FLEXIBILITY FOR MARKETS AND GRIDS Economic and Technical Evaluation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

flexibility for markets and grids
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FLEXIBILITY FOR MARKETS AND GRIDS Economic and Technical Evaluation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FLEXIBILITY FOR MARKETS AND GRIDS Economic and Technical Evaluation of the hybrid-VPP Concept T. Esterl, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology C. Gutschi, cyberGRID IAEE 2017, Vienna, 5. September 2016 HYBRID-VPP CONCEPT Distribution grid Market


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FLEXIBILITY FOR MARKETS AND GRIDS

Economic and Technical Evaluation of the hybrid-VPP Concept

  • T. Esterl, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology
  • C. Gutschi, cyberGRID

IAEE 2017, Vienna, 5. September 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

HYBRID-VPP CONCEPT

Flexibility Distribution grid Market

05/09/2017 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

1. Project overview 2. Use case description 3. Use case Market & Customer 4. Use Case Market & DSO support 5. Analysis of regulatory framework 6. Conclusions of hybrid-VPP concept 7. Outlook: InteGrid project

AGENDA

05/09/2017 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

INTRODUCTION TO HYBRID-VPP4DSO

Hybrid operation of a VPP

  • hybridVPP: Market participation and support of the distribution grid
  • Focus on provision of ancillary services to the TSO by resources located inside distribution grids with

significant restrictions Simulation and Proof-of-concept of hybrid-VPP concept

  • in two distribution grid sections in Austria and Slovenia
  • grid sections with diverse characteristics (urban/rural, feed-in from windpower/PV/hydropower vs.

flexible loads, different topologies, etc.) Consortium AIT (Lead, research), cyberGRID (IT, market analysis), Energienetze Steiermark (DSO), Energie Steiermark (Trader), Elektro Ljubljana (DSO), Elektro Energia (Trader), Grazer Energieagentur (Consulting), TU Wien (research), Energetic Solutions (Consulting) Duration: 04/2014 – 06/2017

05/09/2017 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

HYBRID-VPP CONCEPT

HV connection to neighboring HV grid Transformer to transmission grid Noncritical: VPP operation P↕ permitted Semi-critical:

  • nly P↓ permitted

Critical: P↓ required by DSO Semi-critical:

  • nly P↑ permitted

Critical: P↑ required by DSO Highly critical: VPP operation prohibited

05/09/2017 5

MV grid HV grid

slide-6
SLIDE 6

OVERVIEW OF USE CASES FOR FLEXIBILITY

  • (1a) Participation in flexibility markets
  • (1b) Participation in flexibility markets with restrictions from distribution grid
  • (1c) Cost minimization of supply from energy only markets (day ahead, intraday)

Market

  • (2a) Minimization of grid connection costs for new generators
  • (2b) Minimization of grid connection costs for new consumers

Customer

  • (3a) Optimization of grid investments of DSO
  • (3b) DSO-Support during maintenance and special switching states in case of a

quality regulation scheme

Grid (DSO)

05/09/2017 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Participation of VPP on the Tertiary Balancing Market and Minimization of grid connection costs for new generators in parallel

USE CASE “MARKET & CUSTOMER”

New customer (wind park) applies for connection to the grid at an under-dimensioned connection point. Classic approach: Customer needs to invest into a new line to the closest feasible connection point

  • r bear costs of grid reinforcement.

Hybrid-VPP approach:

  • Customer agrees to be curtailed during

critical hours  Cost savings due to lower grid connection costs  Additional benefits of participation in the balancing market

05/09/2017 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Business Case of VPP:

  • CAPEX and OPEX for VPP basically

depending on capacity of customers and on availability of 24/7 control room

  • Revenues from market participation are

difficult to predict (high volatility)  Positive Business Cases feasible in tertiary balancing market (AT, SI; 2015)

Business Case of hybrid-VPP:

  • Additional costs for interface with DSO
  • Additional benefits from customer use case
  • Difficult regulation for remuneration of grid-

supporting flexibility

  • Mainly non-financial drivers (customer access)

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF VPP OPERATION

8 05/09/2017

100 000 200 000 300 000 400 000 500 000 600 000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

VPP revenues & costs, cumm. 1a [EUR] Capacity of controlled customers [MW]

Total net revenues, 40% shared with customer Total net revenues, 50% shared with customer Total net revenues, 60% shared with customer VPP costs (CAPEX+OPEX), 0,2 MW/customer VPP costs (CAPEX+OPEX), 1 MW/customer VPP costs (CAPEX+OPEX), 5 MW/customer

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Economic evaluation from customers’ perspective:

  • Customers agree to curtail their feed-in or

consumption on demand of the DSO during critical hours. Use case is strongly dependent

  • n grid topology and value of curtailed feed-in

(or consumption).

