geary bus rapid transit
play

Geary Bus Rapid Transit July 18, 2018 1 Geary corridor: looking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Geary Bus Rapid Transit July 18, 2018 1 Geary corridor: looking east 2 The Geary corridor: 54,000 riders/day 3 Weve been busy making major improvements New low-floor buses More frequent service Safety enhancements Red lanes downtown 4


  1. Geary Bus Rapid Transit July 18, 2018 1

  2. Geary corridor: looking east 2

  3. The Geary corridor: 54,000 riders/day 3

  4. We’ve been busy making major improvements New low-floor buses More frequent service Safety enhancements Red lanes downtown 4

  5. And our customers are noticing “Thank you for the bus lanes!” “I like the new buses. They have I like the new buses. They have more room more room and are cleaner .” and are cleaner. “38 bus improved immensely within the last 3 years” 5

  6. But, more is needed High ridership is a blessing and a curse • More frequent service  harder to prevent bus bunching • Geary riders sometimes still experience crowded buses, uneven wait times and inconsistent travel times SF’s longest High -Injury Corridor • Geary travelers are eight times more likely to be hit by traffic than the city average 6

  7. Major project features Dedicated bus New signals + lanes crosswalks Pedestrian bulbs, Better bus stops median refuges Smarter traffic Calming the “expressway” signals 7

  8. Alternatives Evaluated 8

  9. Bus-Only Lane Configuration (Hybrid Alternative, as amended by SFCTA Board) 9

  10. Example: O’Farrell at Leavenworth - Before 10

  11. Example: O’Farrell at Leavenworth - After Dedicated bus lanes Better bus stops 11

  12. Example: Geary at Buchanan - Before 12

  13. Example: Geary at Buchanan - After Pedestrian Calming the New signals + Dedicated bulbs, median “expressway” crosswalks bus lanes refuges 13

  14. Example: Geary at 17 th Ave - Before 14

  15. Example: Geary at 17 th Ave - After New signals Pedestrian Dedicated + bulbs, median bus lanes refuges crosswalks 15

  16. Extensive outreach process • 4 major rounds of outreach • Public meetings • 250+ meetings w/ 65+ stakeholder groups • 33 Citizens Advisory Committee meetings • Multi-lingual communications • Corridor surveys • OWL Visualization kiosks • Flyering at bus stops • Web, email, social media updates • Newspaper ads • Corridor postings • Ambassadors at bus stops 16

  17. We Heard You! 5 4 2 1 6 Changes made between Draft EIR/EIS and Final EIR 1 - Retention of Local and Express bus stops at Spruce/Cook (No Rapid stop) 2 - Retention of the Webster Street pedestrian bridge 3 - Addition of more pedestrian crossing improvements Changes made at SFCTA Board Meeting on January 5, 2017 4 - Retention of Collins Street local bus stops 5 - Retention of Laguna Street Rapid bus stops Changes made at SFCTA Board meeting on June 27, 2017 6 - Shift in WB transition from center-running to side-running from 27 th to 28 th Avenue 17

  18. Environmental Review Timeline • November 2008 : Scoping • October/November 2015 : Draft EIR/EIS • December 2016: Release of Final EIR • January 2017: SFCTA certify EIR and adopt LPA • June 2017: SFCTA LPA Amendment • Today: SFMTA Board CEQA findings and LPA approval • Later 2017 : Final EIS and Record of Decision 18

  19. Project Phasing and Next Steps Phase 2 Phase 1 Complete federal environmental process. Following completion, immediate next steps: – Phase 1: Outreach on design details, then SFMTA Board legislation – Phase 2: Kick-off preliminary engineering 19

  20. Cost estimate Cost Notes Phase 1 – fully • $65 Includes coordinated utility upgrades funded million not related to BRT • Center-running bus only lanes • High amenity stations • Bus and ped bulbs, stops, and signals Phase 2 – will • $235 Vehicles for increased service seek $100 million • million Utility relocation related to BRT Small Starts grant. • Mixed flow lane re-surfacing • Masonic area bike lane and median modifications Total $300 million 20

  21. Actions Requested 1. Approve the Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project 2. Adopt CEQA findings, including • Statement of Overriding Considerations • Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program 3. Concur with designation of Locally Preferred Alternative 4. Authorizing Director of Transportation to continue to obtain otherwise necessary approvals and carry out the actions to implement Geary BRT Project 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend