Fe and NOM increasing Acid/base, complexation and redox chemistry - - PDF document

fe and nom increasing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Fe and NOM increasing Acid/base, complexation and redox chemistry - - PDF document

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 Print version Updated: 24 April 2020 Lecture #46 Redox Chemistry: Basic Calculations (Stumm & Morgan, Chapt.8 ) Benjamin; Chapter 9 David Reckhow CEE 680 #47 1 Fe and NOM increasing Acid/base,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 1

Lecture #46 Redox Chemistry: Basic Calculations

(Stumm & Morgan, Chapt.8 )

Benjamin; Chapter 9

David Reckhow CEE 680 #47 1

Updated: 24 April 2020

Print version

Fe and NOM increasing

 Acid/base, complexation and redox chemistry

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 2

Acid rain is the driver

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 3 David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 4

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 3

Question for the class

 Which is the strongest chemical oxidant?

1.

Chlorine

2.

Chloramines

3.

Permanganate

4.

Ozone

5.

Chlorine Dioxide

6.

Hydrogen Peroxide

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 5 David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 6

Oxidant Reduction half-reaction Eºred, volts Ozone ½O3(aq) + H+ + e-  ½O2(aq) + H2O 2.04 Hydrogen Peroxide ½H2O2 + H+ + e-  H2O 1.78 Permanganate 1/3 MnO4

  • + 4/3 H+ + e-  1/3 MnO2(s) + 2/3 H2O

1.68 Chlorine Dioxide ClO2 + e-  ClO2

  • 1.15

Hypochlorous Acid ½ HOCl + ½H+ + e-  ½Cl- + ½H2O 1.49 Hypochlorite Ion ½ OCl- + H++ e-  ½ Cl- 0.90 Hypobromous acid ½HOBr + ½H+ + e-  ½Br- + ½H2O 1.33 Monochloramine ½NH2Cl + H+ + e-  ½Cl- + ½NH4

+

1.40 Dichloramine ¼NHCl2 + ¾H+ + e-  ½Cl- + ¼NH4

+

1.34 Oxygen ¼O2(aq) + H+ + e-  ½H2O 1.27

Standard Half Cell Potentials for Some Oxidation Reactions that Can Occur During Drinking Water Treatment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 4

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 7

Oxidation half-reaction Eºox, volts ½Br- + ½H2O  ½HOBr + ½H+ + e-

  • 1.33

½Mn+2 + H2O  ½MnO2(s) + 2H+ + e-

  • 1.21

Fe+2 + 3H2O  Fe(OH)3(s) + 3H+ + e-

  • 1.01

1/8NH4 + + 3/8H2O  1/8NO3

  • + 1¼H+ + e-
  • 0.88

½NO2

  • + ½H2O  ½NO3
  • + H+ + e-
  • 0.84

1/8H2S + ½H2O  1/8SO4

  • 2 + 1¼H+ + e-
  • 0.30

½H2S  ½S(s) + H+ + e-

  • 0.14

½HCOO-  ½CO2(g) + ½H+ + e- +0.29

Standard Half Cell Potentials for Some Oxidation Reactions that Can Occur During Drinking Water Treatment

Oxidation State

 Oxidation state is characterized by an oxidation number

 the charge one would expect for an atom if it were to dissociate from

the surrounding molecule or ion (assigning any shared electrons to the more electronegative atom).

 may be either a positive or negative number, usually, an integer

between ‐VII and +VII

 in their elemental forms, e.g. S(s), O2(aq), atoms have an oxidation

number of zero.

 This concept is useful in balancing chemical equations and

performing certain calculations.

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 5

Determining oxidation state

 Rule:

 Sum of the oxidation states of all elements in a molecule

  • r ion equals the charge of that molecule or ion

 Conventions:

 H is (+I)

 Exceptions are H2, and hydrides

 O is (‐II)

 Exceptions are O2, and peroxides

 N is (‐III) when bound only to C or H  S is (‐II) when bound only to C or H

David Reckhow CEE 680 #45 9

See Benjamin,

  • pg. 667

Oxidation States

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 10

Stumm & Morgan, 1996; Table 8.1, pg. 427

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 6

Balancing Equations

 The first step in working with oxidation reactions is to

identify the role of the reacting species.

 At least one reactant must be the oxidizing agent (i.e., containing an

atom or atoms that become reduced)

 At least one must be a reducing agent (i.e., containing an atom or

atoms that become oxidized).

 The second step is to balance the gain of electrons from the

  • xidizing agent with the loss of electrons from the reducing

agent.

 Next, oxygen atoms are balanced by adding water

molecules to one side or another and hydrogens are balanced with H+ ions.

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 11

Example: Mn & ozone

 As an example consider the oxidation of manganese by

  • zone .

 The substance being oxidized is manganese (i.e., the reducing

agent), and the one doing the oxidizing (i.e., being itself reduced) is ozone.  Next the products formed need to be evaluated.

 It might be known from experience that reduced soluble

manganese (i.e., Mn+2) can be oxidized in water to the relatively insoluble manganese dioxide.

 It might also be known that ozone ultimately forms hydroxide

and oxygen after it becomes reduced.

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 12

products O Mn  

3

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 7

Mn & Ozone (cont.)

 The next step is to determine the oxidation state of

all atoms involved.

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 13

 

    OH O MnO O Mn

2 2 3 2

} }} } }}

I II II IV II

H O O O Mn O Mn

      

   

2 2 3 2

4 8 4 7 6

𝑁𝑜2

  • 𝐽𝐽

𝑃3

  • 𝑁𝑜
  • 𝐽𝑊

𝑃2

  • 𝐽𝐽

𝑃 ⏞

2 𝑃

𝐽𝐽

𝐼

  • 𝐽

Mn & Ozone (cont.)

 From this analysis, we conclude:

 manganese is oxidized from +II to +IV, which involves a loss of

2 electrons per atom

 ozone undergoes a gain of 2 electrons per molecule, as one of

the three oxygen atoms goes from an oxidation state of 0 to -II.  The two half‐reactions can be written as single electron

transfers.

 These half‐reactions are balanced by adding water molecules

and H+ ions to balance oxygen and hydrogen, respectively.

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 14

    

    e H O Mn O H Mn

IV II

2

2 2 1 2 2 2 1

  

(+II)

(+IV)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 8

Mn & Ozone (cont.)

 By convention, when hydroxide appears in a half‐

reaction, additional H+ ions are added until all of the hydroxide is converted to water. This is done to the reduction half‐reaction.

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 15

 

II

O H O e H O

  

    

2 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 1

(-II) (0) (0)

Mn & Ozone (cont.)

 From this point, it is a simple matter of combining the equations

and canceling out terms or portions of terms that appear on both sides.

 At the same time, the standard electrode potentials can be

combined to get the overall potential.

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 16

O H O e H O e H MnO O H Mn

aq aq S 2 2 1 ) ( 2 2 1 ) ( 3 2 1 ) ( 2 2 1 2 2 2 1

2        

    

) (E V 2.04 ) (E V 1.21

  • red
  • x

 

 

     H MnO O O H Mn O

s aq aq ) ( 2 2 1 ) ( 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 ) ( 3 2 1

) (E V 0.83

  • net

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 9

Mn & Ozone (cont.)

 Immediately, it is seen that this reaction will proceed

toward the right (the Eo

net is positive). But how far to the

right will it go?

To answer this, the previous equation is rearranged to get:

 So for this reaction:

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 17

  • net

E

e K

95 . 16

6 83 . * 95 . 16

10 29 . 1 x e K  

Mn & Ozone (cont.)

 and using the concentration quotient from the reaction

stoichiometry,

 and since the activity of solvents (i.e., water) and solid phases

are, by convention, equal to one,

 Furthermore, if the pH is 7.0 and a dissolved oxygen

concentration of 10 mg/L and an ozone concentration of 0.5 mg/L is maintained in the contactor, an equilibrium Mn+2 concentration of 1.8x10‐25 M or about 10‐27 mg/L can be

  • calculated. Thermodynamic principles therefore indicate that

this reaction essentially goes to completion.

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 18 5 . 2 5 . 2 5 . ) ( 3 5 . ) ( 2 5 . ) ( 2 6

} { } { } { } { } { } { 10 29 . 1 O H Mn O H MnO O x

aq s aq  

5 . 2 5 . ) ( 3 5 . ) ( 2 6

} { } { } { } { 10 29 . 1

 

 Mn O H O x

aq aq

slide-10
SLIDE 10

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 10

Mn & Ozone (cont.)

 Now, knowing that the Mn+2 should react essentially completely to

form manganese dioxide, it might be important to know if ozone can possibly oxidize the manganese dioxide to a higher oxidation state, i.e. permanganate. To examine this, the above ozone equation must first be combined with the reverse of the permanganate reduction equation

 This allows the net potential to be calculated:

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 19

½O3(aq) + H+ + e-  ½O2(aq) + ½H2O 1/3 MnO2 + 2/3 H2O  1/3 MnO4

  • + 4/3 H+ + e-

½O3(aq) + 1/3 MnO2 + 1/3 H2O  1/3 MnO4

  • + 1/3 H+ + ½O2(aq)

V V V E E E

  • red
  • x
  • net

36 . ) 04 . 2 ( ) 68 . 1 (        

Mn & Ozone (cont.)

 Again, this is a favorable reaction, The equilibrium

constant is:

 The equilibrium quotient can now be formulated directly from

the balanced equation. Note that neither manganese dioxide (MnO2) nor water (H2O) appears in this quotient. This is because both are presumed present at unit activity. Manganese dioxide is a solid and as long as it remains in the system, it is considered to be in a pure, undiluted state. The same may be said for water. As long as the solutes remain dilute, the concentration of water is at its maximum and remains constant.

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 20 1 . 6

10 1 . 6 ) 36 . ( 059 . 1 059 . 1 log      K V E K

  • net
slide-11
SLIDE 11

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 11

Mn & Ozone (cont.)

 So under typical conditions where the pH is near

neutrality (i.e., [H+] = 10‐7), dissolved oxygen is near saturation (i.e., [O2(aq)] = 3x10‐4M), and the ozone residual is 0.25 mg/L (i.e., [O3(aq) = 5x10‐6 M), the expected equilibrium permanganate concentration should be:

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 21

   

   

1 . 6 5 . 3 5 . 2 33 . 33 . 4

10 } { } { } { } {   

 

O O H MnO K B A B A K

b red a

  • x

b

  • x

a red

       

1 . 6 5 . 6 5 . 4 33 . 7 33 . 4

10 10 5 10 3 10  

   

x x MnO K

Mn & Ozone (cont.)

 and solving for permanganate

 Obviously one cannot have 327 moles/liter of permanganate.

Nevertheless, this tells us that the system will be forced in this direction so that all of the manganese dioxide would be converted to permanganate. Once the manganese dioxide is gone, the reaction must stop.

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 22

   

327 10 5 . 3

4 7 33 . 4

 

 

MnO x MnO

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 12

p

 p = ‐log{e‐}

 Low p means:

 High {e‐}  Reducing conditions  Tend to donate e‐

 pH = ‐log{H+}  Low pH means:

 High {H+}  Acidic conditions  Tend to donate H+

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 23

p is really a hypothetical construct. There are no free electrons in

  • solution. It is really a measure of the relative tendency to accept or

transfer and electron

Equations with p

 Half reactions as equilibria

 Ox + ne‐ = Red

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 24

n

e Ox d K } ]{ [ ] [Re

 ] [ ] [Re 1 } { Ox d K e

n  

                              

] [ ] [Re log 1 ] [ ] [Re log 1 log 1 ] [ ] [Re log log } log{ Ox d n p p Ox d n K n p Ox d K e n

 

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CEE 680 Lecture #46 4/24/2020 13

To next lecture

David Reckhow CEE 680 #46 25