Util ility ity-Scale Scale So Sola lar r an and d Large Large-Scale Scale Co Comm mmercial ercial So Sola lar

» Designed for a single off-taker.

˃ In contrast, community solar allows individuals including renters, condominium owners, and businesses the opportunity to directly participate in and receive the benefits of solar.

» Typically sell power directly to utilities, who receive the benefits of solar power.

˃ In contrast, community solar provides individuals and commercial entities the opportunity to directly participate in a generating facility and receive the benefits from their subscription.

» Utility-scale and large-scale are typically connected at the transmission level.

˃ In contrast, community solar facilities are connected to the local distribution system.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Co Comm mmunity unity so sola lar r so solv lves es th the e ph phys ysical ical an and d ho home meownership

  • wnership ba

barr rrier iers s

  • f
  • f so

sola lar

Source: Greentech Media U.S. Community Solar Market Outlook, Oct 2016

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Be Bene nefits fits of

  • f Co

Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar

» Promotes competition to create low-cost customer focused offerings. » Expands access to local renewable energy for entities that cannot install rooftop solar (e.g., homeowners, small businesses,

businesses that lease space, commercial and industrial facilities, renters, apartment complexes, local governments).

» Allows subscribers to directly benefit from offsite community solar installations. » Provides opportunity for customer savings and re-investment in the local economy. » Drives economic development and private investment.

Massachusetts: In 2016, 63 MW of community solar resulted in over $154,000,000 in the Commonwealth.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Communi unity ty solar r is legisla slative tively ly enabled ed in 16 states es and the the Distri rict ct of Columb mbia. ia.

= CS in restruc structu tured ed market rkets = CS in vertic rticall lly integr tegrate ted market rkets

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

= CS in restruc structu tured ed market rkets = CS in vertic rticall lly integr tegrate ted market rkets

OR: 160 MW CA: 100 MW by 2018 MN: 80 MW

  • perational,

515 MW in development HI: 80 MW by 2019 CO: 37 MW

  • perational,

~200 MW by 2019 IL: 300 MW by 2020 NY: 250 MW by 2018 MD: 220 MW by 2019 MA: 112 MW

  • perational,

175 MW qualified

Communi unity ty solar r is legisla slative tively ly enabled ed in 16 states es and the Distri rict ct of Columb mbia. ia.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar r in in Re Rest structur ructured ed Ma Mark rkets ets

» Community solar fits in all market types.

˃ 6 vertically integrated markets: CO, MN, HI, WA, OR, CA ˃ 11 restructured markets: MA, NY, MD, IL, RI, VT, NH, ME, CT, DE and DC

» Maryland Register, Proposed Action on Regulations, published 4/29/2016:

1 1

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar r in in Re Rest structur ructured ed Ma Mark rkets ets

» Community solar ownership:

˃ A Subscriber Organization shall be any for-profit or not-for- profit entity permitted by state law that: + (A) owns or operates one or more community solar facility(ies) for the benefit of subscribers, or + (B) contracts with a third-party entity to build, own or

  • perate one or more community solar facilities.

˃ In restructured markets, this includes third party providers, customer owned facilities, and retail suppliers.

» Electric distribution utility responsible for administering the credits. » Community solar credit rates are consistent for all end-users, regardless of the competitive retail supplier.

1 2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar r in in Re Rest structur ructured ed Ma Mark rkets ets

» Interconnection ˃ Community solar facilities are interconnected at the local distribution system. ˃ Community solar system owners are responsible for all maintenance up to the point of interconnection. ˃ Project interconnection is governed by a set of safety standards and regulations that apply to all distributed solar energy projects. ˃ Clear rules and regulations for project interconnection and queue management.

1 3

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar: r: 5 G 5 Gui uiding ding Pr Prin inciples ciples

» Expand consumer access » Provide tangible economic benefits » Put consumers first » Promote fair market competition » Complement existing programs

1 4

IREC, Model Rules for Shared Renewable Energy Programs (2017),

http://www.irecusa.org/publications/guiding-principles-for-shared-renewable-energy-programs/

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Ke Key y Re Reco commendation mmendations

» Create a statewide community solar program to provide all customer types the opportunity to access solar energy through off-site solar installations. » Allow for multiple subscribers to directly benefit from a single off-site solar installation. » Enable subscribers to receive a bill credit for their share of production from an off-site facility. » Encourage competition to create low-cost community solar offerings and expand access to all customer types.

1 5

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Th Than ank y k you

  • u!

Marta rta Tomic mic Commu mmunit nity y Solar, ar, Program gram Direc rector tor marta rta@vo @votesolar.org tesolar.org www.v w.vote

  • tesolar.org

solar.org

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Re Reso sources urces

» Interstate Renewable Energy Council Guiding Principles:

˃ http://www.irecusa.org/publications/guiding-principles-for-shared-renewable-energy- programs/

» Coalition for Community Solar Access Policy decision matrix:

˃ http://www.communitysolaraccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CCSA-Policy-Decision-Matrix- Final-11-15-2016.pdf

» Links to authorizing legislation and/or regulations

˃ Massachusetts: Virtual Net Metering, Chapter 169, https://malegislature.gov/Laws/SessionLaws/Acts/2008/Chapter169 ˃ New York: PSC Order Establishing a Community DG Program, http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId={76520435- 25ED-4B84-847 ˃ Maryland: + Chapter 347, http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2015RS/Chapters_noln/CH_347_hb1087e.pdf + Title 20 Public Service Commission, Subtitle 62 Community Solar Energy Generating Systems, http://www.dsd.state.md.us/COMAR/subtitle_chapters/20_Chapters.aspx#Sub

1 7