from cell membranes to ultracold gases classical and
play

FROM CELL MEMBRANES TO ULTRACOLD GASES: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FROM CELL MEMBRANES TO ULTRACOLD GASES: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM DIFFUSION IN INHOMOGENEOUS MEDIA Pietro Massignan ICFO - Institute of Photonic Sciences (Barcelona) In collaboration with: John Lapeyre (IDAEA & ICFO) Miguel-Angel


  1. FROM CELL MEMBRANES TO ULTRACOLD GASES: 
 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM DIFFUSION 
 IN INHOMOGENEOUS MEDIA Pietro Massignan ICFO - Institute of Photonic Sciences (Barcelona) In collaboration with: John Lapeyre (IDAEA & ICFO) • Miguel-Angel García-March (ICFO) • Aniello Lampo (ICFO) • Maciej Lewenstein (ICFO) • Carlo Manzo (ICFO) • Juan Torreno-Pina (ICFO) • María García-Parajo (ICFO) • Janek Wehr (Arizona U.) •

  2. Outlook A. Classical • Anomalous diffusion in biological systems • Kinetic Ising Models B. Quantum • Quantum Kinetic Ising Models • Quantum Brownian Motion 2

  3. Ordinary Random Walk Time-averaged mean squared displacement along a single trajectory: N − m 1 � 2 X � T-MSD( t lag = m ∆ t ) = x ( t i + m ∆ t ) − x ( t i ) N − m i =1 Ensemble-averaged mean squared displacement over J trajectories: J E-MSD( t lag = m ∆ t ) = 1 � 2 X � x j ( t i + m ∆ t ) − x j ( t i ) J j =1 An ordinary RW is • diffusive: MSD~t β , with β =1 • ergodic: T-MSD and E-MSD coincide at long times • stationary: MSD independent of the total observation time (at large times) 3

  4. Diffusion in structured media A random walker may be strongly affected by: • repeated interactions • transient binding • clustering • crowding • multi-scale, or scale-free, disorder 4

  5. Live cell membrane A random walker may be strongly affected by: • repeated interactions • transient binding • clustering • crowding • multi-scale, or scale-free, disorder 5

  6. Trans-membrane receptors Single particle tracking of 
 pathogen-recognizing receptors 
 on live cellular membranes (M. García-Parajo’s group @ ICFO) 60 frames/s 
 20nm position accuracy Manzo, Torreno-Pina, PM, Lapeyre, Lewenstein & García-Parajo, Phys. Rev. X (2015) 6

  7. Sampling of J=600 trajectories Time-averaged MSD Ensemble-averaged MSD Different scaling of T-MSD and E-MSD ➟ weak ergodicity breaking! Time&Ensemble averaged MSD: TE-MSD ∼ D TE ( T ) · t lag The TE-MSD depends on the total observation time T ➟ non-stationary! 7

  8. 
 
 Continuous-Time Random Walk -1- β with β≤ 1 (so that <t wait >= ∞ ) 
 • CTRW: a fat-tailed distribution of waiting times ~t induces non-stationary (thus non-ergodic) subdiffusion 
 β and TE-MSD~D TE (T)*t lag , with D TE ~T β -1 with E-MSD~t • Widely used model for transport in disordered media (initially developed for amorphous solids) 
 Montroll & Weiss, 1965; Montroll & Scher, 1973 • However, are trapping events present in the ICFO experiment? 
 only 5% of the trajectories contain events 
 compatible with transient trapping 
 and excluding these trajectories yields 
 a very similar E-MSD exponent β 
 • For CTRW, the long-time dynamics is 
 R TH dominated by anomalous trapping events, 
 so that the escape-time distribution at long times 
 becomes independent of the trapping radius R TH 8

  9. Strongly varying diffusivity Maps of receptor motion on the cell membrane highlight the 
 • presence of patches with strongly varying diffusivity Many possible reasons: crossing regions of low/high 
 • viscosity, transient binding, clustering, … Employ a likelihood-based Bayesian algorithm to detect 
 • time-dependent changes of diffusivity within a single trajectory : 9

  10. 
 
 
 
 Theoretical model Ordinary Brownian motion with a diffusivity that varies randomly, 
 • but it’s constant on time intervals with random duration 
 (or patches with random sizes) power law at small D 
 P D ( D ) ∼ D σ − 1 e − D/b Assume a distribution of diffusion coefficients 
 • fast decay at large D 
 mean transit time ~D - γ 
 P τ ( τ | D ) ∼ D γ e − τ D γ /k and a conditional distribution of transit times 
 each area has radius r~( τ D) -1/2 Three possible regimes: • (0) γ < σ : the long-time dynamics is compatible with regular Brownian motion ( β =1) 
 (I) σ < γ < σ +1: the average transit-time diverges ➟ non-ergodic sub-diffusion ( β = σ / γ ) 
 (II) γ > σ +1: both < τ > and <(r area ) 2 > diverge ➟ non-ergodic sub-diffusion ( β =1-1/ γ ) PM, Manzo, Torreno-Pina, García-Parajo, Lewenstein & Lapeyre, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2014) 10

