global control using a laser strainmeter for kagra
play

Global control using a laser strainmeter for KAGRA Kouseki Miyo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Global control using a laser strainmeter for KAGRA Kouseki Miyo Sep 9, 2019, TAUP2019 at Toyama Contents 3000 m 500 m 1500 m 1000 m X arm Y arm Laser Strainmeter 1. Introduction 2. Strainmeter of KAGRA 3. Sensor Correction Technique


  1. Global control using a laser strainmeter for KAGRA Kouseki Miyo Sep 9, 2019, TAUP2019 at Toyama

  2. Contents 3000 m 500 m 1500 m 1000 m X arm Y arm Laser Strainmeter 1. Introduction 2. Strainmeter of KAGRA 3. Sensor Correction Technique 4. First trial 5. Results 2

  3. Seismic noise under ground Earth Tides 
 ~100 um 
 ~10 -5 Hz) Microseismic Wind, trafic, human activity In lower frequencies, reduction is not so much. K. Yamamoto, JGW-T1000218, (2010) 3

  4. potentially limits the duty cycle of KAGRA. TestMass The range is enough, but small actuator range Actuator range and seismic noise (MN) MarionetteMass Mass (IM) Intermediate 
 (TM) * * * 50th 90th 99th MN IM TM klog:9386 * Y. Michimura, et. al., (2017) 4

  5. • Strainmeter can FeedForward the seismic motion to the arm to reduce the feedback force. 2nd floor 1st floor 3 km 1.5 km IX EX Strainmeter X arm Global Control Feedback Global Control on the Arm cavity 5

  6. In the case of LIGO 4 km EX Arm Local Control • Seismometers can also measure the arm fluctuation . 6

  7. N LVDT N STRAIN (Trillium120Q) N SEIS • However, seismometers can not measure the ground motion below 80 mHz. • The strainmeter can measure below that. Seismometers and Strainmeter 7

  8. Earth Tides (KAGRA strainmeter) Microseismic • Strainmeter can measure almost all seismic motion in low frequency. Bandwidth of the Strainmeters A. Araya et. al., (2017) 8

  9. Strainmeter of KAGRA PBS • Wide dynamic range length changes • Rotation indicates arm detection • Quadrature phase 1500 m ΔL Laser Stabilized Frequency circular - polarized sin s - polarized p - polarized sin cos QWP HWP End Reflector Front Reflector -ΔL +ΔL cos 9

  10. The strainmeter KAGRA X arm Stand Alone DAQ End Reflector KAGRA X arm Frequency Stabilized Laser Front Chamber Center 
 Area X End Me 10

  11. Sensor Correction Technique + - - Strainmeter X TM(EX) Position sensor X STG X GND where, X GND(IX) - + X TM X STG - H TM (r=0) X GND(EX) Hs S ff C fb C sc C ff Pa S fb N ff N fb r - - - + Test Mass Actuator IP 11

  12. Sensor Correction Technique EX follow IX by using SC. X TM + - X GND(IX) where, If G is high and SC will subtract, 
 X GND - X STG Position sensor X TM(EX) Strainmeter - - X STG + H TM S fb Hs S ff C fb C sc C ff Pa X GND(EX) N ff N fb r - - - + (r=0) Test Mass Actuator IP 12

  13. Sensor Correction Technique X GND X TM + - X GND(IX) If G is high and SC will subtract, 
 EX follow IX by using SC. X STG + Position sensor X TM(EX) Strainmeter - - Test Mass 1 X STG - H TM X GND(EX) Hs S ff C fb C sc C ff Pa S fb 1 N ff N fb r - - - + (r=0) Actuator IP 13

  14. Sensor Correction Technique EX follow IX by using SC. X STG X TM + - X GND(IX) If G is high and SC will subtract, 
 X GND H TM X STG Position sensor X TM(EX) Strainmeter - - - + (r=0) X GND(EX) Hs S ff C fb C sc C ff Pa S fb N ff N fb r - - - + Test Mass Actuator IP 14

  15. Sensor Correction Technique EX follow IX by using SC. X STG X TM + - X GND(IX) If G is high and SC will subtract, 
 X GND H TM X STG Position sensor X TM(EX) Strainmeter - - - + (r=0) X GND(EX) Hs S ff C fb C sc C ff Pa S fb N ff N fb r - - - + Test Mass Actuator IP 15

  16. Sensor Correction Technique X GND X STG X TM + - X GND(IX) If G is high and SC will subtract, 
 X STG H TM Position sensor X TM(EX) Strainmeter - - Test Mass - + (r=0) S fb Hs S ff C fb C sc C ff Pa We can make the EX follow the IX motion! X GND(EX) N ff N fb r - - - + Actuator IP 16

  17. First trial • Correction signal was feedforwarded to the EX suspension point. The singnal was injected in all frequencies. • No arm length control to the test mass. The FP was locked by the feedback loop to the AOM. Laser Feedback Signal Not use Correction Signal 17

  18. OFF ON • Slow motion was subtracted from FeedBack signal Result • High frequency motions are not seemed so. Worked! e d i T h t r a E 18

  19. Higher frequency band • Noise was injected 
 (~ 0.8 Hz) 
 →Need lowpass filter • No big difference in RMS, because of a peak at 150 mHz. RMS (ON) RMS (OFF) We need more investigation 19

  20. Summary • Actuator range is limited near the test mass not to introduce electric noises on the GW signal. • Unlike seismometers, the laser strainmeter has an advantage to measure the change of arm length directly. It also covers frequency range where seismometers cannot measure the ground motion accurately. • Sensor correction technique using strainmeter can make the EX test mass follow the IX test mass motion. • We need more investigation to improve the subtraction 20

  21. Backup 21

  22. Frequency Stabilized Laser AM Nd:YAG s - polarized p - polarized Prob Pump Derivative Signal Absorption Signal 6 kHz 97 kHz FM - + Stabilized Light QWP AOM Iodine cell FI PBS1 PBS2 BS1 BS2 PZT TMP 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend