Globalization, Technology and the Decline in Labor Share of Income
1
Globalization, Technology and the Decline in Labor Share of Income - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Globalization, Technology and the Decline in Labor Share of Income Mitali Das Strategy, Policy and Research Department. IMF 1 The global labor share of income has been on a downward trend E volution of the Labor Share of Income (P ercent)
1
44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 1970 75 80 85 90 95 2000 05 10 14
E volution of the Labor Share of Income
(P ercent)
A E s E MD E s (right scale)
–8 –6 –4 –2 2 4 6 8 10 12 –8 –6 –4 –2 2 4 6 8 10 G ini coefficient, annual deviation from country mean Labor share, annual deviation from country mean (percentage points) 15 25 35 45 55 65 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 G ini coefficient Labor share
Labor Shares and Income Inequality
Levels W ithin-C
hanges (A nnual) N et/disposable G ross y = –34.397***x + 62.053 R
2 = 0.1049
y = –38.319***x + 50.459 R
2 = 0.1305
y = –0.308***x R
2 = 0.08
▪ How widespread is the decline in the labor share of income across countries, industries and skill groups? ▪ What are the key drivers of the labor share of income and through what mechanisms do they operate? ▪ Do the drivers vary between advanced economies (AEs) and emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs), industries, and skill groups? ▪ How have technology and globalization affected labor shares? What has been the role of exposures to routinization and participation in global value chains (GVCs) in declining labor shares?
▪ The decline in labor shares is widespread, though heterogeneous, across countries, industries and skill groups. ▪ In advanced economies s it reflects predominantly the advance of technology; global integration is a contributing factor, particularly in tradable sectors. ▪ In emerging and developing economies, it reflects predominantly the forces of global integration, notably the trend increase in participation in GVCs. Importantly, this could be a benign development: a result of capital deepening that is not necessarily accompanied by dislocation of employment or reduction in wages. ▪ “Routine-biased” technology and participation in GVCs have lowered the labor share of medium-skilled labor.
–6 –4 –2 2 4 6 8 K A Z C H N ID N C O L V E N H K G A R G IR L D E U P O L Z A F A U T R O U IS R T U R N O R P R T N LD U S A C A N F IN C H L IR N JP N A U S K O R S G P IT A ME X H U N MA R C H E E S P B E L E G Y C Z E S W E F R A D N K P E R T H A N Z L G B R U K R R U S A R E G R C B R A P H L MY S
E stimated Trends in L abor S hares by C
ector
–4 –3 –2 –1 1 2 3 4 Manufacturing T ransportation Mining H ealth services T rade F inancial services C
U tilities R eal estate A griculture A ccommodation E stimated Trends in L abor S hares by C
(P ercentage points per 10 years) E stimated Trends in L abor S hares by S ector, 1998–2014 (P ercentage points per 10 years)
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 1995 2000 05 09
dvanced E co no m ies H igh Middle 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 1995 2000 05 09
m erging Market and D evelo ping E co no m ies Middle Lo w H igh (right sc ale) Sources : W
utput D atabas e; and IMF s taff calcula tions . N
s = adv anced economies ; E MD E s = emerging market and dev eloping eco nomies .
L ab
are E v
tio n b y Skill L ev el
(P e rce n t)
What are the Key Drivers of the Labor share of Income?
– Relative price of investment goods – Exposure to automation in routine occupations
– Trade in final goods – Intermediate trade: participation in global value chains – Financial integration
– Corporate taxes, Unionization, Reforms in product and labor markets
– Depreciation, self-employment
–10 –8 –6 –4 –2 2 4 6 8 10 –10 –8 –6 –4 –2 2 4 6 8 10 W ithin Total Labor Share Trends, W ithin versus Total, Two-Digit ISIC (Percentage points per 10 years, 1992–2007) –15 –10 –5 5 10 15 –15 –10 –5 5 10 15 C hina W ithin Total
Shift-Share A nalysis
A E s E MD E s Labor Share Trends, W ithin versus Total, O ne-Digit ISIC (Percentage points per 10 years, 1990–2014)
Technology is the key driver of aggregate labor shares in Advanced Economies, whereas globalization is the key driver in Emerging Economies.
–8 –6 –4 –2 2 4 6 A E s E Ms E Ms exluding C hina
A ggregate R esults: C
ggregate L abor S hare C hanges, 1993–2014
(D eviation from regression constant)
T echnology F inancial integration U nexplained G V C participation P
A ctual change
–10 –8 –6 –4 –2 2 4 6 8 10 12 A E s – T radables sectors A E s – N
S ectoral R esults, A dvanced E conomies: C
S ectoral L abor S hare C hanges
T echnology C
E s U nexplained G V C participation S ector F E s A ctual change
Technological progress and globalization have “hollowed-out” the labor shares
C
ns to A ggregate L abo r S hare C hange by S kill, 1995–2009
–8 –6 –4 –2 2 4 6 8 10 12 H igh skill Middle skill Low skill Middle-skill A E s T echnology G lobal value chain participation F inancial integration S kill supply and other composition shifts A ctual change
▪ Policies should depend on country circumstances: level of development, extent of decline in labor shares, relative importance of underlying drivers, and existing social safety nets. ▪ In Advanced Economies: ▪ help workers cope with disruptions, including through skill upgrading and facilitating transitions, ▪ long-term investment in education, ▪ longer-term redistributive measures in line with social contract. ▪ In Emerging Markets and Developing Economies: ▪ Decline in labor share by itself may not call for policy intervention, but gains from growth should be shared more broadly. ▪ Challenges similar to those in AEs could arise as automation progresses – promote skill deepening to prepare for further structural transformation.
Koczan and Weicheng Lian, presented in:
– “Understanding the Downward Trend in Labor Shares of Income”, World
Economic Outlook April 2017 – “Routinization, Globalization and the fall in Labor’s Share of Income”, VOXeu.org, http://voxeu.org/article/routinisation-globalisation-and-fall- labour-s-share-income – “Why is labor receiving a smaller share of global income? Theory and empirical evidence”, IMF, Working paper WP/17/169.