Final Issue Report on Protection of Intl Organization Names in new - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

final issue report on protection of int l organization
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Final Issue Report on Protection of Intl Organization Names in new - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Final Issue Report on Protection of Intl Organization Names in new gTLDs Brian Peck Updates Since Prague New gTLD Committee Resolution: - GNSO to advise Board prior to 31 January of any concerns over protection for RCRC/IOC names - Board


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Final Issue Report on Protection

  • f Int’l Organization Names in

new gTLDs

Brian Peck

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Updates Since Prague

New gTLD Committee Resolution:

  • GNSO to advise Board prior to 31 January of any concerns over

protection for RCRC/IOC names

  • Board will be prepared to adopt GAC recommendations for 2nd level

protection absent advice GNSO Final Issue Report Published: Council to consider PDP in Toronto GNSO-IOC/RC DT: Proposal for 2nd level protection of RCRC/IOC names

  • Expedited PDP to determine any appropriate protections
  • Interim temporary reservation of RCRC/IOC 2nd level domain names
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Final Issue Report

Objective

  • Define type of organizations that qualify for any top

and second level protections

  • Structuring of PDP to effectively determine any

appropriate protections at top and second levels Scope Evaluation of whether to protect the names of both IGOs and NGOs at the top and second levels in new gTLDs

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Issues to Explore in PDP

  • Definition of international organizations
  • Quantifying the entities to be considered for special

protection

  • Scope of existing protections under international

treaties/national laws for Red Cross, IOC and IGO names

  • Distinguishing between Red Cross/IOC from other

international organizations

  • Establishing an objective set of criteria to determine which

international organizations would qualify for any special protections

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Staff Recommendations

  • GNSO Council should initiate a PDP
  • Formally invite representatives of IGOs, RCRC

and IOC to participate in the PDP WG

  • Consider expanding any new gTLD protections to

existing gTLDs

  • Suggest adopting an expedited work plan and

dedicating necessary resources to facilitate timely implementation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Next Steps

  • GNSO Council to consider initiating PDP in

Toronto

  • Public Comment Reply Period for IOC/RC

DT proposal closes on 9 November

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Additional Background Info

IGOs

  • GAC may change current position of no protection
  • CEO’s 3 October response letter to UN
  • Refers to PDP/Encourages participation

Red Cross/Red Crescent Movement

  • Requested meeting with senior mgmt in Toronto
  • Position: protection is legal requirement, not

policy issue

  • ICANN: DT Proposal, Board Resolution

addressing RCRC concerns

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Additional Background Info

Final Issue Report http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/protection- igo-names-final-issue-report-01oct12-en.pdf Public Comment Forum on IOC/RC Drafting Team Recommendations https://www.icann.org/en/news/public- comment/ioc-rcrc-recommendations-28sep12- en.htm ICANN CEO Letter to UN on IGOs http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/chehad e-to-stelzer-03oct12-en

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Thank You

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Questions