FORRT Open and Reproducible Research Training Sam Parsons, Flavio - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

forrt
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FORRT Open and Reproducible Research Training Sam Parsons, Flavio - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Framework for FORRT Open and Reproducible Research Training Sam Parsons, Flavio Azevedo, Carl Michael Galang FORRT sales pitch The promised How? The enemy Why now? Obstacles land Bad Research Scientific Credibility FORRT Science


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FORRT

Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training

Sam Parsons, Flavio Azevedo, Carl Michael Galang

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FORRT sale’s pitch

The enemy Bad Science Why now?

Credibility Crisis

The promised land

Scientific Nirvana

Obstacles Research Training

How?

FORRT

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Enemy

Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Q-Measurement-Ps P-Hacking Data Hogging HARKing Publication bias Nefarious Incentives Underpowered studies

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why now?

Reproducibility Crisis Questionable Research Misaligned Incentives Re-evaluation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why Now? Initiatives!

Student ECR led Funder, Institution, Journal led

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Promised Land

Cumulative

Crowdsourced Restructured Incentives

Open Scientific

Communication

Pillars of Academic Nirvana (Nosek et al., 2012, 2012, 2018) The Psychological Science Accelerator (Chartier, 2016-Forever) Becoming Cumulative Science (Mischel, 2009)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Obstacles

Current teaching practices

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Obstacles

Teaching subject-matters without: – probabilistic uncertainty – research design – Samples (type & quality) – measurements

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Obstacles & Consequences

Future scholars Future Consumers of science Collaborative Crowdsourced Citizen

slide-10
SLIDE 10

HOW?

FORRT

Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training

slide-11
SLIDE 11

HOW?

Main Motivation ____________ Teaching of reproducible and open research practices is the clearest indicator of the degree to which institutions and/or departments embody principles of credible science.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HOW?

Only Resource Tool (or resource gateway) for Faculty/Institutions Two goals

  • 1. Assessment
  • 2. Resource
slide-13
SLIDE 13

FORRT Assessment

6 core principles

– Reproducibility and replicability knowledge – Conceptual and statistical knowledge – Reproducible analyses – Preregistration – Open data and materials – Replication research

slide-14
SLIDE 14

FORRT Assessment

Breadth describes how widely teaching is distributed

  • None. Not yet enacted, minimal breadth, or no evidence

  • Some. Opportunities for some.

– Course requirement for all.

Depth describes the degree to which students interact with the

core:

  • None. Not yet enacted, minimal depth, or no evidence

– Knowledge. – Practice. – Application.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

FORRT Resource Gateway

– Curated

– Reproducibility and replicability knowledge – Conceptual and statistical knowledge – Reproducible analyses – Preregistration – Open data and materials – Replication research

– Crowdsourced

– As above

slide-16
SLIDE 16

FORRT

www.forrt.netlify.com

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FORRT

Initial (and tentative) steps to join FORRT

Here's a minimal template to enlist your substantive course – on any discipline in social sciences – on FORRT. Please send it to FORRTproject@gmail.com. For information about FORRT’s tentative implementation plan, follow this link and click on the tab “Implementation Plan.” FORRT project invites interested scholars to participate in the further development of it’s concept as well as in expanding its scope to social sciences more broadly. We currently have a draft manuscript for which we are collecting feedback. If you would like to contribute in any way, please consider commenting in our early draft or emailing us at FORRTproject@gmail.com.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Thank you ☺

Sam Parsons @Sam_D_Parsons Experimental Psychology at University of Oxford Carl Micheal Galang @MyEngrams Social Brain, Body and Action Lab at McMaster University.

FORRT is a collaborative project born out of a workshop during the annual meeting of the “Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science” (SIPS) at Grand Rapids (US) in 2018 with the outstanding and wonderful collaboration from: