Global Perspectives in Higher Education India Case Study Pawan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

global perspectives in higher education
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Global Perspectives in Higher Education India Case Study Pawan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Global Perspectives in Higher Education India Case Study Pawan Agarwal 16 December 2009 Scope India Indian higher education Organizing principles & getting it right 2 India: Size and contradictions Demography Higher Education Future


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Global Perspectives in Higher Education

India Case Study

Pawan Agarwal 16 December 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Scope

India Indian higher education Organizing principles & getting it right

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

India: Size and contradictions

Demography

  • Population - 1166

million

  • Large and

growing middle class

  • Large population

with English language skills Higher Education

  • 13 million
  • GER – 12.8%
  • Largest number
  • f institutions –

both huge and tiny

  • Second largest

exporter, but small imports Future

  • Highest

population by 2028

  • 540 million

middle class by 2025

  • Continuing

growth,, but also unmet demand

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Population, 2009 (in million)

Source: CIA Fact book (retrieved on 9 Dec 2009)

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Economy 2008 (PPP basis)

Source: CIA Fact book (retrieved on 9 Dec 2009)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Rising prosperity (million households)

Source: India: The Bird of Gold, M ckinsey, 2007

slide-7
SLIDE 7

India

Indian higher education

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Higher education: USA / India

Size and complexity

  • Order within chaos / Growth creating more complexity

Open democracy with federal set up

  • Indirect, but powerful role of the Federal Govt./ Direct, but ineffective

role of National Govt.

Coordination

  • M arket - government / government - market

Private participation

  • Long history, elite / Recent growth, demand-absorbing

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Size and Prospects: 2009-2020

Enrolment

12.8 m GER -13 % 30 m GER – 30 %

Institutions

Universities 500 Colleges 22000 Universities 1500 Colleges 30000

Private share

30% 3.8 m 50% 15 m

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Private participation

Demand absorbing

  • Public sector growth – slow and more of the same

Expensive, single discipline

  • Engineering, management …

.

Small entities

  • Average – 500/ 600 students

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Current trends

Expansion by the old privates

  • BITS, Pilani, Thapar

Emergence private chains

  • Amity, Techno-India, Career Launcher…

Big corporate sector interest

  • Ambanis, M ittals…

Hybrids

  • Jaypee Group, Apeejay

Niche

  • NIIT University, Vedanta University

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Streaming

Class 10 Class 12 Arts BA / M A Class 12 Science BSc / M Sc BE (Engineering) M BBS (M edicine) Class 12 Commerce Bcom / M com Vocational Stream Certificate (ITIs) Diploma (Polytechnics)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Institutional structures

Colleges (teaching only) Degree-granting Overall Institutions

23000 Central Universities Colleges funded by central govt Colleges funded by state govts IITs / IIMs / Other Institutions Private universities State universities State affiliating univs Colleges funded by state govts Private colleges

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Institutions

  • Unitary / affiliating
  • Central / State
  • Conventional / Open
  • M ulti-disciplinary /

Single discipline

  • Public / private

Universities

  • Arts and science /

professional

  • Regular / autonomous
  • Govt. / private / private

aided

Colleges

  • IIT
  • IIM
  • AIIM S
  • NIFT
  • National Law School

Other Institutions

  • Govt / private

Polytechnics and ITIs

  • Franchise / standalone

Private training providers

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

M aintaining standards

Regulation

  • National govt
  • State govt
  • UGC
  • State Councils of HE
  • AICTE
  • M ed Council
  • Other 10 councils
  • Affiliating universities

Accreditation

  • National Accreditation

and Assessment Council (NAAC)

  • National Board of

Accreditation (NBA)

  • Accreditation Board
  • 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Four concerns

Alignment

Unsettled debate

  • n purpose

M ore of the same Private growth

Funding

Low priority until recently Input-based funding system Unable to connect to national priorities

Standards

Drift to lowering of standards Accreditation system with no impact Absence of other institutional mechanisms

Growth

Govt sector marginal growth

  • ver past 2-

decades No drive for growth in existing institutions Private sector growth – equity concerns

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

India: In Context Indian higher education

Organizing principles

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Two organizing principles

US M arket-led system Primacy of competition Coordination by means of voluntary non-state linkages Diversified sources of funding UK Govt-led system Quasi-competition through performance-based funding Coordination through QA agencies and NQF / SBC Greater reliance on tuition and student loans

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Triangle of coordination

USA / UK

M arket

India

Academic Oligarchy

Source: Adapted from M odel by Burton R. Clark 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Academic oligarchy

But do not transmute this local authority in the state / national systems… .that would create academic anarchy

Academic freedom

Full autonomy in academic work Defined according to disciplines / subjects Continued fragmentation Exercise influence through peer groups

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Four ways to get it right

1

  • Use public funds to drive performance – relevance, growth, equity,

research and quality

2

  • Regulate the private sector the right way that creates incentives to grow

and maintain and enhance standards

3

  • Connect the vocational education and training (both public and private)

with higher education for holistic treatment of the tertiary sector

4

  • Consolidate and classify institutions for critical mass

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Relative growth in volume of publications 1981=100

Source: The Global Research Report: India, 2009 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Top 200 World Universities

Ra nk University Peer Review Employ er Review Staff / Studen t Ratio Citatio n / Staff Interna tional Staff Interna tional Studen ts Overall 49 Tsinghua 98 83 95 34 45 34 78.9 52 NYU 94 94 75 53 26 52 78.4 52 Peking 100 93 89 35 24 30 78.4 163 IIT Bombay 76 79 43 45 16 13 58.6 181 IIT Delhi 68 81 46 48 15 13 56.4

Source: Times Higher Education-QS World University Ranking 2009 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

… .to summarize

India would have largest system of higher education … .and if a few things are set right one of the best and most affordable

24