Geary Rapid SFMT A CAC June 1, 2017 Liz Brisson, G eary R apid - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

geary rapid
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Geary Rapid SFMT A CAC June 1, 2017 Liz Brisson, G eary R apid - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Geary Rapid SFMT A CAC June 1, 2017 Liz Brisson, G eary R apid Project Manager, SF MT A What is Geary Rapid and what happened to Geary BRT? Geary Boulevard Geary Rapid Improvement Project 34 th Ave to Stanyan Stanyan to Market 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SFMT A CAC June 1, 2017 Liz Brisson, G eary R apid Project Manager, SF MT A

Geary Rapid

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What is Geary Rapid and what happened to Geary BRT?

2

Geary Rapid

Stanyan to Market

Geary Boulevard Improvement Project

34th Ave to Stanyan

slide-3
SLIDE 3

We’ve been busy making major improvements

3

New low-floor buses More frequent service Red lanes downtown Safety enhancements

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Not just on Geary, but for all of Muni

slide-5
SLIDE 5

14% 10% 0% 5% 10% 15%

  • Apr. '14 - Mar. '15 Apr. '15 - Mar. '16

% of 38 Rapid peak hour trips where passenger loads exceeded capacity

5

Additional service has provided relief

38 Rapid service increase from every 5.5 minutes to every 4 minutes

Source: Automated Passenger Counter (APC) data: January 2013-June 2016. Average # of crowded trips between 6-9am inbound and 4-7pm

  • utbound, excluding August 2014 which showed 0.0% crowding, likely in error. Crowding – passenger loads exceeding capacity.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

And our customers are noticing

“38 bus improved immensely within the last 3 years” “Thank you for the bus lanes!”

I like the new buses. They have more room and are cleaner.

“I like the new buses. They have more room and are cleaner.”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

But, more is needed

High ridership (~54,000/day) is a blessing and a curse » More frequent service  harder to prevent bus bunching » Geary riders experience crowded buses, uneven wait times and inconsistent travel times

7

Gaps in service regularly cause Geary riders an additional 5+ minutes wait time

Typical Wait Extra Wait Due to Gaps Total Wait Frequency for daily commuter 38 4 mins 5 mins 9 mins 2x/week 38R 2 mins 5 mins 7 mins 1x/week

Source: SFMTA AVL 1/2013 to 6/2016, peak hours, Presidio Ave to Market

slide-8
SLIDE 8

But, more is needed

8

SF’s longest High-Injury Corridor

» Geary travelers are eight times more likely to be hit by traffic than the city average

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Muni Forward key investment opportunities » Operators » Vehicles » Schedules » Line management » Right-of-way

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Geary Rapid and the Muni Rapid Network

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Major project features Dedicated bus lanes Better bus stops Smarter traffic signals New signals + crosswalks Calming the “expressway” Pedestrian bulbs, median refuges

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Example: O’Farrell at Leavenworth - before

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

EXAMPLE: O’FARRELL AT LEAVENWORTH - AFTER

13

Dedicated bus lanes Better bus stops

Example: O’Farrell at Leavenworth - after

slide-14
SLIDE 14

EXAMPLE: GEARY AT BUCHANAN - BEFORE

14

Example: Geary at Buchanan - before

slide-15
SLIDE 15

EXAMPLE: GEARY AT BUCHANAN - AFTER

15

New signals + crosswalks Calming the “expressway” Pedestrian bulbs, median refuges Dedicated bus lanes

Example: Geary at Buchanan - after

slide-16
SLIDE 16

EXAMPLE: GEARY AT STEINER - BEFORE

16

Example: Geary at Steiner - before

slide-17
SLIDE 17

EXAMPLE: GEARY AT STEINER - AFTER

17

New signals + crosswalks Calming the “expressway” Pedestrian bulbs, median refuges Smarter traffic signals

Example: Geary at Steiner - after

slide-18
SLIDE 18

EXAMPLE: GEARY AT COOK - BEFORE

18

Example: Geary at Cook - before

slide-19
SLIDE 19

EXAMPLE: GEARY AT COOK - AFTER

19

New signals + crosswalks Smarter traffic signals Dedicated bus lanes

Example: Geary at Cook - after

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Intercept survey: background

» Conducted March 2017 b/w Stanyan and Market » Saturday, Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday » >1,400 valid surveys

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Intercept survey: key findings

21

90%

  • f those intercepted had come by

transit (55%) or walking (35%).

68%

  • f those intercepted AND had seen

red lanes believed they were helping improve Geary bus service. Transit riders and walkers reported visting businesses ‘daily

  • r weekly’ more often than

drivers.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Project benefits and tradeoffs

Benefits

  • Faster more reliable transit trip
  • Safer street
  • More comfortable bus stops
  • Optimized traffic flow with state-
  • f-the-art signals

22

Tradeoffs

  • Decrease in # of travel lanes
  • Small reduction in on-street

parking

  • Some temporary disruption

while construction occurs

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Who will benefit?

23

Low Income People of Color # % # % 38 15,000 57% 15,000 58% 38R 11,000 47% 15,000 57% Geary customer demographics

SFMTA System wide On-Board Survey, 2014

slide-24
SLIDE 24

On Geary and rail…

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Next steps

» New SFMTA-led Citizens Advisory Committee in formation - recruitment beginning in June » MTA Board environmental actions » Complete federal environmental process » Major outreach push » Then MTA Board legislation, complete design, and begin implementation

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

THANK YOU! QUESTIONS?

26

Liz Brisson Geary Rapid Project Manager 415.646.2300 GearyRapid@sfmta.com

Thank you! Questions?