Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

geary corridor bus rapid transit sfmta citizens advisory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee Project Update SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Aug ugus ust 6, 6, 20 2015 15 Project Overview and Goals 6.5


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee

Project Update

Aug ugus ust 6, 6, 20 2015 15

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Project Overview and Goals

 6.5 .5 mi mile eas ast-we west corridor

  • r

 Home

  • me t

to

  • maj

major

  • r SF

SFMTA t trunk l line (38 Gear ary) wi with mor more than an 5 55,0 ,000 t tran ansit trips pe per da day  Characte cterized by slow, unreliable and crowd

  • wded t

tran ansit Geary y BRT’s s project ct goals s include:  Improving t transit t reliability a y and effi fici ciency cy  Creating a a comp

  • mplete street f

for

  • r al

all users  Improving ng the p pedestrian e n env nvironmen ent 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Benefits

3  Strong b g bus b benef efits wher ere e BRT treatm tments ts applied:

 Travel l tim ime: 2 25% s savings gs  Relia liabili lity: 2 20% r reduction in in travel t tim ime variabil ilit ity  Ridersh ship: 10%+ g gains f s forecast asted – strong c cost st e effectiveness ss  Lower t travel t tim imes = = more s service, more rid iders a at lo lower o

  • perating c

g cost

 Pedestr strian cro rossing ng i improvem ement nts  Streetsca tscape enhance cements ts

slide-4
SLIDE 4

BRT Recommended Alternative

►Sel

elec ected t d the e best best c con

  • nfiguration f

for

  • r ea

each seg segment

4

Palm/Jordan-to-27th Masonic Fillmore/ Japantown No bus lanes Side Lanes (existing) Center Lanes Side Lanes

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Environmental Document Status

5

Key Key envi viron

  • nmental p

process ss m milest eston

  • nes:

es:

Summer – Fall 2014

  • Admin. Draft EIR/S local agency reviews

December 2014 Submitted Administrative Draft EIR/S to FTA January – April 2015 Discussion of preliminary FTA comments on project definition and Small Starts Packages May 2015 Submitted Admin. Draft EIR/S Round #2 to FTA June 2015 Received FTA Comments on Round #2 August 2015 Submitting Admin. Draft EIR/S Round #3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

FTA Review: Potential Funding Sources

6

POTENTIA IAL F FUNDIN ING S SOURCE POTENTIA IAL AMOUNT ( T ($M) FEDERAL FUNDS Active Transportation Program $1-5 Highway Safety Improvement Program $1-5 Lifeline Transportation Program $5-15 FTA Small Starts $75 OneBayArea Grant Program $5-20 Transit Performance Initiative Incentives $5-15 Transit Performance Initiative Investments $5-15 STATE FUNDS Cap and Trade $10-30 LOCAL FUNDS Prop K Transportation Sales Tax $44-55 Cost sharing opportunities (e.g. SFPUC, Public Works, others for utilities, paving, etc.) $20-50 2014 General Obligation Bond $5-10 Prop AA Vehicle Registration Fee $1-5 SFMTA Revenue Bond $1-10 Transportation Sustainability Fee $5-10 Vehicle License Fee $10-30 AB 644 Bridge Tolls $5-10 TOTA TAL $198 to $360 Project cost: $320

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Environmental Process Schedule

7

Schedule Environmental Process Fall 2015 Public Draft EIR/S release,

  • utreach & comment period

Winter, Spring 2016 Develop FEIR/S, including responses to comments Summer, Fall 2016 Locally Preferred Alternative and FEIR/S approvals

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Environmental Public Outreach Plan

 Notific icatio ions ( (mult ltilin ilingua ual) l)  Stakehol

  • lder

er grou

  • up pr

presen esentation

  • ns

 Ou Outrea each a at com

  • mmunity even

events  OW OWL vi L view ewer depl deploy

  • yment

 Host

  • sted pu

publ blic h hea earing  DEIR/S doc document on

  • nline a

and d at pu publ blic l loc

  • cation
  • ns

 Com Comments a accept epted vi via

Ema Email Mail il Commen ent c t cards Cou Court r t rep eporter a at t hea earing

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Other Work

 SF SFMT MTA Prop K K fu fund r requests ( (Jul 2015) 2015):

Nea Near-te term/Initi tial al C Constr tructi tion P Phase implementati ation Full ll-project engineering d design ( (Conceptual al E Engineering Repo port)

 Transit itio ion Pla lan  Commun munit ity inpu put on

  • n desi

design

Webste ter S Street B et Bridge Palm m Ave Avenu nue

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Near-Term Improvements: Phasing Packages

 Pha hase 1 1 Nea Near-te term: Delivers s project ct benefi fits ts prior t to completi tion of full project* t*

 Sid ide-running t transi sit-onl

  • nly l

y lanes  Transit s signa nal p priority y (TSP) and nd qu queue-jump s p signals  New ew and ex exten ended ed t transit b bulbs  Walk lkFir irst/Vision Z Zer ero p ped edes estrian safet ety t trea eatments  Muni F i Forward im improvements  Japantow ntown trans nspor

  • rta

tati tion i n improv

  • vements

nts  Rig ight-turn p pockets ( (pending a analysi sis) s)

 Phase se 2 Full Build-out: t: Comple leti tion of the remaining project ct elements ts including constr tructi ction of cente ter-running l lanes and utility w ty work 10

*Note: Near-term improvement design will be at-risk pending selection of Locally Preferred Alternative and FEIR/S approvals.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Near-term Improvements: Red Transit-only Lanes

 Complet eted ed: Marke ket t to

  • Gou
  • ugh

Streets, Summe mmer 2014  Ph Phase 1:

 Stanyan – Wood Street eets  Ba Bake ker – Gough S Street ets w wher ere e feasible le (Timing to b be e det deter ermined ed p pen endi ding repaving) g)

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Near-term Improvements: TSP and Queue-jump Signals

 Complete ted: Transi sit t signal priority: ty: e exte tends s green phas ase for

  • r buses

 33rd Ave t to Marke ket/3 /3rd rd Street

 Phase e 1: Qu Queu eue-jumps: s: dedica cate ted b bus p s phase se to give bus s priority ty through the interse secti ction

 Powell ll/O’Farrell a l and Geary/Maso Masonic A Ave Queue-jump 19th Ave and Lincoln Way

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Near-Term Muni Forward Service Improvements

 Comp

  • mpleted: Se

Service Imp mprov

  • vements

 Incr creased f frequency (38 & (38 & 38R 38R)  Sun unday service (38R (38R)

 Phase se 1: Bus s Stop M Modifi fica cati tions

 Stop

  • p o
  • ptimizati

tion

  • n (mov
  • ve

nearsid ide t to far arsi side at at si signals)  Consolid idatio ion o

  • f clo

losely ly-spa pace ced s d stops ps  Conversio ion o

  • f two
  • Rapid/l

/loca cal s stops ps t to local o

  • nl

nly

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Near-Term Vision Zero/ WalkFirst Safety Improvements

 Comb

  • mbinat

ation

  • n of
  • f par

arallel effor

  • rts an

and Phase e 1 elem ement ents:

 Pedestrian bulb lbs, s sin ingle and w wrap- around  Pedestrian s sig ignals  New s sig ignalize zed c crossin ings gs  New countdown s signal als s  Leading p g pedestria ian in interval  Hig igh-vis isib ibil ilit ity c crosswalk lks  Da Day-li ligh ghtin ing  ADA u upgrades Sidewalk bulbs

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Near-Term Improvements: New and Extended Transit Bulbs

 Transit bu bulbs bs pr provi

  • vide a

a sm smoot

  • ther, m

mor

  • re r

e rel eliable r ride de 11 n 11 new t tran ansit bulbs 4 ex exten ended bu bulbs bs

15

Geary and Leavenworth

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Near-Term Improvements: Japantown/ Fillmore

 Road Roadwa way r redesign

 Lane r reductio ion to calm lm traffic ic a and priorit itiz ize transi sit

 Op Openi ening g of

  • f Webste

ster surfa face ce-level l west-si side crossw swalk

 New p pedestria ian r refuge ges a and c corner b bulb lbs  Sig ignal t l tim iming g change ges  Pedestrian b brid idge ge r removal

 New New mi mid-bloc

  • ck cros
  • ssing at

at Bu Buchan anan an/Peac ace P Plaz aza

 Dedic icated p pedestria ian s sig ignal l wit ith u upgraded median

 Remov

  • val

al of pedestr strian overcr crossi ssings s at Webste ter a and Steiner

 Opening of

  • f surfa

face-level e l east-sid ide c crosswalk lks

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Project Schedule

17 17

Schedule Environmental Process Near-Term Improvements Fall 2015 Public Draft EIR/S release,

  • utreach & comment period Begin conceptual design

Winter, Spring 2016 Develop FEIR/S, including responses to comments Begin utility construction Detailed design for contract elements* Summer, Fall 2016 Locally Preferred Alternative and FEIR/S approvals Red lane installation Winter 2016 Begin construction contracting for remaining near-term improvements

*Note: Near-term improvement design will be at-risk pending selection of Locally Preferred Alternative and FEIR/S approvals.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

For More Information: www.gearybrt.org