fairfax county school board
play

Fairfax County School Board September 17, 2018 Presenter ELI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation to the Fairfax County School Board September 17, 2018 Presenter ELI MARTINEZ Executive Director/CIO 2 Agenda Executive Summary Membership Characteristics Financial Strength Cost Efficiencies Strategic


  1. Presentation to the Fairfax County School Board September 17, 2018

  2. Presenter ELI MARTINEZ Executive Director/CIO 2

  3. Agenda • Executive Summary • Membership Characteristics • Financial Strength • Cost Efficiencies • Strategic Initiatives • Summary • Questions 3

  4. Executive Summary

  5. 2017 returns were above expectations and the funded ratio remains stable Fund Expenses 2001 Tier 2 Fund Performance Funded Ratio 16% 1,700+ 75.7% Competitive vs. Peers December 31, 2017 2017 After Fees Sustainability | Marketing | Messaging | Education 5 Executive Summary Our Members Performance Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  6. Membership Characteristics

  7. ERFC serves members within three benefit plan structures; only the 2001 Tier 2 is open ERFC Membership by Plan Type December 31, 2017 1,072 Retired 10,657 15,629 Active 4,488 1,724 Legacy 2001 Tier 1 2001 Tier 2 Closed 1973 to 7/1/2001 7/1/01 - 6/30/17 7/1/2017 - Beyond Are there any trends? 7 Executive Summary Our Members Performance Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  8. Legacy and 2001 Tier 1 members are driving retirements ERFC Membership by Plan Type Year Ending December 31 Plan Closed 16.9K 16.3K 15.6K 15.6K 15.4K 2001 Tier 1 14.7K 13.6K 12.2K 11.5K 10.9K 10.2K 8.8K 9.4K 6.8K 6.2K 5.8K 8.4K 5.3K 7.9K 7.4K 4.9K 4.5K Legacy 2001 Tier 2 Plan Opened 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 What if we drill down on the trends? 8 Executive Summary Our Members Performance Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  9. Retirements from the 2001 Tier 1 plan will outweigh Legacy plan retirements in the future 2001 Tier 1 retirements Annual Retirements by Plan Type expected to outweigh Year Ending December 31 Legacy by 2029 164 208 115 186 61 143 90 49 28 2001 Tier 1 27 547 520 517 506 490 479 446 442 435 Legacy 379 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 How much are we paying retirees? 9 Executive Summary Our Members Performance Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  10. Benefit payments to retirees as a percent of payroll have trended downward since 2010 Retiree Benefits Paid as Percent of Payroll Year Ending December 31 11.95% 5% Decrease 11.92% 11.76% 11.69% 11.69% 11.67% 11.40% 11.37% 11.36% 11.09% 2010 2017 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 How much does the average retiree receive? 10 Executive Summary Our Members Performance Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  11. Working longer for FCPS increases retirement benefits Average Retiree Profile December 31, 2017 Legacy Retiree 2001 Tier 1 Retiree 64 Years Old 62 Years Old 12 Years of Service 24 Years of Service $6K Annual ERFC Benefit $20K Annual ERFC Benefit $19K Annual Including VRS $48K Annual Including VRS 54% of Final 25% of Final Not Including Social Security Average Salary Average Salary * Assumes VRS service credit equals ERFC for calculating VRS benefit * ERFC benefit amount may decrease at Social Security age depending on payment type selected * ERFC benefit amounts may be reduced due to selection of spousal/lump-sum options How does this compare to FCERS? * The 2001 Tier 2 plan is a new plan, opened on July 1, 2017 and does not have retirements 11 Executive Summary Our Members Performance Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  12. Fairfax County employees receive higher retirement benefits; FCPS employees paying more into retirement Differences Between FCPS & FCERS Possible Plan Changes VRS Hybrid + FCERS Plan D* ERFC 2001 Tier 2 60 Min. Retirement Age Social Security with 5 yrs. Rule 90 Rule 90 Retirement Eligible 5 Years 5 Years Salary Averaging Total Employee Contributions 5.33% 8-12%** Multiplier 2% 1.8% * Changes under consideration by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors to the FCERS Plan D would be effective July 1, 2019 ** 12% contribution assumes employee contributes 5% into VRS, 3% into ERFC, and maximizes into the Hybrid Plan at 4% What about current employees? 12 Executive Summary Our Members Performance Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  13. Average Legacy plan members are only 4 years from full benefit status Average Active Member Profile December 31, 2017 Legacy 2001 Tier 1 2001 Tier 2 • • • 54 Years Old 42 Years Old 35 Years Old • • • 21 Years of Service 7 Years of Service 0.4 Years of Service • • • $88K Current Annual Salary $64K Current Annual Salary $50K Current Annual Salary Newest Plan What about the portfolio? 13 Executive Summary Our Members Performance Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  14. Financial Strength

  15. ERFC’s portfolio is well diversified ERFC Policy Asset Allocation Private Equity, 3.5% Hedge Funds, 5% Alternatives 16.5% Real Estate, 8% Domestic Equity, 22.5% Emerging Market Debt, 3% Unconstrained Bonds, 6% Stocks Bonds 39.5% 29% International Equity, 14% Domestic Fixed Income, 20% Emerging Market Equity, 3% Global Asset Allocation/Better Beta, 15% …and performance? 15 Executive Summary Performance Our Members Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  16. Above average performance over longer periods compared to defined benefit plans >$1B ERFC Performance and Ranking Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2017 15 Year 1 Year 12.1 % 7.2 % After Fees After Fees Rank 64* Rank 32* * Universe of 60 Defined Benefit pension plans greater than $1B in assets, shown in percentiles (lower number is better). How do we compare vs. large plans? 16 Executive Summary Performance Our Members Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  17. ERFC outperformed some of the largest pension funds in the nation ERFC Performance vs. Large Public Pension Funds Year Ending June 30, 2017 (After Fees) 13.4% 12.1% 12.1% 11.2% 209B AUM* 2.4B AUM* 78B AUM* 326B AUM* 1,700 Staff 30 Staff 370 Staff 2,875 Staff 64% Funded 75.2% Funded 72.9% Funded 68.3% Funded CalSTRS ERFC VRS CalPERS * Assets under management (AUM) How do we compare vs. local funds? 17 Executive Summary Performance Our Members Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  18. ERFC’s portfolio also performed well compared to Fairfax County Funds ERFC vs. Fairfax County Investment Performance Year Ending June 30, 2017 (After Fees) 12.1% 10.9% 9.3% 8.3% 6.9% 2.4B AUM AUM 6.8B 30 Staff Staff 26 75.2% Funded Funded 80.3%* FC Police Officers’ ERFC FC Employees’ FC Uniformed FC Weighted Retirement System Retirement System Average Return Retirement System * Average funded status How does this impact our funding? 18 Executive Summary Performance Our Members Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  19. ERFC has maintained a stable funded ratio Funded Ratio vs. Unfunded Liabilities Year Ending December 31 (Millions) 900000 77.7% 800000 76.9% 76.7% 76.0% 76.5% 75.6% 75.6% 75.4% 75.7% 700000 Funded Ratio 75.2% 600000 500000 $769 $753 400000 $693 $631 $616 $610 $604 $570 $561 Unfunded 300000 $521 Liability 200000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 100000 0 What does a 75.7% funded ratio mean? 19 Executive Summary Performance Our Members Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  20. The current funded status would allow ERFC to pay benefits for the next 25 years! Normal Scenario: Pessimistic Doomsday Assumptions Zero Investment Return Zero Investment Return ∞ 25 9 Years Years Benefit Current No Payments Contributions Contributions Less Likely Impact on contributions? 20 Executive Summary Performance Our Members Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  21. Recognition of prior year losses contributed to increased employer contribution rates Fiscal Year Contribution Rates Future Years 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 4.00% 3.00% 4.00% Employee 4.04% 4.34% 5.34% 5.60% 5.60% 5.60% 5.60% 6.24% 6.26% 6.44% Employer 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 …But when will we be fully funded? 21 Executive Summary Performance Our Members Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  22. Over time normal costs will decrease, and we’re gradually moving towards 100% funded Normal Cost Funded Status Funded 2040 2001 Tier 2 100% 100% Gradual Movement How do we compare in costs? 22 Executive Summary Performance Our Members Expenses Initiatives Summary Q&A

  23. Cost Efficiencies

  24. ERFC’s overall costs are relatively low Expense Comparison Year Ending June 30, 2017 (Basis Points) Average Cost 84.2 Basis Points Investment & 106.9 Administrative 94.0 Expenses 76.2 75.4 68.4 FC Police Officers’ FC Employees’ FC Uniformed ERFC VRS Retirement System Retirement System Retirement System Source: Fairfax County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2017 What drives investment expenses? 24 Executive Summary Performance Expenses Our Members Initiatives Summary Q&A

  25. Investment expenses are in line with expected costs for a plan of our size Linear Regression R 2 of 43%, P-Value of 0.003 $13.5M ERFC Investment Expenses Key Drivers of Investment Expense • Scale • Allocation • Internal vs. external management • Managed vs. unmanaged $13.2M 1 Expected Investment Expenses 1 Expected ERFC Investment Fees = 0.0056(2,304,281,654)+274,534 = $13,237,270 What drives administrative expenses? Link 25 Executive Summary Performance Expenses Our Members Initiatives Summary Q&A

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend