governor s committee on energy
play

Governors Committee on Energy Choice: Choice: Technical Working - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Governors Committee on Energy Choice: Choice: Technical Working Group on Innovation, Technology, & Renewable Energy Marta Tomic Community Solar, Program Director December 5, 2017 Agenda enda 1. Community solar and a comparison to


  1. Governor’s Committee on Energy Choice: Choice: Technical Working Group on Innovation, Technology, & Renewable Energy Marta Tomic Community Solar, Program Director December 5, 2017

  2. Agenda enda 1. Community solar and a comparison to other solar energy offerings 2. Benefits of community solar 3. Community solar in restructured markets 4. Key recommendations 2

  3. What Wh at is is Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar? r? Community mmunity solar ar refers ers to to » local cal solar lar facil ciliti ities es share ared d by multiple tiple commu mmunit nity membe mbers rs who o recei ceive ve credi edits ts on their ir elect ectricity ricity bills lls for r their ir share re of the e energ ergy y produ oduced ced. Community solar differs from » other customer-focused offerings such as community choice aggregation and green tariff programs (e.g.: 3 “subscription solar”)

  4. Co Comm mmunity unity Ch Choi oice ce Ag Aggr gregati egation on (C (CCA CA) Community Choice Aggregation must be legislatively enabled. A A program ogram that t allows lows cities ies and » count unties ies to buy and/or /or generate erate elect ectric ricity ity for residents, idents, busin sinesses esses and d government ernment elect ectricity ricity users ers withi thin n its s jurisdiction. isdiction. ˃ Aggregated buying power ˃ CCAs enter contracts with alternative suppliers or large generators connected to the transmission system ˃ Utility retains ownership and management Legal in 7 States: CA, IL, MA, NJ, OH, RI and of transmission and distribution. NY Under consideration in: UT, DE, MN 4 Image source: http://www.leanenergyus.org/cca-by-state/

  5. Gr Gree een n Ta Tari riff ff Pr Prog ograms rams (e (e.g .g. . “subscription solar”) Invol volve ve the e sale le of Renew newable able Energ ergy y Credi edits ts (RECs ECs) ) from m a » renew newabl able e energy rgy facility ility to individual ividual subscribers scribers. Pros Pros Cons Cons » » ˃ ˃ Flexible contract terms Subscribers pay a premium ˃ ˃ Allows subscribers to meet Renewable energy generating individual and corporate facilities are typically not sustainability goals sited locally ˃ ˃ Allows utilities to maintain Do not provide the energy the customer relationship from the generating facility on subscriber bills ˃ Do not offer the opportunity to reduce energy expenditures 5

  6. Ut Util ility ity-Scale Scale So Sola lar r an and d Large Large-Scale Scale Co Comm mmercial ercial So Sola lar Designed for a single off-taker. » ˃ In contrast, community solar allows individuals including renters, condominium owners, and businesses the opportunity to directly participate in and receive the benefits of solar. Typically sell power directly to utilities, who receive » the benefits of solar power. ˃ In contrast, community solar provides individuals and commercial entities the opportunity to directly participate in a generating facility and receive the benefits from their subscription. Utility-scale and large-scale are typically connected at » the transmission level. ˃ In contrast, community solar facilities are connected to the 6 local distribution system.

  7. Co Comm mmunity unity so sola lar r so solv lves es th the e ph phys ysical ical an and d ho home meownership ownership ba barr rrier iers s of of so sola lar 7 Source: Greentech Media U.S. Community Solar Market Outlook, Oct 2016

  8. Be Bene nefits fits of of Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar Promotes competition to create low-cost » customer focused offerings. Expands access to local renewable » energy for entities that cannot install rooftop solar (e.g., homeowners, small businesses, businesses that lease space, commercial and industrial Massachusetts: In facilities, renters, apartment complexes, local governments). Allows subscribers to directly benefit » 2016, 63 MW of from offsite community solar community solar installations. resulted in over Provides opportunity for customer » savings and re-investment in the local $154,000,000 in the economy. Commonwealth. Drives economic development and private » 8 investment.

