governance of executive com pensation key trends and em
play

Governance of Executive Com pensation: Key Trends and Em erging - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Canadian Society of Corporate Secretaries 1 6 th Annual Corporate Governance Conference Banff Springs Hotel | Banff, AB | August 24 - 27, 2014 Governance of Executive Com pensation: Key Trends and Em erging Practices John Hammond, Towers


  1. The Canadian Society of Corporate Secretaries 1 6 th Annual Corporate Governance Conference Banff Springs Hotel | Banff, AB | August 24 - 27, 2014 Governance of Executive Com pensation: Key Trends and Em erging Practices John Hammond, Towers Watson Phil Barnett, Talisman Energy August 26, 2014

  2. I n this Session • Highlight evolving executive pay governance “hot topics”: 1. Shareholder engagement 2. Other executive compensation (EC) governance tools 3. Management / HR Committee (HRC) interaction 4. Pay for performance 5. Effective incentive plan designs • For each topic we will use the following framework: Current Trends Talism an Experience • Canadian market practices • Recent experiences, & trends (proxies & surveys) considerations, decisions and lessons learned Evolving Practice Talism an Considering • Consulting insights • Client feedback • What’s next?

  3. 1 . Shareholder Engagem ent Current Trends Talism an Experience • Voluntary Say on Pay; • Say on Pay experience 140+ companies in Canada • Changes to executive • Monitoring proxy advisors’ compensation programs voting guidelines • Increased focus on EC • Comprehensive proxy disclosure circular EC disclosure • Direct shareholder engagement by Board Evolving Practice • Direct engagement with • Use of proxy solicitors ISS, Glass Lewis, investor (e.g., Kingsdale) activists and Kingsdale • Meetings with principal Talism an Considering investors on EC topics • Articulating key elements • How proactive do we of EC programs & rationale want to be?

  4. 2 . Other EC Governance Tools Current Trends Talism an Experience • Voluntary Clawback Policy; • Executive DSU plan more than 70% of TSX 60 • Clawback Policy • Higher levels of minimum • Increased SOG share ownership • Decreased CEO severance • Voluntary deferral of STIP • Pay-for-performance (P4P) payments in DSUs disclosure (realizable pay) • Peer group update Evolving Practice • Re-focused STIP metrics • Ongoing alignment with • Relative TSR in LTIP shareholder interests, i.e., share retention ratios, Talism an Considering post-departure share ownership, “career shares” • Post-departure holdings • P4P, “cost of EC” and CEO • LTIP vesting on CIC pay ratio analyses

  5. 3 . Managem ent / HRC I nteraction Current Trends Talism an Experience • Structure and processes • Approved work plan for HRC annual calendar • More HRC engagement on • Clear responsibilities and P4P and governance approval authorities (e.g., • Two consultant model two consultant model) – Autonomy / • CHRO dotted-line confidentiality of HRC accountability to HRC Chair vs. duplication of work – Comms. more complex Evolving Practice • HRC mandate beyond • HRC mandate beyond compensation traditional EC topics • Greater time and attention Talism an Considering on EC governance and P4P • How to better manage • Interaction / overlap with two consultant model other Committees

  6. 4 . Pay for Perform ance Current Trends Talism an Experience • Ensuring incentive plans • Re-set of previous PSUs motivate desired outcomes • “Audit” of P4P in 2013 • Ensuring appropriate – Re-focused STIP weight on “pay-at-risk” metrics and added • Preparing for ISS and relative TSR metric to Glass Lewis assessments PSUs (50% weighting) • Judgment vs. discretion Evolving Practice • ISS and Glass Lewis • Reviewing “realized” and • Review of realizable pay “realizable” pay vs. target vs. performance • Assessing “performance” Talism an Considering through multiple lenses • Stress testing pay • Future performance outcomes and overall cost metrics for PSUs

  7. 5 . Effective I ncentive Plan Designs Current Trends Talism an Experience • Structured STIP / LTIP • Designs to fit Company design with tools for HRC strategy judgment / discretion • STIP: focus on • Less weight on options quantitative metrics (retain discretion for HRC) • Rigorous metric selection and target setting • LTIP: 100% PSUs (50% relative TSR, 50% Evolving Practice business metrics) • Financial / operating metrics • P4P and impact on beyond TSR in LTIP behaviour and retention • Differentiating LTIP grants Talism an Considering for corp. / individual perf. • Reviewing value for spend • Linkage of PSU metrics to business strategy • Customizing pay programs; “best fit over best practice”

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend