FORCE11 Scholarly Commons Working Group Webinar 20171208 Welcome ! - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
force11 scholarly commons working group webinar 20171208
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FORCE11 Scholarly Commons Working Group Webinar 20171208 Welcome ! - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 31, 2024 168 likes •950 views

FORCE11 Scholarly Commons Working Group Webinar 20171208 Welcome ! Practicalities WEBINAR NOTES (please add your questions/comments) https://tinyurl.com/FORCE11-SCWG-webinar Duration: 90 minutes Please mute when not speaking

slide-1
SLIDE 1

FORCE11 Scholarly Commons Working Group Webinar 20171208

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Welcome !

  • WEBINAR NOTES (please add your questions/comments)

https://tinyurl.com/FORCE11-SCWG-webinar

  • Duration: 90 minutes
  • Please mute when not speaking :-)
  • This webinar will be recorded and shared afterwards

Practicalities

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Welcome !

Goals of this webinar

WEBINAR NOTES https://tinyurl.com/FORCE11-SCWG-webinar

We are at a crossroads: we think we know what the Scholarly Commons is and are looking for ways to move forward We are asking you for:

  • your opinion (and suggestions) on what is worth pursuing
  • your interest to contribute in any of the proposed activities
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Welcome !

Programme

WEBINAR NOTES https://tinyurl.com/FORCE11-SCWG-webinar

  • The Scholarly Commons: what has been done and where we

are now

  • SCWG subgroups: issues addressed, future plans

○ SG1 - Inclusivity ○ SG2 - Principles ○ SG3 - Decision trees ○ SG4 - Enabling technologies and infrastructures

  • Live poll
  • Where do we go from here?

Dan O’Donnell Chris Chapman Stephanie Hagstrom Ian Bruno

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Welcome !

Programme

WEBINAR NOTES https://tinyurl.com/FORCE11-SCWG-webinar

  • The Scholarly Commons: what has been done and where we

are now

  • SCWG subgroups: issues addressed, future plans

○ SG1 - Inclusivity ○ SG2 - Principles ○ SG3 - Decision trees ○ SG4 - Enabling technologies and infrastructures

  • Live poll
  • Where do we go from here?

Bianca Kramer

Maryann Martone

Dan O’Donnell Chris Chapman Stephanie Hagstrom Ian Bruno

Jeroen Bosman Fiona Murphy Dan O’Donnell Chris Chapman Ian Bruno Bastian Greshake Nate Jacobs

Stephanie Hagstrom You!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction

Maryann/Jeroen

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Keep your eyes on the stars and your

feet on the ground

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FAIR Social networks Interoperable DCIP Data repositories Citable ORCID PIDs By Katherine Skinner Annotation Semantic Web Data journals Altmetrics Credit Taxonomy

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • If so, what?
  • Have we built it already?
  • If not, do we know how?
slide-10
SLIDE 10

and many more: http://tinyurl.com/scholcomm-charters

What are all these declarations saying?

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Madrid, February 2016
slide-12
SLIDE 12

FAIR → Open → Citable → Versioned → Research objects Open is not the only aspiration...

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Values driven

“Values should be reflected in our software”—Quote from FORCE2016 Our scholarly practices and reward system should lead to the best scholarship possible “Academic self-determination”-Priego et al, 2017

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6C2XT

slide-18
SLIDE 18

scholarlycommons.org @scholrlycommons www.force11.org/scholarly-commons/discussion-forum scholarlycommons-info@force11.org 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C2XT web: twitter: forum: email: preprint:

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Subgroup 1 Subgroup 2 Subgroup 3+4

slide-20
SLIDE 20

WG1: Inclusivity

Bastian Greshake and Dan O’Donnell

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

WG2: Principles

Jeroen Bosman, Dan O’Donnell and Bianca Kramer

slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

→

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • Giving direction to a

community

  • Showing what people

could pledge

  • Guiding development
  • f policies & tech
slide-33
SLIDE 33

WG3: Decision Trees

Fiona Murphy and Maryann Martone

slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35

FAIR → Open → Citable → Versioned → Research objects Resources in the commons should be:

slide-36
SLIDE 36

https://www.force11.org/scholarly-commons/practice San Diego, Sept 2016

slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Matrix of the commons: Organizing and applying what we’ve learned

Decision tree: Making data open Decision tree: Making data open Repositories Data Open Denton Declaration Principles of open scholarly infrastructures Entity, object or action SC principle Community principles Decision tree

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Library of high level decision trees that can be adapted for each community

  • Built on open source software stack so they are available to the

community

  • Recommendations are generic but can be adapted for more specific

uses

○ e.g., FAIR Data recommendation: Deposit your data in a specialist repository if one is available ○ SCI: Deposit your data in the Open Data Commons for Spinal Cord Injury

slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • Why should I participate?
  • What can I do?

–e.g. supply domain knowledge, support Policy Models software, help with funding

  • We need more capacity to allocate persistent identifiers, input metadata and provenance

information, attribute actions and works and automate versioning.

  • What are the consequences of investing (not monetary but time and effort)?
  • What are the consequences of NOT investing (money, time AND effort)?
slide-45
SLIDE 45

0000-0002-8406-3871

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Scholarly Commons WG4

Enabling Technologies and Infrastructures

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Big picture overview

1. Positioning & rationale 2. Current approaches & where we are 3. Where we want to go & how you can get involved 4. Questions & answers

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Positioning & Rationale

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Positioning of WG4 within the FORCE11 Scholarly Commons Working Group’s efforts

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Technology is part of this.

slide-51
SLIDE 51

The cultural and technical are one. We cannot look at one without seeing the

  • ther.
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Technologies and infrastructures are projections of culture.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

In response to the Subversive Proposal:

“Right now, the research system works in an extremely complex manner where pecking

  • rders, legitimacy, memory building through

proper archiving and bibliographic efforts and even communication :-) takes place. This is the given and we must start from there while, simultaneously conjuring up the right vision for the future. In short we must simultaneously have the right vision of the present and the right vision of the future to have a chance to chart the right course between now and the future. The word “right” occurs three times in this sentence and it points to the fundamental difficulty of the

  • task. In fact it is daunting, but it should not

discourage us.” (Jean-Claude Guédon 1994)

slide-54
SLIDE 54

CC-BY-SA JMortonPhoto.com & OtoGodfrey.com

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Theoretical backbone (at least of group’s inception)

Thinking in Systems: A Primer Donella H. Meadows (Publisher, Amazon) Notes on the Synthesis of Form Christopher Alexander (Publisher, Amazon)

slide-56
SLIDE 56

We need a new form to fit the context of contemporary society. This is a design problem.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Current Needs of Society

Scholarly Commons

slide-58
SLIDE 58

A slide from Thomas Mboa’s 2017 OpenCon presentation

slide-59
SLIDE 59

“The whole question, then, is how to move from a Westernization

  • f science to a truly

shared science…”

(Bonaventure Mvé-Ondo)

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Current approaches & where we are

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Our goals & current approaches

Scholarly Commoning Laboratory Understanding the context Designing for fitness iterate

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Understanding the context

“Christopher Alexander discusses the process by which a form is adapted to the context of human needs and demands that has called it into being. He shows that such an adaptive process will be successful only if it proceeds piecemeal instead of all at once.… When the designer, in our own self-conscious culture, is called on to create a form that is adapted to its context he is unsuccessful, because the preconceived categories out of which he builds his picture of the problem do not correspond to the inherent components of the problem, and therefore lead only to the arbitrariness, willfulness, and lack of understanding which plague the design of modern buildings and modern cities.” (source)

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Understanding the context

We’re developing a list of scenarios about the types of interactions which might occur in a scholarly commons. A common theme to those scenarios is connections. We are developing a list of questions as well as ways to manage and preserve these questions and the process of finding answers. We are aggregating a pool of topics/projects, from which we will reach out and invite leaders

  • f these topics or projects to weekly calls for

discussion.

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Designing for fitness

Constant experimentation with approaches that may help to preserve the continuity of a broad-reaching, multi-faceted exploratory research process (cf. The Challenge). Example: We’ve run into the problem of having a lot of distributed raw information and need something to make it easier for new people to understand what our process is, where we are in that process, and how best to participate. A proposal was made that we try Knowen to see how well it could help with this task: http://knowen.org/nodes/23403

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Where we want to go & how you can get involved

slide-66
SLIDE 66

End goal

??? (this is still and will continue to be under discussion) Possibilities include:

  • “Some kind of decentralised knowledge map that could connect all kinds
  • f scholarly/knowledge commons, be they from academic, diy,

indigenous, non-western etc communities.”

  • To build some sort of map using the raw data we will have collected;

something that could eventually be useful to humans and machines in helping with next steps of research. Something that could be very basic at first but with an ability to scale in complexity and diversity.

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Ways to get involved

  • Join the group!
  • If you are working on something or just have a topic that you think would

be useful for us to explore, add it to the list of topics.

  • If you have research questions that you think we should think about, add

them to the list of questions.

  • If you have an idea for a future scenario that you would like us to think

about or that you have been wanting to express, add it to the list of scenarios.

  • If you have ideas on how to help preserve the continuity of a

broad-reaching, multi-faceted exploratory research process, come and share your ideas with us.

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Questions & answers

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Poll

Jeroen

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Poll on the scholarly commons

https://tinyurl.com/commonspollwebinar

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Preliminary poll results from this webinar

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Results from the same poll at Force2017 (note: questions in different order)

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Where do we go from here?

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Discussion points

  • Is there more to be done?

○ The current steering group thinks so but believe focus should be through subgroups

  • Broad goals - is it helpful to define some?

○ Understanding what the Scholarly Commons means in practice ○ Driving adoption of Scholarly Commons principles

  • Sub-groups - what areas should we be focussing on?

○ Current: Inclusivity, Principles, Decision Trees, Enabling Technologies ○ Other groups? What interests you?

  • Related activities - who should we be engaging with?

○ There are many...

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Other Initiatives and Activities

https://101innovations.wordpress.com/ http://tinyurl.com/scholcomm-charters

slide-76
SLIDE 76
slide-77
SLIDE 77

scholarlycommons.org @scholrlycommons www.force11.org/scholarly-commons/discussion-forum scholarlycommons-info@force11.org 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C2XT web: twitter: forum: email: preprint:

slide-78
SLIDE 78