Fellowship Applications:
my experience
Katherine Joy School of Earth Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences
1
Fellowship Applications: my experience Katherine Joy School of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Fellowship Applications: my experience Katherine Joy School of Earth Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences 1 My career path Present: School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, UK Oct 2015
1
– Oct 2015 – Present: Royal Society University Research Fellow – May 2015- Present: Senior Lecturer – May 2012 – April 2015: Leverhulme Trust Early-Career Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Antarctica)
NASA’s Johnson Space Center, USA
– Postdoctoral Fellow funded by the NASA Lunar Science Institute
– Postdoctoral Research Assistant funded by the Leverhulme Trust
– Ph.D. in Planetary Science
2
– Sample analysis of terrestrial samples – Remote sensing measurements
record of 13 in the Scopus citation database
3
4
5
6
– First year course – Fieldtrip
– Active missions – Mission planning
drafts, review papers, review grants, fight with egencia, emails etc etc… stuff that takes time and energy.
its critical to maintain time at weekends not working. You have to enjoy what you do. Don’t get sick. Learn to say no.
7
8
you anticipated
9
– Highs and lows (learning what doesn’t work is also valuable experience to reflect
strengthened by work published through supervising students
future…
10
– STFC advanced fellowship (5 years) – x2 – both failures – Royal Astronomical Society early career fellowship (3 years) – failure – Imperial College internal early career scheme (3 years) – failure – Leverhulme Trust early career – (3 years) success! – University of Manchester – deans research fund – x3 success – STFC – consolidated grant to be PI fund my own PDRA – (3 years) success! – Leverhulme Trust to fund my own PDRA – x2 failures as PI, x3 times success as a Co-I – Royal Society (5 years) – success! – Royal Society – RSURF startup grant- unknown outcome – Leverhulme Trust – Philip Leverhulme Prize – unknown outcome
11
– Are you independent enough to manage your own research project? – Are you at the right level of experience to apply? – Do you have good support from those around you?
– Don’t get defeated by imposter syndrome –talk to others to get their honest opinion about if they think you are at the right level, give it a go
– Is it timely? – Is it achievable? – Is it in the remit of the funding body? – What are the flaws? How can these be mitigated?
12
13
14
15
minute
– Get your finances sorted early – coordinate with the research office – go and meet the person you will work with and be nice to them (say thank you, understand they are human – they get sick, forget stuff like we all do) – Check that every box is filled on an application – easy to miss them requiring formatting – Check your font size and page margin and word limit requirements – stupid little things that might ding your application – Check referees have sent in their letters of support by the date (politely hassle them) – Check head of department letter has been signed (is the HoD on holiday? Make sure that your research coordinator has this in hand)
– I submitted by RS fellowship in Morocco at a conference, and my LT one in the middle of a conference in the US… flipping stressful – Let office know when you have submitted, so if they need to press a confirmation button then they can. Check that this has happened before deadline.
16
– Case for support – 2-3 pages (more needed for NERC?) – Lay report – Pathways to impact (seems to mean different things to different people) – CV/publication list – Budget
– will really vary scheme to scheme at what level you can apply for – if you have a lab based project then you may need university to agree to subsidise your research (which you hope they should do to enhance your career, and make them look good for bringing in research fellowships)
– Justification of resources – Referees (critical to choose the right ones) – need to find yourself people who will champion you and will spend time to write an excellent reference. – Head of School support letter / university approval form
reviews
17
18
19
– Why the science is important and timely (why now)
– Why you are the best person to do this science – That the method is achievable (how are the critical flaws mitigated) – Time planning (justify why 3 or five years are needed) – That you have the resources to do it (labs, technical support, local expertise) – Broader implications of study (impact)
20
– don’t use small font, use line spaces, use bold or italic font where
– I used a large image in my application to demonstrate science problem I was seeking to test
21
– 5 mins to provide update on your research and project since application had been made – Specific questions based on reviewer enquiries
– Are there any questions we haven't asked you that you think we should know about
22
– Watch it like a hawk… check that your spend has been taken out of your account especially if your end of reporting year doesn’t match up with university end of financial year – Equipment – don’t forget VAT
– Keep up to date records throughout the year
CV….
– Try to ensure proleptic appointment – before or after appointment – Otherwise – if the fellowship scheme is movable – seek to move it and continue to apply for full time posts
sure that you keep publishing to be able to secure that 2nd fellowship or permanent job role.
23
24
– Request school guides – Find out who has previously applied for your grant scheme – Ask to see these applications – If you get an interview meet with them to discuss their interview experience – Practice for your interview (mock)
25