  • Simulations showed a duration of required

curtailment of maximum 300 h/a.

  • Substantial savings are possible especially

for new generators.

  • In our case study for an industrial customer

the costs of shifted load should not exceed 42 €/MWh to be economically feasible (also highly dependent on grid typology, etc.).

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF CUSTOMER USE CASE

9 05/09/2017

€ 0 € 500 000 € 1 000 000 € 1 500 000 € 2 000 000 € 2 500 000

Avoided investment Reduced revenues from feed-in (NPV) VPP service fee (NPV) Net savings

Wind park A Wind park B Wind park C

slide-10
SLIDE 10

hybrid-VPP Over voltage issues in winter due to market participation of VPP Under voltage issue in summer due to delayed grid investments  All voltage issues could be solved by applying the traffic light system

min voltage in the grid max voltage in the grid

Optimization of DSO’s grid investments & Participation in Tertiary Balancing Market

USE CASE “MARKET & DSO” (A)

 Issues caused by ancillary service provision being avoided

05/09/2017 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Supporting of DSO during maintenance and special switching states + Participation in Tertiary Balancing Market

USE CASE “MARKET & DSO” (B)

hybrid-VPP hybrid-VPP supports the DSO by reducing voltage problems during special switching states and thus preventing tripping of customers.  During non-critical hours, all units of the hybrid-VPP can participate in the balancing market.

05/09/2017 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Minimization of grid connection costs:

General connection requirement

  • Benefit for network users possible,

but no legal claim

  • Optimization of grid investment costs:

Highly reliable network infrastructure in Austria, Short-term benefits of hybrid-VPP for deferral of grid investments

  • Maintenance and special switching states: exceptional grid state

Quality regulation scheme would create incentives for hybrid-VPP

  • No regulatory issues for pure market partcipation

REGULATORY ANALYSIS OF USE CASES

12 05/09/2017

Market Customer Grid (DSO)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

POSSIBLE COORDINATION SCHEMES

Yes Does the DSO have sufficient information about flexibilities? The DSO has to tender the required flexibility. Does the DSO procure the needed flexibility on the market? Model Aggregator Model Single Market (?) The DSO operates the control infrastructure. Can the flexibility operator choose its marketer? Model Flexibility Model DSO (?) The DSO outsourced the network operation Model Service Provider (?) Does the DSO operate the grid

  • n its own?

Yes No No Yes No Yes No

13 05/09/2017

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Support of DSOs in parallel to active participation on a national market for tertiary control feasible
  • Recommendation of diverse pool with units in different locations and include demand side

management as well as different types of (renewable) generators (Applicability of hybrid-VPP depends on grid topology and connection points, capacity and type of available flexibilities)

  • Added value of a hybrid-VPP is related to multitude of different use cases using the same hybrid-

VPP platform (as for example reduction of investment costs for new users who connect to the grid as well as prevention/deferral of grid investments of DSOs)

  • Regulatory barriers for the integration of the hybrid-VPP for the remuneration of grid-supporting

flexibility operation and for the definition of the connection point

  • Two promising solutions for the configuration of hybrid-VPP operator: i) aggregator as hybrid-VPP-
  • perator and ii) DSO as market facilitator

CONCLUSIONS

14 05/09/2017

This work was funded by the Austrian Research Funding Association (FFG) under the scope of the e!mission program.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Overview of the InteGrid project

  • Traffic Light System as investigated in hybrid-VPP4DSO

will be further developed in the InteGrid project.

  • InteGrid aims at demonstrating how DSOs can enable

different stakeholders to actively participate in the energy market, by testing and validating solutions in an integrated environment. Among these tools, the Traffic Light System will be refined in order to comply with multiple markets designs and to reach a higher Technological Readiness Level.

  • State of the art forecasting and optimisation algorithms (like multi-period Optimal Power Flow) will

be integrated to realize the Traffic Light System as a tool for DSOs.

  • This concept will be implemented using a Grid and Market Hub platform to simplify communication

with DSOs and tested by the DSOs Elektro Ljubljana (SI) and EDP Distribuição (PT) in the scope of Pilots of technical and commercial VPPs. This means a further development of the hybrid-VPP coordination scheme “Flexibility”.

  • Scalability and Replicability Analysis will be performed for several countries

OUTLOOK: H2020 PROJECT INTEGRID

Project Homepage: www.integrid-h2020.eu

slide-16
SLIDE 16

MANY THANKS FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION!

16 05/09/2017

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FLEXIBILITY FOR MARKETS AND GRIDS

Economic and Technical Evaluation of the hybrid-VPP Concept

  • T. Esterl, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology
  • C. Gutschi, cyberGRID

IAEE 2017, Vienna, 5. September 2016