Formation Social and Economic Networks Jafar Habibi MohammadAmin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

formation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Formation Social and Economic Networks Jafar Habibi MohammadAmin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Correlation Patterns & Link Formation Social and Economic Networks Jafar Habibi MohammadAmin Fazli Social and Economic Networks 1 ToC Correlation Patterns & Link Formation Correlation & Assortativity Homophily


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Correlation Patterns & Link Formation

Social and Economic Networks

Jafar Habibi MohammadAmin Fazli

Social and Economic Networks 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ToC

  • Correlation Patterns & Link Formation
  • Correlation & Assortativity
  • Homophily
  • Affiliation
  • Tracking Link Formation
  • Spatial Segregation
  • Readings:
  • Chapter 3 from the Jackson book
  • Chapter 4 from the Kleinberg book

Social and Economic Networks 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Correlation & Assortativity

  • Correlation patterns in SENs:
  • What is the pattern of connections among nodes with property P and

property Q?

  • Assortativity: Do high degree nodes connect to low degree nodes?

Social and Economic Networks 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Correlation & Assortativity

  • Important discoveries in economical studies:
  • Serrano & Boguna: While large countries have a vast number of trades with each
  • ther, there exist a negative correlation among degrees of countries in the trade

network.

  • They show that in the trade network the average degree of a node with degree d,

can be modeled by 1

𝑒2

  • They show that these networks can be described by a hub-and-spoke architecture.
  • Important discoveries in social studies
  • Core-Periphery patterns: There is a core of highly connected and interconnected

nodes and a periphery of less connected nodes

  • Homophily and Segregation: Tendency to be connected to (structurally) similar nodes

Social and Economic Networks 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Clustering Patterns

  • Studying clustering behavior of SENs can help. Example:
  • Correlation between clustering coefficient & degree:
  • Goyal et al. show that in the network co-authorship among economic researchers has CC
  • f 0.157 while the CC of high degree nodes is only 0.043!
  • One way to study this is to compare cloverall and clavg
  • Cloverall can be thought of as a weighted averaging of clustering across nodes with weights

proportional to the number of pairs of neighbors that the nodes have (exactly 𝑒𝑗

2 ).

Why? See on the black board.

  • Clavg weights them equally.
  • If Cloverall << ClavgClustering is significantly lower for high degree nodes and vice versa.

Social and Economic Networks 5

Network of Co-authorship Physics Mathematics Biology Cloverall/Clavg 0.45/0.56 0.15/0.34 0.09/0.60

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Homophily

  • People are more prone to maintain relationships with people who are

similar to themselves.

  • Age
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Many SENs are

segregated

  • Shrum et al. : In middle

schools less than 10% of expected cross-race friendship exist.

Social and Economic Networks 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Homophily

  • Homophily can produce a division of a social network into densely-

connected, homogeneous parts that are weakly connected to each

  • ther.
  • Homophily provides natural basis for triadic closure: When B and C

has a common friend A, the principle of homophily suggests that B and C are each likely to be similar to A, and hence quite possible to be similar to each other

  • There is an elevated chance that B-C will form even if neither of them is

aware that the other one knows A

Social and Economic Networks 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Measuring Homophily

  • Suppose that a p fraction of all

individuals are male and a q fraction are female.

  • What is the probability that a given

edge has different gender endpoints? 2pq

  • If the fraction of cross-gender edges

is significantly less than 2pq, then there is evidence for homophily

Social and Economic Networks 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Inverse Homophily

  • To have a fraction of cross-gender edges that is significantly more

than 2pq

Social and Economic Networks 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mechanisms Underlying Homophily

  • Selection: the tendency of people to form friendships with others

who are like them.

  • Explicit selection: choosing friends in a small group
  • Implicit selection (opportunities to form links) : at more global levels such as

attending schools, living in neighborhoods or working for a company that are relatively homogenous compared to the population at large

  • Socialization (Social Influence): people may modify their behaviors to

bring them more closely into alignment with the behaviors of their friends.

  • Can be viewed as the reverse of selection

Social and Economic Networks 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Selection & Socialization

  • With selection, the individual characteristics drive the formation of

links, while with social influence, the existing links in the network serve to shape people’s (mutable) characteristics

  • Have the people in the network adapted their behaviors to become

more like their friends, or have they sought out people who were already like them?

  • Longitudinal study of social networks
  • Example: Christakis & Fowler

Social and Economic Networks 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Selection & Socialization

  • Christakis & Fowler:
  • The structure of a network between obese & non-obese people is observed for a

32-years period

  • This network shows homophily patterns for the obesity feature.
  • Three hypotheses are considered as a reason for this homophily:
  • i) because of selection effects, in which people are choosing to form friendships with others
  • f similar obesity status
  • ii) because of the confounding effects of homophily according to other characteristics, in

which the network structure indicates existing patterns of similarity in other dimensions that correlate with obesity status

  • iii) because changes in the obesity status of a person’s friends was exerting a (presumably

behavioral) influence that affected his or her future obesity status

  • Statistical analysis show that iii is more significant that i and ii. Obesity is highly

contagion.

Social and Economic Networks 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Selection & Socialization

  • Crandel et al:
  • Define similarity between

two Wikipedia editors as

  • Baseline: the average of

similiarity for non- interacting editors

Social and Economic Networks 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Affiliation

  • The idea: we can consider link formation

enablers inside the network

  • Foci or Focal point
  • Affiliation network:
  • Consider a node for each foci and a node for

each person

  • If person A participate in foci X connect A to X
  • Affiliation networks are bipartite
  • but implicit relations among the nodes of both

sides exist

Social and Economic Networks 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Selection & Socialization in Affiliation Networks

  • We can inject focal

points into a SEN

  • Social-Affiliation Network
  • If two people participate in a shared focus, this provides them with an
  • pportunity to become friends; and if two people are friends, they

can influence each other’s choice of foci.

Social and Economic Networks 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Closures in Social-affiliation Networks

Social and Economic Networks 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Link Formation in SENs

  • The effect of triadic

closure (Kossinet & Watts)

  • The baseline link

formation probability: 1 − 1 − 𝑞 𝑙

  • Taking many

snapshots of a university email dataset and averaging T(k) over all the snapshots

Social and Economic Networks 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Link Formation in SENs

  • The effect of focal

closure (Kossinet & Watts)

  • Considering class

schedule of students as focal points

Social and Economic Networks 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Link Formation in SENs

  • The effect of

membership closure (Backstrom et al.)

Social and Economic Networks 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Spatial Segregation

  • People live near
  • thers like them

Social and Economic Networks 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The Schelling Model

  • Two types of agents: X & O
  • An unsatisfied agent has less that t similar neighboring agents

Social and Economic Networks 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Schelling Model

  • Sequentially, in each round an unsatisfied agent is chosen and is

moved to an unoccupied node where it will be satisfied

  • Different movement can be considered (e.g. nearest good node)

Social and Economic Networks 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The Schelling Model

  • A larger example: (t = 3, 150 by 150 board with 2500 empty space,

random initial assignment of agents, move to random good places)

  • Convergence After 50 steps

Social and Economic Networks 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The Schelling Model

  • A larger example: (t = 4, 150 by 150 board with 2500 empty space,

random initial assignment of agents, move to random good places)

Social and Economic Networks 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

The Schelling Model

  • A larger example: (t = 4, 150 by 150 board with 2500 empty space,

random initial assignment of agents, move to random good places)

Social and Economic Networks 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The Schelling Model

Social and Economic Networks 26