GEOTEMPORALLY DISTRIBUTED PROJECT TEAMS Francis Norman, David Pick, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GEOTEMPORALLY DISTRIBUTED PROJECT TEAMS

Francis Norman, David Pick, Carolyn Dickie ANZAM conference Perth, December 2012

Agenda

• Introduction
• Forms of Virtual Teams
• Temporal Influences
• Geotemporally Distributed Project Teams

Broken communications

"I understand that the PM has addressed this in a press conference in Turkey in the last few hours. I haven't seen what she said, but let me say I support what it is that she said."

Bill Shorten MP , speaking to the media, 26th April 2012.

Forms of Virtual Teams

Virtual Teams

‘Groups of geographically and/or organizationally dispersed coworkers that are assembled using a combination of telecommunications and information technologies to accomplish an

• rganizational task.’

Townsend, DeMarie, and Hendrickson 1998, 17

But, not all virtual teams are alike…

Forms of virtual team

Hub

Location A Location B Location C Location D

A “hub and spoke” model

• ften used for projects

Forms of virtual team

Location A Location B Location C Location D Location E

A “Peer to Peer” model – typical of IT where work circulates the globe

Location E Location D Location A Location C Location B

A “Collaborative” model – typically used in research.

Forms of virtual team

A B

A large hub with very small remote groups or individual remote personnel

Forms of virtual team

Forms of virtual team

HUB

A

B C

D

A B C D E

E D A C B

HUB

Forms of virtual team

• Even as researchers we

are occasionally working in forms of virtual teaming;

• Collaboration with

academics at other facilities

• Communicating with

supervisors or students when remote from campus

• Outsourcing transcription
• f interviews

Forms of virtual team

Some virtual teams are run as part of the base organisation’s

• perational model, a part of the

normal way of doing business.

A B C D E

Some are formed for between days and months/years to undertake a particular developmental project.

25% 50% 75%

And that is just the structure of the virtual team… Yet the term “Virtual Team” is used to cover all of these.

Temporal Influences

Temporal diversity

Takes many forms;

• Separation
• Scheduling
• Precision
• Pacing
• Present time perspective
• Future time perspective
• Flexibility
• Linearity
• Scarcity
• Urgency

Ballard & Seibold (2003)

Temporal symmetry & asymmetry

• Proposes that different

individuals and groups/cultures perceive time differently and that they relate better to those with similar perspectives

Zerubavel (1981)

Time zone separation

A number of researchers have investigated the impact of time zone separation on stress and communication. Findings and recommendations are;

• Even a few metre’s separation

can affect communications. Espinosa et al. (2012)

• Stick to a limited number of

forms of communication. Kayworth & Liedner (2000)

• Asynchronous is more stressful.

Espinosa et al. (2012

Geotemporal leadership

Leading a distributed team is more complex than leading a co-located

• ne.

Bluedorn & Denhardt (1988) These leaders need a greater tolerance for ambiguity, understanding of temporal diversity and be able to build trust at a distance. Lu et al. (2006) and others (see paper)

Geotemporally distributed project teams

A sub set of the traditional Virtual Team

Geotemporally Distributed Project Teams

‘Groups of geographically and/or organizationally dispersed coworkers that are assembled using a combination of telecommunications and information technologies to accomplish an organizational task.’ (Townsend, DeMarie, and Hendrickson 1998, 17)

+

“A temporary endeavour undertaken to achieve a unique product, service or result” (PMI 2008, 5)

=

“A group of geographically and/or temporally dispersed coworkers, temporarily assembled using appropriately selected communication techniques to undertake or create a unique product, service or result”

What makes them different

• Formed for only a brief period of between days and months to

complete their scope in a specific project.

• Typically all from a single company but could be employees of

several company’s in a Joint Venture

• Typically in large groups but with the occasional individual

working in isolation from the single or multiple large groups.

Societal and Cultural Organisation

Outcomes Mediators Inputs Temporal Developmental Process

Processes Multiple Criteria Project Team Members Team Members

Input - Mediator - Outcomes model of Geotemporally Distributed Project Teams (after Mathieu et al. 2008)

Propositions

1.

There are some forms of communication that are more effective between geotemporally distributed teams who are separated by fewer time zones and others that are better suited for teams separated by greater distance or time zones, and that it is better for teams to adopt these forms of communication and either discard or use sparingly other forms.

2.

There are particular characteristics and skills of both leaders and team members that make them more suited and more effective as participants in geotemporally dispersed project teams, that these characteristics and skills can be identified, developed and leveraged to make the projects these individuals are engaged in more effective.

References

• Ballard, Dawna I., and David R. Seibold. 2003. "Communicating and Organizing in Time : A Meso-Level

Model of Organizational Temporality." Management Communication Quarterly 16 (3): 380-415. http://mcq.sagepub.com/content/16/3/380.

• Bluedorn, Allen C., and Robert B. Denhardt. 1988. "Time and Organizations." Journal of Management 14

(2): 299-320. bth. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=7202109&site=ehost-live.

• Espinosa, J Alberto, Jonathon N Cummings, and Cynthia Pickering. 2012. "Time Separation, Coordination,

and Performance in Technical Teams." IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 59 (1): 91. http://proquest.umi.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/pqdweb?

• Kayworth, Timothy, and Dorothy Leidner. 2000. "The Global Virtual Manager: A Prescription for Success."

European Management Journal 18 (2): 183-194.

• Lu, Mei, Mary Beth Watson-Manheim, Katherine M Chudoba, and Eleanor Wynn. 2006. "Virtuality and

Team Performance: Understanding the Impact of Variety of Practices." Journal of Global Information Technology Management 9 (1): 4-23.

• Mathieu, John, M. Travis Maynard, Tammy Rapp, and Lucy Gilson. 2008. "Team Effectiveness 1997-2007:

A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse into the Future." Journal of Management 34 (3): 410-479. http://jom.sagepub.com/content/34/3/410.

• Townsend, Anthony M., Samuel M. DeMarie, and Anthony R. Hendrickson. 1998. "Virtual Teams:

Technology and the Workplace of the Future." Academy of Management Executive 12 (3): 17-29. bth. doi: 10.5465/ame.1998.1109047. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=1109047&site=ehost-live

• Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1981. Hidden Rythms; Schedules and Calendars of Social Life. Chicago: University of

Chicago Press.

Thank You