  11. 
 Comparison with experiments Simulation of 
 WT dynamics 
 σ =1.16 
 γ =1.38 regime (I) ☟ non-ergodic 
 subdiffusion with β = σ / γ =0.84 Instead, mutated receptors with impaired function ( Δ rep ) may be best simulated 
 with γ < σ , i.e., they perform usual ergodic and diffusive Brownian motion 
 Transport properties strongly linked to molecular function Manzo, Torreno-Pina, PM, Lapeyre, Lewenstein & García-Parajo, Phys. Rev. X (2015) 11

  12. ⬇ ⬆ ⬆ ⬆ ⬇ Include receptor/membrane interactions? [see Poster P.03 “Random walks in Random Environments” by M.-A. García-March] X Model the membrane as an Ising lattice: H = − J σ i = ↑ , ↓ σ i σ i +1 i Link diffusivity to local membrane state (e.g. faster diffusion on ⬆ background) Allow walker to locally modify 
 the membrane state 12

  13. Kinetic Ising Model for the membrane ˙ X [ w ( σ 0 → σ ) P ( σ 0 , t ) − w ( σ → σ 0 ) P ( σ , t )] Kinetic Ising Model: • P ( σ , t ) = w: transition rate σ 0 α /2: single spin-flip rate w ( σ i → − σ i ) = α h 1 − γ i Interacting membrane: 2 σ i ( σ i − 1 + σ i +1 ) • γ >0: IFM 
 2 γ <0: AFM Detailed balance at equilibrium: • P eq ( σ 1 , . . . , σ i , . . . , σ n ) w ( σ i → − σ i ) = P eq ( σ 1 , . . . , − σ i , . . . , σ n ) w ( − σ i → σ i ) q i ( t ) = h σ i ( t ) i P eq ( σ 1 , . . . , σ i , . . . , σ n ) ∝ exp[ β J σ i ( σ i − 1 + σ i +1 )] • r i,k ( t ) = h σ i ( t ) σ k ( t ) i 8 9 P ( σ , t ) = 1 N ) P ( σ 0 , t ) = 1 < = X X X (1 + σ 1 σ 0 1 ) . . . (1 + σ N σ 0 : 1 + σ i q i ( t ) + σ i σ k r i,k ( t ) + . . . • 2 N 2 N ; { σ 0 } i i 6 = k α − 1 ˙ Recursive system of differential equations: e.g., • q i ( t ) = − q i ( t ) + γ / 2[ q i − 1 ( t ) + q i +1 ( t )] Exact time-dependent solutions may be found for: infinite lattice, single spin fixed, (time- • delayed) spin correlations, spin systems in a magnetic field, … R. Glauber, Time-dependent statistics of the Ising model , J. Math. Phys. (1963) 13

  14. Kinetic Ising Model for membrane+walker s: spins (=membrane) ˙ Master equation: • P ( σ , x, t ) = [ γ s L s + γ w L w ] P ( σ , x, t ) w: walker x: position of the walker The walker may act as a localized potential for the spins, or it may change the tunneling • between the neighboring spins If either the spins or the walker dynamics is fast, we may use an adiabatic approximation •  � L s + γ w P ( σ , x, t ) ∼ P w ( x, t | σ ) P (eq) L = γ s L w E.g., and ( σ | x ) • γ s � γ w ! s γ s polaronic behavior (rapid formation of a dressing cloud, dragged along by the walker) • In the opposite limit instead, the walker spreads very fast, and will act as a diffuse potential • (mean-field) for the membrane 14

  15. (Quantum) Kinetic Ising Models q Ansatz: • P ( σ , t ) = P eq ( σ ) φ ( σ , t ) ˙ X The KIM master equation may be written as H σσ 0 φ ( σ 0 , t ) φ ( σ , t ) = − • s σ 0 P eq ( σ 0 ) X w ( σ → σ 00 ) δ σσ 0 − w ( σ 0 → σ ) H σσ 0 = P eq ( σ ) σ 00 If the KIM satisfies a detailed-balanced condition, then H is a (real) symmetric matrix, so that • the KIM-ME may be seen as a Schrödinger equation in imaginary time, which converges exponentially to the thermal equilibrium solution. Diagonalization of H is then equivalent to the complete solution of the KIM-ME Classical spins may be promoted to non-commuting Pauli matrices to obtain quantum models • 1 X e − β H ( σ ) / 2 | σ i p Z N | Ψ i = Quantum states built from thermal states of classical Hamiltonians, e.g., 
 • σ fulfill the area law in any dimension, even at criticality , and can be represented efficiently as matrix product states (MPS), or projected entangled pair states (PEPS) Augusiak, Cucchietti, Haake & Lewenstein, New J. Phys. (2010) 15

  16. Quantum Brownian Motion A small system interacting with a large thermal bath: • H = H S + H B + H I x k : position of the k th oscillator X Simplest interaction: • H I = − κ k x k x κ k : coupling constant x: position of the system k Z t ρ S ( t ) = − 1 ME for the reduced density matrix: ˙ d s Tr B [ H I ( t ) , [ H I ( s ) , ρ ( s )]] • ~ 2 0 Born approx.: • ρ ( t ) ' ρ S ( t ) ⌦ ρ B (0) Markov approx.: the bath evolves on timescales much faster than the system, and as such • effectively retains no memory of the system’s dynamics κ 2 The spectral density contains all details of the bath-system coupling: X • k J ( ω ) ≡ δ ( ω − ω k ) 2 m k ω k k 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend