with PYTHIA 6.414 compare different options: no parton showers, no - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

with pythia 6 414 compare different options no parton
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

with PYTHIA 6.414 compare different options: no parton showers, no - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

with PYTHIA 6.414 compare different options: no parton showers, no MI MSTP(61)=0, MSTP(71)=0, MSTP(81)=0 parton showers, no MI MSTP(81)=0 parton showers, MI -MSTP(5)=100 R.Field CDF tune A -MSTP(5)=300


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

with PYTHIA 6.414 compare different options:

  • no parton showers, no MI MSTP(61)=0, MSTP(71)=0, MSTP(81)=0
  • parton showers, no MI MSTP(81)=0
  • parton showers, MI -MSTP(5)=100 R.Field CDF tune A
  • MSTP(5)=300 Sandhoff-Skands tune 0
  • MSTP(5)=402 GAL1
  • pythia default

try CKIN(3)=5, 10,15,20

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

E, Et , N flow vs eta CKIN(3)=5

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

E, Et , N flow vs eta CKIN(3)=10

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

E, Et , N flow vs eta CKIN(3)=20

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

E, Et , N distributions (5.2<η<6.6) CKIN(3)=5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

∑Et, E and N of hadrons for 5.2<eta<6.6 (~ CASTOR)

CKIN(3)=10

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Hadron jets, Pt and eta (Pt_jet>20 GeV) CKIN(3)=5 CKIN(3)=10

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Pt_leading_hadron jet vs parton (parton is the one from 22 hard scattering) Can we get ‘true’ jets from the measured ‘hadron’ jets ? good correlations between ‘leading’ jets and partons CKIN(3)=5

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Pt_leading_hadron jet vs parton (parton is the one from 22 hard scattering) CKIN(3)=5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

eta_leading_hadron jet vs parton (parton is the one from 22 hard scattering)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Jet profiles: different ηjets no MI no pedestals MI pedestal independent on ηjets measurements in CASTOR region may help tp subtract pedestal

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Pt (leading_jet_hadron- parton) vs ∑Et (5.2<eta<6.6)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Pt (leading_jet_hadron- parton) vs ∑E (5.2<eta<6.6)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Jet profiles vs phi (Δη<2) CKIN(3)=10

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Jet profiles vs eta (Δφ<1.5) CKIN(3)=10

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

‘Et profiles’ vs phi (3.5<η<7.5) Jet profiles vs phi (Δη<2) and Et ‘profile’ for 3.5<eta<7.5 CKIN(3)=10

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

increase Ptcut CKIN(3) to 20 Pt_leading_hadron jet vs parton (parton is the one from 22 hard scattering)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

E, Et , N flow vs eta increase Ptcut CKIN(3) to 20

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Pt_leading_hadron jet vs parton (parton is the one from 22 hard scattering)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

eta_leading_hadron jet vs parton (parton is the one from 22 hard scattering)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Pt (leading_jet_hadron- parton) vs ∑E (5.2<eta<6.6)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Jet profiles vs phi (Δη<2)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Jet profiles vs eta (Δφ<1.5)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Jet profiles vs phi (Δη<2) and Et ‘profile’ for 3.5<eta<7.5