  9. Communi unity ty solar r is legisla slative tively ly enabled ed in 16 states es and the the Distri rict ct of Columb mbia. ia. = CS in restruc structu tured ed market rkets = CS in vertic rticall lly integr tegrate ted market rkets 9

  10. Communi unity ty solar r is legisla slative tively ly enabled ed in 16 states es and the Distri rict ct of Columb mbia. ia. MA: 112 MW MN: 80 MW OR: 160 MW operational, operational, NY: 250 MW 175 MW 515 MW in by 2018 qualified development CO: 37 MW CA: 100 MW IL: 300 MW MD: 220 MW operational, by 2018 by 2020 by 2019 ~200 MW by 2019 = CS in restruc structu tured ed market rkets HI: 80 MW by = CS in 2019 vertic rticall lly integr tegrate ted market rkets 10

  11. Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar r in in Re Rest structur ructured ed Ma Mark rkets ets » Community solar fits in all market types. ˃ 6 vertically integrated markets: CO, MN, HI, WA, OR, CA ˃ 11 restructured markets: MA, NY, MD, IL, RI, VT, NH, ME, CT, DE and DC » Maryland Register, Proposed Action on Regulations, published 4/29/2016: 1 1

  12. Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar r in in Re Rest structur ructured ed Ma Mark rkets ets Community solar ownership: » ˃ A Subscriber Organization shall be any for-profit or not-for- profit entity permitted by state law that: + (A) owns or operates one or more community solar facility(ies) for the benefit of subscribers, or + (B) contracts with a third-party entity to build, own or operate one or more community solar facilities. ˃ In restructured markets, this includes third party providers, customer owned facilities, and retail suppliers. Electric distribution utility responsible for » administering the credits. Community solar credit rates are consistent for all 1 » 2 end-users, regardless of the competitive retail supplier.

  13. Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar r in in Re Rest structur ructured ed Ma Mark rkets ets Interconnection » ˃ Community solar facilities are interconnected at the local distribution system. ˃ Community solar system owners are responsible for all maintenance up to the point of interconnection. ˃ Project interconnection is governed by a set of safety standards and regulations that apply to all distributed solar energy projects. ˃ Clear rules and regulations for project interconnection and queue management. 1 3

  14. Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar: r: 5 G 5 Gui uiding ding Prin Pr inciples ciples » Expand consumer access » Provide tangible economic benefits » Put consumers first » Promote fair market competition » Complement existing programs 1 4 IREC, Model Rules for Shared Renewable Energy Programs (2017), http://www.irecusa.org/publications/guiding-principles-for-shared-renewable-energy-programs/

  15. Ke Key y Re Reco commendation mmendations Create a statewide community solar program to » provide all customer types the opportunity to access solar energy through off-site solar installations. Allow for multiple subscribers to directly benefit » from a single off-site solar installation. Enable subscribers to receive a bill credit for » their share of production from an off-site facility. Encourage competition to create low-cost community » solar offerings and expand access to all customer types. 1 5

  16. Th Than ank y k you ou! Marta rta Tomic mic Commu mmunit nity y Solar, ar, Program gram Direc rector tor marta rta@vo @votesolar.org tesolar.org www.v w.vote otesolar.org solar.org

  17. Re Reso sources urces Interstate Renewable Energy Council Guiding Principles: » ˃ http://www.irecusa.org/publications/guiding-principles-for-shared-renewable-energy- programs/ Coalition for Community Solar Access Policy decision » matrix: ˃ http://www.communitysolaraccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CCSA-Policy-Decision-Matrix- Final-11-15-2016.pdf Links to authorizing legislation and/or regulations » ˃ Massachusetts: Virtual Net Metering, Chapter 169, https://malegislature.gov/Laws/SessionLaws/Acts/2008/Chapter169 ˃ New York: PSC Order Establishing a Community DG Program, http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId={76520435- 25ED-4B84-847 ˃ Maryland: Chapter 347, + 1 http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2015RS/Chapters_noln/CH_347_hb1087e.pdf 7 Title 20 Public Service Commission, Subtitle 62 Community Solar Energy + Generating Systems, http://www.dsd.state.md.us/COMAR/subtitle_chapters/20_Chapters.aspx#Sub

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend