geometrica period 2002 2006
play

GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006 Jean-Daniel Boissonnat Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The team Context and overall objectives A selection of scientific achievements Software development and technology transfer New challenges GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006 Jean-Daniel Boissonnat Evaluation seminar November 14, 2006 Evaluation


  1. The team Context and overall objectives A selection of scientific achievements Software development and technology transfer New challenges GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006 Jean-Daniel Boissonnat Evaluation seminar November 14, 2006 Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  2. The team Context and overall objectives A selection of scientific achievements Software development and technology transfer New challenges The team Permanent researchers Temporary employees J-D. Boissonnat (head) F . Chazal (U. Bourgogne) F . Cazals 11 Ph.D. Students, 3 Post Doc., O. Devillers 2 Engineers M. Yvinec M. Teillaud ( GALAAD 2003-2005) P . Alliez (2001) S. Pion (2003) D. Cohen-Steiner (2004) Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  3. The team Context and overall objectives A selection of scientific achievements Software development and technology transfer New challenges Context and overall objectives 1/2 Context ◮ Processing (massive) geometric data is mandatory ◮ A theory for approximating geometric objects is lacking ◮ Complexity and robustness issues are critical Focus: Effective Non-Linear Computational Geometry ◮ Geometric Algorithms ◮ Geometric Calculus ◮ Geometric Approximation Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  4. The team Context and overall objectives A selection of scientific achievements Software development and technology transfer New challenges Context and overall objectives 2/2 Our approach ◮ Provide mathematical and algorithmic foundations ◮ Validate our theoretical advances through extensive experimental research ◮ Develop the CGAL library and use it to disseminate our results Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  5. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Some selected results Sampling, meshing and reconstruction ◮ Sampling theorems and algorithms zoom ◮ Mesh generation zoom Feature extraction ◮ Ridge extraction zoom ◮ Stability of geometric features zoom Data Structures ◮ Delaunay triangulation and Voronoi diagrams zoom ◮ Compact data structures zoom next Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  6. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Sampling theory for compact sets in R n ◮ Well-chosen offsets of sampled compact subsets of R n have the correct homotopy type if the sampling is dense enough. ◮ Automatic scale selection is possible using the critical function of the point cloud. ◮ The sampling theory is based on non-smooth analysis of distance functions. SoCG 06 Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  7. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Restricted Delaunay triangulation back ◮ If S is C 1 , 1 or Lipschitz surface and E a sufficiently dense sample of S , RDT( E ) is a good approximation of S ◮ Can be turned into an approximation algorithm, assuming knowledge about the reach of S (or k -Lipschitz radius) Graph. Models 05, SOCG 06, S. Oudot’s PhD thesis Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  8. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Surface meshing by Delaunay refinement ◮ A simple and incremental algorithm for sampling and meshing surfaces ◮ Produces a good approximation of the surface ◮ Produces sparse samples of optimal size ◮ Produces facets with good aspect ratio ◮ General (black box) model of surfaces basic primitive: intersection line segment-surface ◮ Usable in various situations implicit surfaces, remeshing, reconstruction simplification of large data sets SGP 03, Graph. Models 05, SOCG 05-06, Oudot’s Ph.D. thesis Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  9. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  10. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Surface reconstruction Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  11. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Delaunay refinement for 3D meshes ◮ Coupling the surface mesher with a 3D Delaunay refinement process IMRT 05 ◮ interleaved refinement of surfaces and volumes ◮ multi-volumes domain are meshed at once ◮ with optionally region-dependent granularity Rineau’s Ph.D thesis Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  12. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Variational meshing Minimize (locally) � � ρ ( x ) || x − x j || 2 dx E = x ∈ R j j = 1 .. k Lloyd iteration alternates: - partition w.r.t. sites (Voronoi tiling) - move sites to centroids Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  13. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Variational meshing back Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  14. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Ridges [SGP 03, CAGD 05-06, IJCGA 05, Pouget’s Ph.D. Thesis] Difficulties : ◮ Differential quantities up to 4th order Def.: extrema of ◮ Singularities: umbilics + self-intersections principal curvatures ◮ Non global orientability of principal along curvature lines directions Contributions : ◮ On meshes: guaranteed approximations ◮ On parametric surfaces: novel implicit characterization as P ( u , v ) = 0 ◮ On polynomial surfaces: certified algorithms Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  15. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Extraction on parametric surfaces : illustration back h ( u , v ) = 116 u 4 v 4 − 200 u 4 v 3 + 108 u 4 v 2 − 24 u 4 v − 312 u 3 v 4 + 592 u 3 v 3 − 360 u 3 v 2 + 80 u 3 v + 252 u 2 v 4 − 504 u 2 v 3 + 324 u 2 v 2 − 72 u 2 v − 56 uv 4 + 112 uv 3 − 72 uv 2 + 16 uv . • P ( u , v ) : bivariate polynomial of total degree 84, of degree 43 in u , degree 43 in v with 1907 terms and coefficients with up to 53 digits. • Certified extraction < 10 minutes Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

  16. The team Sampling, meshing and reconstruction Context and overall objectives Ridges A selection of scientific achievements Topological persistence Software development and technology transfer Delaunay triangulations and Voronoi diagrams New challenges Compact data structures Topological persistence How to distinguish “features” from “noise”? ◮ track the creation/destruction of components/loops... in sub-level sets as “sea level” increases ◮ set of “persistence intervals” ≃ life-spans of features ◮ “features” yield long intervals, “noise” yields short ones Evaluation seminar GEOMETRICA Period 2002-2006

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend